assuming an unstoppable object near an observer is moving at the same speed as an unstoppable force, then to the observer, they'd be identical objects

"I'm making this post as a gesture of resistance against the pro-pussy crackpots who don't accept that pussy has mass" -- a statement that actually makes more sense if you assume an unstoppable object near an observer would have the same speed as an unstoppable force

frank, what are you on about?

i mean, i GUESS a pussy has mass?? it's made of matter, after all

what does this have to do with inertial frames making things identical

If we assume an unstoppable object has the same speed as an unstoppable force (which is the only valid option), then we're forced to conclude that pussy has, among other things, the ability to punch you in the eye

stars above, i hope not

unfortunately, no one has bothered to check, which is odd considering that billions of people have had the opportunity to be punched by pussy

Avatar

Sacrifices must be made for the advancement of science