russian emperors

Two Types of Ravenclaws
  • Ravenclaw 1: *chopping up some basil*
  • Ravenclaw 2: Basil is a pretty good name
  • Ravenclaw 1: Like Basil Rathbone, the late English actor
  • Ravenclaw 2: It was also a common name among Eastern Roman Emperors and the source of the name Vasily in Russian

Tsar Nicholas II, Emperor and Autocrat of All the Russias (1868 - 1918)

“What am I going to do? What is going to happen to me, to you, to Alix, to Mother, to all Russia?“

Nikolai Aleksandrovich Romanov was born on May 6, 1868, in the Alexander Palace in Tsarskoye Selo, south of St. Petersburg. He was the eldest son of his parents, Alexander Alexandrovich, the heir to the Russian throne, and Princess Dagmar of Denmark. Nicolas’s grandfather was the Tsar, Alexander II, known as the Liberator for emancipating Russia’s serfs in 1863. Their family, the Romanov dynasty, had ruled Russia for three hundred years. Nicholas would be the last emperor.

Unlike his soft-hearted, liberal grandfather, Nicholas’s father was a reactionary, whose conservative and religious values strongly influenced Nicholas’s beliefs. In 1891, Nicholas’s father acceded to the throne when Alexander II was murdered by an anarchist revolutionary. This murder convinced both Alexander III, and his son, against offering further reforms. Yet Nicholas’s education did not prepare him at all for his future role as Russian emperor.

Although he had a close relationship with his mother, Nicholas’s father believed his son to be silly and weak. Tsar Alexander III was a very strong ruler and saw no need to share a job with his uninterested heir. He refused to let him participate in any affairs of state; once, when Nicholas was twenty-five, a minister suggested that he be allowed to head a committee to supervise the completion of the Trans-Siberian Railway. Alexander III was incredulous. “Have you ever tried to discuss anything of consequence with him?” asked the Tsar about his son and heir. “He is still absolutely a child; he has only infantile judgements. How would he be able to become president of a committee?”

The Romanov family in 1893. From left to right: Tsarevich Nicholas, Grand Duke George, Empress Maria Feodorovna (Princess Dagmar of Denmark), Grand Duchess Olga, Grand Duchess Xenia, Grand Duke Michael, Tsar Alexander III seated.

In neither his education nor his temperament did Nicholas show much aptitude to be emperor. He enjoyed foreign languages and history, but struggled with economics and politics. In general he preferred sport to books, when older he delighted in the military and served for a year when he was nine-teen. In 1894 he married Princess Alexandra of Hesse-Darmstadt, a German noble, with whom he had four daughters and a son, Alexei. Alexandra was an assertive woman whose personality dominated the weaker Nicholas, and she strongly reinforced his belief in autocratic rule and his resistance to democratic reforms. In contrast to his political life, Nicholas’s home life was serene. He was a wonderful family man, a devout Orthodox Christian, and devoted to his wife and children.

The same year that he married, Nicholas became the Tsar when his father died of kidney disease. The newly-crowned emperor had not expected to be thrust into the role so soon, and he panicked about running the vast Russian empire all by himself. It was the moment, he wrote, that he “had dreaded all his life.” He confessed his fears to a cousin: “Sandro, what am I going to do? What is going to happen to me, to you, to Alix, to Mother, to all Russia? I am not prepared to be Tsar. I never wanted to become one. I know nothing of the business of ruling. I have no idea of even how to talk to ministers.”

Nicholas determined to uphold the status quo as Tsar, but unfortunately evens abroad and at home forced his hand. Hoping not to be left out of the imperial scramble, Russia grew its industry in the Far East, and forced concessions from China in Manchuria. Yet Russian’s expansion provoked the Japanese, who attacked Russia’s eastern border in 1904, beginning the Russo-Japanese War. Europeans were convinced that the white Russians would easily triumph over the “yellow” Japanese, but the Japanese embarked on a series of victories ending in the total destruction of the Russian fleet at the Battle of Tshushima in 1905.

Nicholas and Alix’s engagement photo, 1894.

The defeat was a stunning humiliation for Russian prestige. At home it sparked outrage and crisis that turned to strikes and riots. In January 1905, Russian troops opened fire on demonstrators in front of the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg, killing many. Outrage turned to outright revolution, and eventually the Tsar was forced to grant concessions in a constitution, as well as establish an elected parliament, the Duma.

Despite some elements of democratic reform, Nicholas tightened his autocratic rule. Secret police crushed revolutionary elements in the cities, and voting laws prevented the election of radicals. A travel guide for foreigners published in 1914 warned against taking photos in rail stations - offenders would be arrested.

The Tsar’s most pressing crisis, however, was at home. His son and heir, the Tsarevich Alexei, had hemophilia, the scourge of interbred European royal families. Nicholas and Alexandra despaired for their child and sought any means to help him. They turned to an unlikely source, a disheveled mysticfrom Siberia named Grigori Rasputin. Rasputin’s monasticism belied his true character, that of a debauched womanizer and con-man. Russian noble society despised him, but Alexandra especially confided in him, and Rasputin strengthened her belief in Nicholas’s divine right to rule. His influence steadily eroded the trust Russian people felt for their Tsar.

Nicholas (left) with his cousin King George V of England. They are wearing German military uniforms while on a visit to Berlin. Despite their likeness, George refused to help Nicholas or offer him asylum during the Russian Revolution, fearing that he might be toppled as well.

Nicholas’s failing popularity received a boost in 1914, when Russia went to war against Germany and Austria. Although Nicholas was close to his cousin, the Kaiser (they wrote to each other as “Nicky” and “Willy”), Russians enlisted en masse and displayed loyalty and love for their royal family. Yet endless failures at the front burst newfound support for the Tsar, especially when Nicholas took over from his cousin as supreme commander in 1915, a position in which he demonstrated no talent. The unending string of military disaster was now firmly pinned on him. Worse, economic deprivations at home soon turned into crisis. Russia was deeply in debt and many were starving. Approval of the royal family soured; they were thought to be living in luxury while ordinary Russians died at the front or starved at home.

In March 1917 (February of the old Russian calendar), demonstrations in St. Petersburg (now Petrograd) again turned to revolution. This time, Nicholas had no army to turn to - the military was in a state of collapse, with many soldiers deserting to go back home and take part in the revolution. Helpless, Nicholas abdicated on March 15, 1917. He hoped to go to England for asylum, but the British government (fearing he might provoke the British left) refused his request. Five hundred years of Russian Tsardom ended with NIcholas.

A shaky liberal-socialist Provisional Government was set up to replace the monarchy, but the war continued to go badly. Nicholas went into house arrest in the Urals with his family. His situation worsened in the fall of 1917, when a radical communist party, the Bolsheviks, ousted the Provisional Government. Civil war began in Russia between the Bolshevik “Reds” and the “Whites”, a complex mix of warlords and political parties who opposed the Bolsheviks.

The Russian royals played no role in the Civil War, but the Bolsheviks feared that the Tsar and his family could become a symbol for the White armies to rally around. Nicholas, Alexandra, and their children were transported to a house in Yekaterinburg for safe-keeping, but in the summer of 1918 the war was going poorly for the Reds and the Czech Legion, a unit of the White army, was rapidly advancing towards Yekaterinburg.

Nicholas in captivity at Tsarskoye Selo. This is one of the last photos taken in his life.

On the night of July 16-17, as the Czechs neared, Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin ordered the execution of the royal family. What actually happened is still shrouded in some state secrecy, but what is known is that a truckload of local Bolsheviks and foreign soldiers entered the house and ordered the ex-Tsar and his family to the basement. The Empress asked for chairs for her and thirteen-year-old Alexei to sit upon. The Red commander brought in two chairs, and then informed the stunned Tsar that he had been condemned to death. “What? What?” asked the Tsar. The executioners brought out revolvers and began shooting the family. The four daughters, between twenty-two and seven-teen years old, had been hiding some of their jewels in their clothes which deflected the bullets. The Bolshevik shooters stabbed them with bayonets and shot them in their heads, and stabbed to death their maid, who had shielded herself with a pillow full of jewels.

The executioners burnt, dismembered, and buried the bodies. In 1976 a team of investigators found their grave, but did not release the information until the collapse of the Soviet Union. Rumors had long abounded that one of the daughters, seven-teen year-old Anastasia, had survived and escaped the massacre, which were put to rest. In 2000 the Russian Orthodox Church canonized the family as saints; today the place where they were buried is the site of a church.

@Neoprusiano
Emperador Alejandro I de Rusia, Rey de Polonia y Gran Príncipe de Finlandia
Импера́тор Александр I России, Царь Польский и Великий Князь Финляндский
Imperator Alexander I Russiae, Rex Poloniae et Magnus Princeps Finlandiae
Kaiser Alexander I. von Russland, König von Polen und Großfürst von Finnland
Emperor Alexander I of Russia, King of Poland and Grand Prince of Finland
Empereur Alexandre I de Russie, Roi de Pologne et Grand Prince de Finlande

Stepan Semyonovich Shchukin (1754-1828), 1806.

Emperor Nicholas II of Russia with his wife Empress Alexandra Feodorovna of Russia and their five children: Grand Duchess Olga Nicholaievna, Grand Duchess Tatiana Nicholaievna, Grand Duchess Maria Nicholaievna, Grand Duchess Anastasia Nicholaievna and Grand Duke Alexei Nicholaievich, 1913.

volturisecretary  asked:

I saw your tag novel and I'm curious- if you could had the opportunity to make your own vampire government system, how would you set it up to prevent crazy vampire world turmoil. A lot of people seem to be fans of the "vampire council" concept but I agree that it probably wouldn't work well with how vampires are portrayed in the books. Thanks :3.

This is such a great question! My headcanons about an idea vampire government are tentative, so forgive any ambiguity or logical gaps. 

  • Democracy won’t work. The idea of elected representatives is premised upon a changing pool of candidates and a populace that cares. Vampires definitely don’t have that the former. The number of ‘available’ politicians doesn’t change much throughout the decades, so even if the undead wanted to vote somebody out, there might be no good replacements to vote in. 

  • Also? Vampires are selfish. Yes, even the nice ones. Self-sacrifice and inconvenience don’t come to them easily. You can’t “make” a politician out of Carlisle or Siobhan or Rosalie if they’re not eager about the job. It’s also worth mentioning that vampire politics seem utterly joyless. Even the kindest characterization of the Volturi portrays them as paranoid, worn down, separated from their partners for long periods of time, and making hard ethical choices. I can’t see any of present-day non-ruling vamps signing up for that lifestyle willingly.

  • So where does that leave us? International satellite governments with similar mandates but different methods, staffed by long-term volunteers

  •  I really like the Volturi’s idea of indoctrinating newborns with their laws, but I wish they had taken it a step further, by settling up parallel government/working with local covens, and ultimately ingraining the idea that secrecy matters into vampire society.

  • Once everyone has agreed that secrecy is the law of the land, I could see various ruling covens using different methods of enforcement. Covens in high-population regions constantly being hammered by natural disasters could afford to be chill. Covens in low-density areas with excellent record-keeping, less so. Allowing vampires to work out a system that makes sense in their territory is more efficient than the Volturi swooping in after a disaster has already broken out.

  • Let’s talk checks and balances! First, I imagine that a network of established ruling covens would keep any tyrannical tendencies at bay. Like… if Aro were trying to recruit some wonderfully gifted person, three other covens would probably compete for them with more intriguing workplace benefits packages, and two more would offer that vampire a peaceful life on their territory. If a Vladimir or an Amun decided that he wanted to be worshipped, other covens would step in because of the human refugee influx onto their territory. 

    Second, with more vampire governments, there are– by necessity– more open positions. Ambitious vampires are no longer relegated to making battlefield speeches, Garrett-style. They can be the change they want to see in the world by actually signing up and doing the hard work of ruling. (And, because it really is hard work, I’d imagine that some coven would be grateful for volunteers at any given time.)

  • Basically, I think the strength of this system is as follows: nomads can continue living as they like, and the ambitious vampires can actually implement their vision, while being restrained by other, equally ambitious/intelligent vampires. 
5

Replica Colt Model 1851 Dragoon single action revolver presented to the Russian Czar and Ottoman Emperor.

In the 1854 Samuel Colt center picture) ordered the production of two heavily decorated Colt Model 1851 Dragoon single action revolvers, which were decorated by master engraver Alvin A. White.  Each revolver featured a portrait of George Washington on the cylinder and the Marquis de Lafeyette on the frame.  Each were heavily decorated with gold inlays and intricate scroll work engraving.  One was presented to Sultan Abdulmecid I, Emperor of the Ottoman Empire (left picture) and Czar Alexander II, Emperor of Russia.  Both leaders were adversaries during the Crimean War, and the purpose of the gifts were to celebrate the end of the war.

The revolver gifted to Abdulmecid II is currently on display at the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

@Neoprusiano
Emperador Nicolás II de Rusia, Rey de Polonia y Gran Príncipe de Finlandia
Импера́тор Николай II России, Царь Польский и Великий Князь Финляндский
Imperator Nicolaus II Russiae, Rex Poloniae et Magnus Princeps Finlandiae
Kaiser Nikolaus II. von Russland, König von Polen und Großfürst von Finnland
Emperor Nicholas II of Russia, King of Poland and Grand Prince of Finland
Empereur Nicolas II de Russie, Roi de Pologne et Grand Prince de Finlande

Ernst Friedrich von Liphart (1847-1932), 1897.

@Neoprusiano
Emperador Nicolás II de Rusia, Rey de Polonia y Gran Príncipe de Finlandia
Импера́тор Николай II России, Царь Польский и Великий Князь Финляндский
Imperator Nicolaus II Russiae, Rex Poloniae et Magnus Princeps Finlandiae
Kaiser Nikolaus II. von Russland, König von Polen und Großfürst von Finnland
Emperor Nicholas II of Russia, King of Poland and Grand Prince of Finland
Empereur Nicolas II de Russie, Roi de Pologne et Grand Prince de Finlande

A. de Safonoff, 1898.