When I say that women should take care of their male partners, I don’t mean housewife stuff like cooking and cleaning. I mean that women should be affectionate with their male partners and provide them with emotional support and do romantic gestures for them sometimes. I mean that women should take care of men the same way they want men to take care of them.

I feel the need to bring this back after remembering how I got called a Nazi and got death threats for this post.

What you're saying here is both right and reasonable.

How any of these words make anyone a Nazi or deserving of being threatened. I can't imagine. 😲

It's encapsulated in the phrase,

If you want him to treat you like a queen, be ready to treat him like a king.

I like how progressives think the recent court rulings mean that businesses are going to just turn a leaf overnight and start putting “NO BLACKS” or “NO GAYS” on their buildings and oppress them in public

when what is actually going to happen is progressive, extreme-left businesses are gonna start “fighting back” by pulling out “sorry, we don’t serve Christians here 😏” and pretend as if they aren’t feeding directly into the division problem in our fucking country.

Why does no one understand this ruling An atheist baker can now refuse to bake a cake that says "jesus saves", but they still cannot wholesale refuse to do business with christians.

A christian baker can refuse to bake a cake that says "gay pride", but they still cannot wholesale refuse to do business with gays. I get that the current SCOTUS is doin' some controversial shit, but this particular ruling simply extends the first amendment's coverage of "you have a right to make a statement you feel is true" to also cover "you have the right to refuse to make a statement you don't feel is true" Businesses are not allowed to discriminate against clientele under this ruling. They are simply allowed to discriminate against INDIVIDUAL WORK REQUESTS that contradict their beliefs. This is a W for everyone. Just be cool, guys.

Exactly why the progs are mad. They don’t want free speech they want compelled speech and for those that don’t tow the line to be shutdown, fined and jailed.

I also like how they think the only thing stopping businesses from being discriminatory is the law. Like they want to ban the gays but they’re afraid of Uncle Sam

Well, considering how fast they were to put up their own signs, the fact is that they WANT to discriminate against people, and as such they think everyone else wants to as well.

> supreme court passes confusing and contradicting bills back to back

> people decide to protest and praise the law, protesters putting the interpretation they and many other people across the political field are having to demand clarity and actual examples of how those laws can apply

> acshually the lefties are the only dumbs here and me the only smarty-pants

Mea Culpa 2: Eletric Boogaloo for the left as always lol.

If a law the supreme court is either seemingly vague or weasily worded enough that both leftist and right wingers have the same interpretation of it why exactly is only one side the one to be ridiculed or judged for taking actions in demand for clarity here?

But sure the people enacting upon a interpretation of the rulling multiple others within the political sphere is having to demand clarity is just a divisive as someone claiming their opponents as child molesters lmao.

The only supposed investigation going on seems to be by the municipality and we don't know if she's convicted by the county of anything she will be able to appeal to the supreme court, which is kinda of the point of the worry people are having.

And it must be asked: what does "not saying or supporting something" actually include in practice? because I see that same explanation used by legit homophobes to not make a cake that will have just two same sex stands or simply a cake that will have gays as recipients of it(like who even writes shit on weeding cakes? That's so tacky, those people deserve to get hate crimed for that alone lol). Like that fake ass wedding planner with a made up story using the name of a straight married dude who did everything in bad faith for example, what constitutes "a individual work request that contradicts a person beliefs", where does it begin and stop? Is the existence of a behaviour by a person enough to constitute opposing ideology? Who's ideology is the metric here? What's the extreme and the common situation expected to be covered by this rulling?

Again, if both sides equally allegedly misinterpret the ruling, what's the intention behind to begin with?

And within a county were majority is straight, extremely conservative and in counties were homophobia is more rampant how is "you are gonna reject the tasteless tacky gays with "gay marriage and dick sucking is based af" on their cake not the Respectable™®© gays that have bare minimum of taste and want a generic cake" even going to be enacted upon when is within the interest of the majority not to?

I'm going to be honest with you here, the moment you started with 'supreme court passes laws' I just could not read the rest. Perhaps it's unfair of me, but... That's a kinda start that tells me a lot about the rest.

My zero respect for USA judicial system impedes me from taking it seriously enough to care about it's terminology, and I'm very stream consciousness type of writing so even if I knew it wasn't a law I wrote law because I wanted to.

Okay, but you do understand that makes your position worse, not better?

As in, you just openly stated with a weird gif that you feel too superior to know what the fuck you're talking about AND that you'll just say whatever comes to mind in the heat of the moment and feel smug about it even as you get hideously basic things wrong?

I mean, you do you it's refreshing to see someone go 'you can dismiss anything I say because being right is tertiary to being sassy' so openly but fuck if that's not an admission I'd ever say with such eagerness.

We need to go back to using sailing ships full time like immediately. Yes it would take longer to get places but the Aesthetic is unmatched

Like there is nothing sexier hthan this

Can’t wait for OP to get scurvy

Are you under the impression that the ships themselves are what caused scurvy

Once again. Do you think this is the fault of the ships themselves

Finally I can have that wet pants look without actually peeing myself!

The closest I’ve ever come to radicalization is handling a pair of Neiman Marcus designer jeans which were designed to look dirty, stained, and torn from the sort of constant manual labor that no one who buys from Needless Markup has ever performed in their life.

“You ghouls, you ghasts, you shambling zombie fucks. I have owned pairs of jeans that look exactly like this BECAUSE I FUCKING LIVED IN THEM. You wouldn’t spit on me if I were on fire, but you want to LOOK like you dress like me? My socio-economic situation is an aesthetic fad to you? Get a fucking life!”

When I was a little kid my mom explained the idea of 'the ends justify the means' as evil. She was right.

I mean, I guess I knew this to be true, but I never really processed the ramifications of that fact until seeing this meme

I have been hangin this drum for years, this is a little more eloquent than I have been though.

Yeah, something about the way this was worded just resonated in my brain better

"undercover cops / fbi agents are so easy to spot their disguises are so ineffectual and they act so suspiciousl"

When I was a little kid my mom explained the idea of 'the ends justify the means' as evil. She was right.

I mean, I guess I knew this to be true, but I never really processed the ramifications of that fact until seeing this meme

ah so they let all the property (and people) burn because they wanted the land. got it.

Relevant

Sounds very similar to the California fires a few years ago.

The California fires where the houses that burned all had government-issued tempo-stat controls, where the houses downwind of the burning houses DIDN’T catch fire, yet cars close to the burning houses MELTED from temperatures impossible for house fires, and where schoolyards had grass burned completely on one side of a perfect line while the grass on the other side of the line was completely untouched... and that line then cut a perfect 45* degree angle in a different direction to continue burning perfectly straight?

Yeah, sounds exactly like those fires.

Hey, remember how all of those several massive fires in Canada happened in the same MINUTE as each other, despite the hundreds of miles separating each spot?

whatever I'll post my addendum to it anyway

I always thought Disney Belle was left with a severe downgrade when the prince became Just A Regular Dude.

I was 8yo when I first watched that movie and I was outraged that they took a perfectly good story about someone finding true love and happiness and fucking ruined the entire character by turning him back into a bland pretty boy who would never again have to make any effort to be kind in order to be accepted.

Put 👏 the 👏 fucking 👏 hair 👏 back 👏 on 👏 that 👏 man 👏

Oh, it makes sense from the prince’s perspective. If some curse turned my feet into hooves, I would be ecstatic to get my toes back. But especially after living for years as a buffalo-werebear monster, I would at least be bummed out that I couldn’t Beast Mode the next time I need to wrestle a bear for my wife’s sake.

(Or wrestle my wife, for my wife’s sake.)

sounds like men need to stop being deadbeats idk

where's your dad at

Absentee fathers is a toxic masculinity problem, Women primarily being hired for caregiver roles is a patriarchy problem.

Feminism doesn't blame men for inequality. Feminism is about dismantling the systems in place that create the problem.

Men are victims of toxic masculinity too. Men kill themselves rather than admit they have emotions. Toxic Masculinity raises boys to objectify their love interests and so can never hope to form true emotional bonds. It puts men in boxes so they can never truly know who they could have been.

Feminism doesn't hate men.

So when women are hurt, it's men's fault. When men are hurt, it's men's fault. I'm sure that absolute binary construction of the world is definitely real and not at all something you're making up to reinforce your ideology.

See, you say this...

But then go on to belittle and insult a majority of all suicide victims. So who should I believe-you, or you?

For every single feminist snottily telling people to quit taking "kill all men" rants seriously bc of COURSE feminists don't want to kill all men

This is almost every man ever to make a "get back in the kitchen" joke.

I eagerly await the list of excuses as to why #killallmen is better and kindly request you bring me a sandwich with it

*Hands Cyan a nice reuben sandwich*

So off the top of my head some excuses would be:

-“Systemic sexism”

-“History of oppression”

-“Well they do worse!”

-“It’s totally different!” and refuses to elaborate

-“Blowing off some steam/stress”

-“Oh my God how can you not take a joke.”

-“[Slur]”

All shitty attempts to cover the whole “I just want to be an absolute bitch to people” thing.

Told husband "sorry, I have to go marry someone on Tumblr" and he said "ok have fun" so you're my spouse now. Who needs a ring when you have a Reuben

And yeah absolutely. Whereas the dudes making kitchen and sandwich jokes don't need any excuse because they just find it funny and it isn't a fucking death threat.

conspiracy theory that the welcome mat industry was created by vampires

I say this all the time

Anyone responsible for throwing these records away should be fired immediately.

Fired by a squad

Larry Tesler, inventor of the cut, copy, and paste commands, dies at 74

Larry Tesler, inventor of the cut, copy, and paste commands, dies at 74

"clip" gtfo

^^^

See here, officer, I absolutely did not put more than one round in my clip!

Choices