Avatar

Untitled

@steelcockandballrun

Avatar

This is Sarah Grimké.

She was born to a rich plantation family in the American South during the time of slavery. She owned a slave, Hetty, a girl her parents gave her when she was a child. She was absolutely the sort of person whose racism you could justify as being ‘of her time’ and ‘just the way she was raised’.

And she cited the injustices she saw growing up on the plantation as the motivation for her becoming an abolitionist as an adult.

When she was a kid, she tried to give bible lessons to the slaves on her Dad’s plantation, and taught her own slave to read and write. As an adult, she and her sister campaigned for the end of slavery. When she found out that one of her brothers had raped one of his own slaves and gotten her pregnant three times, she welcomed her nephews into the family and paid for education for the two that wanted it.

This was a woman who was raised in a culture of slavery, looked around her as a child and said “hey, wait a minute, we’re all assholes!” and spent the rest of her life trying to put things right.

It absolutely was a choice.

This is something I’ve been forced to learn in the past two years. The world around me is turning into something I was raised to believe could only happen in history books, or maybe in other parts of the world that sort of belonged in history books.

The more I see this happening–and the more I learn about the past and how hard people did fight to stop Hitler from initially rising to power, or to point out the humanity of slaves–the more apparent it becomes that we have always had these choices, and they’ve always been the same.

And we’re always going to have genuinely appealing opportunities to make the worst possible choices again, no matter how much more modern the world appears.

Avatar
katrinageist

George Washington owned slaves right? Most of the founding fathers did, and in grade school, to smooth over that abuse of humanity by an American hero, we as children were told “Yes, George Washington did own slaves but he freed them when he died.” And you infer that he didn’t like slavery but it was an economic necessity.

And then you’re in your mid twenties watching a food show on Netflix and you learn that because Pennsylvania was a Quaker colony, they led the nation in emancipation and if an enslaved person was in Philadelphia for more than six months, they automatically became freed. And the young nation’s early capital was in Philadelphia, where Washington brought his household of enslaved people with him. And he took them back to Virginia every five months for a time so as to start that clock over and keep them enslaved.

There’s a trend with historians to want so badly to maintain the prestige of George Washington and an exceptional and morally pristine figure. And true, there are many instances in his writing where he sounds like his opinion on slavery as an institution is turning and that he knew slavery was wrong. But his actions. He literally had to do absolutely nothing to free his household staff, and took great pains to keep them enslaved.

It’s important to remember that too. That there were people in positions of enormous power, who know what they’re doing is wrong, and choose to do it anyway.

Do not let anyone tell you his teeth were made of wood.

Avatar
“Many people seem to think it foolish, even superstitious, to believe that the world could still change for the better. And it is true that in winter it is sometimes so bitingly cold that one is tempted to say, ‘What do I care if there is a summer; its warmth is no help to me now.’ Yes, evil often seems to surpass good. But then, in spite of us, and without our permission, there comes at last an end to the bitter frosts. One morning the wind turns, and there is a thaw. And so I must still have hope.”

— Vincent Van Gogh

Avatar

I promise you that freight rail is far more important than you think. It is the lifeblood of all industry in America. All raw materials and the ingredients to make them run on America's shrinking rail network. I mean everything from refined petroleum products (ALL OF THEM- gasoline, plastic pellets, etc.) to sheet steel to grain, all of it is moved from industry to industry on freight trains. Right now, this essential service is under the thumb of wall street. It is a noose both around the neck of the workers who keep it running and the rest of us who rely on it. Corporate America is constantly cutting costs to maximize profits- that means less maintenance, fewer crews, and a greater burden on everyone else. That's why there was a narrowly-averted rail strike, and that's why an entire train was derailed in one of the greatest environmental disasters in American history.

Avatar
agbpaints

The crazy thing to me is that destroying the rail strike and constantly cutting costs in the name of profit is such a 'cut off your nose to spite your face' move. Labor is as squeezed as it can be squoze, most of the people currently trapped in the trains are gonna be retiring out in a few years, and as scary as the specter of automation is for workers it's clear that the railroads won't even make the capital improvements necessary to actually make it work. If the railroads run out of men and women willing to drive the trains the military doesn't have a corps of rail soldiers large enough to do what they did with the ATC strike, there aren't enough trucks in the country to handle the loads the railroads carry, and if there were would you like the specter of that many hazmat trucks anywhere near your town with their rate of accidents? Remember, East Palestine was *four* tankers and it's spreading fallout for a hundred miles, think of what just one would do in even a relatively small metro area.

We're a few years away from the very real possibility of freight rail completely failing in America with a long lead up of disasters like this and corporate America and the lib politicians that work for them are more willing to burn with their precinct than they are even attempt to meet labor's demands and provide basic quality of life and safety. No trains doesn't mean 'supply chain shortages' like we saw with toilet paper or food runs or some electronics during the height of the pandemic; it means power plants turn off because they didn't get their unit train of coal, basic food stops showing up in supermarkets becuase no grain is getting sent to the flour mills, and your water is no longer potable because your city didn't recieve its chlorine shipment for water purification (that it maybe can't use anyway because again, no trains has a decent chance of meaning no power depending on what your grid is powered by). It means you and all your friends and neighbors are starving and cold and it's 100% the government's fault for simply not stepping aside when they could've. These are the sort of conditions that lead to revolutions and for now the US establishment is willing to kick the can down this road because they're too cheap to force the freight carriers to give their employees sick days and force them to run trains at a safe length. This is a death cult

I highly recommend the Well There's Your Problem episode on the US freight rail industry if you want a good overview of how fucking stupid rail bosses are.

Never mind the last capitalist selling you the rope to hang him. He's hanging himself because a management magazine told him it'd let him spend less on shoes.