thank you porter


“I finally—for once in my lifeI could see something, something real

is this who we meant to be

ship: portgo (one-sided)
word count: 1063
warnings: anxiety attacks
soundtrack: madeon - beings

Hugo wakes up and he’s crying.

He hasn’t been sleeping much since he got back to France, not really. His bed is too cold, too empty without anything to look forward to.

The tour had ended as he’d known it would. He’d gone home and Porter had gone to stay with his girlfriend - “a whole month,” Porter had said, breathlessly happy, “a whole month just for us,” - and it’s only been two weeks but Hugo misses him. He misses him more than he could have ever been ready for.

Keep reading


Porter Robinson and Madeon. Webster Hall Speech NYC

anonymous asked:

i rlly like the utopian can u tell me more about that :00

yEAh idk if you mean the character or the story so let’s do both i guess?

The Utopian is typically called U, he does have a real name but I’m tryna decide a few things w the comic and once I do I’ll decide whether to start posting his actual name. U is a semi-biotic kid, he’s been living in an abandoned city called Archaeda and maintaining it’s clockwork for abt 120 years, and he spends a lot of this time either checking on the mechanisms, sorting through rubble, or caring for the various animate things around the city (descendants of the pets left behind, gardens, the ghosts, etc), among these being his blind kitten, Sweetpea
Archaeda itself is the remains of a utopia that held a perfect kind of balance between science and religion, but U finds out that a scientist got greedy and stole an egg from a lindworm for research, and the lindworm herself (Lucy) came and destroyed the city that he now lives in. WHICH by the time he pieces this together, U’s already accidentally released Lucy from a forced hibernation and she now is desperately looking for her egg/who took it from her while still destroying what’s left of the city.

and that’s. kinda the gist of The Utopian. kind of a shortened version of it anyway.



First of all, thank you to @the-porter-rockwell (cannot be tagged :c) for being my 650th follower!

Now, thank you to me (¯\_(ツ)_/¯), @nwrphase2, @the-mighty-birdy, and @snickerslizard for being my top followers, you guys consistently show up in my notes so I’m very grateful for that!

Now, on to who I reblog​ and like the most. @hot-chubbies-with-cheese, @danplaystrumpet, @clementambrose, @local-dritte-mom, @preussenwolf89, @the-mighty-birdy, @pax-britannica, @loricarious, and @jewishmagpie are apparently the people I like the most, and for good reason. You guys have outstanding blogs!

Now, of course, comes out tremendous list of honor. If you do not follow these people, and the ones above, you’re missing out on alot.


And again, thank you guys! c:

An Open Letter to Aaron Diaz

Dear Aaron Diaz,

Over the past few days we’ve already exchanged some words about this. I reblogged Mary’s comic lampooning your comic (and others like it), expressing my approval of its message. I also subtweeted your work fairly obviously. We are friendly acquaintances and my behavior was inappropriate and rude. I apologized to you via email for being passive-aggressive and thoughtless, and you graciously accepted my apology. I admit: what I did was hurtful, and the wrong way to go about it. With that in mind, I want to try to address the problems I have with your work in a direct, honest, and hopefully respectful way. No passive-aggression, no rudeness, no vague-tweeting. 

Aaron, I have a real problem with the way you write and draw female characters. It is sexually objectifying and sexist.

I do not have a problem with artists writing and drawing objectified female characters. I do have a problem with characters I consider sexist, but ultimately it’s something I can ignore. There’s a place for everything, and an artist has the right to create whatever they want to create, for whatever ends they choose. What I have a problem with is that your comic is not presented as a science fiction comic with a dash of sexy thrills, but rather as a feminist narrative in support of powerful independent women. You’ve made it clear on many occasions that you don’t consider your work to be objectifying or sexist. I have a problem with cheesecake-style art being presented as something feminist, empowering, enlightened- something made “for women”, when it’s clearly made for men.

You’re allowed to make art with male gaze. But please call a spade a spade.

I think you are a nice person who does good things. I think you’re a good artist and a good writer. But I consider writing and drawing women to be one of your weaknesses, and it’s hard to imagine that you don’t know that. If you do, I haven’t heard you say so.

I know Mary’s comic stung. I’m not going to deny there was meanness there, although I saw it more as humorously exaggerated satire than a personal attack.  I understand that it sucks to see your work roasted in such a way. But the criticism it made of your work resonated with a lot of people. They can’t all be idiots, crazy people, or “SJWs”, or people with a personal grudge against you. To paraphrase a saying, “If lots of people are telling you it’s raining, get an umbrella.” Aaron, many people have this problem with your work. The problem exists. And since you seem to be very much invested in feminism and positive, non-sexualized portrayals of women in media, you need to take a long hard look at your own output. You need to get an umbrella.

I don’t think I’ve seen a single page of Dresden Codak that doesn’t feature a woman posed in a male-gazey way, with loving focus on her ass or cleavage, or wearing a sexual costume, or in some situation that puts her in a compromising position (like the most recent page in which Kimiko’s clothing is burned off of her body, which has happened at least twice in the series’ run.) I have a very hard time believing that these details are accidental. Not to mention the pinups you posted a few days ago. Instead of saying something like, “Here’s some sexy drawings of Kimiko I did” you said they were about “agency” and “celebration of the female form”. It’s hard not to see language like that as dishonest and sort of insulting.

The following images are a few examples of what I’m referring to. I tried to only find examples from the current arc in the comic, or from merchandise you currently sell. I understand that there is a larger context to these images, but the fact that you continually write situations in which these presentations of women would be contextually appropriate is part of the problem. For the sake of fairness, there is ONE female character in Dresden Codak who is not presented sexually, but to me, that doesn’t do much to make up for the rest of it, especially since she is the only female character with a speaking role in the history of the comic who is not presented this way.

Aaron, you can do whatever you want with your own comic. However, if you really do care about female characters in media, or care to know why so many people seem to be angry with you about it, I would do one of two things. If you don’t want your comic to present its female characters in a borderline-erotic light, then stop doing that. If you don’t mind that, then by all means continue, but please just admit that you like drawing t&a and that it’s not particularly empowering, or feminist, or a celebration of personal agency. As a woman, I resent being told that men’s eye candy is actually meant to uplift me and that I should celebrate it.

I’m not trying to attack you or slander you. I’m certainly not doing this to stir up drama. I think you are a good person. And I think that you make a good comic. It’s obvious that a lot of people really love it and support it, and will continue to love and support it no matter what. There’s a lot you are doing right. But your work is not perfect, and I want to talk about it directly, honestly, and respectfully.

Thank you for listening.

-Magnolia Porter