susie the moderator


I’ve been asked to compile a list of appropriate terms/words when referring to Indigenous Australians.. So here goes!

As a little bit of back-ground info on us.. Indigenous people in Australia have the longest continuing culture/s in the world. With many different language groups, culture groups, similarities with cultures in certain parts of Africa, Indonesia and nearby countries/nations, Aboriginal Australia is indeed diverse, to say the least.


Terms/words that are appropriate:

  • Indigenous Australian/s
  • Indigenous 
  • Aboriginal 
  • Aboriginal people/s
  • Torres Straight Islander person/s
  • Torres Straight Islander people/s
  • Native (though it’s not used as much here and more often heard to describe the Indigenous people of America, some will use the word)
  • Black (yes, we ARE Black.. the white settlers used the term “Blacks” which reduced us down to our skin color.. we’ve reclaimed that word and is often used like “Black-fella”)
  • ATSI - Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander/s (umbrella term for Aboriginal and Torres Straight Island people’s or for shorthand)

Terms/words that are NOT appropriate:

  • Aborigine/Aborigines (a big no-no and sadly many still use these terms today)
  • The Aborigines
  • The Aboriginal people
  • The Torres Straight Islanders
  • Blacks
  • Colored
  • The n word (pretty obvious, really)
  • Half-caste 
  • Full-blood 

Appropriate area-specific terms:

  • Murri - Qld, north west NSW
  • Nyoongah - WA
  • Koori – NSW
  • Goori - north coast NSW
  • Koorie - Vic
  • Yolngu - Arnhem Land
  • Anangu - Central Australia
  • Palawa - Tasmania
  • Ngarrindjeri – SA - River Murray, Lakes, Coorong people
  • Torres Strait Island Peoples
  • Murray Island Peoples
  • Mer Island Peoples

Also, words that are used to describe us as “less-advanced” when compared to European societies, are not acceptable. We are not less-advanced, or less-modern or a “primitive” people - we are just different. As is everyone. 

Please direct any further questions to black-australia.


Often when you are kicked down whether it be mentally, physically, or spiritually... These 5 familiar words are often spoken with little to no explanation as to how it will help or what exactly is meant by : "don't fight fire with fire"

What they mean is: Don’t fight fire with anything.

Do not fight fire with water.

Do not fight fire with foam.

Do not evacuate the people.

Do not sound the alarms.

Do not crawl coughing and choking and spluttering to safety.

Do not barricade the door with damp towels.

Do not wave a white flag out of the window.

Do not take the plunge from several stories up.

Do not shed a tear for your lover trapped behind a wall of flame.

Do not curse the combination of fuel, heat, and oxygen.

Do not ask why the fire fighters are not coming.

When they say: Don’t fight fire with fire.

“What they mean is: Stand and burn.”

- Claudia Boleyn “Stand and Burn”

(via @claudiaboleyn)

White people crying racism about Nick Cannons album name

(Time to break this down for white people especially American Whites…I doubt they’ll ever understand)

First of all for the “White Americans” who are complaining about racism against you…All the African American people in American live YOUR culture. Not their native culture but YOURS. This European language, we’re conditioned to dress like you in order to seem professional, have certain acceptable hairstyles etc. Even due to our own ignorance today a lot of what WE think is apart of their culture NEVER even came from them. I say to hell with that!

Now first of all I think Nick Cannon is a lousy music artist. I don’t even like him.
I stumbled upon this album on itunes and I decided so see the reviews.
Of course, the comments were white people crying out:

“What about WET” ( white peoples version of BET)
BUT…this is my question for white people…
1) How the hell can you complain about BET when over 95% of American television is aimed at your race? You have the super Heroes and much much more.
You have slave movies like the Butler, 12 years a slave etc to make YOU feel comfortable and look like saviors. ( btw in hated those two movies! Pure propoganda.)

2)The people who even maintain most of the worlds wealth look like you.
3)American society and many others where Europeans have taken over are systematically built to benefit you.

To sum it up: not a goddamn thing about that title is going to negating affect the way society treats you. And you know it. Any negative ways were already a result of what your ancestors did to nearly the whole planet of non white people and the attitudes that I’ve noticed many still have today. Smile In Your face but talk shit about you online.

This is something for my black people even the black people who’ve been Europeanized (willingly accepting white culture and abandoning your own carelessly) to keep in mind:

Most white people have to make themselves matter. For survival purposes. They try to make themselves matter by staying on your mind constantly. When you see movies, turn on the TV, who do you mostly see? White people. They’re everywhere being put into
Our subconscious minds even though they’re the minority on the planet earth. We’re conditioned to dress like them, and look like them. They have no significant history so they put themselves in positions that get them attention.
As long as they’re on top everything is good. When that dominance is threatened and it will be you’ll see exactly the two bit sense of self worth they believe about themselves.

anonymous asked:

Considering that both you and susie were exposed for being lightskin earlier this year moderator susie comes off as a hypocrite telling lightskin poc to humble ourselves. In the end we're all being bit in the ass by white supremacy so this divisive ideology you hold isn't doing nonwhite people any good.

Lol “exposed”

Colorism exists. Colorism effects the black community. You sound like a white person talking about economics so either accept the above or go somewhere else with that bullshit.


Hi—Susie the Moderator had asked if I wanted to submit something, and after a gap of many days, I have. If you have moved on and no longer need this, lemme know. I’m just proud that I stopped writing before I actually hit book length.

Stuff like this usually goes on my SemiticSemantics site, but I am also lodubimvloyaar as above.

Thanks for the opportunity!

Are Jews considered POC?

The short answer is, “Yes, no, and maybe.”

This is the long answer:

The terms ‘white’ and ‘people of color’ don’t work very well to describe many Jews, or many Jewish experiences. I’m going to try to explain why, and also to explain

The great majority of Jews are descended from an indigenous Middle Eastern people who, according to tradition, started from Iraq or Syria before settling in what is now Israel and Palestine. A global diaspora resulting from a series of invasions and population upheavals spread Jews across the map. We picked up some customs from the people we lived among, while preserving our own,and our own religion, legal code, and self-concept. We also picked up some genes along the way. Ashkenazim and Sephardim (these terms will be explained below) seem, according to modern genetics research, to be about 70% Middle Eastern, and 30% European. (I’m basically leaving Jews by choice out of this discussion, for several reasons, so I’m taking this moment to salute them and assure them that no disrespect is meant by this omission.)

The bulk of the diaspora can be split into three broad groups, distinguished by region, language, and minhag (a term referring to religious traditions). The Mizrahim, ‘the Easterners’, are the Jews of the Arabic-speaking world and their descendants, but the term is often also used for Persian Jews, and for Jews from West Asia and parts of the Caucasus. The Sephardim (from ‘Sefarad’, the Hebrew name for Spain) are the descendants of the medieval S*panish Jewish communities, expelled from Spain at the end of the fifteenth century, and Portugal during the sixteenth. And the Ashkenazim (from “Ashkenaz”, the Hebrew name for Germany) are the descendents of the Jews of Central and Eastern Europe.

These groups are somewhat fluidly defined and described, not least because Jewish history has been one of continuous upheaval, expulsion and migration. Ashkenazi communities settled in parts of Turkey and other areas within the Ottoman Empire, and Sephardim ended up in Ottoman lands, Holland and North Africa. Mizrahim moved to France. Everyone moved to Israel and the United States. Marriages between the groups happened for centuries, and are now super-common in Israel. (As a well-known pop example, Jerry Seinfeld—yes, that Jerry Seinfeld—has an Ashkenazi father and a Mizrahi mother.)

The cultural divisions above, in addition, do not include the entire Jewish people, by any means. The Ethiopian community, for example, is an example of a large group that falls into an entirely different category, since their diaspora began earlier, and their religious practice reflects an earlier form of Judaism than the ‘beginning of the common era’ model the rest of us walked away with.

However, and this is something that is rarely understood by gentiles, and vitally important to any understanding of Jews, despite all of these cultural divisions and variations, we have actively considered ourselves a single people—am Yisrael—for thousands of years.

So, given all of this, are Jews people of color?

Some groups are undeniably ‘visible’ people of color, such as the Ethiopians or the Chinese communities, and no one attempts to define them otherwise. Ditto, visible people of color who are Jews by choice, or people of mixed Jewish and gentile PoC heritage.

Outside of this narrow zone, however, definitions get tricky.

Many European (both Ashkenazic and Sephardic Jews) have defined and do define themselves as white, since roughly the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the point at which the development of whiteness as a social construct intersected with the emancipation of the Jews of many European countries. Many of these hopeful dates, of course, reflected false promises. If whiteness was offered in many places in Europe in the 1800s, one might say it was revoked, emphatically, during a period of the 1900s. Nevertheless, this is the starting point of the idea that Jews could be ‘white people’ in any real sense.

I can’t emphasize enough that this access to whiteness was conditional on the borders and attitudes of gentile nations and cultures. The perception that Ashkenazim were always privileged for being white Jews is entirely false. This extended to some of the Mizrahi communities as well: for example, the wealthy Baghdadi merchant families

I also can’t emphasize enough that all of these groups have, throughout Jewish history, understood ourselves as one people, one am. Despite separations of distance, we shared a language, a religion, a legal code, and an understanding of ourselves as the descendants of common ancestors. I am not going to be romantic enough to insist that distance, cultural difference and gentile concepts of race never got in the way of this, but I find that it is very hard for most gentiles to accept how deeply it ran and runs, and how core the concept that all Jews are a single people has been and continues to be.

In the United States, my experience has been that most light-skinned Jews tend to identify themselves as white. It is how we are commonly perceived by strangers, at least in urban, ethnically diverse areas, and it is how we are defined (like Arabs) on government paperwork. It also reflects, in the last few generations, the degree of white privilege we are able to access. This is not a universal. Some Jews, identifying themselves primarily as people of Middle Eastern descent, or as people consistently targeted historically and in the present day by white supremacy, choose to define themselves outside of whiteness. It’s common for American Jews who feel this way to define themselves as ‘white-passing’ or ‘conditionally white-passing’. Many Mizrahim, regardless of skin color, describe themselves as people of color, because of their cultural and historical distance from what is usually defined as whiteness.

This is the United States. Europe is a different matter, and I would argue that, outside of, perhaps, Great Britain, it’s impossible to define European Jews as being white in a European context. I’m basing this on my own experience, and that of people I’ve been close to, as well as discussions with Jews living or raised in Europe. If a European Jew wants to weigh in with more detail about this, please, please do. In areas where the dominant Gentile cultures are not white, there are other issues, and the concept of white/PoC may be entirely irrelevant, or only relevant in the context of the country’s experience of colonialism.

My back went up when I saw the original question. For Jews in places where it’s a relevant question, whether we are white or not has often been a subject that gentiles feel free to pronounce upon, often with political objectives of their own in mind. Jewish oppression, both historical and modern, is often dismissed scornfully—if Jews are white, how can we possibly have been the victims of racial oppression, the reasoning goes. Non-Jews with little understanding of Jewish history and culture often weigh in as experts, announcing confidently that Ashkenazim are white and Sephardim and Mizrahim are PoC. Not only does this not reflect either historical or modern reality—and reveals that these weighers-in have met very few if any Jews who are not assimilated American Ashkenazim—but from a standpoint of Jewish social and political identity, it can be a direct attack on our self-definition and our concept of peoplehood.

Often, the results of outsiders imposing their ideas of whiteness or color on Jews results in the idea that Ashkenazim are white—and that therefore, their privilege outweighs their oppression as Jews—and that the ‘exotic’ Sephardim and Mizrahim are people of color. As such, the gentile ‘definer’ will agree that they can experience racism—from white people, and from white Jews—but the ‘definer’ will seldom bother to understand their experience of anti-Semitism, nor to understand that the source of this anti-Semitism was often other people who would be called people of color.

The result of all this is to drive an artificial wedge…one not based in Jewish thought…through the Jewish people, insisting that a sociological distinction based on the concepts of white-supremacist non-Jewish cultures defines Jews more accurately than our own cultural concepts, and is entitled to divide us from one another.

To the questioner: ask. Don’t try to put some thirteen million people who were, until recently, flung world-wide into such a small box. One Jew may tell you she is white, another that she is white-passing, and yet another that she is a woman of color. All three may look the same to you, or they may look different. Understand that even if they give different answers, they are tied to one another by thousands of years of history.

Edit: I just sent through a submission, then realized one sentence got truncated. The sentence is from toward the beginning and should read: “The terms ‘white’ and ‘people of color’ don’t work very well to describe many Jews, or many Jewish experiences. I’m going to try to explain why, and also to explain to some extent how Jews actually identify ourselves.”

anonymous asked:

is it ok for people who are from asia (the middle east and around there, so brown) to say nigga/nigger?

No, no no no NO.
It sure as hell is NOT OKAY.

If you are not black don’t say it.
“nigga” and “nigger” are the same word if you’re not black.

It will never be okay, you cannot reclaim a slur that was not directed at your people.

- Susie the moderator

In response to the Anonymous Asker wondering why "white allies" and "non racist" White People are called Race Traitors by their fellow white people:


Personally, I thinks it’s because of the “white lens” their viewing the world from (not excusing btw just giving my theory).
It’s no secret, no matter how many times they try to deny it to save face, that White Pride and White Nationalism are White Supremacy Groups with racially motivated discriminative beliefs. The white people in such groups undeniably and ignorantly believe they are above any non-white human and have an unbecoming sense of entitlement to everything and everyone on our shared planet earth.

The premises of these groups is Hate. Also, to stroke their fragile Egos. Plain and simple it’s to HATE and LOATH People of Color with the full intentions of violence and hindering non-white communities. They know this and they forgo any sensibility that what they are doing is wrong or unethical. Or they know and don’t care, making up relatively false or discriminative misinformation to excuse themselves (willful ignorance and cognitive dissonance).

Subconsciously, throughout White Western communities whether it’s blatant, unknowingly, or subject to circumstance declaring love for your race, ethnicity, and cultural community is strongly associated with Hatred for others. i.e “You cannot love yourself without hating another group. Racial Pride means you view yourself supreme to all others. Self-love and cultural pride stem from the belittlement and dehumanization of those who differ from you”. A very black and white concept, I know. (no pun intended).

*Again, you all know me fairly well enough (as a blogger anyway) to conclude that I’m not giving anyone a free pass to think in this destructive way… I’m just explaining it in a way others can educate themselves and hopefully form strong arguments to combat this destructive thinking.*

*Now, where does this fit in with our ‘White Allies’(using this term very lightly)?*

We know that it is very possible to unlearn toxic mentalities and also to not internalize them heavily during socialization. The ‘White Allies’ that we’re speaking of do not share the false equivalence of “Self-Love=Outward-Hate”. Having the ability to understand that when a non-White person claiming love for their race (i.e. “Black Pride, etc) in response to White Pride/Nationalism it is not an act of hatred toward others, but a proclamation of love/acceptance of ones self despite Institutional Racism and Socialization telling non-white people that you aren’t worth anything. Self-Love is a beautiful revolutionary thought process, really.

IN CONCLUSION and answer your question (finally I know!):

Due to their environmental socialization White People, consciously or not, see non-white self-love and personal acceptance as ‘White Hate’ or 'Reverse Racism’. Witnessing another White Person (their own kin) speaking out against the very institution that allows them their unchecked privileges is disheartening to them. Not to mention seeing White People supporting non-White self love is seen as a White Person saying “Fuck me and my fellow White People! Non-White people are supreme and all around better than us White People). This then brings up conscious feelings of betrayal/anger/frustration to those who are blatantly racist and subconscious feelings of betrayal/anger/frustration to those who have internalized this mentality.

Hence, the term “race traitor” becomes applicable and make more sense as to why it’s used. Regardless of the probable fact that the aforementioned 'White Allie’ doesn’t hate themselves or their people. They just do not support Institutionalized Racism. Despite also having privileged and internalized racist socialization like their blatant counterparts.

HOPE THIS HELPS :) it’s a long read, but worth it to get a good understanding of this subconscious thought process. Again, not excusing, but it’s important to be aware of why people behave the way they do.

- Susie the Moderator

p.s. This knowledge can also be applied to why Feminism is thought of as 'Male Hatred’ and the LGBT+ being seen as wanting to destroy CIS heterosexual relationships, etc etc

anonymous asked:

Hey, would it be appropriation if a white South African wore traditional South African clothing because they were born there?

Yes, it would 100% be cultural appropriation. Just the thought of that disgusts me.

They are not Bantu are they? No, they’re white. The white South Africans killed and segregated the black Africans and the Bantu people for wearing such clothing, for being proud of being African. Also, white South Africans are just people living in Africa, they are NOT African in any which way. It doesn’t matter if they were born there it’s not their culture even in the slightest.

- Susie the moderator

anonymous asked:

There's a difference between helping PoC because we are all oppressed and only standing up for black people. I used to love your blog but now I'm just sick to see that I stand up for BLM so much and they don't support other PoC movements

….. mmkay honey, I’m not sure if I’m reading this correct.

To Paraphrase: You used to love our blog but not anymore because Eon and I are a supporters of ‘Black Lives a Matter’ and you are unhappy that they aren’t focusing their attention on non-black POC and you’re mad because we support BLM and think we are only standing up for Black People? Do you not see the diversity in our posts or nah?

Okay well first unfollow us and if you don’t it’s okay because I’m blocking your IP address anyway. 💁🏾

Second… You are literally whining in our inbox because BLACK Lives Matter: (BLACK) as in in Blickity-Blacker-than Black… BLAAAAAACK as in Black Diaspora….. As in Black People being the topic of discussion. Focuses solely on Black People? Are you shitting me? Out of ALL the Black run groups that have a base as black rights group, but also touch on POC you’re mad because BLM focuses on Black People? Like how selfish do you sound. There are hundreds of Black run groups that focus on Everyone, why BLM?

Black People have our own racial problems to worry about (if you were wondering) which are quite large and can be found across every ethnic group. Seriously, look in the mirror and reconsider sending this type of message again.

I’m sick and tired, and tired and sick, of this sense of entitlement Non-Black People of Color have when it comes Black run spaces and what we protest about. The majority of your groups focus on y'all damn selves and the majority of black groups focus on EVERYONE TOO.

You want visibility and marches damnit get a group together and do it on your own. We’ll cheer you on. You don’t need Black People holding your hands do you? C'mon we support you guys on so many things while being well aware of the anti-black racism in your communities.

Black Lives Matter is for Black People and Black People ONLY. No one else. Sorry I don’t feel an ounce of guilt or regret for saying this (I’m very unapologetic, quite frankly): THIS. SPACE. IS. NOT. FOR. YOU. IF. YOU. ARE. NOT. BLACK!

I’ll say it again just so there is no confusion: “Black Lives Matter is for Black People.. ONLY”. Deal with it and move on or be unhappy, because it’s not changing anytime soon. 💚

… and you know, as a digress, the irony and humor of your whiny little ask is that Black Lives Matter has fully supported, shouted out, and included Non-Black People literally since it began.
- that time the white kid was wrongfully killed BLM supporters were literally the only ones taking about.
- same with non-black POC getting wronged we made articles and hashtags for you guys.
- 'literally too many examples to list’
***Is this an actual message or are you just trolling to get blocked, Anon?

- Susie The Moderator

virtuallyoffended  asked:

people are really hypocrites like I remember this one blog saying you shouldn't say nigga bc it has deep roots to a different meaning but they call people fuckboys even tho it has deep roots and in prison it means a guy in prison that was raped ugh people really need yo watch what they say

Fuck boy 100% does not mean that literally at all. Like at ALL. The definition you gave was by white people columbusing one of the many African American slang terms.

That post was made by a white person who obviously didn’t know what it meant, looked it up and found it on urban dictionary (that’s right urban fucking dictionary, the website that when you search black people the highest rated definitions are 100% racist and repulsive cuz the majority of the users on that site are immature white people).

It’s an African American slang term for (in my (Susie) own super broad words *feel free to add more definitions followers) an immature man who treats woman poor, uses them for their bodies, etc. He’s a cheat that can’t be trusted and is sketchy and lame with his actions.

- Susie the Moderator

I'm going to take the liberty to assume Pete Wentz does identify as mixed Black Person and that he's a democrat all from that post <3 I knew I liked FOB for a reason

- Susie The Moderator

Blogs to block and unfollow.

We highly suggest that if you are following whatwhitesdontknow you unfollow and block them immediately.

Not only is this blog about respectable politics, it’s sexist, victim blaming, and would rather have its name be called “whatblacksdontknow” but decided against it so they wouldn’t be attacked.

They highly disregard anti blackness in the black community.

It’s a literal shit show, save yourself the time and effort.

- Susie The Moderator

anonymous asked:

Why do you hope the Exodus movie fails? Sorry if im slow!

It white washed the Egyptians they are depicting.

And apparently one of the main characters wives is from mid Africa and they case her as a blonde white woman? Byeee

- Susie the moderator

anonymous asked:

"nigeeros r oppresseddd!!! We do so many work as u and none credit!!!" says the bitch who sits on tumblr all day

Actually anon, both of us are in school and both of us are very educated.

It probably seems like we are on Tumblr all day because we use Tumblr scheduler to schedule a post every hour or so? We have homework/tests like every university student so we think critically when it comes to posting because we are extremely busy. (Remember when Eon was on hiatus) (:

Myself personally? I go to the University of Minnesota (honors program mind you). I’m majoring in health science w/ a minor in African American diaspora. I speak multiple Bantu languages indigenous to my country of Zambia. Not to mention a little French and Spanish from my mother and father. I’m very fit and active and can proudly call myself the mommy of a new Russian dwarf hamster named “Ziggy Mandela”(named after Ziggy Marley and Nelson Mandela).

Any black/African living in a world designed to cater to white people has to work 3x as hard as ANY white person to be even recognized as a human being. We don’t get handed ANYTHING. As a people we are constantly being judged no matter how great we are (see the black students accepted into Ivy League schools and white and Asian people claiming affirmative action). My people built The United States, South America, and Europe. The worlds economy would be NOTHING, but a failure without black people.

Why so salty anon, does this page force you to check your privilege?

You are a coward, hiding behind anon to attack a page meant to uplift the spirits of POC.

- Susie the moderator

anonymous asked:

don't drink Starbucks its white culture.white people get made fun of for drinking it and blacks don't. Starbucks originated from Europe like honestly this is a big deal. If hairstyles and accessories are a big deal, coffee is too.

👀 Hmm, I wonder which troll is behind this Anon message :)

Firstable, this is obviously a troll message and I usually go ahead and block every troll message without answering (cuz I’m that bitch & I like to know y'all waiting fervently with anticipation of my anger😎). But, as a self proclaimed and avid confectionary coffee drinker I had to serve you up a lil’ sumthin’ sumthin’ 😏

Listen and learn, honey💁🏾:

My Blended Caramel High Rise with a double shot of Hazelnut and lactose free milk made with cream… Is not a Starbucks Drink✨. GOTCHA BITCH! YOUUUUUU THOUGHT!😊😊

In fact, my very ignorant and trolly friend, my overpriced Blended Caramel High Rise with a double shot of Hazelnut made with lactose free milk and cream is a drink that is home to none other than Minnesota’s own: CARIBOU COFFEE💁🏾💁🏾💁🏾👸🏾

That’s right hunty, yo ass THOUGHT you were onto sumthin 😂 but you wasn’t. 💅🏽😇😏😂

- Susie the Moderator and Avid Coffee Enthusiast.

p.s. I not only blocked this IP Address after I wrote this humor themed response, but I have it (&other trolls/racists/hecklers/etc) stored and saved just in case I’m in the mood to Doxx 😎👀💅🏽👸🏾

anonymous asked:

I find it annoying that white people keep saying Cleopatra was greek. Do you believe this or is this just another regurgitated lie attempting to white wash our history.

I do not believe it. The Egyptians were black. I do not care what the white washed history says. Most of it is lies created by old white men.

People assume Cleopatra was Greek because of her name. If an Asian woman is named Britney does that make her white? My name is Susie… Am I white? Hell Nope.

Many people do not realizing the Greeks and Egyptians were much like middle America and North America. They traded cultures, languages, Etc.

If in 500 years people look back on United States look back on the American English language and see that the Spanish language is being taught in school and quickly dominating English, will they believe the current North American society was in fact of middle American descent and not “culturally diverse”? People seem to find it hard to believe that older societies participated in cultural exchange and that black people did INFACT travel the world eons before the transatlantic slave trade.

With that being said, the Egyptians didn’t even call themselves the Egyptians, it was a name given by the English. The Greeks referred to them as “melampodes” (black footed ones).

Just like how Brazil is actually “Brasil”, but English speakers call it Brazil and the Spain is actually “Espana”, but the English speakers call it Spain. The Egyptians called their country the “Kemet” which directly translates to ‘land of the blacks’ and referred to themselves as the “Kemets” which translates to the ‘the black ones’.

Now, I don’t know about you, but I find it very hard to believe that a land supposedly full of white people would be referred to as black footed and then call themselves the blacks.

- Susie the moderator

It’s Islam Awareness Week here at The University of Minnesota! Today’s theme is: Hijabi for a Day

The very beautiful ladies of the Muslim Student Association are putting on a “Hijabi for a Day” here! Knowing me of course I took their cultural invitation and have been wearing my Hijab the entire day :) and well… It’s very different I must say. I’ll never fully understand what is like to be Muslim, with or without Hijab(etc). But it’s very nice of them to share their culture with us!

I just wish people would stop staring at me… It’s like a spotlight was shown on me once I left the Coffman Union central area and began exploring campus… I’m not sure if they’re like “oh she’s participating today or oh they think I am Muslim”… Either way.. MIND YOUR OWN DAMN.

SOOO.. As much as I love participating in this, I would like to here ALL opinions. Both negative and positive about this?

- Susie The Moderator