On Sunday’s edition of MSNBC’s AM Joy with Joy Reid, the mother of slain 12-year-old Cleveland, Ohio native Tamir Rice discusses how President Barack Obama’s lack of real solutions to end police brutality is affecting the nation.
In the segment, Samaria Rice says it has been a struggle coping after the killing of her son in 2014. The mother and activist tells Reid that the Black Lives Matter movement has been important at enacting some change.
“I appreciate Black Lives Matter and them stepping up and showing me with unity looks like,” Rice says.
The activist against police brutality adds that white Americans also should stand up because it is happening to them as well. She explains that white Americans who do nothing are part of the problem.
Reid asks her about the presumptive candidates’ response. And Rice confidently says none of them are very outspoken on the issue.
“President Barack Obama, I don’t know what you are doing,” Rice says with disdain. “I don’t know how you are able to sleep at night … Nobody is getting any justice … I am very disappointed in him.”
The interview concludes with Rice saying that the RNC and the open-carry laws in Ohio are a “recipe for disaster.”
The UNESCO designated Samaria Gorge, located on the island of Crete is in danger of being expelled from the UN organisation’s list of natures due to the bureaucracy and the incompetence of state services.
The complete lack of coordination between the Greek state administration services could lead to the national park being struck of the UNESCO list, according to the President of the Greek National Committee MAB/UNESCO, Michalis Skoullos.
UNESCO sent a letter of warning to the Greek state revealing the park was at risk of being dropped from the relevant international list, unless the Greek Ministry for Environment proceeded with the legal guarantee of the park and the surrounding areas.
The Ministry was aware of the risk, as UNESCO had sent a first letter of warning two years ago!
The issue confronting both the Israelis and the Palestinians is
fundamentally humanitarian in nature. It is not political and it is not
geographic. Both peoples are entitled to live in peace and dignity, and
both peoples are being deprived of those fundamental rights because of
one thing and one thing only – radical Islamic jihadism, a cancer that
infects Israel and much of the rest of the world. No re-allocation of
land will cure this scourge, and, indeed, Israel knew no peace from 1948
to 1967 when it did not even control Judea and Samaria.
So what should we do? Should we continue to force a square peg
into a round hole and demand that Israel cede land to Palestinians in
exchange for a naked promise that the Palestinians will change their
behavior? Are you not concerned that Mahmoud Abbas has no electoral
mandate (his term expired six years ago), and that his justification for
not calling for new elections is that he will be replaced by an even
more violent jihadist? Are you not concerned that Mr. Abbas presides
over ceremonies honoring Palestinian terrorists or that he has been
accused of massive fiscal corruption? Are you not concerned that
Palestinians teach their children to hate and murder Jews, even putting
on school plays enacting such despicable behavior? Are you not concerned
that the Palestinian Authority has no ability to control the Hamas
factions in Hebron, Jenin and Nablus, which continuously assault and
kill Jewish people? Are you not concerned that the Palestinian Authority
pays generous stipends to the families of terrorists who are jailed or
killed after murdering Jews? Are you not concerned, after seeing the
disastrous results of Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza, that a Palestinian
state on the West Bank will bring missile attacks to the entire
population of Israel?
I know that you have no doubt that the People of Israel want
peace and that they are overwhelmingly well-intentioned, well-informed,
and non-hateful. Given that, are you not concerned that your desire to
divide Israel in two, leaving it without defensible borders, is solidly
rejected by a super-majority of Israelis? Indeed, even many Palestinians
now sensibly prefer Israeli rule to a nascent Palestinian state. Where
but in Israel do Arabs have educational opportunity, first class
healthcare, social and religious freedom and civil rights for women?
Purcell, a member of the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission, is
best known for her former role as a current affairs producer at RTE,
Ireland’s public service broadcaster. Purcell is a television producer
of longstanding, who wrote a book called Inside RTÉ: A Memoir
about her thirty-three year career at the Broadcasting institution,
which indicated the extent to which she influenced RTE’s political
trenchantly advocated against the Jewish State in the mainstream media,
in the aftermath of a supposed fact-finding tour of Judea and
Samaria/West Bank, organised by the Bethlehem branch of the YMCA (Young
Men’s Christian Association). Purcell’s staunch anti-Zionist claims, as
expressed in an Irish Examiner article, letters, and during an RTE
interview, echo most of the normative propagandistic talking points
found when anti-Israel tourism activists share their insights with the
international media. This article uses Purcell’s commentary as a
starting point to closely critique these broad talking points.
Purcell’s screed begins with a description of the appearance of a field of olive trees, near Bethlehem:
“It should be an idyllic scene. But we are with the farmer who owns the field, and his story is tragic.”
does not name the farmer and his family, upon which several of her
claims are based. The absence of an identifying source for Purcell’s
claims soon becomes significant. Of the farmer, it is said:
down the hill towards him is a massive Israeli settlement (illegal
under international law, and condemned by the International Court of
Justice in 2004). It has already led to the confiscation of half of his land.”
Numerous invalid claims have been made in the media about the confiscation of land
and property that was supposedly owned by Arab-Palestinians. Purcell
does not even deem it necessary to name the area where the farmer lives,
but it appears to be near the security barrier, in the environs of
Bethlehem. It is difficult to deduce the “massive” Jewish settlement
that Purcell references. It might be Efrat, or the neighbourhood of
Gilo, which Purcell may deem a settlement but it is merely a suburb
of East Jerusalem. Purcell describes this settlement as almost a living
thing, coming after the unfortunate farmer, but these urban centres
typically develop inward rather than outward, and do so at a relatively
slow pace due to the controversy that such developments garner
naming the security barrier the “Separation Wall”, Purcell demonstrates
a clear propagandistic intent. The term evokes the notion of apartheid
and negates the historic circumstance in which the development occurred,
namely the Second Intifada, in which the civilian Israeli populace was
subjected to approximately four years of terrorism, that largely
originated in Judea and Samaria/West Bank. It led to the death of nearly a thousand Israelis, the majority of which were Jewish civilians, along with many thousands of non-fatal casualties.
Purcell’s article introduced a rather extraordinary claim:
“The Wall is built in the West Bank, and when it is completed will annex a further 47% of West Bank territory.”
Purcell states that the separation wall, when it is completed, will
gobble up 47% of Palestinian territory. This is a lie; the wall is
expected to take up about nine per cent of the territory. Ms Purcell
does not explain why it was built in the first place: to keep potential
terrorists out of Israel.”
are varying estimates as to the amount of West Bank land the Separation
Wall will seize. The YMCA for instance predicts the incursion will be
there are varying estimates, then why did Purcell choose to go with the
most extreme estimate in her article? Purcell’s 47% claim is so absurd
that the reader might be forgiven for thinking that she has never seen a map of Judea and Samaria/West Bank!
The answer is found in Obadiah 1:17-Jonah 1:3 (NKJV),
17 “But on Mount Zion there shall be deliverance, And there shall be holiness; The house of Jacob shall possess their possessions.
18 The house of Jacob shall be a fire, And the house of Joseph a flame; But the house of Esau shall be stubble; They shall kindle them and devour them, And no survivor shall remain of the house of Esau,” For the Lord has spoken.
19 The South[c] shall possess the mountains of Esau, And the Lowland shall possess Philistia. They shall possess the fields of Ephraim And the fields of Samaria. Benjamin shall possess Gilead.
20 And the captives of this host of the children of Israel Shall possess the land of the Canaanites As far as Zarephath. The captives of Jerusalem who are in Sepharad Shall possess the cities of the South.[d]
21 Then saviors[e] shall come to Mount Zion To judge the mountains of Esau, And the kingdom shall be the Lord’s.
Jonah 1:1-3 (NKJV),
1 Now the word of the Lord came to Jonah the son of Amittai, saying,
2 “Arise, go to Nineveh, that great city, and cry out against it; for their wickedness has come up before Me.”
3 But Jonah arose to flee to Tarshish from the presence of the Lord. He went down to Joppa, and found a ship going to Tarshish; so he paid the fare, and went down into it, to go with them to Tarshish from the presence of the Lord.