Interior of Nasir al-Mulk Mosque in Shiraz, Iran
Did the people who designed it take a lot of psychedelics? The ceiling especially *really* looks like closed-eye visuals.
Rattumb Grandpa, sittin' in his spot on the front porch: there's a discourse a comin', I can feel it in my bad knee
The government of Hong Kong took out a full page ad in The Economist. Huh.
okay but
fuck your stereotypes
long hair is not “girly”
the same way short hair is not “manly”
hair has no gender
hair is just hair
&as long as you’re not disrespecting a culture with the way you do it
you keep on doing you
…h…elp…too much…..in one post……me n………b ea utif u l……….
evolution-is-just-a-theorem
This would be a nicer message if it wasn’t just pictures of incredibly beautiful men
The message here is that guys can get away with doing otherwise feminine things without being perceived as less masculine so long at they're ripped af and/or have prominent facial hair.
Source: actionables
god I love graphs like this
Source please. Time to reallocate my portfolio out of shitcoins into high leverage forex swaps.
Anonymous asked:
Would you be willing to elaborate on why you dislike languages that care about indentation?
First, read this:
Second, realize that the exact opposite is true
For the Indentation paragraphs: If a line of code is followed by a different line of code “twelve spaces left,” how many blocks did it just exit? The compiler knows, but the human does not - but if there are three ending braces, it stepped out three blocks.
For the Tab paragraph: If blocks are important, use a character that steps a whole block at a time. If you’re using spaces, congratulations, your indentation size is one space. There, now you have an obvious answer to the first question - stepping twelve spaces left stepped twelve scopes left.
(And this is all Python’s fault, because Python uses 4 spaces in all the important libraries)
Re point 1, everyone is or should be using a code formatter that makes that sort of thing impossible. And once you're doing that it may as well be part of the language.
Robin Walker, to The Verge:
Half-Life: Alyx’s core combat skill is about using your hands to interact with your weapons efficiently. Reloading is the first of the weapon interactions that you’ll learn. Alyx’s pistol has a multi-step process to reload it, and we see almost all players starting out fairly clunky, doing each step in isolation, but after a bit of practice they start to blend it together. Soon it becomes one single, smooth process, after which we often see them start to put a bit of flair into their movement. But eventually they find themselves having to do it while a zombie is right in front of them, and it all goes to hell. Some players have cited the moment where they fumbled and dropped their magazine at the foot of the attacking zombie as the highlight of their playtest.
So Half-Life: Alyx is pretty much Receiver in VR. Cool!
Bay area apartments by crazy, episode 54
I'm heading home from a friend's apartment in Palo Alto. It's theoretically a studio, but damn. You have the main room with a quarter-assed kitchen, as you'd expect. He doesn't sleep there though. For some godforsaken reason there is a huge closet that is elevated like four feet from the floor. He has his bed set up in there.
Great article on the Coase theorem. Sometimes Wikipedia sucks and David Friedman is good.
Epistemic status: I spent only a short time on this and might have missed important things; please let me know if so.
With electricity-sparked wildfires causing billions of dollars of damage, and scheduled power outages affecting hundreds of thousands of Californians, people blame the utility company PG&E. Governor Gavin Newsom said “As it relates to PG&E, it’s about corporate greed meeting climate change. It’s about decades of mismanagement.”
I looked into the way PG&E’s regulation works, and came away thinking that this was less about choosing the cheapest option to enrich shareholders, and more about the regulator wanting to keep electricity rates low rather than pay for increased safety.
Every three years, PG&E asks its regulator (CPUC, the California Public Utilities Commission) to approve its expenditures, line by line. CPUC has an internal office called the Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA, or sometimes ORA for Office of Ratepayer Advocates), which reviews the proposed expenditures and objects to some of them, then PG&E responds to the objections, and then CPUC makes a final decision.
This is the 2014 expenditure document from the CPUC website. In it, we see that PG&E asks for approval for fire risk reduction expenditures, and the DRA advises that CPUC not approve this. Fortunately, CPUC did approve it:
4.8.2. Fire Risk Reduction
DRA claims that ratepayers should not pay the $11.113 million forecast by PG&E for additional Fire Risk Reduction. PG&E’s current work to reduce the risk of fires is recorded as Routine Tree Work. DRA claims it is inappropriate to require increased ratepayer funding for activities already embedded in historical expenses.
PG&E responds that its Fire Risk Reduction Work forecast is not embedded in historical amounts.
…
We conclude that PG&E has justified its forecast for Fire Risk Reduction Work and adopt it. As PG&E notes, the forecast increase is intended to cover more intensive inspections on the highest risk fire areas that is beyond the scope of work covered in embedded funds.
They obviously should have spent more money on fire risk reduction, but with the DRA opposing the amount they did ask for, it seems plausible that there was no reasonable prospect of getting approval to - as I’ve seen proposed - bury all the electricity lines. Not all safety improvements that PG&E asked for were approved; for example, PG&E wanted approval for a $10 million Distribution Integrity Management Program for its gas lines, but CPUC only approved $4.7 million, so it doesn’t seem that they can expect blanket approval for safety measures.
I got started looking at this because of this Twitter thread by Chris Garnett. Garnett says:
The cynic in me says the system is working exactly as intended–PG&E is a quasi-public entity that looks private to laypeople, providing a layer of plausible deniability (and liability shielding) for the public officials with ultimate control
Having to choose between much higher rates, frequent blackouts, or massive fire losses is a unwinnable scenario for any elected to be in; obscuring responsibility is the only way to survive.
Some things I don’t know:
- If PG&E spends less on safety, does it get higher profits? From what I can tell in the document, it appears not, but I’m not completely sure.
- If PG&E spends more in general, do the executives get paid more? It looks like their compensation is approved in the expenditures process, but it’s probably easier to argue for larger executive pay if their overall budget is larger.
- To what extent has PG&E captured its regulator and is therefore responsible for its mistakes?
- What is the largest amount of fire risk mitigation spending PG&E could have gotten approval for?
- Did PG&E have enough money to solve these problems, but mismanage it, or did it just not have enough money?
wow
I’ve had European friends criticize Americans for just popping a pill whenever anything is slightly wrong with them, but honestly there’s a lot of scenarios where that’s preferable to the alternative. When I got a bad flu in Italy I stumbled to a pharmacy to get some NyQuil only to learn that even basic dextromethorphan needs a prescription from a doctor. All they could offer me was acetaminophen. Like grazie per l'aiuto asshole, I feel like I’m dying, guess I’ll just take some Tylenol about it
IME, yes, American society is medicated to the gills. OTOH, this is awesome, because in the US I can buy otc painkillers in a grocery store and on a Sunday, doctors are way less patronizing, and nobody I know has ever been recommended homeopathic shit for clinical depression. Germans are particularly (to the extent, apparently, that this is an Acknowledged Issue by the WHO) medication-shy, but like, jesus. Some shit it does not actually take a medical degree to figure out, and it will save everybody’s time and money if you just let me buy the thing I know I need and get out of your hair rather than make me jump through hoops for it.
I'm horrified by the idea of a place where doctors are even more patronizing than here in the states.
doctor strange
My people need me, I must go.
not only was he banned; blizzard took back his prize money and fired the casters interviewing him
At first I thought they just took down VODs of his matches but holy shit
FrEeDoM oF sPeEcH iS nOt FrEeDoM fRoM cOnSeQuEnCeS!
polyamoroustabout
What exactly are you saying here? That Blizzard should be legally prohibited from taking the interview down? Yeah, taking away money blitzchung already earned is shitty, and the exploitative contract that enabled it is shitty too. I’d be perfectly happy with that part not being legal. But as much as I disagree with Blizzard politically here, deplatforming him and refusing to work with him again is and should be absolutely within their rights, just as it’s in ours to refuse to consume their products in response. Apart from the prize money shit, this is the system working as it should.*
*There’s a legitimate argument, I think, to be made that the existence of authoritarian regimes like the PRC skews free speech incentives even outside their borders (as seen here), and that it’s worth looking into ways to curtail that influence. That doesn’t seem like it’s your position, though.
People can act within their legal rights while still being immoral. I have a right to call someone a stupid ugly piece of human garbage, but it still makes me an asshole.
Love big huge tumblr arguments where both sides pattern-match the other’s arguments to the nearest easily-dismissed, emotionally charged strawman and then refuse to engage with any of the actual points being raised.
So, Tumblr arguments.
lydiadotnet-deactivated20191101
I am not unmuting this and frankly it's so funny without sound I don't want to know the context
if you are a weeb of a certain age, it is much, much funnier with sound