Short version: Yup. Right on the money
Long version: I know it can be entertaining to check sales charts and analysis, but it’s an incomplete and inaccurate picture that leads to confusion. I’ve checked out some of my books on those charts and seen numbers almost 20% lower than actual sales. That’s a huge margin of error and that doesn’t even include digital, trades, foreign licensing, convention sales, or how all those compare to actual creative costs.
Internet chatter can affect sales (positively or negatively) but there’s also a large portion of the market buying outside of our bubble. Something like the Disney Kingdoms: Figment series won’t burn up the sales charts in single issues (though it did well for its niche), but now, in collection as a hardback, it sells well in the book market, to libraries, and through the Disney park gift shops.
Fans armchair quarterbacking through flawed sales charts without understanding those complexities can be frustrating. So many assumptions. In the past I’ve taken a small writing pay cut on a work-for-hire project to keep it rolling with a different artist as a way to tweak the creative cost equation.
It might be nice to have a simple clear _number_ to indicate success/profitability or failure/cancellation, but that’s not going to happen.
Printing, shipping, marketing, editorial, and creative costs fluctuate.
Sales, profit, optics, and politics all factor into which comics stay afloat and which are cancelled.