Avatar

The struggles are real, but at least they're sunlit.

@sunlitmcgee / sunlitmcgee.tumblr.com

Hi! Not a minor. He/Him + Ser/Seraph/Seraphs/Seraphimself + Angel/Angelself + Berry/Berries/Berryself + Heart/Hearts/Heartself. Dream SMP/Dungeons and Dragons/Good Omens/The Magnus Archives /Wings of Fire fan, C!Tommy apologist and c!Benchtrio Main. c!Dream apologists/sympathizers please DNI. Dream supporters fuck off. I am a demisexual aromantic queerplatonic whore

PINNED POST THING

image

(beeduo header by @cannosoup !) (transmen header by @sweetpeauserboxes !) (stuffed animal header by @sweetpeauserboxes !)(moomins header by @sweetpeauserboxes !)(benchtrio headers all by @ajdrawsstuff !)(dragon header by @sweetpeauserboxes)(PFP by @flamedoesart​ !)(fanfic head by @infinityuserboxes) (comfort character header by @sweetpeauserboxes)(aro queer header by @aroworlds !)(CC header by @tmmyhug)(tommy DNI banner was also made by tmmyhug)(transmasc swag header by @tyde-pods​)

Hello hello! Welcome to my blog. I plan to post about whatever it is that interests me most at any given moment, as well as the usual tumblr brand of queer awareness and related topics. Because am big gay, big trans, and big Using Whatever Platform I Have Available To Me To Do That Kind Of Thing. But it is mostly fandom stuff here so yeah.

                           Stuff for DNI and other things below the cut

ginger beer. meds. meal. I am so so chill rn. I haven't felt this relaxed since first grade.

i think the problem with bad faith criticism of art in regards to identity politics is that when you point out that a bad faith criticism is based in misogyny, or racism, or homophobia, or whatever, people will always be like "so what, we can't criticize marginalized artists? we're just supposed to think everything they do is perfect?!" when in reality the actual problem is that people respond to white dude artists that make #problematic art with an eyeroll at most, while treating marginalized artists like they're destroying the very fabric of their communities by making non-perfect art

image

If you ever get a message like this, guys, block ‘em and move on. This has been a PSA.

What’s the scam here? Fake link to steal your account? They ask for you to donate to some post?

It doesn’t matter. There are a dozen reasons for people to do this and more spring up every day. Sometimes they want money, sometimes it’s a social engineering thing (making you paranoid so you’ll back them up on some random social issue), sometimes it’s a convoluted publicity scam, sometimes it’s just drama. It’s easier to ID them based on scammer tells than click the link, try to deduce their motive, and work backwards.

Tells to look for

1) “Not following each other”/ has been following you for a suspiciously short time

The majority of messages out of the blue you get should be from mutuals, or at least followers. Sometimes strangers will message you out of the blue – I’ve had people do this to ask questions about my stories or tell me they saw one of my posts on another site, for instance; these might be people who follow your work in other places but don’t want your posts on their dash, or they might want to ask you to clarify something they saw in one of your posts on someone else’s blog – but this is pretty rare, and they’ll tell you straight-up why they’re messaging. They very rarely send links, and if they do they’re exhaustively clear about what the link is, because everyone knows that scammers send random links. If you get a link from a stranger where the description is very vague or obviously designed to induce urgency, like this, it’s bait.

2) “I follow you on a different account”

This is an attempt to make 1) look less suspicious but it does the opposite. Why are you messaging me from this account? Why do you want to hide your identity from me? Again, there ARE some legitimate reasons to do this – I have anon messaging turned off, so anybody who had a good reason to stay anonymous and was desperate enough to contact me might make a dummy account from it. I’ve had baby gays in oppressive environments contact me this way. Abuse victims or people who otherwise need to be very careful about their identities might do this.

However, when they do so, it will be abundantly clear why they are doing it. Usually they’ll straight-up tell you, and it’ll also usually be clear from context. Why would you go anon to tell me I’m getting cancelled? That’s extremely suspicious. That’s scammer behaviour. If you follow me and you see this, either you wouldn’t care enough to tell me, or you’ll let me know you’re not a fresh scam account by identifying yourself.

3) Empty blog

Again, this CAN just be a legitimate person trying to be anon, but it’s a LOT of effort to do so. And even those legit people usually have *some* activity on their sideblog. A fresh blog like this, especially when connected to such a trivial message, screams “dead end phone”; that is, a blank communication base for running a scam that potential victims can’t immediately and easily connect to the scammer and ruin their reputation. Anyone messaging you from an empty blog can be assumed to be a scammer unless it’s immediately and abundantly clear that they have another reason for doing it.

4) “You’re getting cancelled…”

First; no, I’m not. If I were getting cancelled, I would definitely know about it. That’s kind of intrinsic to getting cancelled. It can’t happen secretly.

Second, strangers do not tell you this. A mutual who you have an existing friendship with might give you a heads-up if they see drama about you, but unless you’re a legitimately famous person (like Neil Gaiman or something), random people don’t say this in good faith. If I were getting cancelled and a stranger were going to contact me about it, it would be to ask clarifying questions about the claims being made. (Or hate mail, I guess.) “You’re getting cancelled” here is designed to induce a panic or defensive response, or at the very least curiosity… what could I have possibly said in my remark on that ebay post that could be racist? I just made a silly language joke about being nonbinary! I need to go and see how it was misinterpreted, and defend mysel –

And that’s the trap.

5) “… in the comments of this post”

You can’t get “cancelled” in the comments of a single post. Even if this was actually happening, that’s not what being cancelled is. They just want me to click the link.

I could find out why they wanted me to click the link by clicking the link. Maybe it’s for money, somehow. Maybe it’s a virus. Maybe it’s a bid for popularity, or drama, or social engineering. Maybe they’re just blanket testing people’s susceptibility to clicking random links so they can fish targets for a more labour-intensive scam later on.

This kind of curiosity, too, is a trap. The only winning move is not to click the fucking link. Block and move on.

Avatar

I want more villains who care about their henchmen. I wanna see the bad guy fly into a rage because the hero hurt their very favorite bungling goon and it was nearly his birthday.

Avatar

"how dare you fail me you miserable oafs!!" should be retired. "How DARE they bully my adorable oafs!!!" should be industry standard.

Underlings having to hold back their dark lord like an overprotective parent because they don't really want a famous hero to get outright murdered just on their behalf.

Avatar

I had to draw something

I don’t want to go ‘realism in fiction’ bc we all know how much of a dogwhistle that can be. But it really always bothers me that this isn’t the norm. Like, how the fuck do all these dark lords and evil empresses and what not keep any minions or lieutenants or what not around?

Literally, what is stopping them from just walking to Hero and going ‘I surrender, get me the hell away from this asshole!’ when most Heros will immediately turn them in a redemption story and all.

Like, how they hell do the villains keep anyone working for them without a solid health plan, 401K, and recreational facilities? Isn’t that the minimum. Has no one actually read Machiavelli?

Avatar

Indeed; one of my least favorite tropes is the whole "I don't need you anymore" bit, where a villain backstabs a fellow villain working beneath them, which inevitably ends up with the betrayed villain aiding the heroes in order to spite the big bad.

Luckily, I can just draw something that cuts that bullshit out!

it’s shitty that someone was harassed that’s awful don’t harass people over ao3 elections however. sharing that someone worked for the fucking party trying to actively genocide people isn’t spreading misinfo it’s public and open info? like yeah she wasn’t personally against equal rights afaik but ur still taking a deal with the fucking devil and people are well within their rights to not trust someone who does that. fuck harassment but it’s reasonable people would be incredibly concerned about a politician working with a rotten group trying to join their own. it’s not a misinfo campaign to speak about that it’s literally basic confirmed facts that should be shared bc they’re important.

plus, from the brief look over of the answers she provided to some of the questions that are public on the otw's site, a lot of her answers to stuff like "so how will you go about helping with issues of harassment and mishandling of abuse within the org" were roughly to the effect of "well. i'm New to this, but I don't really think that stuff is super important. if end otw racism wants to change things, they can run and stop interrupting our meetings" so y'know. even ignoring her connections to the Literal Fascism Party, she just doesn't seem very compete for this sort of position

example:

^^^yeah

hey @staff @humans ! why the fuck are you flagging trans people's facial selfies as mature when i just had to block 7 porn blogs with explicit cis heterosexual penis and vag on their posts from interacting with my rp blogs ^_^ what's up with that?

reiterating because maybe we weren't clear the first time

reddit refugees, reblog art, don't repost it

if you really like someone's art, reblog it. you can do that by clicking the little looping arrows at the bottom of the post. this will make it so the art appears on your blog and shows up to your followers, but the op is still credited and given notes.

reposting does not give credit. and no, saying "artist is ___" as the caption doesn't count, unless you have permission given directly by the artist.

if you have a funny or pretty image on your phone that you saved from reddit, don't post it here on tumblr, because 99% of the time it came from tumblr. use a reverse image search to try and find the original tumblr post, and reblog that.

taking that extra five minutes to find the original post of an artist you love will absolutely brighten their day and make the entire world a better place.

please, I'm begging you. reblog art. don't repost it.

#that is the most venomous native lizard in north america

so i was compelled to look that up and

A) the most venomous lizard in north america is called the Gila Monster

B) I’m no expert obviously but that boy there sure looks like a Gila Monster

C) from the Gila Monster wikipedia article, here is the funniest doctor that ever lived:

"I have never been called to attend a case of Gila monster bite, and I don't want to be. I think a man who is fool enough to get bitten by a Gila monster ought to die. The creature is so sluggish and slow of movement that the victim of its bite is compelled to help largely in order to get bitten."

–Dr. Ward, Arizona Graphic, September 23, 1899

I feel like there's a necessary counterpoint to the "torment nexus" problem, namely that science fiction itself isn't free from the political and cultural biases of its creators or the capitalist incentive structure of media production. Like, every time there's an article about research into cloning extinct species, there are a bunch of comments to the effect that "There's an entire series of movies explaining why that's a bad idea." And that's true: there's an entire series of blockbuster monster movies (that very much make their money off of the spectacle of prehistoric monsters running amok), based on a thriller novel written by a reactionary, that hold that if you develop this technology, you will get the plot of a monster movie.

Like, the Cybermen were partially inspired by Kit Pedler getting squicked-out by the then-new technologies of pacemakers and organ transplantation. It's not a good argument.

Avatar

absolutely simmering with rage cause I was gonna make this exact post. it woulda been funny too. it woulda been like “I like the torment nexus meme as much as the next guy but like, a guy wrote a whole entire book about how you shouldn’t put dinosaurs in a zoo. sometimes it’s the sci-fi writers who are wrong” and it woulda gotten 50-60 notes. maybe even reposted to reddit. but I didn’t. I let the idea roll around in my head too long, and the opportunity passed me by. now I sit here, nary a note to my name, watching someone else live the dream that could have been mine. let my tragedy be to you a cautionary tale. sieze the day, my friends. there is no greater a curse than a life unlived. i love you.

the concept of a freakshow never fully went away. nowadays people collect posts/screenshots of disabled/mentally ill people literally just Existing Online and put them on their accounts with the intention of displaying them for people to hurl abuse towards. And they think that this is a Normal and Moral way to behave and carry themselves.

Avatar

Also? TLC shows are often freakshows rebranded to be inspoporn or "these are obviously freaks but we're HELPING them". I'm a literal bearded woman and had a TLC show producer reach out to try and make a show about me in 2018. See also: British tabloids and reality shows. They're even more aggressively obvious that they're into freaks. Freakshows are everywhere in modern media.

I've been formulating a paper on this. As someone who consistently falls within a couple of the traditional categories of person who would have almost certainly been employed by a freakshow (born female but can grow a luscious beard and also fat as hell, thanks pcos.) The thing is we never solved the problem of how people treated us because we held none of the power. Instead "polite society" decided it wasn't nice to keep us in cages and gawk at us with open horror.

The thing I would be interesting in studying is "how much of a change was there?" For example, we know there are few if any big circuses or carnivals anymore, and even fewer freakshows. At least things marketed as freakshows. In fact we see a steady decline of them throughout the 1900s. So why, in the mid 2000s and early 2010s did we start getting a serious uptick of media that allowed people to gawk at us in untold numbers? My 600 pound life(2012), little people big world(2006), the biggest loser (2004, nbc show but still fits in the category) my giant life(2015), and my strange addiction(2010), are just flagship examples of these type of exploitative shows that perform the same function as freak shows.

This doesn't even begin to touch on tabloid media which, as previously stated by @dabwax, continues to not only throw us traditional freaks under the bus but have since roped in various flavours of lgbt in there as well. Can you look at the way that trans people are treated by media and tell me that it isn't heavily influenced if not totally the point to gawk, point, laugh, and pity in the same way?

So what changed? What allowed these attitudes towards us to become popular again? I have my own theories. A sharp rise in conservatism in culture after 9/11 is definitely a cause. When you're in an era that prioritizes in-groups and out-groups the first means of determining and enforcing those groups is visually. "Any deviance, whether intentional or not, can and should be punished as a means of protection" never stays within the target group. Was it the proliferation of other forms of traditional trash reality TV? Producers saw real life drama and thought "Hey you know what would get even more views?"

The sad part is that even with a patient zero event, it would still rely on a population that still has an interest in seeing that type of media. If they had aired these shows and they had done poorly they would have floundered on season one and we could have chalked them up to a tacky studio exec. But they didn't, some of them are even still aired. So the sad part is, things really didn't change, at least not by much, and I worry that they never will.

mutuals to lay on the living room floor with during a rainstorm

I hate driving because you have to do everything perfectly as fast as possible or everyone around you will announce their displeasure with airhorns

oh and if you mess up you die and kill a bunch of people at the same time

LITERALLY like disarming a bomb except there’s a peanut gallery watching you and they’ve each got an airhorn and also another bomb