The new, updated version of my Dream Library print is available here with 3 background colour options!
Which would you most want? I would personally love to read the potentially award winning book that I occasionally have vague ideas about writing..

The new, updated version of my Dream Library print is available here with 3 background colour options!
Which would you most want? I would personally love to read the potentially award winning book that I occasionally have vague ideas about writing..
I love it when dogs try to help but the task at hand requires zero dogs so they just kinda stand in front of you and look serious.
mama didn’t raise a quitter she raised a burnt out perfectionist who settles for mediocrity
if at first i do not succeed i will try and try and try again until I hit some invisible bar and decide “never mind, that’ll do”
This is one of the best lesbian movies i’ve seen and it’s a fricking car commercial
The light… The cinematography… French WLW at its finest
we should be lovers instead
mice are having sex in my walls :(
the mice are fucking AND now i’m getting heckled
@oyavaski i think the funniest part of this is you thinking that this is fake because…..some of us are the same age and we have normal tumblr names i guess lmao????
never thought i’d get accused of faking having a mice infestation for tumblr clout and yet here we are
you fucked those mice yourself
I fucked those mice myself
decided to put these in a bit of a chronological order as i can’t help but form a story behind the scenes. it’s a storyteller’s habit. and yeah i do have an idea i would genuinely like to explore with gail simone as a crossover comic.
i don’t want to be the writer for this. but at the same time i always found diving into these things and exploring the character chemistry was the best way to get an artistic feeling for it.
this is also how i usually develop my own stories.
anyhow, while many think this is me drawing some shipping, in fact this a proof of concept for an adventure story featuring lara and diana. Gail simone at some point asked if they would kiss and i gave it some genuine thought. i am a character first kind of a writer, myself, so i contemplated this. then i decided, yes, probably.
after all, romantic subplots have been the bread and butter of adventure writing since its inception and i always liked that aspect of adventure stories.
i hope this puts some things in context from my end XD
and while there will probably be a few more of these, there will be no nsfw pics. after all, camera pans away from indiana jones in those moments as well XD
okay… there may be a chance of a kiss… but that’s about it.
ITS BACK IN MY LIFE👏🏾😭
tumblr's great because i learned that a new resident evil game was coming out only because the lesbians on my dash all collectively went insane at once
“Peggy Carter’s fighting style has none of the artistry of characters like Melinda May or Black Widow. She basically slams heavy objects into men until they fall over, which is very satisfying to watch.”
(source)
the second panel was originally going to have words but I decided it was better without them
how come you only become aware of how tipsy you are in bathrooms
Hi, welcome to my Ted Talk, today we will be dealing with something that has bothered me about Disney’s Robin Hood since I was a kid and I still cannot get over to this very day.
And it all stems from THESE THREE PEOPLE:
I’m going to preface this entire thing by saying THIS version of Robin Hood is very very VERY different than the source material, much like all Disney animated films, but it wasn’t really DISNEY who did the big changes… those just came over time with making things more… I’m just going to say “normal for society”, which is ultra double lame.
BUT that’s not the point, because that stuff happens everywhere and with everything, and if I started to complain about THAT we’d be here all day, and I’m already going to take more of your time than needed to complain about something SUPER unimportant from a children’s animated movie made in 1973.
ANYWAY!
So, in the movie the titular character, Robin Hood, is a fox. Makes total sense, foxes are crafty, hard to catch, cunning, and known for getting into and out of situations that other animals would have difficulty with. Take that and turn it into an anthropomorphic character and you’d get someone who would easily be against the normal laws, not BAD, but would do BAD to do GOOD. Robin is a show off when he wants to be, and quiet when he has to be.
He’s a pretty perfect Robin Hood, especially in the case of animated kids movies, his characteristics just work SO WELL with his personification as a fox. GOOD STUFF, if I do say so myself!
Little John, meanwhile, is a bear. Not just any bear, but a big ol’ lovable brown bear. This plays on the idea of Little John being a cheeky nickname because Little John is a big, strong, and above all the calm, cool, and rationally smart one of the two. Robin may be clever, but John is the big picture guy. Pun intended.
These two designs and animal choices work SO well with each other, and it’s because these two are so different yet they get along and honestly NEED one another that makes the differences so perfect.
ALAN-A-DALE IS A ROOSTER. BRILLIANT. I don’t even have to go into this, do I? What a GREAT call by making Alan-A-Dale a rooster. Though, I feel a bit of his characteristics were also borrowed from Will Scarlet for the Disney version, but even that still fits everything. And, honestly, I don’t mind the blending of Alan and Will, it kinda works? Especially with the movie being as short as it is.
ROOSTER BARD. ROOSTER. BARD. So good, I mean c’mon. It’s perfection.
The Sheriff of Nottingham being a wolf is… okay. It’s okay. I get it though, having the wolf hunt the fox. Haha. Cheeky. Cliche, but cheeky.
I really have nothing to say about him, he’s just…okay. Dude’s a cop, so whatever. Not a fan of bootlickers, and the fact that they’re dragging wolves in the mud by making a wolf into a cop is… whatever. /He’s A Wolf Cop/
Personally, I don’t like Friar Tuck as a badger. It really doesn’t make sense to me, and I lowkey hate it that they totally missed so many opportunities. DOVE OF PEACE? LAMB OF GOD? Like FOR REAL, you coulda done something super cute like that, but NOoOoOoOoOoO… he’s a badger. And they kinda pick on him for half the movie, for no reason, and I don’t like that.
Still, Friar Tuck is cute, and a really fun character and they do some clever animation stuff with his “badger”-ness. Still a bit of a missed opportunity.
OKAY NOW THAT WE’VE GOT THESE OTHER BIG ONES OUT OF THE WAY, IT’S TIME FOR MY ACTUAL PROBLEM!
ABSOLUTELY NOT! Disney did this JUST because they wanted Maid Marian and Robin Hood to be THE SAME ANIMAL, and that’s ABSOLUTE BUNK!
WHY? Well there’s two BIG reasons that is irks me!
First, the idea that they HAD to be together because they were the same animal or they were made to be the same animal so it wouldn’t be “weird” that they were together.
*ehem* Nonsense. Nonsense.
And it’s even MORE nonsense because of this little fact…
Okay, you could argue that Maid Marian was adopted, or that King Richard married a lovely fox woman and the fox woman’s relative had a daughter and THAT was Maid Marian. And YES, that would make the situation plausible…
EXCEPT!
This is MEDIEVAL ENGLAND and they are ROYALTY and that kinda stuff wouldn’t fly even IF King Richard is the King.
I really recommend reading the rest, it’s gold
Also this post is a goddamn mood
This movie is the perfect example of why a bard and a rogue should never leave the party and go off on their own adventure.
Uh, this movie is a perfect example of why a bard and a rogue should absolutely leave the party and have their own adventure
Minor quibble: one of them took enough levels in ranger to get an animal companion
I would generally argue that Altivo is a player character (probably a druid) but Animal Friendship is a lvl 1 bard spell. Miquel might have just rolled really well.
Or the horse is actually a player character too
#i feel like most show and movie-makers who bring in a combative dynamic in their romantic leads miss the fundamental point: #there are couples who argue because they don’t like each other (bad to watch/bad take/go back to film school) #and couples who argue precisely because they DO like each other (narrative gold) #they’re not arguing because their personalities are fundamentally in conflict #like their baseline of reality is valuing different things which leads to friction #it has to feel more like they’re arguing because with anyone else? they’d be gone before they even got to this level of disagreement #they’re only arguing BECAUSE what the other person thinks and does and says is important #‘this person is IMPORTANT to me and they’re WRONG and it’s UPSETTING that those two things co-exist!’ #like beatrice and benedick aren’t arguing with random inhabitants of messina #they’re arguing with the other specifically because they’re the only one who matters #the mummy #(also the fact that these two arguing with anyone else? competent verbose and focussed) #(arguing with each other? resort to saying the word ‘fine’ five in increasing tones of urgency and desperation: POETIC CINEMA) (Harrietvane)
adult life is truly just thinking “I NEED TO CLEAN” while dealing with the 17 other things that have a hard deadline
If you ask yourself “Would Gomez Addams treat me this way?” And the answer is no, move tf on from that situation.
If you’re a wlw ask if Morticia would ever treat you this way.
If the answer is no, move on.
“Is this how an Addams would behave?” Is the best way to make sure you’re being treated fairly and with love
Except maybe not for sibling relationships because Wednesday likes to try to guillotine her brother.
no that’s just how siblings are