Avatar

don’t talk to me or my sideblogs ever again

@swirling-vortex-of-fandoms

Julia. XXV
Occasional mcr, stranger things, and always sunny in Philadelphia but mostly just stuff I find funny

when i was younger and stupid and in the (glass) closet i was dating the son of a pharmacologist. this man had made millions developing medications. he was fond of me and privately told me i was too funny and smart to be dating boys.

he also said that it was incredibly unlikely that sexism will ever be resolved in the medical field. that the majority of medications i will ever take - even some of which are "for women" - will not be clinically tested on my body.

the problem, he said, was in getting any human clinical trial approved. to test on a body with a uterus - any body, even elderly patients or those who have been sterilized - was often nigh-impossible, because the concern was that the test patient may, at any point, become pregnant. once/if the patient became pregnant, the study would not be about "the effects of New Medication on the body." instead, the trial would fail - the results would be "the effects of New Medication on a developing fetus/pregnant patient."

it was massively easier, he said, to just test without accounting for a uterus. that's how he phrased it - accounting for a uterus.

at the time, i remember him talking about the ethical implications of testing on a developing fetus; how such testing could theoretically bankrupt a company if a lawsuit was filed. he talked about informed consent and about how long it took for any legislation to be passed about this - that in 1993; the year i was born, it finally became illegal to outright exclude women and minorities from clinical trials.

i remember him shrugging. "that's not to say it doesn't happen," he said. my ears were ringing.

i was thinking about how every time i have been rushed to the ER, the first thing they have asked me is if i am pregnant. when i broke my wrist at 16 years old - despite never having had sex - they made me wait three hours for the test to come back negative before they gave me pain meds. the possibility of a child haunts my health.

how many people have died on the table because they were waiting for the pregnancy test before treatment. how many people have died on the table because they were pregnant, and the only thing we care about is the fetus.

it is hard to explain to other people, but it feels like some kind of strange ghost. our entire lives, we are supposed to "save" our bodies for our future partners. but really we are just saving the body for the future child, aren't we? that hovering future-almost that cartwheels around in a miasma. you can't get your tubes tied, what if you change your mind? think of the child you must have, eventually.

who cares about you and your actual safety. think about what you could be carrying.

Anonymous asked:

i am a heron. i haev a long neck and i pick fish out of the water w/ my beak. if you dont repost this comment on 10 other pages i will fly into your kitchen tonight and make a mess of your pots and pans

wouldnt even notice with the roommate situation i got going on

Avatar

"I hate when the skeletons on decorations aren't anatomically accurate." A Halloween skeleton isn't the same as what's inside you, idiot. It's different. A Halloween skeleton is, like. A guy or something. It's an animal.

If Halloween skeletons had bones like ours instead of hollow bones like that of a bird, they wouldn't be able to play their ribcages like xylophones. You sound so fucking uneducated right now.

Hey maybe you guys should stop writing for the Addams family cause you don't get them at all.

Imagine my girl Morticia saying that shit in any other portrayal? NO? Because she wouldn't.

I really love Jenna Ortega as Wednesday

And when she's given good material to work with I love Catherine Zeta Jones as Morticia

but this show really does not seem to get the dynamic of the Addams Family as a whole like it just does not seem to grasp what their deal is as a family

The problem with Netflix's Wednesday is that one of the main things about the Addams Family is that they are counter cultural. Specifically counter to cishet, white, American, suburban norms.

Part of that is being the opposite of the shitty sitcom family where the wife is a nag, the husband is an idiot, the mother-in-law sucks, and no one seems to like each other very much. The Addamses actually love each other. There's no 'take my wife' bs. If Gomez calls Morticia a battle-axe or the ol' ball and chain he means it to be highly complimentary. There's none of the nonsense like in the pics OP posted. Gomez or Morticia lives with their mother in law (it depends on which version whose mother she is) who is literally a witch (geddit, 'my mother-in-law is such a witch...') and get on great. They genuinely and openly support, love, and care for each other through thick and thin.

But the biggest problem that Netflix's Wednesday has is that to make a really good Addams show rn would mean scrapping the Sabrina the Darksided Witch/boarding school Monster High concept, going back to basics, and having them live next to an upper-middle class, conservative values, MAGA family and letting their differences fuel the plot.

A really good Addams Family show would have Morticia fighting against book bans at the school and having hilarious misunderstandings about what her neighbour means about "Liberal witch hunts." It would celebrate queerness, and gender (and species) non-conformity because the Addamses are queer and gender non-conforming, and not always definitely human (Cousin Itt, for example). You know Fester's gender identity is probably something like 'an abomination.' If one of them gets asked, "What are you?" the answer is a prompt, "An Addams."

They would be fighting for co-ed sports so Wednesday can trounce a boy at fencing, and would find out her chromosomes are just 'spooky' or something.

There'd be an episode about immigration and being targeted by ICE. OFC several Addamses come from somewhere weird and arrived in the USA via broomstick, or tunneling from some underground community of cryptids, or other hilarious misadventure. Gomez would desperately want to be blackbagged and treated like a dangerous animal (cue a major flirting moment between him and Morticia). They would permanently scare ICE out of the town.

Wednesday would fiercely support Landback. Pugsley would get redpilled and learn a lesson real quick. Gomez would get into (and out of) Crypto, and Morticia would have run-ins with MLM 'huns.' They would advocate for freedom of religion. Granny would rally alongside Evangelicals to have religion in school, only to reveal she meant witchcraft. They would support UBI, and be anti-landlord. Easy episode idea: Gomez is a landlord and goes on a spiral about it ("But, Gomez, you love leeches and scum" "Not this kind! Morticia, they've painted everything white, in my name!!!" "No!") and they wind up in a battle with the town because he wants to unburden himself of this shame and the town wants to stop free community-owned housing.

The point is that Netflix isn't going to touch any of that with a ten foot pole. They don't want to; that's way too political for them. Instead, they made this wildly unrelated supernatural teen drama that has nothing to do with the original concept or world that the Addams Family exists in (they're outsiders in the real world, that's the point).

And, worse, Netflix's Wednesday actively goes against the original themes by being vaguely conservative in its values.

Netflix's Wednesday fails the assignment so bad I'd laugh, if it wasn't so disappointing and enraging. Just take a look at what the Mary Sue had to say about the whole "werewolf conversion camp" debacle for a microcosm of the many things wrong with this show.

"It wants to use hot-button topics like conversion therapy and colonization but it doesn’t understand how to work them into the metaphor. In fact, it barely knows how to work with the basic metaphor of “monsters” and how they function in the horror genre in general. In storytelling, the monster or the freak has always been the stand-in for the societal outcast. For the person who can’t be controlled by the dictates of polite society. They are the subtext for the outcast. But Wednesday makes the subtext text by literally splitting the characters into “outcasts” and “normies.” And yet the outcasts, the monsters and freaks who live on the fringe, are also the privileged and elite."

In my opinion, Netflix's Wednesday is wholly unworthy of the Addams name and is an outright blight on the franchise.

…I want a world where this is the version of the show we got. Because that all sounds awesome and like it would make all the right people mad.

The Addams family play has similar problems.

Gomez is portrayed as being sex hungry and not initially accepting it when Morticia doesn't want to fuck after finding out he had been keeping something from her.

Morticia is portrayed as a hypocrite who will throw Gomez out if he keeps secrets, but doesn't expect any consequences if she keeps secrets.

Anonymous asked:

feel free to ignore this but you seem to have a happy relationship and have given advice in the past and i'm not ready to present this to my friends bc they can be kinda biased. i've been seeing this guy casually for a couple months but now things are getting more serious like he calls me his girlfriend, talks about the future, we aren't dating anyone else etc. recently we talked about boundaries and he said one for him is he really can't be with someone long term who has close friendships with men. he says it makes him uneasy bc men tend to want one thing and he would be worried about his girl's safety more than her loyalty. he said he would never have a wife who is super super close friends with a man which wouldn't be a huge problem literally bc all my friends are other girls. is this a red flag or am i bringing my own bias into this? it wouldn't be an issue bc i have no male friends so am i making a problem out of nothing? or is this controlling?

not to be dramatic, but run, don't walk. this dude has issues and they will grow more and more apparent with time. he subscribes to heteronormative gender bullshit and is controlling.

a few things:

  1. not all men want the same thing. they are not mindlessly driven by instinct. i have a lot of male friends and none of them are interested in me sexually or romantically. we're friends due to shared interests and values and complementary personalities.
  2. he is a man. is he saying he also only looks at women as people to have sex with and nothing more? what does that say about you? or about how shallowly he regards your relationship? is a girlfriend or wife just someone to have sex with, or is she an equal partner whose personality, wants, and needs matter?
  3. women and men are not separate species. we are not wildly different by nature. never trust someone who believes people can be simplified or divided along the lines of gender and/or sex. anyone who spouts that shit also believes women are all the same. they harbor scary beliefs about the roles women should fill and have limited compassion for our struggles.
  4. would he be allowed to have female friends? do you really believe he'd let you stop him?
  5. why would this rule stop at friends if he claims all men are sex hungry dogs? what's to stop him from preventing you from being around or talking to male classmates, coworkers, neighbors, relatives, healthcare providers, etc?
  6. you haven't been together for even half a year and he is already trying to control a huge part of your life and isolate you from roughly 50% of the population. that is very concerning.
  7. you don't have male friends now. but you might meet a man down the line who could be a wonderful friend. or, hell, you might have a friend who transitions. are you willing to prevent or end potentially wonderful relationships because your partner is so insecure?
  8. this isn't about your safety. it never will be.
Avatar

btw just wanted to add that not all boundaries need to be respected.

i knew a girl in undergrad who asked queer people not to discuss being queer around her because she was christian and it upset her. she framed that as a boundary. we all ignored it because her boundary was cruel, homophobic, and harmed others.

"you can't form friendships with men" is just control, not a valid boundary.

phan is real, destiel is canon, johnlock are parents, the doctor is gay and mcr are back. you have reached the end point of tumblr thank you for participating and good night