Avatar

Tiffany Loves Broadway

@tiffany-loves-broadway / tiffany-loves-broadway.tumblr.com

she/her.  has a sideblog for headcanons and aus at tiffanys-aus-and-headcanons
Anonymous asked:

Ai is an algorithm originally based in the Ukraine Russian war to scrape information from people and use it else where, and the out put of the art and other content people are getting is a farse so that they can collect your personal information including g your behavioral preferences, demographics, and your face and save it in places where that information can be sold and exploited by unsavory parties.

But you go off about IP maximalist like a fucking idiot who hasn't actually done the research and had an opinion based on face value speculation like a Trumper.

[wonders if anon is actually serious or doing a bit]

Avatar

ao3's legal chair coming out as pro AI training on our fanworks during the middle of the writer's strike and right after ao3 had a record donation drive weren't on my bingo card but here we are i guess

anyway the full interview is worse and the comments on the main article are worth reading for a full refutation of everything said in the interview. i really hope this encourages otw and ao3 to come out with an official stance on ai stealing fanworks and that whatever they come up with is not this.

whole lot of people who are extremely defensive of intellectual property in the notes despite their heavy investment in fucking fan creativity. anyway you're all disgusting and I hate this particular blowup especially; burn the concept of intellectual property to the fucking ground. please don't bend the knee to this stupid fucking IP-maximalist luddism, AO3

Avatar

Reminded again of the terrible website Mythcreants, and I think the main pattern, the biggest repeating problem I’ve seen with them, is how they, like, imagine a pretty broad Category of Thing, imagine it being in some way bigoted, and then instruct the audience to never do that Broad Category of Thing, and instead do the opposite - stay on the safe side, and saying anything inadvertently if anyone were to read into what they’re saying.

If you’ve got a character with a disability, you could imagine it potentially feeling demeaning or tiring or patronising if the disabled character is really vocally down on the disability and it’s a significant issue for them and it ruins their life. So the solution, you are instructed, is that your disabled character must not consider it that big of a deal. There’s a stereotype of having evil villains having certain minor distinctive disabilities like eyepatches and hook-hands and scars. And like, you can imagine that having some negative cultural effect. So the solution, you are instructed, is that villains are not allowed disabilities. Unless they are sympathetic about it. There was a bit about ‘Villain Redemption Arcs’ - one point in the numbered list of things not to do was the villain being too villainous. Villains get redeemed, but they were too evil in the past, so they don’t *deserve* to be redeemed. The solution, they instruct, is to just not redeem villains that are ‘irredeemable’, or to make your villains less evil.

It’s all just very… uncreative. Surface-level.

Like, it’s stuff that you could probably do to be *aware* of, but that *awareness* of it should lead you to do something *interesting* about it, and Mythcreants just seems so fundamentally afraid of doing things that are *interesting* over anxiously avoiding things that could be considered problematic. Just nervously hiding from it.

Like, good fiction, I find, grabs and idea, and just *goes into it*. It’s following it wherever it leads. Really *exploring* whatever the thing has to offer. Like it’d be so much better if you’re just… aware of the stereotype, or aware of how evil the villain is, and you just… explore that. You go somewhere with it. You do something interesting about it.

But the writing advice is always more ‘Covering your Ass’ and ‘Checking the boxes’ than, like, being interesting. It’s less about Good writing as it is about Inoffensive writing.

Avatar

Like, in this article ‘ Five Anachronisms That Fantasy Needs ‘, it lists 5 things from history and instructs you to just Not Use them in your story, because it “Will Detract from your reader’s enjoyment” and “Risk normalising said views.” in the case of disagreeable social views.

And like, every single one of those 5 examples are things that could be really really interesting things to play with. Like you could really *explore* that, it could make for something really interesting and memorable. It’s the sort of thing that makes me want to start writing, y’know. You can do some crazy stuff with that.

But the instruction is just “Don’t”. In creative disciplines you never just “Don’t”! 

Avatar

Civilization was not developed to produce food for people. It is specifically the organizational processes of limiting access to abundance as a means of social and ecological hegemonic dominance. Hope this helps :)

Avatar

It's neither of these things. "Civilization" is a post hoc term for "all the stuff people have been doing for the past 5-12 thousand years, or at least all the stuff sedentary people have been doing". A wide variety of historians and archeologists have rightly criticized the term as basically meaning nothing, other than conveying a vague judgement about the relative worth of settled vs. nomadic hunter-gatherer societies. Anyway, "civilization" wasn't developed by anybody or for any purpose, it's just a hodgepodge of shit that's been going on recently (in, you know, geological terms).

Wrong again. "Civilization" was developed by Sid Meier in response to his fascination with recently released "god games" like Sim City and Populous, which he believed were the foremost evidence that computer games could be "about" more than destruction. Civilization is now a particularly successful and well-established franchise known as a formative example of and the premier of the 4x genre. It has shipped more than 40 million total units and further installments are still being developed.

the way that "Karen" originally meant primarily white women using ther privilege to abuse people of color and service workers and the internet turned it into a stand-in for "bitch"...... the way that "NLOG" originally meant girls and women who performatively separate themselves from femininity and put down other women out of internalized misogyny but the internet turned it into a stand-in for their lesbophobic or transphobic slur of choice for masculine women.....the way "manic pixie dream girl" was originally a critique of a sexist trope in fiction and the internet turned it into a way to insult real life girls and women for being weird or quirky....never fucking ending

Expecting to talk to the manager is good actually. Too many people hide behind the rules they made up, or tell you it's a software error and they are powerless and must obey the computer.

Nobody actually knows what other girls are supposed to be like, but if you're 13 it's valid not to like ponies.

Roger Ebert made a great mistake when he coined that term instead of "screwball deuteragonist".

Avatar

also i personally heard ‘Karen’ for ages before i heard anyone using it specifically as a race thing.

Honestly it’s always seemed pretty weird just how much people have recently started assuming “Karen” is about race when its historic usage was much closer to describing a class dynamic

I'm starting a new movement in literary criticism called "Undeath of the Author". basically we consider the author to be alive enough that their intention is the only source of meaning in the text, but dead enough that any interpretation of the text is valid. consequently, if you can read a particular meaning into a text, the author put that meaning there entirely on purpose, regardless of any claims to the contrary.

FAQ:

  • This is already a common mode of reading things online, you're not starting it.
  • Every literary movement draws on existing practices which it formalizes, expands, and explores. I'm the first one to endorse this approach openly and give it a catchy name. That counts as me starting it. Besides, most people who follow the basic principles of Undeath of the Author wouldn't admit to it.
  • This is a piss-poor approach to understanding anything.
  • Nowhere in the above statement, nor in any of my other writings, do I endorse pissing on the poor.
  • Are any of these FAQ entries questions?
  • Only this one.
  • Actually, Barthes's point in La mort de l'auteur is a lot more interesting and subtle than the received concept of "Death of the Author", having as much to do with the authorial voice within the text and the cultural archetype of The Author as with the "proper" way to interpret texts. The received concept instead derives mostly from the New Criticism, and -
  • Yes.
Avatar

many people find the song Imagine viscerally irritating, perhaps because it's overplayed, really slow, kind of maudlin, sanctimonious, and by John Lennon which is bad if you hate the Beatles but also bad if you like the Beatles, etc. etc.

but the lyrics actually work! I mean, they're actually good! the song kicks off with "imagine there's no heaven" as the first line and that's an incredible start! "imagine there's no countries"? brilliant! "imagine no possessions"? amazing!

so the main reason the song might annoy is that it occupies such a clear and prominent position in hyperdimensional songspace that there's really no dodging its intent, all you can do is gnash your teeth and scream incoherently about hippies in response.

is there a vegan song with equivalent impact? "imagine if eating animals was equivalent to eating human babies, unless those animals were themselves carnivores in which case it might be morally neutral on balance"?

Avatar
femmenietzsche said: Many people have made the point that the song would be vastly less sanctimonious and annoying if he’d just replaced “I wonder if you can” with “I wonder if I can”

oh god yes 😩

Avatar

I always thought it's just one of those things people find cringe because they liked them as teenagers? The worst I can say about it is that it's a little too obvious, it doesn't challenge me much anymore. But that doesn't put it in the "rage-inducing" category for me, just in the "shameful indulgence" category, like other stuff that felt like a revelation back then but makes you roll your eyes a bit now. It is indeed a bit weird that other people are so much more aggressive about it.

Avatar

seeing it as "entry level" but presented as profound is another reason why it might grate, yes

the song is "imagine if Communism, imagine everything Communism said was true, I assume everyone is exactly like me and has all of my opinions and of course think all of these things are great and everyone has all of my priorities"

really that thing where all the rich celebrities sang "imagine" at the start of lockdown and it was embarrassing and cringe, that's really what the song always was. "Don't feel down! Imagine a future where I got all the very specific things I want and you don't!"

however the song's sins are absolved by its use in "The Leap Home, Part 1"

Quantum Leap was a good fucking show, man

imagine that nothing good happens to you when you die. come on, imagine it, idiot. (nothing bad happens either, you just turn into a corpse and rot. which I am a-okay with)

alright, now that that’s out of the way, imagine that I took over the world and I could just tell everyone what to do. (this isn’t rocket science, moron; pretty simple scenario) that’d be pretty swell. everyone would be cool with it IMO. there wouldn’t be anything else to be concerned with, just whatever I felt like making people do. many people agree IMO

okay, last one, time for a real brain teaser, you fucking imbecile. imagine that I took all your shit. and all of everyone else’s shit, except my friends, who I also let take everyone else’s shit. that’d be pretty fun. we’d never run out of shit because we’d always have more people to take it from. if you don’t want me to take your shit, well, don’t worry, because I will anyway, but just so you know you’re a greedy selfish pig who only cares about yourself. again, many people agree IMO. someday we will make you agree too

-the song that made millions of people go “wow!  so true, how inspiring”

Thinkin’ about The Siberian

I was sitting on a draft that said something to the effect of “Worm AU where Manton pulls an NBC Hannibal and moonlights as The Siberian on top of being a globally respected parahuman studies researcher. Is this anything.”

Then I thought about this a little more and realized that this might not be far off from what actually happened. There’s a throughline in Manton’s interests, in his trajectory through life, where he’s trying to figure out what you can use powers to get away with doing to people- about identifying constraints and overcoming them. 

He’s the guy who somehow credibly catalogued, and got his name associated with, the fact that powers generally can’t be used to pop people like balloons, and he did so reasonably early in the timeline, in the nineties at the latest. That’s…. an interesting direction to take your research! When people are just coming to terms with the fact that parahumans are real he’s out there taking careful note of whether they can manifest their powers inside people to instantly kill them. How did he test that? What capes did he collaborate with to test that? What did those conversations look like? Did the IRB at a minimum issue any revise-and-resubmits?

And then, of course, he gets picked up by Cauldron (also known as the infinite untraceable victim depot) to work on improving the vials- gaining a sufficiently in-depth understanding of what they are, how they’re made, and what they can do to people that when Cauldron told Legend that Manton had gone rogue and was the one creating C53s, he found this plausible. You’ve got the guy who’d later become the backbone of the Slaughterhouse 9 basically systemically cataloging every conceivable way a power could violate someone’s physiology- first from without, and then, at Cauldron, from within.

Then, when he pulls the trigger and gives himself powers, the resultant ability is essentially a distilled refutation of the Manton Effect- a minion that can obliterate anything, eat anything, delete any material from existence, viscerally dismember people in a unity of conventional and esoteric, power-enabled violence. And he’s insulated from the consequences of his actions on two levels- in terms of Siberian’s invulnerability, but also in the discrepancy between his form and that of his minion. He mixed the vial that gave him that power himself.

Essentially- I don’t think Siberian is something that just happened after a psychological break following a messy divorce. I think Manton basically pre-committed to becoming something like The Siberian, spent most of his career working towards some form of transcendence through superpowers, and the messy divorce was downstream of the cracks starting to show as he got closer and closer to what he’d been chasing.

Now to segue into a complication that’s more directly supported in the text- it’s Worm, it’s always complicated- Master powers spring from loneliness. My theory is that while Manton wanted apotheosis, and while he’d probably been gearing up for a rampage for a while, he genuinely didn’t want to do it alone; he wanted a sidekick. Hence why he bothered pursuing a family in the first place, hence why he fed his daughter a vial, hence why his own projection ended up looking like his daughter after he accidently made her explode or whatever with the bad vial- a monkey’s paw restoration, giving him back a facsimile of the person he wanted to take along for the ride, and making his capacity for violence inseparable from her presence.

This is why he joined up with the Nine rather than remaining a solo act; it’s why he engages in a bad imitation of the Parent/Child relationship with Bonesaw; and it’s why he seeks out Bitch as a candidate. His interest in her candidacy parses to me as genuine- Even moreso than Bonesaw, even moreso than Jack, Bitch has arrived at a no-frills fuck-you-I-do-what-I-want outlook that’s very appealing to Manton. He wants to have a murderer-daughter relationship!

But Rachel got where she is the hard way, by having a life that sucked a lot, by getting near-constantly kicked around! She has a clear reason to be so angry! Even if all my postulations about Manton having a long game are complete bullshit, there are several stages at which Manton had to actively opt in to the same lifestyle and reputation that Bitch was forced to adopt as a basic survival tactic. He didn’t have to start eating people! He’s a tourist! His “freedom” is inseparable from his distance, his disguise. Rachel’s “freedom” is just the freedom of having nothing left to lose.

All of this to say- In an interlude in which Bitch has an extended internal monologue about how people with families have the opportunities to be assholes and monsters to a captive audience, it is absolutely not a coincidence that she’s scouted by a would-be parental figure who proceeds to be an asshole and a monster in front of a captive audience, before trying to buy her affection with a puppy. In rejecting Manton, Rachel dodged an esoterically-packaged but ultimately very familiar bullet.

classic wuxia trope: a flawed hero is tempted by unvirtuous feelings and fails to uphold the standards demanded of the righteous; as a result an innocent, particularly one they care about, is hurt or killed

spider-man is wuxia

classic wuxia archetype: a hero standing outside conventional structures of law and order, who uses their powerful martial arts to stand up for the weak and oppressed

spider-man is wuxia

Tie Xinlan sighed: “Not just quite good, his personal secretive lightness martial arts [The Flying Celestial Spider] is unmatched in the realm.”

Xiao Yu’er asked: “What is so special about this skill?”

Tie Xinlan said: “He has hidden some special lanyard made from the silk spun by a thousand year old rare spider in Nanhai. It is very strong, not even swords and sabres can sever it. The lanyard is put in a mechanized tube, when he waves his hand the lanyard will shoot out. It can reach about 40 metres and at the end of the cord there is a sharp silver needle that can puncture anything. He will go with the line and that is why he is so swift, he also makes him very secretive.”

Xiao Yu’er laughed: “He is not only strange and funny, but his martial arts are funny and strange too. But I wonder how old he really is, why is he so fixated on being other people’s seniors.”

Tie Xinlan said: “No one has ever seen his real face and nobody knows his true age. He hates when people call him young. Whoever makes that mistake will suffer dearly.”

Xiao Yu’er said: “Why am I not suffering?”

– introducing the Black Spider, The Legendary Siblings, Gu Long (1966)

When I saw this addition, I assumed tumblr user leahsfiction had riffed on my post by writing a short piece, in an excellent bit of yes-anding. I did a bit of googling, saw the novel existed and was published a few years after the first Spider-Man appearance in 1962, thought “oh well played situating it in an actual real novel, that’s really clever.”

He is in love with Murong Jiu but is afraid of confessing to her so he always watches her from a distance. When Murong Jiu ventures into the jianghu, he follows her closely and protects her with his life. They are married eventually. 

🤔

Avatar

Minotaur is not a species

The Minotaur was named that because he was the son of King Minos. Anyone with a bull head has to be named after their dad, like the Kyletaur or something.

this is basically like calling every single wacky artificial body horror mashup-of-parts creature (or thing roughly in the same thematic wheelhouse) “a Frankenstein”, which IMO is pretty valid

I will expound however that IMO minotaurs should specifically be human-bull hybrids, not just any arbitrary bull-headed race

(also as many other commenters have pointed out King Minos was NOT the father)

Avatar

Minotaur is not a species

The Minotaur was named that because he was the son of King Minos. Anyone with a bull head has to be named after their dad, like the Kyletaur or something.

this is basically like calling every single wacky artificial body horror mashup-of-parts creature (or thing roughly in the same thematic wheelhouse) “a Frankenstein”, which IMO is pretty valid