weapons of self destruction

Well, it was a long day. I had to cheer myself up so I grabbed my (dying) graphic tablet.

The quote is from Robin Williams’ stand up from 2009 (Weapons of Self Destruction). Best pickup line EVER! Robin, thanks for putting a smile on my face. The world misses you so badly!

Let me just say as someone with PTSD who has been (and currently still is) the victim of stalking, I am so glad I dropped RWBY before that apology scene with Blake and Sun happened because seeing that would have wrecked me. Having PTSD puts a person on edge 24/7 (like Blake is). If someone applies any extra pressure to that person, such as in the form of stalking, there’s a very good chance that person will psychologically snap. I did. The stress of feeling unsafe constantly made me not want to live anymore, and I almost committed suicide.

That’s the level of distress a traumatized person goes through when they’re made to feel endangered. I speak from experience when I say Sun was lucky the worst that happened was Blake hit him. We’ve seen very clearly that Blake has self-destructive tendencies, and she also carries a weapon that she’s not afraid to use on people. Him stalking her could have ended in tragedy, and there was no good reason for him to put her through that.

Blake is the victim here, and making her apologize is textbook victim-blaming. I need people to see and understand this. Life is already hard enough for trauma survivors without a webseries convincing people who don’t know what it’s like that we’re the ones at fault for our own victimization because the people who disregard our boundaries sometimes have “good intentions.”

Missy/Master and the Doctor - The whole bloody mess

(spoilers for season 10 finale)

Many people have argued quite differently about the Master, Missy and the Doctor and their motives and relationships. I have discussed it with a tumblr user in two threads (x and x) so for convenience, I collected the arguments here in one thread because I do have a few things to add.

The Master is an awful person, to the point of almost being a one-dimensional caricature of evil.

This is your conclusion so let me start here. The Master, in all the years he has appeared on Doctor Who is a lot of things but never one-dimensional. I’m not sure how familiar you are with his background so let me fill you in quickly. Mind you, I will of course only canon:

1. During their childhood the Doctor and the Master were bullied by a boy named Torvic. To save his friend’s life the Doctor had to eventually kill that boy. Later a personification of death asked the Doctor to be her champion. He refuses and suggests she takes the Master instead as her disciple. She agrees and the Doctor forgets about the whole encounter. In canon it is the Doctor who becomes a killer first and then conveniently escapes responsibility for it by making the Master bear the consequences.

2. At the age of eight the drums were implanted into the Master’s head and always seen as a sign of madness. The drums worsened over time. It was only when the Master forced the Doctor to actually listen to them, that the Doctor believed. So we have a little boy thinking he is not worthy being a Timelord (because why else would he “turn mad” when he looked?) and not even his very best friend even so much as entertains the idea that it could be something else.

3. Koschei (as the Master preferred to be called for a while) was on an academic research mission when the Doctor was expelled from the academy, forcing him into a conflict of loyalty. Again, it is the Doctor who is kicked out first. The Master follows on his own accord because after all they made a pact to see all the stars together.

4. Koschei was obsessed with order to the point that the Timelords planted a spy to monitor him. That spy, a Timelady posing as a human, became his companion. When he eventually found out about her true identity he lost a good part of the ability to trust anyone. Isn’t it beautiful that the Master wanted companions, too? Companions, not servants, not “disposables”. And is it really so wrong that he would despise the Doctor’s companions and insist that they themselves are the only real companions for each other?

5. Later the Doctor made a deal with Death to grant the Master ten years of peace and sanity. At the end of those years the Doctor was supposed to kill him. During those ten years the Master forgot about his true identity, took the name of John Smith, became a doctor and even had a stable relationship. If this is the Doctor’s attempt to take responsibility, it really is rather poorly executed. He never asked the Master if he wanted that kind of “saving”. What are ten years in the life of a Timelord after all? Is the Doctor portrayed here as agreeing to a mercy killing? Possible. But completely without any consent from the Master. Also, isn’t it ironic that of all things the Master, free from the drums and his past, chooses to be a doctor? That “good” is obviously in him.

6. The Master met Sato Katsura, a samurai who was accidentally made immortal as a result of his involvement with the Doctor. It had left him so bitter, he began to follow the Master. This is probably the most obvious moment of the Master picking up after the Doctor. The Doctor has always liked to use people however he sees fit, often not caring much about the consequences. An example from New Who would be the 12th Doctor making Ashildr use a device that kills her instead of trying a little harder to eliminate that possibility.

7. The Master was continually used by the Timelords and other entities to fight for them. He was deliberately turned into a weapon. The latest example of that is his resurrection to fight in the Time War but what he saw scared him so much that he turned himself into Professor YANA and ran away to the end of the universe. The Doctor however stayed and fought. Sometimes I wonder if this is cowardly running away as opposed to courageously doing what is right. Sometimes I wonder if the Doctor’s tolerance for bloodshed, war and violence is higher than the Master’s.

8. At some point he posed as the Doctor and began to work for UNIT were he helped them to fight off several alien attacks on Earth. Does it really matter that he posed as the Doctor? Does doing good only count when it is done in the “right” way?

There are many more examples but these should make it very clear that the Master is anything but one-dimensionally evil.

Let’s look at some of your arguments about Simm!Master’s character:

He told Ten to “get out of the way” because Rassilon was right there, in front of him - the one responsible for his ‘condition’. The intended catharsis of that scene was about the Master getting revenge on Rassilon. (…) It was something that happened in the moment and the status quo of his existence was restored by the Time Lords. (…) People don’t just change in a moment.

So even although the Master had tried to kill the Doctor before time and time again he doesn’t do it when he can because shooting at the Doctor first and then at Rassilion is somehow not cathartic enough? Killing them both, the two people he considers responsible for all that went wrong in his life, wouldn’t be the ultimate revenge? No, the Doctor spared him and so the Master spares him in return because in that moment the Master understands that his friend still loves him, that there is still hope for a future for them together, seeing the stars.
Maybe it is not the huge change in character some people want to see. But it is a redeeming quality. The Master doing “what is right”. All by himself.

Likewise, time has passed since then. The Master went back through the gate with Rassilon to Gallifrey, the Time Lords made a mutual bargain to remove the drums from his head and fix his botched regeneration (…) He just continued with his old ways because that’s what the Time Lords enabled him to do, it was convenient for them to do that in order to get rid of him.

Sometimes I wonder what the other end of that bargain was. What did the Timelords do to him, or make him do for them to remove the drums? After all, they have used him all his life. Why change so suddenly. I think it is very plausible that the Master ran away again and hid on that spaceship (a “mutual kicking out” can mean many many things). Also, despite everything he has done, the Timelords still keep him around. Later, Missy isn’t executed as ordered by the Timelords. They still need the Master for whatever future war they need a monster for. I can’t even imagine what that does to a man. Going back to his “old ways” after once more being confirmed by the Timelords that that is all he is and all he can do is really not that surprising. After all, if they fixed the drums they could have fixed so much more. They could have helped him. Truly helped. With all their knowledge and wisdom. Instead they try to keep him as a convenient weapon.

The premise of the argument “the Master is not self-destructive” kinda falls apart because he literally chose to die at the end of The Last of the Time Lords instead of being at the Doctor’s side. The last two of their kind and he chose to die, not knowing that his ring would be picked up by Miss Trefusis and he’d later return.

Two things:
1. He chooses to die because the idea that the Doctor would imprison him and just “keep him” was so incredibly appalling to him that he couldn’t bear it. It’s not just for his own good or the good of the universe. The Doctor sees the Master as his responsibility, his burden. Considering that the Doctor played a considerable role in the Master becoming the Master, that is incredibly arrogant and self-righteous.
2. The Master has “died” so many times before seemingly without the ability to to come back. His mind has been in other people and objects before. Even if he wasn’t entirely sure about the ring, he must have known (and said so to the Doctor before) that he is pretty much indestructible.

He sees Missy as such a fundamental violation of who he is with regards to her perspective on the Doctor that he chooses to kill his future self. That is who he is in extremis.

Exactly. He simply cannot agree with the fact the Missy has been changed so much that she would forget who she is and how she came to be. He hates that she basically turned into one of the Doctor’s fangirls. He can’t understand why she would regress so much in her development that she is barely more than the child they used to be, looking up at the Doctor hoping for guidance. Let’s remember here that yes, the Doctor saved their life as a child by killing someone. And he put the blame on the Master. The Master simply cannot allow Missy to forget that the Doctor is not morally pure and superior. He cannot allow that standing with the Doctor on the Doctor’s terms leads to their death. He’d rather do it himself. If anything, this was a mercy killing, just like the Doctor agreed to do with the Master many years before. Considering that the Master has survived many of his “final deaths” we can be sure that they will return. When they do it will most likely not be pretty because right now, she thinks that the Doctor believes that she has betrayed him and that he lost his hope for her and does not come after her once more. She might also believe that he is dead and blame herself. The Master’s next regeneration could be the most messed up yet.

And there really was nothing at all self-righteous, self-victimising, or egotistic about the Doctor’s speech. It was about self-sacrifice, out of kindness. (…) the message was simply to just be kind.

The Doctor tries continuously to sacrifice himself. The 9th legion, the cybermen, … It’s a compulsion. Makes me wonder why? Is it because he is so incredibly good (then why does he never die, only regenerate, when he does? Why is his sacrifice never real?) or is it because he needs redemption and forgiveness just as much as the Master does? The Doctor is consumed by guilt and tries to get rid of it by offering himself up again and again. That is not without reward and therefore not entirely and purely good. There is always an agenda behind what the Doctor does, especially when it’s self-sacrifice or kindness. He always goes to extremes to prove that he truly is “good” even although it is only his definition of “good” that counts here. Good is only good in extremis. Only in self-denial and self-sacrifice.

I mean… the Master is a sadistic murderer. (…) The Doctor didn’t “force” anything on her, and, to be honest, what you want when you’re somebody who commits the kind of atrocities that the Master does on a regular basis really doesn’t matter all that much. (…) Your “leave their names out” argument doesn’t really work because that’s just removing the context from the situation. The Doctor has always been a flawed hero, but the whole thing with Missy’s arc is really not an instance of that.

It is exactly here that the greatest flaw of your perception of both Doctor and Master becomes obvious. We are talking about fiction so for a moment let’s talk about real life. Operation Neptune Spear as sanctioned by then-President of the USA Obama was a capture or kill mission directed at Osama bin Laden. US-offficals have also simply called it a kill mission. The mission was accomplished in May 2011 resulting in the death of Osama bin Laden. Criticized as a “revenge mission” by foreign governments and organizations like Amnesty International, this mission remains controversial until today. The reason is simply that a criminal, no matter how bad, does have rights, that human rights are non-negotiable, that the crimes of a person do not make them less human. At the same time, acting as if a criminal has lost his human rights because of (past or future) crimes is morally incredibly flawed and honestly, simply plain wrong. It’s not hard to see the parallels to the Doctor and Missy here. It does matter if there was consent or not and if there continued to be consent because Missy is still a sentient being with rights and the Doctor (with Gallifrey being back) has no authority whatsoever to decide otherwise. By locking Missy up and isolating her the way he did he violated her. He of all people who always thinks he is morally superior. He messed up epically here. Leaving the names out returns them to what they both are: sentient beings with rights.

She said to the Doctor that she’d be good, asking him to teach her how to be, and consented to being imprisoned for rehabilitation. Whether that was what she actually wanted at the start or if she was saying that to get out of being executed, that was something she made good on. She says as much that she could have escaped the Vault if she’d wanted to, but she’s chosen to stay and engage in the process.

Again, it is highly questionable if it was continued consent, or even just consent born out of an honest desire to change and not just desperate words uttered to save her life.  And yes, continued consent is a thing and it is necessary. Ask anybody who agreed to anything and then changed their mind mid-way through. It’s one of the very obvious symptoms of rape culture to think that continued consent is not a thing. Besides, the difference in power between them was so huge by then that in order to keep at least some kind of dignity Missy would have probably said anything, including suggesting that she could have escaped the vault, something the Doctor clearly disagreed with.

It’s not just that Missy decided to stand with the Doctor… It’s that the reason WHY she decided to do that was because her whole perspective and understanding of him has changed. (…) she says to her former self “he’s right”. It’s not just about standing with her friend because she wants to, it’s that she actually has come to understand and empathise with his philosophy.

I stand by what I said in the first place. Isolating a prisoner and depriving them of stimuli is torture. And no, a few books and a piano are not enough to keep someone like the Master sane. Time and time again it was shown in studies and experiments that sentient beings, from monkey to human to most likely Timelord are social animals and lose their minds if isolated for too long. That alone, that isolation over decades must have worn her out so much that the Doctor could have planted any kind of philosophy into her head. He chose the only one he knew of course. Self-denial through self-sacrifice. Let’s remember here that his self-sacrifice has always been fake. Doctors 10 and 11 regenerated after acts of self-sacrifice but it is just never real because he never dies. He always knows that he has a way out. Regeneration. And so his sacrifice doesn’t mean all that much. He of course cannot see that and so he believes his way to be the “most good”, the only right way. And that is the way he tries to make Missy understand.

And she kills her former self, not just to get him out of the way, but to ensure, in that moment, that he will regenerate into her so everything will come back around to this moment - to make it happen. Without hope. Without witness. Without reward.

There is literally no reason to get the Master out of the way at this point. She doesn’t know that he would shoot her should she try to go back to the Doctor. She could have literally shoved him into the elevator, sealed the door and send him back down. There was no reason whatsoever to kill him. Especially because she utters remorse about having lost herself, about not being how he is. She is not burning anymore and she knows it. Mind you, we do not know if she refers to her whole existence as Missy or just her time as the Doctor’s prisoner.
But even if she does kill him to ensure that she comes around to this point, isn’t that a reward all in itself?
Let’s also not forget that the Master concludes from Missy not being able to remember her “birth” that he will regenerate in the very near future. He knew it and simply wasn’t ready for it. Another reason why he wouldn’t stand with the Doctor.


1. The Master has never been one-dimensionally evil. If anything the Doctor and the Master are more ying and yang than black and white.

2. The Master and Missy never lost hope that they could be reunited with their childhood friend but they always wanted it to be a mutually benefiting reunion. A reunion that happened on both their terms. The Doctor continually insisting on it to be one-sided was too much for the Master.

3. The Doctor mistreated and violated Missy greatly and the Master could not accept that. And honestly, who would?

4. The Doctor doesn’t understand that his so-called self-denial that does work quite well for him, just isn’t the go-to-thing for everybody and so he screws Missy up and blows his reunion with the Master.

In the end Missy was right, she has always been on the Doctor’s side. All her faces, all her regenerations. They were always his friend. He just always insisted that they be that on his terms and his terms alone.


tiny precious cinnamon roll evolves into big buff sinnamon roll who could actually kill you

theaggressiverobin  asked:

“who the hell did this to you?” for corvosider

The last person finally went down, the curse dying halfway through her lips as Corvo’s knife cut her throat. He looked around, panting, but saw no movement anywhere, heard no sound. Nothing. It should have calmed him down, allowed him a moment to breathe, but instead he turned and banged on the locked door. While the surface of the heavy steel bore marks of the attempts to get past it by force, it was still standing unbroken. It had been a relief to see, but now Corvo wanted nothing more than to tear it down so he could get to the the one hidden within.

“Outsider?” he asked, hoping the Outsider still had his comlink. “Outsider, come in. It’s Raven, I’m here now. There’s no one else out here, it’s safe to open the door.”

He waited a few seconds, his worry quickly growing to engulf him when he got no response.

“Outsider? If you can hear me, say something. I’m here now, just like I said. Open the door. Please, just… please.”

Keep reading

I Didn’t Know There Was A Place Past Rock Bottom

I remember when you had whole galaxies in the smallest parts of your eyes and when the stars burned beneath your skin, tell me how does it feel to be so full yet so empty? I reach for you and I find nothing. All I wanted was to collide with you, to make something bigger than the both of us. But I think the stars in you died a long time ago because I can’t find the ones that guide me home anymore. We used to sip bleach from fancy glasses and pretend it’s the wine we were too afraid to steal from the kitchen late at night. And we carved into our bodies like the dead trees we used to carve young love’s initials. We wore ripped jeans and shredded hearts and we popped pills like candy all while they said “it’s just on your head” and people used to wonder why we wanted to die so bad.

When I am mad I destroy everything within my reach including you. I collect my anger in my finger tips and on the tip of my tongue then use it to tear you apart because I can’t reach the part of me that I hate the most. I know these must be my hands but I can’t remember what they do. And this is a heartbeat or an attempt to escape a body that does not feel like my own. And she thinks I’ll hurt her but I swear to you my darling the only heart I’ve ever broken is my own.

I don’t write to heal. I don’t write so that you can fill the empty space between my words with the belief that they are written with the purest intentions. I write to destroy. I write so that I can find a sick satisfaction in making you hurt like me. Let me break your heart just to punctuate it with a period. Let me make your stomach drop and call it art. Let me use my words as weapons of self-destruction, words like a razor to the wrist, words like a pill to the lips. Do you hurt like me yet? Do you understand?

I am broken open for all to see. I am cracked wide so you can see my inside. I’ve got to pull my pieces together so I can show you, I’m getting better.


The Planet of the Apes Films:

Where there is fire, there is smoke. And in that smoke, from this day forward, my people will crouch and conspire and plot and plan for the inevitable day of Man’s downfall - the day when he finally and self-destructively turns his weapons against his own kind. The day of the writing in the sky, when your cities lie buried under radioactive rubble! When the sea is a dead sea, and the land is a wasteland out of which I will lead my people from their captivity! And we will build our own cities in which there will be no place for humans except to serve our ends! And we shall found our own armies, our own religion, our own dynasty! And that day is upon you… now!

Conquest of the Planet of the Apes (1972, J. Lee Thompson)

I wrote chapter 45 of Evolution from Noah’s POV

I took the amazing piece of art that Michelle Hodkin blessed us with and wrote it from Noah’s POV. It’s shit, yes, because I cannot write to save my life but it was so much funnnnn

(In case you missed it, chapter 1 and 2 of The Shaw Confessions from Michelle Hodkin’s live reading.)


“I’m sorry,” she says. “I didn’t—“

But I cut her off. “Yes, you did.”

My voice is distant. Harsher than I would have wanted to intend. I can’t look at her. Not right now. So I look at the ocean instead. God, I envy the freedom of the waves.

Keep reading

[Rebels] Heroes of Mandalore

I’ve stopped watching regularly SW: Rebels somewhere after first season, but I keep coming back for episodes about Mandalorian. The Heroes of Mandalore aren’t exception. Though most of times I wonder why the hell I still bother to do so.

To be fair, the newest episode(s) have interesting and beautiful moments, like:

  • new informations about mandalorian art (though I would like know more about Tojnun and the Pre-Exile Masters)
  • the reversed roles with Ursa (a female character; the wife & mother) is the leader & veteran warrior while her husband is the artist who, so far, did not show any combat capabilities (”My dad fights with his art”)
  • Bo-Katan is showed as capable warrior and leader and she is pretty good at what she is doing for past decade(s)
  • Sabine - and her past - once again is important part of the story
  • Fenn’s “show off” and in general, the evolution of his character
  • the ending scene of the first episode
  • Mandalorian for good now are visible diverse group insted of all-white TCW!version
  • A scene where three main female characters (all leaders & warriors in their own way) get together to discuss future of Mandalore. That alone is something pure and beautiful in so many ways, and I wouldn’t mind to get used to such scenes, really.

But though all of those points were great and fun, there is also a lot things that are, well, stupid. As in: pointless compared to the old canon/Legends. And yes, I’m biased, I know, but then again, new canon gives me time after time more reasons to be distrustful for its content. What means, I’m going to rant about Mandalorians.

The things tha pissed me off for good:

the whole Mandalorian without armor is no more than a common soldier bullshit. Seriously. You know what was great about Legends!Mando, beside how diverse they were? The armor was preciuos thing, sure, but it meant nothing, if person wearing it didn’t deserve the title of Mandalorian warrior. Just like that. Legends!Mando had saying about it: “A warrior is more than one’s armor.”

The armor is not what makes a Mandalorian. This is one of basic thing one must understands about their whole culture. Mandalorians were taught from early age to fight without it, without technology, without weapon to be strong and capable to survive if they were deprived of such things. There were even a time(s), when mandalorian ore wasn’t available to make new armours - or, like The Bounty Code mentioned: the armours were destroyed by New Mandalorian - so the warriors used other materials, like duresteel. And it was fine, no one really cared for such details. For Force’s sake, Boba Fett used durasteel armour, and even though he screwed up almost all rules of Mandalorian Code (what, btw, had only 6! conditions), he was still seen as Mando.

In short: you may deprive someone of armor, but it will not make someone less Mandalorian. Just no.

What makes the whole Sabine’s epic talk about her armour - how its part
of their identity, how “it makes us, Mandalorians, who we are” is so… odd and impractical.

Keep reading

Among all the X-Men’s antagonists, Alpha Flight is the only group directly affiliated with the national government of a supposedly trusted American ally.

It is surprising that Canada is signalled out for this dubious honor, given the historically close and amicable relationship between Canada and the United States; the two countries share the world’s longest undefended border and are each other’s largest trade partners. However, I argue that, particularly within the context of the late-1970s, Canada does in fact make a very useful enemy for the All-New X-Men. The late-‘70s comic book battles between the X-Men and Alpha Flight present some obviously unrealistic portraits of Canadian politics and values, but they also reference real cultural conflicts concerning different visions of multicultural group identity. The involvement of Byrne, who immigrated to Canada from England in 1958 as an eight-year old and lived there until at least 1973, suggests that the Canadian superteam can be read, at least in part, as reflecting internal anxieties about Canadian identity; although Byrne is technically credited as the “co-plotter” of Alpha Flight’s first appearance, several of the character concepts date back to comics and sketches Byrne produced as a student at the Alberta College of Art and Design. Yet because Alpha Flight ultimately performed for a predominantly American audience, their stint as villains largely reveals American insecurities-about Canada, but also about the American identity that Canada throws into relief.

In particular, the differences between the internationally comprised, vigilante, and heroic “American” X-Men versus the domestically multicultural, federally-regulated, and villainous “Canadian” Alpha Flight enact American anxieties related to the official multiculturalistn policy that Trudeau promised in 1971, and finally incorporated into the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982. Through their displays of immoral, aggressive, and ultimately self-destructive megaviolence, Alpha Flight’s fantastically weaponized humans literally and spectacularly embody American fears that Canadian multiculturalism regulates identity in a way that prohibits a conscience-based, and thus sustainable, form of national unity.

—  Anna F. Peppard, Canada’s Mutant Body: Nationalism and (Super)Multiculturalism in Alpha Flight vs. the X-Men

I know it’s popular to shit on dark and gritty Pokemon theories, but the world is a dark and gritty place, so I don’t really get the backlash.

Real world locations and even animals are referenced in Pokemon, so it stands to reason that realism can be applied to the Pokemon universe and that, as such, human beings in the Pokemon universe likely aren’t all that different from human beings in our universe–meaning, yes, they probably do actually exploit Pokemon in a variety of ways, just like we exploit animals.

Pokemon enjoy battling and are happy to be with trainers who love and care for them, but we’ve seen canon instances of Pokemon abuse, so we know that it exists at least on a small scale–but where there’s abuse on a small scale, there’s quite often abuse on a large scale as well.

Why shouldn’t factory farms exist in the Pokemon universe? Why shouldn’t we harvest Electric-types to power our homes and businesses? Why shouldn’t we force Pokemon to fight in our petty wars? Why shouldn’t terrorists (and, yes, they exist, we’ve seen canon acts of terrorism in the games) use Explosion and Self-Destruct ‘mons as weapons? Why shouldn’t there be religious conflict between sects that follow separate Legendary Pokemon? Why shouldn’t there be corruption within the government? Why shouldn’t there be death, and disease, and horrible events that change the course of history?

Realistically speaking, there is a really dark and gritty side to Pokemon. It’s just that the games don’t want to address it, and that’s totally valid, they’re meant to be kid-friendly games–but even fantasy worlds cannot exist without conflict, and even the conflict the games show us can be pretty fucked up at times (Cyrus’ plans to rewrite the world, Archie and Maxie being literal eco-terrorists, the abomination that is Lusamine).

I don’t think people are trying to be edgy. I think people are just applying realism to the universe, because the creators have already applied realism to the universe selectively. I find more realistic takes on Pokemon really fascinating, just as someone interested in world-building. It’s fun to see how people apply realism to the games and how they explain certain game mechanics in realistic ways. For me, it’s never about shock value and always about fleshing out a world that leaves a lot of open ends.

I’m not always in the mood for grimdark Pokemon theories, but, when I get the itch, it’s enjoyable to discuss realism and its applications to Pokemon with others.

I still catch myself thinking about you. Not just at night, even in the daytime. Sometimes you are my first thought in the morning. This has happened since forever. No I have not forgotten you. That seems impossible. And for a fact, I know it is. But I promised myself I will make space for my future. Which doesn’t involve you, no matter how much I want it to happen. I guess this is why love has always been a weapon of self-destruction.
—  Excerpt from a book I will never write #1107 //  @coffeeinmyvein

tw6464  asked:

Fanfic title: "WRAITHBONER"

aka Badly-Written Porn.

An overly fit, sculpted, mostly half-naked, strutting, smooth-talking studmuffin Eldar attempts to save his race by collecting fragments of wraithbone to create the greatest weapon rumored to destroy Slaanesh (aka the Imperium’s biggest, most badass, self-destructing sex toy…no don’t ask what it is, its a SECRET) and reinstate their power. Along the way he meets hot, equally as scantily clad Mon’keighs, Drukhari, Tau, Ork, Necrons and tyranids all “eager to help” him win his cause and getting naughty along the way!!!

@sisterofsilence Wasn’t there a discourse not too long ago about Imperium porn? LMAO.