CRTC Website Blocking Submissions Confirm Over-Blocking Risks: "Every Blocking Technique Suffers from Over-blocking and Under-blocking" - Michael Geist
With broad-based criticism of the Bell website blocking plan, supporters have tried to dismiss the opposition by characterizing much of their analysis as "misinformation". Yet a review of many expert submissions reveals widely held concerns regarding the proposal. Many point to the absence of court orders as a key flaw and no one - whether supporter or critic - disputes that the majority of countries that have used site blocking require court orders. Further, claims that human rights concerns are unfounded ring hollow in light of the critical submission from the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression. Efforts to dismiss the cost implications of site blocking are undermined by the clear position of the majority of Canadian Internet providers that the expenses associated with blocking are likely to lead to increased consumer costs and reduced competition. Many submissions similarly point to the risks of over-blocking legitimate content.
Post to Tumblr