“And do you know why they call me that? Because some of them, they think it´s funny to have their little sleepovers and go into their little bathrooms and say my name five times in the mirror. They find it less funny when I actually show up and feed their lungs to the family dog.”
....why did you post that hunting thing? Like, I know you are probably in favor for it and stuff. Since you didn't tag it with anything there was no way for me to avoid it + it makes me super upset that a wolf who actually likes humans will get betrayed and killed for that interest? And you don't want us to protest it or help them so why would you post it? Why make your followers super upset like that I actually cried? I can't fucking deal with more bad news and how fucked up humanity is.
@daughtersoftime Hi! My blog posts factual content about wolves, including news or articles. In order to be able to create a realistic view on what’s going on, I share áll wolf related news - not selectively just the positive news, because it’s important to be aware of what’s going on. That includes upsetting news. I usually post the original articles without adding anything myself such as my own opinion, unless I consider it needed/useful.
I do support regulated, sustainable wolf population control - it is one of the most beneficial ways to help keep their own population, other species’ populations, and the environment they live in safe and healthy, and is beneficial to the conservation of wolves as a whole*. But I’m against the hunting of wolves for other reasons than effective wildlife conservation. I often post petitions of cases in which the culling of wolves is not beneficial to the concerning wolf population. When needed, I speak out against culling practices that have nothing to do with sane wildlife conservation. If people feel like they want to take action after reading news on my blog by let’s say starting a petition, I fully support that.
This case of the wolf in Saxony doesn’t concern hunting, it concerns conservation - a less pretty side of conservation, yes. I understand that you’re upset - so am I. Cases like this are always painful and sour, especially considering it was probably humans who made this wolf a threat. But there’s no denying this wolf became a legitimate threat that needs to be dealt with anyhow.
There aren’t unlimited resources for conservation, so you’ve got to pick your battles. Realistically, there is very little chance a very expensive rehabilitation program for this wolf would work. So unfortunately, this case is a “pick your battles” one, and a preventive action for the greater good, because the general public holds a very ignorant and irrantional fear towards wolves, and will not be open for reasoning if this wolf causes serious problems. Those people won’t hear to the fact that this concerned a habituated wolf who acted very unnatural, and that wolves normally don’t act like this. An attack on livestock, a pet, or a human being will do severly further damage to this already very negative public opinion on wild wolves, and will only give governments and hunters yet another argument to cull more wolves in said region, or the whole of Germany, or all over the world.
The feeding of wild animals is the cause of this problem, so preventing problems like this is mainly a matter of educating the public to not feed wildlife. There is no wildlife conservator that wants to kill an animal. But until we have fixed the cause (the feeding of wild animals), we will have to deal with the consequenses in a way that fits the bigger picture. Knowing how these politics work, there’s a very big chance that in this case protesting/petitions/etc. won’t make a difference, and even if you cóuld somehow stop them from killing this wolf, it’s just a matter of time before the wolf will cause an accident and it will then be shot either way ánd will be used as an ignorant example of the misinformed, fear-mongering idea that wolves are vicious man-eaters.
I do apologize for forgetting to tag this post with “wolf hunting”, which I normally tag posts like these with. I totally understand that news like this is upsetting, but it’s not okay assuming things about people you don’t know and accusing people of things when you don’t know what and how.
Context: I’m DM-ing a homebrew campaign and the party’s half-elf rogue decided to wander through a forest full of wolves by herself.
Me: As you walk through the forest, you hear rustling on your left and right.
Rogue: I wanna keep going.
Me: O-okay, you take a couple of steps and then two wolves leap out at you from either side.
Rogue: *proceeds to one-shot one of the wolves*
Me: As you slash the wolf it lets out a howl of pain, alerting a nearby dire wolf to your presence.
Rogue OOC: *after taking out the other wolf* I wanna tame the dire wolf!
Me: You want to what now!?
Rogue OOC: I throw a piece of meat at the dire wolf. If I feed it, it’ll like me and we can be friends.
Me: You’d have to roll very high to befriend this guy.
Rogue: *rolls nat 20*
Me: OH COME ON! You know what? Fine! The dire wolf, FOR SOME REASON, decides that you THROWING MEAT AT HIM is a good enough reason to eat it and follow you around for the foreseeable future. But I’m making you train him and feed him three rations a day and if you can’t feed him, he’s gonna try and eat you or your party members.
Rogue: I name him Fluffy.
*the other members of the party were not pleased with the new companion that they had to feed*