Avatar

Hutspot

@small-potato-of-defiance

“Fear is a strange soil. It grows obedience like corn, which grow in straight lines to make weeding easier. But sometimes it grows the potatoes of defiance, which flourish underground.” ― Terry Pratchett, Small Gods

Medievalists of Tumblr: what inaccuracies annoy you the most in movies set in the Middle Ages?

Mine is probably the ‘everyone was constantly caked in mud and only wore grey and brown’ aesthetic.

Same. Also the idea that “women were property so they did nothing but sew and have babies and the time was inherently backwards and violent”

the complete absence of christianity from pop culture perceptions of the medieval period really bugs me (or it being relegated to the fringes and a few monks somewhere)

like… this was a major part of most people’s daily lives even if it didn’t necessarily look like christianity as we know it. also medieval theology is fucking wild! where are all the debates about cannibal babies in pop culture medieval stuff? WHERE is the twelfth century werewolf renaissance? the fuckign infancy gospels?? give me weird medieval theology you cowards

A lot of them had already been mentioned, so may I add

“The dishes were only bland soups and maybe some moldy bread”

I’m studying English language and literature, not History, but like… Pork vs Pig… Deer vs Venison… Cow vs Beef… May give you the idea THEY FUCKING ATE MEAT AT LEAST GODDAMIT

And not even like we do

Where’s the feast with venison? The ridiculous amount of salmon and other fishes? The little gardens full of spices? Or the trade of exotic foods? Slaughtering season was celebrated in some places not that much ago (like… I saw one when little), why not portray one?

And more importantly

WHERE’S THE CHICKEN WITH HELMET???

GIVE ME CHICKEN WITH HELMET OR GIVE ME DEATH

Yeah, and for better or for worse they were much less picky about which animals they ate than we are. Porpoise, anyone?

Medieval people loved their spices; The Forme of Cury has a lot of flavours I’d associate more with Indian food than anything else. Even if you weren’t a wealthy seasoning-loving king like Richard II, you could still have garlic, onions, and herbs.

Also please link me a picture of the chicken with helmet if you can, I need to see this.

Here it is

Here’s a link with more info. Apparently the dish is called Singing Chicken… But that’s a chicken with a helmet

This is the best thing I’ve ever seen.

Avatar

Hollywood has a tendency to portray the past as “just like today, minus whatever of today’s things we know they didn’t have.” There’s no concept that the past had things that today doesn’t.

The idea that people used spices to cover spoiled meat is similarly stupid and utterly infuriating.

And yes, the gaping absence of religion from depictions of the Middle Ages is jarring.

Avatar

All of this, but mostly that they existed in a sepia toned world with no color, pattern, or texture.

Going off the colors of textiles, the assumption that their textiles were always crude and rough compared to today’s. Think of the twills and brocades! The cloth of gold! The silks, and the wool so gauzy you could see through it! The soft wool clothing! The quality and variety of fabric we have available has plummetted since the industrial revolution.

beyond conventional spices the medieval cook and especially the resourceful housewife would have been exploiting herbs by the fistfull on a level we today cannot comprehend, like we dont even know what some of the names of herbs they used even mean anymore and they grew them like suburban homeowners today grow ugly border hedges. whatever soups they had access to had a decent chance of being something that would be 100% locally grown and every bit as flavorful as any regonal dish today withiout having to resort to saying ‘well they could possibly have been eating curry’ instead of giving them a flavor identity of their own. just because ‘spice’ isnt readily available dont assume ‘flavor’ is out of reach, the aromatics they used would be on par with the modern french concept of mirepoix but, moving past the kitchen the two things that irk me are that everyone toiled miserably and everything was grey stone, rudely carved buildings, shoddy construction unadorned well yeah, if you went to a decrepit ruin thats been abandoned for centuries it would look like that, but not when people lived there! you see the shows and movies and sweet baby cheese the kings residence looks like a dank basement and sometimes he doesnt even have a change of clothes when castles were in use they were prominent displays of power and wealth, whitewashed so that even small amounts of light reflected well inside them so that they illuminated well, paintings and murals in a riot of colors and displaying personal tastes, tapestries that may be the local lords wife, aunt, or grandmothers gift to them as tappestry making was a popular hobby at court where women gathered to gossip and giggle while making vibrantly colored decorations that are usually dismissed because the only ones that survive had endured about 500 years of sun damage, smoke damage, and uncertain cleaning history

that clearly showed the people of the time valued color, had style, and only occasionally made horses look like a dog made out of play-doh. even people who didnt live in a castle still had access to paint to liven up the plaster walls of their homes, brightly dyed fabrics and flowers were as available to them as and they sang, constantly. what we assume was a life of toiling in the mud from dusk till dawn the whole year was typically a relaxed paced life of 10 hour a night sleep in a comfortable bed where work didnt start untill you had your flagon of ale and a song with your buddies as you walked to the field, you sang as you worked, took three ale breaks from work while singing, and then you sang as you walked to the tavern so you could sing while you played nine mens morris or cheated at mancala because you thought the miller was too soused to notice. we barely know any of the songs they sang and humanity is less for it, a scant handfull of them do remain and its just beautiful to hear what a table of tavern patrons would break into song about to prove they werent too drunk for another round song and story were all day every day, theres a reason the most well known middle english text was canterbury tales- whose narrative was that a selection of travelers on the way to the same location had an ongoing bar-bet about who could tell the better story, asking bartenders to judge the complexity of these stories, all of which were absolutely valid as just shit you would say to another drunk in a tavern, would give modern soap operas a swift kick in the pants and its sad that it takes a historian to tell you just how crass and lowbrow humor they were on a similar vein to how so many people somehow forgot that shakespear was lowbrow humor for the commoner and not somehow too sophisticated for rubes it wasnt just bards who would own an instrument, instruments are wood, leather, string, bone/horn, or even clay… those are all commonly available and affordable if not straight up FREE items to someone in the medieval world so a hefty chunk of the population would have an instrument and know how to use it, anything from a wood flute to a simple drum to an ocarina. many designs were even specifically for travel so you could always have it at the ready

how about this- in all the versions of robin hood i have -EVER- seen the most historically accurate any of them got was the scene in kevin costner ‘king of theves’ where friar tuck was singing to himself while on the road ‘women wine and whoring’. not just because its one of the only times in any medieval period movie ive seen someone singing to pass the time in the mind-numbing hours of traveling before the invention of the car radio, but ALSO because they based the tune he sings off the classic ‘ Bache Benne Venies’, the oldest known drinking song we still know the words and tune of and let me tell you that song slaps talk to me about historical accuracy in movies and ill tell you that tolkein writing hobbit songs for walking, drinking, or describing what an elephant was was more historically accurate then all of GOT passed through a sieve to collect every grain of stray element of medievalness gaily dressed hobbits full of pie, sitting in a well decorated room full of beautiful hand carved furniture, on their fifth ale, and singing about the man in the moon getting shitfaced is about ten times historically accurate as most anything else i can think of if you ignored the historical accuracy of them being hobbits

To be clear, when I say ‘like Indian food’, I’m not generalising or trying to deny them their own flavour profile, I’m talking about how Forme of Cury uses things like cardamom, ginger, and pepper that I’ve also had in curry or kheer. I’m just comparing it to the closest thing I’ve eaten, not saying the two are the same. My voice teacher did once make me a medieval French bean dish with duck and smoked bacon, and it was excellent.

But yeah, I know that some people get exasperated by the number of songs that Tolkien has in his books, but I really think it completes the world. It makes it feel fleshed out and more enjoyable and individual in its own right but also ties it to history. Singing is such an accessible pastime and I really don’t think people in fantasy do enough of it. (And as a bonus, Tolkien also gives us some Middle-earth lore in his lyrics. Which is great for the reader and also reflects how important an oral information-sharing tradition is within the world itself.)

I will say that even though I’m not a fan of many of the creative choices made in GoT, I can understand GRRM making his world in ASoIaF a bleaker place than is realistic because part of the whole thing of low fantasy is The World Is Shitty. I’ve heard people say that Dunk and Egg is a less depressing story and it’s more of just a fun knight adventure. I’d like to read it. I definitely enjoyed ASoIaF, but it’s just so heavy sometimes. As for GoT, I never finished it.

Ok so I cannot speak to the accuracy of everything here, but let me tell you a little bit about textiles because (obviously this is news to everyone) I Love Them.

I studied late antique textiles in undergrad. Late antiquity is a weird period with multiple different scholarly definitions, but the gist is that it’s the transition period between the ancient and medieval worlds. Christianity was a thing, but people were also still heavily influenced by older stories/mythologies/religions (the vast majority of textiles that survive from this period come from Egypt because of the climate, so in this case it’s Greek and Roman traditions that still hold influence).

Anyway. The textiles from this weird nebulous period of history are straight-up gorgeous, and not just to a nerd of my particular type. Take a look at Dumbarton Oaks or the Met’s collections and come tell me that ancient/medieval hand-woven textiles were all rough and poorly made. And you know why people spent so many hours making these beautiful things painstakingly by hand? (Every single step of the process, by the way - shearing, carding, spinning, dying, all before you get to the actual weaving. This stuff was incredibly skilled, intensive labor.) They did it because textiles were incredibly important. We don’t think much of them now that they can be mass-produced, but there was a whole Thing with the Virgin Mary spinning and metaphors about her weaving Christ on a loom, and textiles were used for protective magic, and they were part of everything important in people’s lives.

There were dyes that were prohibitively expensive, yes - Tyrian purple is literally still so expensive that we couldn’t buy a big enough sample to test our actual antique textiles against effectively. In the Byzantine Empire, it was controlled exclusively by the imperial family - hence the whole royal purple thing. But guess what? There are so many purple textiles, because people used other things! Madder and indigo! Both affordable! Mix them together and you get a very pretty color. Change up the mordants you use to seal the dyes and you can get a whole range of different colors out of one plant!

And people took these things and they wove them into literal artwork and wore it around on their clothes. They had hangings on their walls for decoration, sure (and also insulation and noise control), but they also had curtains! Textiles separated rooms the way wooden doors do now! The reason I have a weird thing for liminal spaces is because textiles were associated with them, and they were given power. The hanging in your doorway could protect your home from misfortune. Protective symbols around the neck and sleeves of your tunic could keep you from getting ill. And all of these things were pretty and colorful and painstakingly crafted by laypeople and professionals alike, and they were everywhere.

Basically, the ancient and medieval worlds were alive and full of color and magic. Not gray stone and plain cloth and misery.

And also textiles are important and you should love them.

ALSO this is what Roman socks looked like, and aren’t they adorable!

(This particular one is a child’s sock and it’s from the Royal Ontario Museum. A lot of other examples are red, possibly because red was a protective color - it’s also more common in surviving children’s items, likely because of high infant mortality and a need for extra protection for kids. Red was also common as a border color around sleeves and necklines and such - this is the liminal spaces thing I was squealing about!)

Avatar

Africans, Europeans, Middle Easterners, Native Americans, Asians and so on, and this is just me talking about the slavery that went on during the only period in history in which you people seem to care about slavery.

Yes, Europeans had slaves, but they didn't run into the Congo with nets, they bought them from local African kingdoms, Dahomey, Kanem Bornu, Kingdom of Allada, Aro Confederacy, Ashanti Empire, Songhai Empire and the Mali Empire to name a few.

These African nations grew fat and opulent on money gained from "slaving," however they are never critiqued, never condemned by your side, but those, like the British, who put a stop to the slave trade in the west, are condemned and anyone who speaks out against this blatant racist bias, is condemned as a nazi or white supremacist, as you and the one you reblogged from have done.

No, instead people who believe as you do make movies glorifying the worst slavers in Africa, such as when Hollywood decided to make "the Woman King," a movie glorifying the Dahomey slavers.

Let's read what the Late King of Dahomey said when the British ended the slave trade, king Ghezo said; "The slave trade is the ruling principle of my people. It is the source and the glory of their wealth…the mother lulls the child to sleep with notes of triumph over an enemy reduced to slavery." Coincidentally he was played by John Boyega in the film, despite having been long dead by the time the film is meant to take place.

Oh, then we have the Indian Ocean slave trade which took Africans from east Africa, mainly the Christian kingdom of Ethiopia, and traded them to areas of India and Asia, then we have the Arab slave trade which took slaves from east Africa, North Africa, Europe, India and Asia, btw this was all happening at the same time as the Trans Atlantic, however you won't find slave descendants in these areas, why?

They castrated male slaves prior to selling them.

An even better fact is this, the Arab and Asian slave trade of Africans and other races is still going on today, it hasn't stopped, and today more than 30 million people are slaves globally, but that's a conservative estimate, it could be far higher.

In fact, let's use this very liberal estimate map from the global slavery index;

And would you look at that, you're so preoccupied with condemning an entire race for something we willingly ended hundreds of years ago, while ignoring the ongoing slavery around the world, oh, but you can't actually do anything about that so you'd prefer to virtue signal online rather than campaign to end slavery globally, after all one is easy and gives you immediate gratification by your online circlejerk while the other you may never see the end result of.

Personally I choose the latter, why?

Blessed are those who plant trees knowing that they shall never sit in the shade of their foliage.

Go you want to birth an Eldridge horror? This is how you birth an Eldridge horror

I want to know how they decided that they hate life on earth

I mean, who doesn’t

The “jellyfish that have returned” are the offspring of the ones sent up; they “hate life on Earth” because they were born into a world without gravity - no direction, different kinds of pressure, so when they return they have trouble adapting and (according to the Read More in the source) “Jellyfish babies, at least, have to deal with massive vertigo on Earth after spending their first few days in space,” which you can tell because you can measure how disoriented a jellyfish is compared with norma behavior. TL;DR your cthulu is an infant with a migraine

I have SO MANY questions, re:the jellyfish space habitat.

I mean I guess it’s probably just an airtight aquarium on board the ISS, but I read it the first several times as the jellyfish were just floating in open space.

tbh when I read “NASA has been launching jellyfish into space for years” my initial mental image was just NASA with a giant slingshot flinging jellyfish after jellyfish into the void 

Obsessed with this photo. How the fuck did he end up everywhere except ithaca

Poseidon: if this guy thinks gouging my son's eye out is funny then I'm about to be real hilarious

This reminds me of this nightmare that I had once that my flight from Winnipeg to Toronto was routed through Calgary, Honolulu and Singapore

Hi Mr. Gaiman! A question suddenly popped into my mind, and it's not making me sleep at all! In the Good Omens TV show, you added the final twist about the bodyswap. But is it really a bodyswap? How come when they shake hands to swap back, we see an external change? If the outward apparence is the one that changes, wouldn't that indicate that Aziraphale simply took Crowley's appearance, and Crowley took Aziraphale's? Because if Crowley and Aziraphale truly swapped bodies, the real change would be just internal and not visible to the eye, so swapping back wouldn't be truly visible. Does this make sense? Am I overthinking stuff? (I probably am)

Avatar

It wasn't a body swap. It was an appearance swap.

Avatar

I always thought it was more of a corporation swapping/mutual borrowing, like taking off a glove and giving it to the other to put on because they don't change their positions on the bench. Aziraphale as Crowley sits on the right and after the swap, he is still on the right (same with Crowley on the left obviously). If they had switched from one corporation to the other, he would have sat on the left, in Crowley's place, and moved to his body on the right (and the effect wouldn't have looked as cool on the screen). But if they are only changing their appearance, why do they need to hold hands at all?

Aziraphale literally said "swap back, then" so what did they swap?

Their appearances. (That's why I said above that it was an appearance swap.)

Why do they need to hold hands? Because it's more than an illusion, because it needed to fool angels and demons who aren't fooled easily. Big miracle energy. And anyway, they like holding hands.

Pretty amazing, considering how only non-corporial 'spirits' can enter Heaven (or Hell). Isn't that why Aziraphale has to hitch a ride in Madame Tracy's body? So how does one "take on the appearance" of another while being a 'naked' spirit, exactly?

Oh, never mind.. We all know that this whole shoddely written 'execution' bit, as well as the new archangel characters were solely inserted to 'show that Heaven is Just as Bad as Hell' and "there is no Good and Evil".

Lord, preserve me from Postmodernists....

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

“ communist governments have always failed after killing millions of people”

The only communist government ever formed was Lenin’s Russia, which didn’t fail and killed no one.

Every other “communist” government was communist in name only and didn’t adhere to Marxist theory at all

Lenin started out by leading a violent coup. By which I mean he ordered his followers to attempt several violent coups, while he hid in safety far away from the killing, and the first few failed badly but eventually one managed to overthrow the Provisional Government.

The first thing that the Bolsheviks did was to try to legitimize themselves in the eyes of the people by moving forward with an election that the previous government had scheduled, confident that since The People loved them so much they would easily win the election, and from then on they could pretend to be legitimately elected instead of violent conquerors. They ended up with barely a quarter of the vote. So, naturally, Lenin declared that the election results couldn't possibly represent the true Will of The People and anybody who said otherwise must be a dangerous Counter-Revolutionary. This kinda sets the tone for everything that followed.

Then several other socialist parties, and many people within the Bolsheviks themselves, called for the creation of a coalition government to represent all the various interests and needs of the Russian people. Lenin rejected this and forcibly disbanded all other political groups to form a One Party State.

From there, major policies from Lenin include but are not limited to:

  • all land seized, to become government property
  • any media outlets which criticize the government were closed; this was initially presented as a temporary measure only needed in the earliest stages of the revolution, but remained in place through Lenin's death seven years later… and then the entire rest of the existence of the Soviet Union… and to a large extent to this day
  • abolished the legal system, replacing it with Revolutionary Tribunals which were instructed to ignore existing laws and instead decide people's fates based on a "socialist sense of justice" and the "revolutionary conscience". Within a few months this transitioned into the Red Terror, a campaign of executions killing at least 100,000 (in an official capacity, on top of all the local witch hunts and grudges), primarily targeting anybody suspected of opposing Lenin's rule, but also "social undesirables" such as prostitutes
  • called for the workers of each enterprise to elect their own local committees to monitor and manage their productivity… but then made those committees subservient to the trade unions, which in turn were made subservient to the Supreme Council of the National Economy, which sacrificed the interests of the workers and local economies in favor of the creation of a grand "centralized economic plan"
  • mandated that every citizen from the age of 16 to 50 must work full time
  • "the state is an institution built up for the sake of exercising violence. Previously, this violence was exercised by a handful of moneybags over the entire people; now we want to organize violence in the interests of the people." Strongly opposed any suggestion to abolish capital punishment, and continually emphasized the need for terror in "overthrowing the old order and ensuring the success of the revolution", even years after the revolution ended
  • ridiculed any socialist group around the world which sought a peaceful route to their goals, calling instead for the violent overthrow of all the "bourgeoisie" governments of europe… and for all the new communist nations created to submit themselves to the ultimate authority of the Bolsheviks
  • when accused by others within the Communist Party of making the new Russian State too centralized and bureaucratic while losing the trust of the working class, declared a ban on all "factional activity" within the party, on pain of expulsion
  • established concentration camps, in which 70,000+ political prisoners were used as slave labor
  • decreed that any "intellectuals" who were not already working for the Bolshevik government should be exiled to the most inhospitable parts of Russia
  • called for the execution of all "anti-Bolshevik" priests, killing at least 20,000 (mostly Orthodox Church, but also including Jews and Muslims)
  • when food shortages began in 1918, Lenin blamed them on peasant farmers supposedly hoarding grain, and established armed detachments to seize their food by force to redistribute to the cities, leading to widespread violence, social disorder, and public mass executions… and a dramatic decrease in food production, for reasons that should surprise nobody except a communist.
  • when a terrible drought began in 1921, Lenin continued to "requisition" all the products of the starving farmers, and then to export the majority of the grain to other countries instead of distributing it to his own people, resulting in roughly five million deaths by starvation alleviated only by the American Relief Administration
  • when Patriarch Tikhon called on Orthodox churches to sell unnecessary items to help feed the starving, responded by calling for all valuables belonging to religious institutions to be forcibly appropriated by the government, resulting in widespread violence
  • when starving peasants began resistance movements across Russia to oppose the government's seizure of their food, hundreds of thousands were directly killed by the Red Army while hundreds of thousands more were arrested and forced into slave labor.

So, did Lenin's government fail? Well, he initially gathered his support base with two fundamental assertions: first, that after the proletariat revolution the State would naturally "wither away" over time, leaving behind true and pure Communism. But every year after the revolution, his State seized more power for itself and perpetrated more violence upon any citizens who opposed totalitarian control. Second was the prediction that similar proletariat revolutions would take place across every nation in europe within a few months; this obviously never happened. So in terms of his own 'campaign promises', he was either lying about everything or failed on all counts.

In terms of the continued existence of the state he created, there are two possible interpretations. The first is that "Lenin's government" could not survive a single day after the man's death, and so lasted less than seven years before being replaced by a different government (using the same name) run by Stalin. In this case, Lenin's government failed after killing around seven or eight million people. The alternate interpretation, that the Soviet Union was lenin's government, means that it survived for an additional sixty-seven years… and killed an additional 50+ million people along the way, before failing in 1991. (For comparison, the total deaths in battle from all the wars of the 20th century add up to about 36 million.)

Either way, claiming that his government "didn’t fail and killed no one" is demonstrating a level of delusion that I have rarely seen.

The best thing I can say about Lenin is that he wasn't as bad as Stalin or Mao. He probably wasn't quite as bad as Hitler, but there's room for debate there. He was certainly worse than Pol Pot, Saddam Hussein, Idi Amin, and Ivan the Terrible put together.

Avatar

Idk if I agree with the last part tbh. Pol Pot ordened newborn babies to be killed with hitting their heads against trees and was even dumber than lenin, ordening the death of ALL "intellectual" people and decided to include even mechanics and other escential workers in that cathegory.

In fact, there is a story where his soldiers had to delay an execution bc they needed a mechanic for fixing their vehicles and one of the people in the executed list was one.

Reminder that public school textbooks try to go to bat for Lenin and try to white wash his misdeeds. Because if Communism was shown to be a failure from the start they wouldn’t be able to say that Communism could work and that the failures of the USSR under Stalin was the pure the result of him being a monster, and not the result of him desperately trying to make Communism work (which it never could).

Saw this on FB. Soo funny!

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

😂🤣😂🤣OMG!!! I’m laughing sooooo hard right now.

Avatar

Omg it just kept going and going

I feel a little bad for her because you just know she’s not gonna have any clue how to deal with an internet dogpile but like. Lady. That really ain’t their fault, why are you picking a fight?

Fuck I’m at a fencing tournament and literally a minute after I reblogged this my dad told me that he talked to the point people and I’m probably going to win a medal.

BURN BAGEL BURN

OH WHY NOT?

Avatar

I need to follow up to say I reblogged this last night, and this morning I got some of the best news of my life, like, a life dream come true news thing.

Bagel what are your powers

FUCK, I though it was just another lucky meme but LISTEN. Since a week ago I was waiting a phone call to confirm me if I got a job or not in my university. I reblogged this yesterday’s night “just for fun and because I don’t want any bagel to be mad with me”, and today’s afternoon, while I was losing my time as always, the professor I was supposed to work with called me and asked me for my personal information to start working with her.

THE BAGEL POWERS ARE WAY TOO MUCH FOR THIS WORLD

I GOT A JOB THE DAY AFTER MY QUEUE POSTED THIS THE FIRST TIME AND I JUST REALIZED IT WHEN I SAW IT AGAIN HOLY GOD

The bagel hasn’t let me down yet!

I got a job offer after reblogging the bagel. Believe in the bagel!

🙏🏼

Worth a try lol

i could use some good news or even a good girl 

Go lil bagle! Show me your power!

Okii then!

THIS IS THE FIRST THING ON MY BLOG

I GOT ASKED OUT FOR THE FIRST TIME AFTER I REBLOGGED IT

wait but whats happening with the bagel tho

Avatar

It’s burning, as is everything I’ve hoped for whenever I’ve reblogged a post like this

I just kinda wanna watch something burn?

Avatar

Mood

You guys didn’t listen when I said Bagels hold an ancient and wonderous power.

i’m really hopeful right now.

Third time is a charm.

Yes

Why not?

if ya don’t ask … no one can tell you yes

Avatar

Oh ok .

Why not?

Yes pls could use help

Nothing to lose. Could use a boost about now…

The Blessing Bagel has returned!

Can't hurt

Modern-day leftism is plagued by the assumption that just because your idea is kind and just, it is applicable to reality and can be put into actual practice with no ill effect.

Not only is this thinking naive, it is actively dangerous.

You ever heard of a man, named Trofim Lysenko?

This dude. He sincerely believed that Marxist ideas should be applied to raising crops. As in, crops should be deprived of individual space and planted as close to each other as possible. They will then "naturally lift each other up" as they grow and produce better yields.

If you ask anyone who has ever worked with crops, they will tell you that this is absolute nonsense. And yet, because it aligned with the official USSR Marxist ideology so well, it was implemented top-down Soviet style all across the country. To the point that they banned genetics and other "alternative" biological ideas, because they didn't align with the teachings of Marx and Lenin.

And it lead to SEVERAL famines.

And they still didn't quit.

It took until after Stalin's death to finally get rid of it in the USSR...

But not before Mao adopted the same ideas, which contributed to the death toll during the Great Leap Forward.

Check your ideas against reality first. No matter how just they are.

IT’S NOT ‘PEEKED’ MY INTEREST

OR ‘PEAKED’

BUT PIQUED

‘PIQUED MY INTEREST’

THIS HAS BEEN A CAPSLOCK PSA

THIS IS ACTUALLY REALLY USEFUL THANK YOU

Avatar

ADDITIONALLY:

YOU ARE NOT ‘PHASED’. YOU ARE ‘FAZED.’

IF IT HAS BEEN A VERY LONG DAY, YOU ARE ‘WEARY’. IF SOMEONE IS ACTING IN A WAY THAT MAKES YOU SUSPICIOUS, YOU ARE ‘WARY’.

ALL IN ‘DUE’ TIME, NOT ‘DO’ TIME

‘PER SE’ NOT ‘PER SAY’

THANK YOU

BREATHE - THE VERB FORM IN PRESENT TENSE

BREATH - THE NOUN FORM

THEY ARE NOT INTERCHANGEABLE

WANDER - TO WALK ABOUT AIMLESSLY

WONDER - TO THINK OF IN A DREAMLIKE AND/OR WISTFUL MANNER

THEY ARE NOT INTERCHANGEABLE (but one’s mind can wander)

DEFIANT - RESISTANT DEFINITE - CERTAIN

WANTON - DELIBERATE AND UNPROVOKED ACTION (ALSO AN ARCHAIC TERM FOR A PROMISCUOUS WOMAN)

WONTON - IT’S A DUMPLING THAT’S ALL IT IS IT’S A FUCKING DUMPLING

BAWL- TO SOB/CRY

BALL- A FUCKING BALL

YOU CANNOT “BALL” YOUR EYES OUT

AND FOR FUCK’S SAKE, IT’S NOT “SIKE”; IT’S “PSYCH”. AS IN “I PSYCHED YOU OUT”; BECAUSE YOU MOMENTARILY MADE SOMEONE BELIEVE SOMETHING THAT WASN’T TRUE.

THANK YOU.

*slams reblog*

IT’S ‘MIGHT AS WELL’. ‘MIND AS WELL’ DOES NOT MAKE GRAMMATICAL SENSE.

Avatar

SLEIGHT - DEXTERITY, ARTIFICE, CRAFT (FROM ‘SLY’) SLIGHT - VERY LITTLE, FRAIL, DELICATE

IT’S ‘SLEIGHT OF HAND’.

Avatar

DISCRETE - SEPARATE, DISTINCT, PARTED

DISCREET - SUBTLE, STEALTHY, DIPLOMATIC

Avatar

BORN= existing as a result of birth

BORNE= carried or transported by

LIGHTENING = to make something less dark in color or to lessen its weight

LIGHTNING = bright flash of light during electrical storms

{This is quite helpful. Thank you Rebloggers.}

((adm: I just want to add-

Loose- untight

Lose- opposite of winning))

((ALSO: A fun trick -  Affect = Action  Effect = End Result ))

There = In that place

Their = belonging to them

can’t = a contraction for cannot

cant = a tilt or lean at an angle, usually to accommodate accessibility

Me thinking that this is child’s play and that I know it all already:

Me realising there are some things I didn’t already know:

TO- GOING ONE PLACE TOWARDS ANOTHER

TWO- 2, A NUMBER BETWEEN 1 AND 3

TOO- A DESCRIPTIVE WORD, THE MUSIC IS TOO LOUD, THE SHIRT IS TOO LOOSE.

TOO- A DESCRIPTIVE

WORD, THE MUSIC IS TOO LOUD,

THE SHIRT IS TOO LOOSE.

Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.

Avatar

I’m gonna add

ROGUE: CRIMINAL/REBEL/VAGRANT/ETC

ROUGE: RED MAKEUP

it’s rogues gallery, guys. Not rouge gallery. You’re making me think batman has an extensive lipstick collection.

If you’re talking about a weapons CACHE, it’s pronounced cash.

If you say cashay, that’s how CACHET is pronounced which means prestige and does not mean a collection of items stored together in a hidden/inaccessible place.

NO ONE IS ‘PREJUDICE"

PEOPLE ARE “PREJUDICED”

If he’s not moving, he’s STATIONARY.

If he’s a fucking space pencil, then carry on with STATIONERY.

Avatar

If it’s wet precipitation falling out of the sky, it’s RAIN

If it’s someone ruling over people, it’s REIGN

If it’s holding back someone from (or getting someone to stop doing) something, that’s to REIN [them] IN (…as if you were using REINS on a horse)

Avatar

(and oh yeah)

If you’re telling someone they’re going to have to reconsider an opinion or course of action, then they have ANOTHER THINK COMING

(because “another thing coming” makes no damn sense whatsoever unless they’re in some kind of monster movie, ffs)

Just adding:

HOARD - (n.) a collection of stuff, (vb) to collect a collection of stuff.

HORDE - (n.) a collection, group, mob or host of people, often unruly or barbaric.

PEEL - (n.) the outside skin of fruit, also (archaic n.) a tower house, sometimes spelled PELE; (vb) to remove the outside skin of fruit; by extension, usually as PEEL OFF, to remove clothing, but also (aviation) to break away, one aircraft at a time, from a larger formation.

PEAL - (n.) the sound of several church bells ringing together or in sequence; (vb.) to ring bells in this manner.

BREACH - (n.) a break or opening, usually in a wall; (vb) to make such an opening, also a whale rising clear of the surface of the sea. (The words BREACH and BREAK are distant relatives.)

BREECH - (n.) the bottom end of a gun-barrel, where it’s loaded; also (BREECH PRESENTATION) a baby being born bottom-foremost; also (n. pl.) BREECHES, a historical style of trousers ending just below the knee and (archaic vb) to BREECH, to dress a boy in breeches (adult clothing) for the first time.

English is…  Complicated.

And my favourite recent one,

It is “TO ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES” and not “TO ALL INTENSIVE PURPOSES”.

Their: group possessive (their ball) 

They’re: They Are 

There: usually a location (over there)

Course: route, path, or layer

Coarse: rough

Bare: exposed

Bear: to support weight or carry

Break: to fracture

Brake: to slow

So many

And for fuck’s sake, it’s SHOULD HAVE. NOT SHOULD OF

Avatar

all about control ….” YOU PEASANT….stay on your plot …do not move until we tell you “….sounds like a monty python skit taken too far  

This is the goal for the entire world. It has nothing to do with the climate; that’s just how they’re selling it.

They want complete and total control over every aspect of your life.

And if you let them get away with it, you deserve to be their slave.

Uh. No. Fuck you, fuck that