Here is why hyperinvisibility is just as bad as hypervisbility for a marginalized group:
There are no solid statistics on things like incarceration rates, abuse, suicide and death, sexual assault, sex work, etc. that focus on trans men because if you cull from regular statistics it's skewed towards misgendering trans men as women due to a lack of comprehensive gender vs sex choices, regular ole transphobia, and of course the need to cover up "controversial" life choices by parents the dead trans person left behind.
We have stats on trans women. Are they perfect? Not at all. But we have stats and they're growing more accurate, just as they are for men who are victims. This does mean too that statistics are becoming more accurate for trans men as well, but this is still mostly from self-reported data to smaller surveys, which automatically nets a smaller pool than being able to trawl through public records.
I think about this a lot through like male sexual assault statistics and how when I was young the average number of male victims was like 1 in 10 or something while women was 1 in 3 or 2 by the time they're 18. Now looking at statistics, while women have basically remained the same, men have jumped up to 1 in 3 (nb: this is specifically about sexual assault, not completed rape).
But even RAINN is getting its stats from public record. And it's just not something that is viable for getting reliable data about trans male victims.
Anyway, those are my thoughts for the day.