Hi there Cass! I saw your post about not Mala chi te and stuff and I have only watched some of SU so I can't really judge for myself. but I keep seeing people basically split in two tents: a) Lapis was the abuser and b) Jasper was the abuser. Feel free to ignore this if it makes you uncomfortable but would it be possible for you to explain to me briefly how you see the whole thing? My autistic (and also abuse victim) ass is really confused basically
jasper is the textbook example of an abuser.
she forced fusion with lapis which is a huge metaphor for coerced consent, which isn’t consent.
lapis lazuli is very obviously coded as a trauma survivor with ptsd BECAUSE of jasper. and the only reason people ((morons)) say lapis is the abuser is because lapis held jasper ((AND HERSELF)) underwater.
except it was literally so jasper couldn’t hurt anyone.
trying to paint lapis as the abuser is like a traumatised person locking themselves in a room with their abuser because their abuser wanted to hurt people, and then blaming that traumatised person for everything and saying they’re the abusive one.