I think I’ve been using correlated wrong the whole time.
I was talking to my partner about how I read a sad book last night and was feeling sad this morning, and said, “but I don’t think the two things are correlated.”
But they are! Barring the fact that two data points is probably not enough mean they are correlated in the statistical sense, the fact that there are these two emotional data points that are next to each other IS a correlation. What I meant is that there is not a causation.
I can’t believe that I was using correlation when I meant causation. Yeesh.


