watch the tester

5
politico.com
Gorsuch to barnstorm the Senate this week
By SEUNG MIN KIM

Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch is ramping up his Senate charm offensive this week, scheduling meetings with a slew of red-state Senate Democrats and Democratic leaders who’ll be a major influence in determining whether he gets confirmed later this year.

Gorsuch has more than a dozen meetings starting Monday, including with a pair of key Democrats to watch: Montana Sen. Jon Tester, a moderate who is up for reelection next fall, and California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee who will lead the Democratic charge during the high-stakes confirmation hearings.

Read more here

Couldn’t help but watch testers with frustration as they repeatedly played a level that was too hard for them without going back to get more currency to buy more skills. I tried “Hey if you suck, stop sucking” but it didn’t seem to help much. Maybe this tip at the bottom will do the job.

On a side note, awhile back I made it to where you only lose 60% of the currency you gained in the level when you lose. Added it to help with the feeling of having wasted your time when you lose, especially if you ALMOST won. 

Keith’s Bayard

Ok, so I was starting to so some plotting for Keith week and asked my partner to do some ref poses for me.  He always does anything for where I want to include a weapon cause his old Taekkyeon teacher was insane and made sure his students could defend against everything bare handed.  This results in a ref machine that knows how like every weapon ever is used at least basically. 

So I show him Keith’s bayard and its not a sword guys.

I repeat Keith’s bayard is not a sword.  It’s a katar. 

Would normally be shorter for punching, but the slashing is the same.

Just watch  this video.  The tester even moves like Keith.


So this could be considered nitpicky.  Why does it matter?  Big pic, it doesn’t much.

But the bayard is supposed to reflect the owner isn’t it?

A sword is a very useful tool.   It’s not just a weapon for killing other people.  It’s a tool for defense as well as attack.  Still a very violent use, but it isn’t exclusively used for slaughter.  It’s also very symbolic for humans.  Heraldry, dress uniforms, sports, ceremonies, we use swords all over.  They can bring to mind things like honor and valor as well as power, dominance and violence.

A katar isn’t those things.  It’s for attack only.  No real defense capabilities. It’s an assassins’ weapon.  It is only for killing people. It hasn’t really developed much of a cultural identity as a weapon.  Aggression is it’s primary attribute.

So Keith’s weapon is a brutal tool meant to do nothing but kill other people that you are up close and personal with.  It’s an over sized punching blade. (Like way over-sized…that length with that grip, talk about some weird leverage problems, but I’m not even going to touch that…the physics do not work)

So I wonder if the animators deliberately wanted this? How many people are familiar with this weapon?  Was it on purpose, did they expect us to only see it as a sword?  Is it possible they don’t know about katar’s either?  Am I over thinking this? 

youtube

See your favorite Saints Row characters face off to the death under the watchful eye of QA Tester Morgan Ledbetter and Associate Player Experience Researcher Elizabeth Zelle! Check out the embedded highlights and see the full stream here.

Download Morgan’s Saints Row Sims 4 characters by searching in-game for EA Origin ID SimplyMorgan77