advocatemmmohan.com
when recovery proved – non examination of other witness is of no consequences =The recovery of the atlas cycle on the confession of the appellant, identified by PW­7 as belonging to him, as also the recovery of the milk can on the same basis with the name of PW­7 inscribed on it with nail polish and the fact that the appellant was absconding after the occurrence till his arrest on 16.09.2007 7 are additional incriminating factors which complete the links in the chain of circumstances. The recovery having been proved by PW­7, the failure to examine the other seizure witness, Kheda, is of no consequence.
NON­REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1892 OF 2017 SATPAL ………APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA …..RESPONDENT(S) …