Wow, so weird that over a decade after he died, a letter Kalashnikov wrote to nobody was found in a house he never lived in, which just so happened to say guns are bad and no one should have them.

I hate troons, but apparently they CAN be funny. Provided that they are actively dying from gas inhalation.

Senator Wiener demands that those who speak against the grooming of children be arrested for hatecrime.

I say we arrest the Senator for grooming the bloody children.

Scott Weiner is responsible for the legislation that makes it legal for a 25 y.o. to have sex with a 15 y.o. in California. He is a sick person.

When the monsters tell you what they are, treat them as such.

Dude also made it legal in Cali to snatch kids from other states to “transition” them

Man I wonder how all these pedos keep getting into positions of power, thank god for democracy!

Dumbest take of the day goes to

And since someone already beat me to the punch and explained why this is *stupid*

Fuck progs, fuck anyone who says we need more laws and gun control to curb a problem the State created when they said the cops would “keep you safe” in exchange for your right to be armed.

Carry everywhere

See like fuck this idiot who probably also believes nobody does drugs ever since they’re illegal, lol

Not to mention, for the 1,000th time the shooter was someone known to the FBI and they did nothing, so much for “stopping dangerous people from getting weapons”. They allowed it to happen to push for tighter controls.

Y'ALL THIS IS THE NEW WHITE HOUSE MONKEYPOX COORDINATOR HOLY SHIT

Biden really said "I think we need a raging queer leather daddy doctor to run the country's monkeypox response" and he was RIGHT

to be fair it is only raging queers who are spreading it so it only makes sense!

He has a pentagram on the first picture.  Democrats keep proving Alex Jones right about everything.

When I say certain demographics are stupid and easily pandered to, I’m talking about people like OP lol

I wish Mythbusters would do a special comeback season just to bust all the nonsense TikTok has brought into the world

Mythbusters is the cause of that nonsense. They disproved every thing dumb people felt smart for knowing and they had to find new things. There's always going to be myths because dumb people need to feel they "know a secret" so they don't kill themselves when faced with the day to day inferiority. We had a stable myth economy until Mythbusters destroyed it without a replacement. It was the intellectual equivalent of the US bombing Afghanistan then leaving.

Cuz it’s in your body, why is that so difficult to understand?

Whatever, pro murder chick.

Lol 🤷‍♀️ unwanted kids are better off aborted than abused and neglected

So we've got "natural biological process is no different than an invasive parasite" and "every child who isn't aborted is going to be abused and neglected" all from one person in the same post. You should donate your brain to science, I'm sure they'd love to study you and figure out how it got so smooth.

My arguement is that nothing can demand human life be in the service of another if the person does not wish it. Not in economics, not ethically, and not in politics.

That includes within your own body and must include it no matter how great the need imposed on you. This is what it means to be free.

I understand that the people who champion my body my choice do not live with it consistently. They betray the priniciple a thousand times over and over. But that doesnt mean we too should also disregard that moral priciniple also in contradiction of our beliefs elsewhere.

I burn your house down. Is it ethical to expect me to have to repay the damages?

I think so, yes.

Now I dont think it changes whether or not you did it intentionally, whether through incompetence, indifference, or outright malice, you have a right to seek justice in the form of demanding that the other person, having violated your rights to property, pay for its replacement.

I get what contradiction you are trying to claim exists, and frankly im more focused on the question of "what can be demanded in the cause of justice under objective law." I am unsure of because Ive honestly not read more into it. (Ive been focusing mostly on ethics and aesthetics because these are the things within my power and add value to my life.) That aside.

But to answer the claim I think you will make I will say that, one is a cause of a justice having violence (which does not require the intention to damage you in this case only the damage) done to you, and seeking payment, as is right, or failing that incarceration for having violated someone elses rights, where as the other is a question of the purely ethical dealing with the ethical foundations of rights, what those rights are, and frankly when those rights begin. One is the foundation, the other a consquence of that foundation.

If my reasoning so far, is inadequate let me know your issue and I will try to answer as best I can, or failing that to study the topic more in depth and come to a conclusion.

Yeah I aint reading all that. It was yes or no. You said yes.

Its my full answer in complete detail. With the answer at the top. Do what you want.

So you already agree your initial premise is false, it is ethical to make people labor to remedy situations they created by their own actions.

No my initial is still correct.

Read my reply at your leisure. Rather than asking me to repeat myself.

No. Its a yes or no question. Anything else is trying to weasel out of being a hypocrite because you don't want to apply the same standards to killing your kid.

You can demand a yes or no all you like but if you ignore the actual reasoning of the answer and its application to the actual question. To blank out the actual answer and thus engage in the unethical behaviour of willful ignorance.

Youve asked the wrong question and ignored the reasoning of the answer. Because as Ive pointed out the question only is a contradiction if you see ethics, or rather all of philosophy as a block of ideas coming at you at once without understanding the heirarchy of ideas necessary for all philosophy.

Ill try and make it simple.

Your question is actually two questions, one you asked and the one I knew would follow.

Do I need to make it even clearer?

If so just ask yourself if it ethical to kill someone with a pure yes and no, without any proper context and see that its the same issue involved.

I will say this again even though it isnt to your benefit but mine, the idea I gave at the start isnt even a full summery of my foundational ethics but a bit of rherotic derived from the whole truth, but I wont contest its use here. Ive done this out of benelovence knowing that I am right in my answer, however I can and will withdraw that benevolence should you continue with your irrationality.

Now then if you want to add the sin of laziness on top of ignorance be my guest. But ive given you plenty to figure out the way to the right question to get the right answer.

I am willing to admit my error if one is made as to the question of "demanding payment for damages within objective law" and so am making another proof work that I think is cleaner for those interested.

I think with the priciniple of self defense covers it, that if one can take another persons life when the that person intiated violence against another persons life, then I think that the same priciniple can be applied to property. That in taking or destroying someones property that theirs in turn be held as forfeit to the injured party to cover the damages and then some.

All of this however requires that a person hold their life and property as their own without contradiction, and demand when a violation is made against either, a process of justice is done to rectify the violation. This is the foundation that validates everying above.

It's not a demand, it's literally a yes or no question. By definition anything else is not an answer but an excuse for your hypocrisy. You're literally doing the same shit politicians do when they're asked an incredibly simple question, and instead of answering just go off on a long winded tangent about absolutely fucking nothing.

If you cannot answer wether people should be held responsible for consequences their actions have on other people then you are the one choosing to disregard the discussion, not me.

Okay bro. Ive given you not just an answer but a full answer, even giving that yes an no a special little break in the flow.

Ive answered you directly, in one word, and then in full detail.

Heres the answer you illerate.

=========== stop here brainlets no further ===========

Because I do in fact get to say your claim that Im a hypocrite is bullshit, espiecally if I then explain why

But I am astounding that you dont even seem to understand the third underlined question, that is the basis of any intellcual question, why or how.

The length of these is me answering the how and why which isnt a yes or no question. Because I dont think you can describe any process or idea purely in yes and no, unless you used them like binary, which Im not.

A politicain engaes in the art of saying nothing in many words. I have a lot to say with a great deal of clarity, and as such I write a great deal. I think the fact you thing all of it was unimportant, its because you understood none of it.

After this Im removing my benevolence.

That's a lot of word for "it's okay for me to break my principles when I feel like it". Actions have consequences, sex and pregnancy is no different.

Lol. I mean if you litterally cant understand how to even disagree with at this point, thats on you.

You are litterally just going "you wrong tho" over and over and expecting me to concede from that? Because if I did that would be the darkest and most inexcusable violation of my priciniples.

So sort yourself out, I know I am right and Ive explained why.

Nah, it's not "you're wrong". It's "you're inconsistent and you're in denial about your lack of consistency". But hey, murder for the sake of convenience, am I right?

Abortionists will say they didn't consent to letting the helpless baby share their body.

My sibling in christ, you had the sex.

This makes no sense

it literally could not be more straightforward

It literally doesnt make sence, both have the same value, they're both $30

I think the failure of many people to grasp an incredibly simple, barebones metaphor is demonstrating implicit bias very well

This dude straight up stated the fucking answer and still can’t understand it, because he’s expecting the answer to be his own views lmao

No im not expecting anything its just a badly frammed metaphor

Bro you said the answer. Both have the same value despite different sizes. It’s simple. Basic. Elementary.

But it never says that, it just asks you wich one is greater and the text ends there, wich leads you to thinking that one indeed has greater value then the other, and that the one with the greater value is the answear

It asks you which one has the greater value and what is the answer to that question?

Im not about to argue over a focken tit size metaphor

Never underestimate the lack of reading comprehension on this site lmfao

The implication is that the coins are less valuable despite being heavier because they are more difficult to actually spend. Why accept coins when you can have more practical bills of equal value? The post was made in a "flat is justice" manner.

Love that they just gloss over the fact that parts of the brain can be just shut off with magnets. Nothing to see there, do not be concerned.

Your mandatory tolerance helmet will arrive shortly.

CDC: if you’re vaccinated you don’t have to wear a mask anymore!

me: *sets this new recommendation gently on the ground* ah. no thank you

So many people today at Costco without masks. I kept mine on. Even though I’m fully vaccinated. No fucking way am I risking that shit.

You two dumb fucks got injected with an experimental vaccine you weren’t even sure was gonna work and now you’re virtue signaling about being this stupid

Lol

these people deserve to be slaves, they’ve so effectively internalized their masters commands that even after the masters say its okay to pretend to be free now that you’ve sacrificed your body and your autonomy they choose to remain in their cages. Yes I hate these people more than I’ve ever hated people and think they deserve everything they ask for, but it’s also incredibly sad. It’s like watching a whipped and abused dog cry for it’s crate because its forgotten how to live any other way. 

These people who felt the boot briefly lift from their neck and panicked and demand it be put back make me feel like im in some sort of solipsistic nightmare

Our mask mandates are down to stores choice. Most places request you to wear one. They don’t enforce it because they know they can’t beyond their staff.

I went to get groceries at my favorite store yesterday. I walked in without a mask and multiple staff thanked me for challenging the norm.

If the plasma place wants my plasma for the antibodies, I don’t need an experimental vaccine.

It’s nice to smile at people and have them try to smile back and realize they can’t, then take off the masks.

so there’s no more charade about masks being anything more than virtue-signaling devices for the insecure, petty and paranoid.

Nice.

Thinking about making "I'M VACCINATED" masks to sell to these retards. May or May not be laced with anthrax.

we live in the best possible version of cyberpunk

this is how people born after 1995 hack. when i started hacking or “phreaking” in the late 80s i would get in the zone by snorting homemade amphetamines & listening to harsh noise cassettes while banging out code for 24+ hour periods on my atari. mostly i would write text-to-speech features into the operating system so the computer said swear words when you double-click. i remember when html was invented i got so frustrated because theres so many greater than and less than signs and you have to put them around everything. in early january of 2001 i changed Google’s header to a gif of a pissing orangutan and the resulting publicity turned the website into a household name 

never have a been more devastated to scroll over a url and see its deactivated who are you ma'am

what if god was one of us…

when you’re right, you’re right

HE JUST DONT MISS!!!!!!!!!

God I love Alex Jones

American veterans of four different wars from Geary, Oklahoma. WWII, WWI, Spanish-American War and Civil War. 1940s

"This is what we fought for? Oh God we should have listened to Jefferson Davis"

do rangers not actually get animal companions anymore? like, there’s the archetype that gives you a drake is that literally it?

oof

Yeah Rangers really got shafted in 5e. They’re the worst class in the game.

this whole archetype system is cancer anyway i was reading up on it to see if you can get a rust monster as a pet and i think the monstrosity category should be removed and all them parcelled up into animals or demons or whatnot

Honestly just play Pathfinder 1e or 3.5. 5e is super dumbed down, and it loses a lot of nuance and cool mechanics in order to cater to normies whose only exposure to the game is Critical Role. It's hobby gentrification made manifest.

Establishment gonna establish.

Twitter

hell is empty

Absolutely beyond parody. I can only hope he takes the entirety of the congress and white house staff on a celebratory hunting trip.

49% Facebook Employees Don’t Believe It Had Positive Impact On World https://ift.tt/38dyRnY

This just in: 51% of Facebook Employees are delusional, nobody surprised.

https://twitter.com/DecisionDeskHQ/status/1324059542343294976?s=19

“We deleted [bad outcome] and uploaded [good outcome].”

Very fortuitous for the Dems that exclusively biden votes came in for a critical time window. And in the exact quantity needed to put him even with Trump! What a wacky coincidence.

Friendly reminder that Joe Biden is also responsible for the 1994 crime bill that militarized the police, enforced “mandatory minimum” statues, pushed “three strike” policies, and led to mass incarceration.

Joe Biden is directly, personally responsible for a lot of the shit that the modern left rails against, and the Democrats made him the face of their party.

Democrats blame others for their own collosal fuck-ups.

It isn't a fuck-up if it does exactly what they intended.

Joseph might disagree, given that God literally cucked him.