so many actors

Starting a portrait series for A Song of Ice and Fire; I like the show fine but many faces aren’t what imagined when I read the books. Going to combine some of Game of Thrones’ costuming (one of the best things they do) with my own ideas and dreamcasts!!

WIP of Cersei, from my Instagram where I’ll be posting progress! (ASOIAF fans feel free to leave comments there of your own fancasts, anything you felt was missing from the show, character you especially want to see or have a vision for, etc.!!)

The Magnificent Seven (2016)

Watch The Magnificent Seven in HD

Synopsis:
A big screen remake of John Sturges’ classic western The Magnificent Seven, itself a remake of Akira Kurosawa’s Seven Samurai. Seven gun men in the old west gradually come together to help a poor village against savage thieves.

Release Date: Sep 22, 2016
Runtime: 132 minutes
Genres: Action, Adventure, Western
Production Company: Columbia Pictures, Village Roadshow Pictures, Escape Artists,Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM), LStar Capital, Pin High Productions
Production Countries: United States of America
Casts: Chris Pratt, Denzel Washington, Ethan Hawke, Vincent D'Onofrio,Matt Bomer, Lee Byung-hun, Manuel Garcia-Rulfo, Martin Sensmeier, Peter Sarsgaard, Haley Bennett, Kevin Wayne
Plot Keywords: remake

The Magnificent Seven

Rarely have so many charismatic actors been used in a film that feels quite as soulless as Antoine Fuqua’s update of “The Magnificent Seven.” It’s one of those projects that should work on paper. The cast is perfectly assembled, and I’ve actually been a bigger fan than most of Fuqua’s recent old-fashioned morality plays like “The Equalizer” and “Southpaw.” However, this effort, the opening night film of the Toronto International Film Festival, too often registers as hollow, an exercise in genre that has echoes of the John Sturges and Akira Kurosawa versions, but little of the charm of the former and none of the depth of the latter. The sheer talent of the cast here sometimes provides enough depth to get audience members to the climactic shoot-out, and there are a few definite MVPs in terms of ensemble, but it’s hard to envision this film having anywhere near the cinematic legacy of those that inspired it.

One of those MVPs is Peter Sarsgaard, as the fantastically-named Bartholomew Bogue, the villain of this version. Sarsgaard and Fuqua know to hold nothing back with their characterization of true evil. They practically give him a handlebar mustache to twirl. In the opening scene, after terrorizing the God-fearing people of Rose Creek, he burns their church to the ground, exiting it like the devil riding out of Hell. In fact, it’s too bad we don’t get more time with Sarsgaard in the center of the film because he understands how to embrace a villain.

On the other side of the moral coin, we meet Sam Chisolm (Denzel Washington), a bounty hunter hired by Emma Cullen (Haley Bennett), one of the citizens of the aforementioned Rose Creek. Chisolm is a man of justice—introduced dressed all in black, riding a black horse. He is the square-jawed and silent type, which doesn’t allow Washington many opportunities to show his natural charisma or leadership abilities. He has a few good scenes of chemistry with his fellow stars, but Chisolm is too dull of a hero for an actor this talented and this typically enjoyable to watch.

Chisolm assembles, you guessed it, six men to help defend Rose Creek from Bogue and his minions. First, there’s the drunk Irishman Faraday, played with expected whimsy by a very good Chris Pratt. We also meet one of Chisolm’s old colleagues, the PTSD-plagued Goodnight Robicheaux (Ethan Hawke) and his right-hand man Billy Rocks (Byung-hun Lee), who’s quick and vicious with a blade. Chisolm decides to let one of his bounties live and so the fifth “Magnificent” becomes Vasquez (Manuel Garcia-Rulfo). The group is filled out with a Native American named Red Harvest (Martin Sensmeier) and a possibly unstable gentleman named Jack (played by the king of the possibly unstable, Vincent D’Onofrio).

As usual, the structure of “The Magnificent Seven” is somewhat beautiful in its simplicity. An evil man must be stopped, and so seven guys get together and form an unexpectedly powerful team by combining their unique skill sets. As there’s not much to the narrative of a film like this one, its success or failure comes down to execution. And this one is too often flat. I kept waiting for it to click into gear, to use the joyful personalities of actors like Washington and Pratt to an end that felt like it was doing more than servicing the incredibly straightforward plot. Way too much of “The Magnificent Seven” plods from point A to point B to point C. And one can really feel this lack of momentum when the film does briefly spark to life. For example, seeing “Training Day” stars Hawke and Washington reunited and given one of the film’s only true dramatic scenes provides some much-needed depth of character, but it just never turns into a flame.

Part of the problem is that too much of this “Magnificent Seven” appears manufactured on a backlot. There’s zero sense of period and setting. Never once did I sense I was watching characters in a story so much as a talented group of actors assembled to create a product. The dialogue references concepts like righteousness and justice but there’s little sincerity in any of it. Part of the problem is also that “The Magnificent Seven” feels like a modern summer blockbuster as much as it does an ode to the Akira Kurosawa film. We’ve seen so many “assemblage of ragtag heroes” films in the years since the Sturges movie, and this version of “Magnificent Seven” seems to have as much in common with “The Avengers” as it does a Steve McQueen movie.

For some people, just getting this particular group of ragtag heroes together will be enough. And, to be fair, we may see films with this structure, but we don’t get star-powered westerns very often any more. The star power, especially with scene-stealers like Pratt and Hawke, can be blinding enough that genre fans won’t see the wasted potential. They just forgot to take advantage of it.

It wasn’t supposed to be such a quick drabble but since I have no time to perfect it, here you go…

well then, ekhem- KUROBAS CUP 2015 MAKES ME LOOK LIKE A MESS.

Every time I see -tch- every time I RECALL crying Kenshou and Yuuki comforting him, my eyes go wet immediately. I know they became good friends after all this time and all but… that scene… I just cannot handle it without emotions simmering inside me ;W;

I shipped KagaKuro but not as a great fan or sth - I believe it’s going to change after everything that I watched… *w*

I didn’t even understand anything except few words and phrases… And still… I think I didn’t really need to understand…

Excuse me, I need to sob in the corner for a while. /crieees/

I know I’ve said this before, but I just can’t help repeating (because it’s just so amusing)….

Of COURSE Mads is the captain of the Hannigram ship. He is Hannibal Lecter, who is THE ADMIRAL OF THE ARMADA. Nobody ships Hannigram more than Hannibal Lecter.

For the last three years, he has literally been, as an actor, going into every scene like, “What’s your motivation for this scene?”

  • “I want to see if I can get Will Graham to kill. Because I love him.”
  • “I want to have a dinner party for Will Graham. Because I love him.” 
  • “I want to get Will to be completely dependent on me through this illness, and accept himself as a killer, so we can be killers together. Because I love him.”
  • “I want Will to know what I am. Because I love him.”
  • “I want to believe Will is honest with me. Because I love him.”
  • “I want to be a murder family with Will and Abigail. Because I love them.”
  • “I want to kill Will for betraying me…but kinda not…but both because I love him.”
  • “I don’t care if I get caught and am going to make myself a target. Because I love Will and I want him to find me.”
  • “I’m going to eat Will. Because I love him.”
  • “I’m going to prison because I can’t bear to be separated from Will. Because I love him.”
  • “I’m going to turn every conversation I have into one about Will. Because I love him.”

Mads Mikkelsen has been doing this day in and day out for three years. No wonder he was all excited to Bryan about the almost-kiss. This is what I was talking about when I mentioned a feedback loop of momentum for Hannigram, especially with Hugh Dancy’s own set of motivations for Will amounting to the last year and a half of him going, “I should do the right thing with Hannibal, but I don’t want to. Because I love him” and before that being so upset with Hannibal’s betrayal because the seeds of love were there, and not wanting to believe Hannibal was the one tormenting him because he was so emotionally dependent on him. It was building, and once the story started pushing Will toward acceptance of that love, Bryan Fuller had created a monster that was pretty well out of his control, at least as far as those actors were concerned. This is why I don’t find it surprising at all that Bryan said that he wasn’t exactly intending to go there, but “was absorbing so much of Mads and Hugh’s performance” (x). Their job was not just to communicate the characters’ feelings to the camera, but in the collaborative participation they were allowed on Hannibal, to drive the characters toward their desires. 

The signs as technical theatre jobs

Aries: director

Taurus: sound designer

Gemini: dresser

Cancer: stage crew

Leo: set designer

Virgo: spotlight operator

Libra: costume designer

Scorpio: stage manager

Sagittarius: lighting designer

Capricorn: dramaturg

Aquarius: technical director

Pisces: choreographer