sync placement


(May 2016)

a cluster of thoughts

Real Talk

Sasha wasn’t my first choice, and I may not have liked how the finale went down, but I get it. Sasha is a wonderful reigning queen to have during the first year of the “wtf America why?” administration. She’s also talented, and I think the show made it seem like she just said she was and I wish we could have seen more of her brainy side played seriously. In other circumstances, with zero lip syncs and consistent high placement, I think I would have found nothing wrong with her winning other than I live for Trinity and wanted her to win.

Also the finale kind of had to be different. The move to VH1 messed up the whole finale at DragCon thing, and there has been a lot of talk about how Drag Race is getting predictable and stale. Until the tea was spilled about the finale taping, people were bitching about how obvious it was that Shea was going to win. This all on top of a trend of queens just not trying during lip syncs this season Ru needed to mix things up and send the Season 10 girls a message about how she’s not having this shit LSFYL thing become a trend.

There is a sort of little motivation to win hanging around a lot of the queens this season, and to a lesser extent season 8 as well. Like as long as they act congenital and do decently a queen is likely going to get fans and bookings no matter the placement, and it’s right. Katya ending up way more popular than Violet really highlighted that fact. Both 8 and 9 lacked the messy personalities in comparison to earlier seasons, and it really does feel like less of a competition when you get the sense people showed up but are mostly marketing and not competing. I think Mama Ru wants to light a fire under these girl’s asses coming into season 10, especially since that’s filming very soon if I remember correctly.

Basically, what I’m saying is I love Sasha and think she’ll be a great addition to the winner’s circle even if I don’t think how she got there was 100% fair. Even though I didn’t like the new finale format, I do appreciate the effort to keep us guessing and be less complacent about the show. Also I’m trying to be fair and rational to Sasha even though I think Trinity was robbed to the Andromeda Galaxy and back. I’m super biased though, so don’t listen to me about that.

Also this crowning and finale was still better than how All Stars 2 ended.

The 3 Most Profitable DIY Revenue Streams, And Why Many Artists Succeed at Only One of Them

Independent artists can make more money than ever before. The walls of major label distribution have crumbled, and have been down for a decade. Social networks make promotion to fans easier and cheaper. Add in home recording, crowd-sourced artwork, and other cost cutting maneuvers and DIY musicians can be financially successful.

Or so goes the myth.

Reality is far murkier. Yes, it is possible to make money as a DIY artist and many are doing it. However, they are not making it from selling recorded music. That can certainly bring in money, but even modestly successful DIY artists generally gross $20,000 to $50,000 from sound recordings annually. These are artists who have many songs in their catalog with some momentum. After you take into account recording costs and splitting revenue amongst band members and the producer, there’s not a lot left. Even those with a big enough fan base to do deluxe packages get a decent gross, but profits can be elusive.

Yet, DIY artists living below stardom are consistently finding profitable careers. How are they achieving this if iTunes and Spotify revenues aren’t paying the bills? The ones who are making a profit mostly fall into one of these three buckets:


Complain all you want about musicians making YouTube covers and goofy videos instead of being “serious”. The reality is many of them make a good living from this. Costs are minimal compared to professional studio time. Distribution costs are near zero. The casualness of the content also allows for more rapid creation than one might find for “official” recorded work.

Companies such as Maker Studios and Big have grown to help these artists monetize their music with better-leveraged ad rates, production assistance, and channel cross-promotion. Once ramped up with a lot of content, successful artists in this area can clear mid-to-high five figures in revenue. Since they are often solo artists, they also don’t have to split it up much.


It’s a rough life trudging from city to city, especially with gas over $3 a gallon. Yet many artists have figured out a way to make this work. The rise of house concerts has allowed some to make thousands per night when a club in town might have previously paid them hundreds.

Social networking has made promotion in new cities cheaper and easier to find the dozen “super fans” that might bring friends to a show. Smart artists also tour in areas where they know a fan base exists from mailing list and social network data points.

Once at the show, with an audience primed to like the band (instead of grumpy locals), these artists sell more merchandise. Easier access to creative items like sunglasses, jewelry, and handbags also leads to increased sales. Add this up, and musicians who aggressively work these approaches take in mid-to-high five figures in profit. As tough as touring can be, artists focused on this are clearly leveraging it into a career.


The proliferation of cable channels and niche online audiences has meant more content and advertising that needs to be created professionally. This has also led to more needs for music around the world. Creators also can’t settle for mediocre library music. They need professional, contemporary songs that fit the mood of the creative.

Artists who fit the sound requirements and have a certain buzz amongst music supervisors are often rewarded with multiple placement opportunities for their music. Rates can be as lower than $100 (on sites like Audiosocket, The Music Bed, and Cuesongs), but they can also be upwards of $100,000 for a worldwide television spot. Even after paying a placement company, an artist can still end up with a mid-to-high five figures in profit. This is also before they may get lucky with the “magic sync” that results in larger sales and popularity.

Bucket List

There are multiple examples of DIY artists who could fit into each of these buckets, but there are very few that were actually succeeding in multiple buckets.

YouTube artists don’t get enough road experience to draw well and their music lacks the “cred” music supervisors want. Touring artists mostly have “road” content to post on YouTube (which doesn’t perform as well), and they are in the studio less often to make tracks for sync placements. Meanwhile, sync artists tend to avoid YouTube for fear of diminishing their brand with covers, and don’t get much name recognition for their sync placements to draw on the road.

While success in multiple categories is elusive for most, success comes to those who focus on one revenue stream. By putting their energy in growing that one element, a musician quickly learns what works for that bucket. Then they refine their trade to fit the medium and achieve greater success. Laser-sharp vision allows them the financial resources to make a living at what they love.

The disadvantage is that this singular focus makes it difficult to get the career momentum most artists desire. Those that want to be rich and famous in music need to be succeeding on radio, the Internet, press, TV, and touring. For the DIY musician, much of that is cost prohibitive anyway, so a focus on what you can achieve makes smart business sense. However, it also explains why most major labels continue to dominate the biggest selling artists. Even when the artist comes from an indie, they usually have a partnership with a major label to generate success.

If you are truly DIY and don’t have a team, focusing on one area to succeed is a wise business plan. If you achieve a lot of success in that bucket, then you can evaluate how to grow on your terms. The new music business may look different, but it’s clear that a focus allows a greater chance towards DIY success.

Source: MTT (by Jay Frank)