New Post has been published on FSRN

New Post has been published on

Tax Day 2015: U.S. House considers estate tax repeal

As millions of U.S. taxpayers scramble to finish their 2014 income tax returns and shoulder their tax responsibilities, the U.S. House of Representatives takes up repealing the estate tax, thereby reducing tax bills for the wealthiest in the country. FSRN’s Nell Abram talked with tax policy analyst Scott Klinger about the estate tax and its effect on growing income inequality in the U.S.

Download Audio

Nell Abram: The tax comes into play on estates worth $5.4 million and up and tops out at 40 percent. Republicans say that’s not fair – that taxes are paid on the front end as the estate grows, and heirs shouldn’t have to pay what they call “additional” taxes on the same money. Democrats say that repealing the estate tax is simply another means to consolidate wealth and gives the richest U.S. taxpayers another huge tax break. Scott Klinger is Director of Revenue and Spending Policies at the Center for Effective Government. He joins us to discuss the estate tax and what he calls a move that would accelerate the income inequality gap in the country. Scott, welcome to FSRN.

Scott Klinger: Thank you Nell, it’s my pleasure to be with you.

NA: First – a quick primer. When did the estate tax begin in the U.S. and why?

SK: It began in 1916 and it was a response to the previous big rise economic inequality after the era that’s known as the Robber Baron Era when all the industrialists and railroaders who benefited from the Industrial Revolution and the rapid growth in the economy in the 1890s and first decade of the 20th century reaped huge fortunes and the estate tax was adopted as the country’s most progressive tax to keep that inequality from getting out of line and to raise some revenue for the federal government.

NA: Fast forward to today, when most taxpayers in the country are struggling with their income taxes today, and many in the lower income brackets would benefit from greater tax breaks on things like childcare expenses and education costs. Who who is affected by the existing estate tax – and how much money are we talking about?



Gold: Chemical Element, Color of spray paint used extensively by Scott Klinger. Traditionally considered attractive. Most common basis of monetary policies and currency throughout human existence. The perceived value of gold represents one of the most distinct differences between man and animal. The artist read somewhere that a total of over 165,000 tonnes have been mined throughout human history. Half of which has been used to make jewelry. Scott Klinger has two gold teeth, his first molars on both sides, symmetrically spaced on his bottom jaw. He views them as an emergency savings plan. The primary goal of alchemy was the transmutation of common metals into gold. Gold has become a common aesthetic theme in Scott’s work over the past few years. Of course, there are the heavy symbolic associations that come loaded with the use of gold, and Scott has an appreciation for these symbolic meanings but there is something more to it than that for explaining why Scott has begun to predominantly use the color in his work. Scott can’t quite articulate what exactly it is though. It is something both more meaningful than all of that and yet more abstract and personal. A. Maybe it began when the artist got his first gold teeth? B. Maybe it is some sort of pathetic compensation for his perceived relative worth existing as an artist in society at large? C. Perhaps the usage is recalling latent childhood Indiana Jones fantasies and the desire to create and possess objects of rare and significant worth? D. All of the above are valid perceptions for the viewer to believe.