An email requesting comment from Twitter’s public relations department was not answered. Instead, the department auto-replied to the email with a smiling poop emoji — the company’s standard response to media inquiries since March.
Source: The Denver Post
Bunch of people have talked about this but. Who's gonna make the new tumblr? How is it going to be funded? What concretely will it do differently such that it does not succumb to the problems of current social media?
the only reason popular websites need exorbitant amounts of funding is that the internet is connection-oriented. with a data-centric model isps would be happy to cache your data to save bandwidth
is there a way to transcompile a linux binary for a different architecture?
it's called cross compilation, yeah
sadly, paradox somehow forgot to include the source code with their games, so that won't work
are you looking to play map games on your raspberry pi or something?
yeah something like that
okay quick core question:
What kind of device are you trying to play the linux game on?
There may be a support layer that can be invoked (like Wine or WSL)
the linux environment provided by termux on an android system
Soooo that actually starts to get interesting.
Assuming my memory is accurate, there's actually been work to make phones no longer run on ARM, but instead use the same architecture as other systems.
I'm trying to remember if it was a full x68 or something else, but I read about that a good while ago, so my memory of the thing is very hazy.
I looked it up because I didn't want to go off old memory, and it looks like phones still use ARM. https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/x86-smartphone#:~:text=A%20smartphone%20that%20uses%20an%20Intel%20x86-based%20Atom,smartphones%20use%20ARM%20chips%2C%20including%20iPhones%20and%20Androids.
Unfortunately, going from x86 to ARM would be a massive challenge. in general, it's easier to emulate a slower, more simple system on a faster, more complex system than to go the other direction. And because phones are designed with their battery length and heat in mind, they're going to have slower chips.
There's a completely unrelated problem on android phones that is likely to get in your way as well - specifically what comes pre-installed.
Programs have a lot of dependencies, many of which you can safely assume are pre-installed. When you switch from a desktop environment to an android one though, you wind up with a completely different software stack.
This is usually resolvable, hence the existence of emulators, but there are performance hits for this, as well as some legal implications for trying.
It's not necessarily impossible to convert a binary, but honestly? You'd likely need to break new ground in the field in order to be successful, and I can't promise that you'd have very high quality results.
the linux games I looked at are either statically linked, bring their own libraries or use the steam distribution, so I'm not expecting that to be the sticking point
why aren't we gathering all the loose biomass from forests and making it into biochar?
because the loose biomass in the forest is still being used. Leaf litter is home to a lot of animals, a protector of moisture, and a key source of nutrients, for example.
Leaf litter is home to a lot of animals
trees are used by animals too, yet we remove some of them. is it that we shouldn't do that either or that removing some amount is okay?
We can remove some amount without causing massive harm, but loss of habitat due to over-deforesting is causing problems for a good number of species.
I agree that deforestation is bad, though I wonder if a lot these burning forests are doomed anyway due to climate change
Don't discount a forest just cause it goes up in flames.
In California, flames are a perfectly natural and expected part of the ecosystem. In forests where it isn't a normal and expected part, it wouldn't surprise me if they had their own mechanisms for dealing with "short term devastating events".
Unlike the introduction of invasive animals, fires allow the forest time to recover, so the chances of a single nasty fire devastating an entire ecosystem are far lower.
just because forest fires are natural doesn't mean they don't have negative effects (air quality & co2 release) or, imho, that we should protect that state of affairs at all costs
You're right, but on the other hand, the fact that forest fires are natural means that forests have developed the ability to recover from them, so they aren't necessarily doomed when they occur.
yes, I didn't mean that they're doomed because of the fires, but perhaps they're doomed because they're no longer in the right climate
why aren't we gathering all the loose biomass from forests and making it into biochar?
because the loose biomass in the forest is still being used. Leaf litter is home to a lot of animals, a protector of moisture, and a key source of nutrients, for example.
Leaf litter is home to a lot of animals
trees are used by animals too, yet we remove some of them. is it that we shouldn't do that either or that removing some amount is okay?
We can remove some amount without causing massive harm, but loss of habitat due to over-deforesting is causing problems for a good number of species.
I agree that deforestation is bad, though I wonder if a lot these burning forests are doomed anyway due to climate change
Don't discount a forest just cause it goes up in flames.
In California, flames are a perfectly natural and expected part of the ecosystem. In forests where it isn't a normal and expected part, it wouldn't surprise me if they had their own mechanisms for dealing with "short term devastating events".
Unlike the introduction of invasive animals, fires allow the forest time to recover, so the chances of a single nasty fire devastating an entire ecosystem are far lower.
just because forest fires are natural doesn't mean they don't have negative effects (air quality & co2 release) or, imho, that we should protect that state of affairs at all costs
why aren't we gathering all the loose biomass from forests and making it into biochar?
because the loose biomass in the forest is still being used. Leaf litter is home to a lot of animals, a protector of moisture, and a key source of nutrients, for example.
Leaf litter is home to a lot of animals
trees are used by animals too, yet we remove some of them. is it that we shouldn't do that either or that removing some amount is okay?
We can remove some amount without causing massive harm, but loss of habitat due to over-deforesting is causing problems for a good number of species.
I agree that deforestation is bad, though I wonder if a lot these burning forests are doomed anyway due to climate change
is there a way to transcompile a linux binary for a different architecture?
it's called cross compilation, yeah
sadly, paradox somehow forgot to include the source code with their games, so that won't work
are you looking to play map games on your raspberry pi or something?
yeah something like that
okay quick core question:
What kind of device are you trying to play the linux game on?
There may be a support layer that can be invoked (like Wine or WSL)
the linux environment provided by termux on an android system
why aren't we gathering all the loose biomass from forests and making it into biochar?
because the loose biomass in the forest is still being used. Leaf litter is home to a lot of animals, a protector of moisture, and a key source of nutrients, for example.
Leaf litter is home to a lot of animals
trees are used by animals too, yet we remove some of them. is it that we shouldn't do that either or that removing some amount is okay?
why aren't we gathering all the loose biomass from forests and making it into biochar?
If you're talking about picking up all the deadfall from the forest floor, I can think of three reasons:
A: Twigs and sticks on the grount trap moisture and paradoxically prevent forest fires.
β: That biomass contains phosphorus 'n shit and removing it means you'd have to start spreading fertillizer around the forest.
3: It's a lot of work.
- I think biochar is even better at trapping moisture so we could just put some back (this would hurt the economics somewhat)
- we've been removing biomass in the form of lumber from most forests for a very long time without soil minerals becoming depleted, afaik (if it did we could again just put some biochar back which contains all the minerals we removed)
- I think if we found a way to price in all the benefits, this would be straightforwardly profitably, but given the current market failure, we should invent a new fitness fad that involves going in the forest with a cart, gathering biomass and then selling it to a local processing facility ("the green gym that pays you!")
why aren't we gathering all the loose biomass from forests and making it into biochar?
is there a way to transcompile a linux binary for a different architecture?
it's called cross compilation, yeah
sadly, paradox somehow forgot to include the source code with their games, so that won't work
are you looking to play map games on your raspberry pi or something?
yeah something like that
is there a way to transcompile a linux binary for a different architecture?
depending on your use case, qemu user mode emulation might be what you're looking for.
I want a native binary not an emulation
is there a way to transcompile a linux binary for a different architecture?
it's called cross compilation, yeah
sadly, paradox somehow forgot to include the source code with their games, so that won't work
pov you are trying to read your mutuals notes but you’re blocked by their mutuals
is that what that means?
I thought it was replies from shadow banned accounts
pov you are trying to read your mutuals notes but you’re blocked by their mutuals
is that what that means?
