Avatar

titanium elemental

@titaniumelemental / titaniumelemental.tumblr.com

Robbie, some kind of engineer, atheist, cyclist, weird sex person, unrepentant “choice feminist,” fan of specificity, looking out for the in-between people (they/them)

this is one of the reasons it’s so hard to translate on the fly 😭 monoglots just don’t understand and think you’re bad at the source language 😟

Avatar

i was trying to think how to translate/interpret this into ASL (disclaimer: i’m a hearing student and not very good) and this is one of those moments that shows off how very different ASL grammar is from English

i don’t have the brain cells to gloss this properly with all the right signs and classifiers (classifier = special kind of adjective or noun placeholder) etc right now but it has to look something like:

HOTEL US CL-5, STREET CL-G, STORE CL-5 CLOTHES, LOOK-IN THERE SUIT I LIKE WANT PUT-ON DECIDE—BUY? MAYBE

keeping in mind that as you explain the location of the store and hotel you are placing them in a 3-d imaginary map in front of you, and kinda zooming in on the store and acting out looking into the window (and this all happens very quickly because ASL is magic like that)

sooo much spatial info that ASL communicates very efficiently and English straight up leaves out. if you’re ever lost you’d be lucky to get a Deaf person to give you directions

(and that’s leaving out the problem i had interpreting this which is: what does it mean you “saw a suit,” was it floating in the middle of the store? no, there’s probably a mannequin. is there a sign for “mannequin”? i would probably have to fingerspell that shit and i don’t even know how to spell it. heck, maybe you’re acting out the description of the suit as if *you’re* the mannequin using role-switching! so for this gloss i just went ~whatever~ and put “there” lmao)

and depending on the conversation there’s going to be a lot more equally cinematic contextual detail—when this happened, how you got there, how the suit caught your eye and your reaction, etc—as a matter of course. there is a different set of cultural expectations for why you’re saying this and realistically, if you’re not already getting into detail about the suit and telling a little story, *this* is not the sentence you’re going to use!

it would more likely be an exchange, like…

“across from the hotel there’s a store I want to go to”

“why?”

and *then* you talk about the suit and how you’re all excited about it but you’re not sure it’s actually going to fit, or whatever.

English language/American culture??—has this assumption where you have to, like, justify your motivation at the same time that you’re saying that you want to do something. ASL (and Deaf culture) is more blunt and straightforward. that affects how you phrase things.

this sentence is *implying* you like the suit, but half the time in English we don’t say that outright because it’s seen as childish or gauche to literally say how you feel about things or show too much emotion in general. in ASL it’s like, if you’re not *feeling* something why say anything? and your opinion comes across in both what you say and your expressions, clear as day

and—at the same time!—this sentence is boiling down the entire process of going to the store to the objective: “try on the suit,” and the context is secondary. in ASL you’re expected to cough up the context first. it’s both heavily contextual and concrete. you can’t just say “i want to try on a suit—” apropos of nothing—like wtf, what suit? the one in the store across the street? well why didn’t you just say that first??

there’s no easy way to say, “so like, there’s this suit…” no, that’s nonsensical. why are you trying to be all coy and ambiguous? it’s clothes. just say “i want to buy a suit” or “let’s go to the store” or “this morning i was walking by the hotel and i saw…” or even “recently i’ve been exploring masculine fashion and…”

the context is not optional. it’s a completely different, much more direct philosophy of how to start a conversation. (and one that i, as an autism, absolutely adore)

Tagging @ace-in-the-wild-version2 for ASL stuff.

Avatar

would be fun to live in one of those worlds where you can kill people and eat their souls to gain their powers and this has absolutely zero relevance bc you need to eat a lot of souls before your metaphysical powers compete with like, a handgun, and also the eerie glow in your eyes betrays you so like, even if you have committed murder for some reason it's a terrible idea to eat their soul, it just means you get captured real quick on account on who the fuck eats souls it's the 21st century.

so it's just an entirely ordinary world exactly like our own except that when conspiracy theorists post screenshots of politicians with video compression artifacts around their eyes and they talk about the cloaking technology failing it's not a lizardpeople thing it's a souleater thing. the antisemitic implications are probably the same.

also wearing sunglasses to high-security events is illegal i guess

i wanted to make a printable version of the poster in peter’s chelsea apartment:

Image

but went down a rabbit hole of what it references (and what it probably should look like) but ohhhh my god it’s something that you could literally set your watch by it’s such a specific cultural mash up of a meme that it’s like….100% incomprehensible unless you go on a hyperfixation deep dive so….

like OK firstly it should probably look like this:

ALT

(or if not the individual red boxes at least a solid red background)

but 1) that would have been too cumbersome to detail out for every panel, 2) it would have reverse-out text which would be dicey to print legibly, and 3) using the actual burma-shave logo prob would have been more of a stretch to drop in without getting copyright annoyances even though burma-shave was bought out in 1963.

but yeah so basically from what i can tell, this is an incredibly hyper-specific example of goofy irony-poisoned 70s humor.

the phrase ‘every day in every way i am getting better and better’ is basically a self-affirmation line developed by the french psychologist émile coué in the 1920s as part of a method which used this kind of mantra to attempt to influence the subconscious to manifest it. the coué method remained steadily popular but had a specific resurgence during the counterculture movement in the 60s and 70s – the beatles even dropped it into a few songs. so it would have definitely been having its moment right when the chelsea apt gets its second-hand makeover.

also from like the 30s up until the mid-to-late 60s shaving cream company burma-shave had these ubiquitous highway advertisements that involved putting one or two words of a little rhyme on small red signs in order along a road, always ending with the burma shave logo:

ALT

these started out with little cutsey poems about shaving, but eventually (as above) started going into road safety advice – always punctuated by the burma-shave logo

so the poster in peter’s apartment, which first shows up in asm163 in 1974, is a mashup of the two things. the way that the lines of the affirmation are broken up (one or two words on a line) refers to the layout of the burma-shave signs hence ‘burma-shave’ being the last line.

and like i said, it’s kind of irony poisoned meme – the idea of this new-age psychological resurgence being framed as just another advertising campaign using life advice to sell a product (double-layer of irony bc the referenced campaign is for a product that had been bought out and slowly phased out by the time this issue dropped).

so yeah. lmao. like i said a reference you could set your watch by it’s so unbelievably specific! haha i feel like i’ve got to print it out now.

Avatar

WHAT

my therapist (in his late 50s ish?) had me say this phrase as an affirmation in 2018. i had never seen it before or since until this moment

Happy International Sex Worker Day

Support and protect sex workers. Support and protect them AS sex workers instead of as some idpol “women and queers and poc etc” subdivision. Support and protect sex workers who cater to kinks you find distasteful.

idk when we decided that explaining yourself shouldn't be part of an apology but like. if someone was a dick to me and apologizes but I still don't understand why they did it I'm not gonna feel any better

"Sorry for hurting your feelings earlier. I was trying to say x, but I guess it came across wrong. I don't think you're stupid."

or

"Sorry I snapped at you. I didn't get enough sleep last night so my patience is a little low today."

is a better apology than

"I want you to know that I am sorry that my actions offended you. I take full accountability for my actions and I am listening and learning. I hear you."

Now that Frank is not posting anymore, I'm going to start doing my out-of-context quotes gimmick again.

For more recent followers, my "out-of-context quotes gimmick" just means posting quotations I find funny/weird/etc, without quotation marks or attribution, under the tag #quotes.

I did this for many years, and only stopped in the last few years because people kept thinking the #quotes posts were by Frank.

(Frank also frequently made her own #quotes posts -- with made-up quotations, of course.)

The Conversation about mental health posts goes in waves - from "it's ok to just do nothing for a while" and "self care is lying in bed with a cup of tea" to a hard backlash against that ("those posts were so damaging to me") and posts like "acually self care is cleaning your apartment," and there's lots of reasons for that --

  1. those posts are for different people. the person who believes that there's nothing wrong with them, they just need to keep going, or the person who believes that not washing dishes means there's something unfixably wrong with them needs to hear that that's unsustainable & a break will help, but the person who feels that everything's already ruined so there's no point in doing anything needs to hear that small steps are still steps.
  2. those posts are for the same person at different times, because people need to hear different things at different times in their lives.
  3. when you post on the internet you can't limit a post to only the people it will benefit - like when broad spectrum antibiotics take out beneficial bacteria. and people don't always know which one will help them, so the audience doesn't even self-select. "it's ok if you do nothing" will help some people and hurt others!
  4. honestly the thing is that it's "you can't push yourself all the time, but keeping your space in a state that doesn't cause anxiety or discomfort is probably better for you," but hitting the right balance requires a lot of self-knowledge, which you can't get from a text post on tumblr.

i don't have a good conclusion here - just "nothing in excess," I suppose.

I was trying to get myself in gear to pack my stuff and go to work and the phrase my brain supplied was “alright, what do I need on my adventure today”