Peer Review System | PSM | Nonprofit Scientific Publishing
Peer Review process plays an important role for the best outcome of an article. All the Editors, Reviewers and Authors need to acknowledge the mails that are received from the Editorial Office within the desired time to enable swift process. Editors are entitled to pre-screen reject submissions at this stage based on the nature of the study, quantity and quality of data, general conclusions, standard of presentation, language quality and if the article falls outside of the journal's scope. Articles that pass the pre-screening stage will be sent to typically two independent reviewers or editorial board members. Reviewers will review the paper for originality and significance of the work described, and judge its acceptability for publication. The reviewers may also make critical comments and, where necessary, suggest improvements or additional experiments that could be done in support of the findings. If the Editor is facing difficulty in obtaining reviewers, then he/she may also act as