Avatar

The Lair of the Wee Bear

@thebearmuse / thebearmuse.tumblr.com

The Muse of Bears This is a personal blog, so any common themes between posts are strictly dictated by my whims. I tend to leave my opinions in the tags.
Avatar

subtle ways to include foreshadowing

  • one character knowing something offhandedly that they shouldn't, isn't addressed until later
  • the crow rhyme
  • colours!! esp if like, blue is evil in your world and the mc's best friend is always noted to wear blue...betrayal?
  • write with the ending in mind
  • use patterns from tragic past events to warn of the future
  • keep the characters distracted! run it in the background until the grand reveal
  • WEATHER.
  • do some research into Chekhov's gun
  • mention something that the mc dismisses over and over
  • KEEP TRACK OF WHAT YOU PUT. don't leave things hanging.
  • unreliable characters giving information that turn out to be true
  • flowers and names with meanings
  • anything with meanings actually
  • metaphors. if one character describes another as "a real demon" and the other turns out to be the bad guy, you're kind of like...ohhh yeahhh
  • anyways add anything else in the tags
Avatar

(the crow rhyme)

one for sorrow,

two for mirth.

three for a wedding

four for a birth

five for silver

six for gold

seven for a secret never to be told

eight for a wish

nine for a kiss

ten a bird you should never miss

eleven for health

twelve for wealth

thirteen beware

the devil himself.

this is an earnest and honest plea and call in especially to fandoms as i see it happen more - please don't use AI for your transformative works. by this i mean, making audios of actors who play the characters you love saying certain things, making deepfakes of actors or even animated characters' faces. playing with chatGPT to "talk" or RP with a character, or write funny fanfiction. using stable diffusion to make interesting "crossover" AI "art." i KNOW it's just for fun and it is seemingly harmless but it's not. since there is NO regulation and since some stuff is built off of stable diffusion (which uses stolen artwork and data), it is helping to create a huge and dangerous mess. when you use an AI to deepfake actors' voices to make your ship canon or whatever, you help train it so people can use it for deepfake revenge porn. or so companies can replace these actors with AI. when you RP with chatGPT you help train it to do LOTS of things that will be used to harm SO many people. (this doesn't even get into how governments will misuse and hurt people with these technologies) and yes that is not your fault and yes it is not the technology's fault it is the companies and governments that will and already have done things but PLEASE. when you use an AI snapchat or instagram or tiktok filter, when you use an AI image generator "just for fun", when you chat with your character's "bot," you are doing IRREPARABLE harm. please stop.

Avatar

This pride month, remember that straight trans and genderqueer people, straight arospecs, straight acespecs, straight intersex people, and all other straight queer people are valuable members of the queer community, and being straight does not make them any less queer. Straight and queer are not mutually exclusive categories. Stop treating them as such.

I think it's very sexy when a fictional character knows they're doomed but makes the conscious choice to keep trying anyway

op are you defending macbeth right now

Assume I'm doing whatever you think will bother everyone the most

I thought it was about hades

It's about whoever we need it to be about

Coward

can't believe it's 2022 and we still have posts around about not overusing "said" like seriously? Imagine if I made a list of words to use instead of "and." wouldn't that be stupid?

Gail Carson Levine was RIGHT

[ ID: Pictures of several pages from a paperback book. They read:

SAID IS A MAGICAL WORD. Boring maybe, but magical nonetheless. It's magical because it disappears. It becomes invisible.

What I'm about to tell you may differ from what your teachers have told you. Your teachers may ask you to use lots of variants on said instead of said over and over. The reason is probably that they want you to vary your vocabulary and not use the same word repeatedly.

That's often fine advice, but not when it comes to said in stories. Asked is about as good as said if the line of dialogue is a question. Asked also disappears. And so does added, if it's used when it makes sense and not used too much. But you should almost never write, "Where did you put the aardvark?" she queried, or "Don't you hate aardvarks?" he questioned. Query and question call attention to themselves and away from your story. The reader sees the question mark and knows that the character is querying or questioning.

Avoid other noticeable words, like affirm, allege, articulate, assert, asseverate (a word I'd never heard of before started writing this), aver, avow, claim, comment, confabulate, contend, declare, express, hint, mention, observe, opine, pronounce, profess, remark, utter, voice. I don't mean that you shouldn't ever use these perfectly fine words. just mean don't use them as a substitute for said.

Try this: Pull out an old story. Above your substitutes for said, write said. Read your dialogue both ways. Which is better?

There are a few exceptions to this rule. It's okay, even good, to use a said alternative that indicates volume. You can write, "We have to get out of here," Tim whispered, or "We have to get out of here," Gillian shouted (or yelled or screamed or screeched). These verbs are okay because you're giving the reader new information when you use them. But don't make your characters whisper or holler just to avoid using said.

It's also okay to use a substitute for said if you're being funny. Here's an example:

"I despise and detest simple locutions," he asseverated.

"Aw, shut your trap, she growled.

And it's fine to use another word if you can get away with it, if your story simply reads better that way.

Fashions in writing change. If you look at an old classic, you'll see lots of uninvisible speech verbs. I just looked at Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë, which was published in 1847, and I found a place where a main character recommenced rather than said! I also looked at my favorite novel, Pride and Prejudice, by Jane Austen, published in 1817. I discovered that Austen uses cried for said so often that cried becomes invisible.

Take a peek into a few of the books you love, the ones written in the last fifty years. Do you see words like exclaimed or queried or interjected? I don't think you do.

Because these days said is beautiful.

/ End ID. ]

Avatar

David Gaider on procedural content generation and AI in video game development, and what this has looked like at BioWare sometimes. The tweet and following ones say:

"Ah, yes. The dream of procedural content generation. Even BioWare went through several iterations of this: "what if we didn't need every conversation to be bespoke?" Unlimited playtime with dialogue being procedurally created alongside procedural quests!
Each time, the team collectively believed - believed down at their CORE - that this was possible. Just within reach. And each time we discovered that, even when the procedural lines were written by human hands, the end result once they were assembled was... lackluster. Soulless.
Was it the way the lines were assembled? Did we just need more lines? I could easily see a team coming to the conclusion that AI could generate lines specific to the moment as opposed to generic by necessity... an infinite monkeys answer to a content problem, right? Brilliant!
In my opinion, however, the issue wasn't the lines. It was that procedural content generation of quests results in something *shaped* like a quest. It has the beats you need for one, sure, but the end result is no better than your typical "bring me 20 beetle heads" MMO quest.
Is that what a player really wants? Superficial content that covers the bases but goes no further, to keep them playing? I imagine some teams will convince themselves that, no, AI can do better. It can act like a human DM, whipping up deep bespoke narratives on the fly.
And I say such an AI will do exactly as we did: it'll create something *shaped* like a narrative, constructed out of stored pieces it has ready... because that's what it does. That is, however, not going to stop a lot of dev teams from thinking it can do more. And they will fail.
Sure, yes, yes, I can already see someone responding "but the tech is just ~beginning~!" Look, if we ever get to the point where an AI successfully substitutes for actual human intuition and soul, then them making games will be the least of our problems, OK?
Final note: The fact these dev teams will fail doesn't mean they won't TRY. Expect to see it. It's too enticing for them not to, especially in MMO's and similar where they feel players aren't there for deep narrative anyhow. A lot of effort is going to be wasted on this."

the tweets don't mention it but it's known from other articles and interviews with devs/former devs etc that procedural stuff, procedural content and a more procedural world was part of what BioWare was exploring/trying to do with ME:A originally.

[source (<- and link to full tweet thread), article]

Avatar

A friend of mine managed to breed her Saharan sand boas, something which... is extremely rare in the USA, because it's difficult to do and not a lot of people know how in the first place. Almost all Saharans are wild caught, which is not ideal. But! She managed it, on what info she could find, and the eggs have been growing and were SUPPOSED to hatch at LEAST 5 days ago, but the clutch is quite large (9 eggs!) so we think they came out earlier than typical.

Of course, she expected them to be well hatched already, and had made plans to be out of town with her family today and tomorrow, so this morning was the day they decided to Start Hatching. So, I'm over here babyssssssitting these extremely precious little babies.

Avatar

look at these idiots

Avatar

Snabysitting is going. I hope it's going well, but neither of us have a reference for this species. But one of the babies is getting out further, and I'm starting to see shapes inside, and colors in some of the unopened ones. They've always had a really fragile, unusual texture to them, but it's really starting to show. So cool.

Avatar

So what it seems like is that post-pip, they're exhausted and just sit there with their faces hanging out to some degree, then they pull back into the egg for a long time once they've recovered from pipping, and reposition themselves. And now I'm seeing the first to pip is on its way out, hopefully for real.

And it has a face on its face

Avatar

I forgot to update, but I AM checking every 2 hours so here's 4 hours ago when hatchling 4 burst forth:

And 2 hours ago at the Upside Down Idiot club's summoning circle:

And just now:

I guess they're just vibing and absorbing yolks and growing some more now that their lungs are working. I don't know why they keep turning upside down but the fact that they all keep doing it suggests it's probably normal. Repositioning themselves as they grow or something.

What's fascinating, and the reason you can't really touch them/move them, is that the membranes are SO thin you can actually see the snakes through eggs. Like I don't know how well it comes through in the photos but I can see their skin patterns through the shells, even without a candling flashlight. I can see the shapes of the snakes in there because the membranes are so thin and soft. It's really cool!!

Avatar

Snoot #5 has appeared outside the egg!

Avatar

Pip #1 decided the original pip was not good enough, and crashed out the opposite side of the egg, finally thinking of exiting entirely, 26 hours after first being found!

Avatar

Okay last update from me, I will be waiting for updates from my friend now as we trade off. You can also find her under Stygian Exotics online on Facebook and Instagram and stuff if you want to keep track of them (or her other snakes and projects) beyond today!

The first baby is fully hatched, and immediately buried himself under the other eggs, so I was unable to retrieve him. But, he's safe in there until the others have hatched. The major concern was that he would try to escape the container and get loose in the incubator, but he appears completely disinterested in that.

Avatar

From my friend, the update this morning is:

8 of the 9 eggs made it. The 9th egg is unlikely to hatch, but 8 big, healthy CBB babies from these guys is a GREAT clutch.

Someone on TikTok said that bitches with anxiety love the enemies to lovers trope because the idea of having someone see all of our negative traits first and then still fall in love with us is really comforting since we worry that if someone sees our negative traits after they fall in love, they’ll leave us.

It’s me, I’m bitches.

Let’s talk about what demisexuality is not.

First off: what is demisexuality? We have to establish what it is to talk about what it isn’t.

  • ‘demisexuality’ describes not experiencing sexual attraction until a close bond is formed. This doesn’t mean demis are attracted to everyone we bond with, and we can have differing desires towards sex. Demisexuals may or may not be demiromantic — they’re not one and the same.
  • While demisexuals can also be demiromantic, this isn’t true as a rule. Just like being asexual doesn’t necessarily mean you’re aromantic. It’s possible to be both, nothing wrong with that — but they’re not inherently synonymous.
  • *For some people who are aroace, include demi aroaces, their sexual and romantic orientations are deeply intertwined and there isn’t a big difference between the two. Other people use the split attraction model, which recognizes a difference in sexual and romantic orientations.

Many people think that “everyone is demisexual” because they read the definition and say “oh, that’s just being normal”. They’re confusing not experiencing sexual at ALL with waiting until a relationship is serious to have sex.

Demisexuality is a sexual orientation. The thing people confuse it with is a decision regarding sexual behavior that can be made regardless of orientation— the decision to wait to have sex until you’re emotionally close. That decision can be made by anyone, demisexual or not.

Often people read the definition and say “I’m demisexual, I wait to have sex until it’s not just sex. I want emotional fulfillment too.” When it’s explained that demisexuals rarely have sexual attraction and only under certain conditions does it occur, one of two things happens:

  1. they misunderstand and assume that demisexuals are also experiencing sexual attraction without the bond and just not acting on it, or
  2. they begin to understand that there’s a difference between sexual attraction and action.

More often than not it’s the former.

It’s interesting that this misunderstanding happens when demisexuality is described because allosexuals (people who aren’t ace) abstain from sex all the time but still feel sexual attraction. There’s this underlying assumption that everyone experiences sexual attraction.

But… just imagine that feeling of not being attracted and expand it. It’s doubtful that you experience sexual attraction to every person you see is physically attractive. Just expand that and there you go. Or imagine it like not seeing a particular color until you suddenly can.

Demisexuals aren’t all cisgender and heteroromantic. But there’s nothing wrong with demis who are! If ace isn’t enough for you to respect someone is LGBTQIA+, you don’t understand or accept asexuality or the orientations under its spectrum.

Demisexuality is NOT “just being a woman”. Demisexuality also isn’t “the patriarchy convinced young girls not having casual sex was a sexuality”.

There’s so much wrong with both of these, and they tie together, so I put them together here. Not only does this thinking see cis women and feminine people as being inherently “more” asexual, it robs allos and aces alike of bodily autonomy towards sex and sexuality. It bleeds out from conservative Christianity — it’s the same ideas that lead us to abstinence only sex “education” and that women must be sexually available at all times or their husband will cheat to “get his needs met”. Saying that cis women & feminine people are just all demisexual or ace removes the bodily autonomy of those who want sex and those who don’t by assigning a culturally acceptable narrative as more important than lived experience. But sexuality isn’t limited by cisheterosexism.

The truth is there are still a lot of people learning they’re under the asexual umbrella as educators and advocacy groups get education out there, and even in queer spaces asexuality isn’t always accepted, let alone its spectrum. A lot of people don’t even know it’s an option!

In addition, and partially because of, tropes like this, asexuality and everything under it are considered more “feminine”. Sex is seen as a symbol of status and depending on your gender and presentation, that status gets lowered or raised depending on the number of partners had.

Cis men and masculine aces exist, and also have to contend with cultural pressures to “perform” sexually, whether they want to or not. Erasing these experiences doesn’t help further acceptance towards asexuality or just sexuality in general.

And! Cis women and feminine people can have and enjoy casual sex! Others don’t but still experience sexual attraction regularly. Being allosexual isn’t limited to the masculine. Libido can also exist without sexual attraction. Human sexuality is just not as narrow as you think.

That’s where I’ll leave this one. Remember, it’s okay to be demisexual. It’s not okay to dunk on a group of people you didn’t bother to try to understand. Keep an open mind. There’s room at the table for learning, not bigotry.