the tweets, when read together, read: "Remember when girls were just tomboys?" I see this talking point a lot, and I call BS. No, actually, no I don't. What I do remember is parents being paranoid their girl was a lesbian and trying to force them into ballet classes instead of boxing and football like they wanted. What I remember is the DSM-IV explicitly calling a refusal to wear dresses and an interest in video games symptoms of a mental illness. I remember girls begging their parents to have short hair and their parents putting them in Bible camps because of it. So, no, ads run on my feed by Texas Conservatives, I don't remember when girls were "just tomboys", because you creeps didn't accept that either in the '00s and don't actually accept it now; you just find it less objectionable than a single-digit percentage of Gen Z being trans. Like, if the image of a girl kicking a boy's ass on a playstation is supposed to be "the good old days", why'd I have to smuggle pokemon on a game boy to girls I was friends with because that was "for boys"? Why'd my partner's parents only ever get games for her brother and never for her? Why'd they never accept her masculine interests in fighting, or engineering, or mathematics, or contact sports? Why'd they police her body and food intake to make her more feminine? Any way you slice it, gender nonconforming girls never get to just "be tomboys", because you assumed their "masculine" interests were a phase and wouldn't let them get better at them than the boys were and would insist they let the boys win to spare their pwecious feelings. This narrative they're trying to spin, that they were fine with gender-nonconforming kids, is just a bald-faced lie to anyone who actually remembers the last 30 years. They weren't fine with lesbians, and they weren't fine with hetero tomboys either, and they still aren't. Because the second they've successfully rolled back queer and trans rights, they'll start looking for any sign of closeted trans and queer people, and suddenly they'll start policing expressions of non-traditional femininity YET AGAIN, because this is how this always worked.
the second image reblog is a screenshot of a user's tags, which read: i keep telling y'all terfism is a reactionary movement and just like an other reactionary movement it mythologizes an imagined past, a past that is totally incompatible with the reality of that time. the 80's were close to one of the worst decades to be gay or trans in. the absolute revisionism is honestly really scary.