Pant-sing the Bartender

So this is the very first session of our campaign and we all meet in a tavern, we just learned that a murder occurred in town and the rest of the party is asking the bartender about that. While the bartender is distracted I attempt the following.

Me: (OOC) “Can I reach over the counter to try and try and steal some gold?”

DM: “Sure, roll slight of hand.”

*Nat 20 plus*

DM: “Jesus with that roll you could take his pants too!”

Me: “Naw I’ll just pants him and take the gold.”

The party at this point is going nuts at this, and now another party member follows in my footsteps and tries stealing more gold.

Me: “I attempt to distract the bar to help my friend steal more gold.”

DM: “K. Roll deception.”

*Nat 20*

At this point I distract the whole bar and we successfully rob the bar as well. Now at this point we’re all going nuts, so I decide to hop the bar and pants the other bartender.

*The whole party is loosing it.*

I get the guards called on me and I bolt. Only later to return to the bar by the backdoor and I dead sprint into the bar and finally pants the last bartender and getting punched in the face. I leave the bar again with party in tow having robbed the bar of ale and gold, and also having pantsed all the bartenders.

507: I Accuse my Parents

This is apparently tied with Hercules Unchained for Joel’s favourite episode.  It begins with a surprisingly depressing short in which the narrator is downright proud of the exploitative and ecologically destructive nature of the vegetable industry.  Then we cheer up with the heartwarming tale of Jimmy, a young man who blunders obliviously into crime because his parents never hugged him – just one of the many excuses that only work for rich white kids!

Keep reading

Going In Style (2017 film)

“It is a culture’s duty to take care of its elderly.”

JOE: I think I may rob a bank.
WILLIE: What was that?
JOE: I’m thinking of robbing a bank.
AL: I’m thinking about buying a Ferrari.
WILLIE: Hmm. I just got drafted by the Knicks. Good week for everybody, huh?
AL: Good week.
JOE: They’re taking my house.
JOE: They’re taking my house. I’ve got 30 days.
WILLIE: Who’s taking your house?
JOE: The bank.
AL: They’re taking your house and you didn’t tell us?
JOE: What are you gonna do? Lend me money? We’re all broke. The three of us combined. These banks practically destroyed this country. They crushed a lot of people’s dreams. And nothing ever happened to them. We’re three old guys. We hit a bank, we get away with it, we retire with dignity. Worst comes to the worst, we get caught, we get a bed, three meals a day and better healthcare than we get now.

WILLIE: You… You’re talking about us? Us and you?
JOE: Yeah, I mean, if a gang of thugs can do it, it can’t be that hard.
AL: You’re out of your frigging mind.
JOE: You have spent 20 years waiting to die, Al. With no life and no purpose.

AL: And robbing a bank is going to give me a purpose?
JOE: It will give us money. Willie would be able to get on a plane and go and see his granddaughter.
WILLIE: It’s a little hard to catch a plane out of prison, Joe.
JOE: Yeah, but we won’t get caught. They didn’t get caught.
WILLIE: Well, they were young. They were fast.
JOE: We got skills, experience. Smarts.
WILLIE: Arthritis, gout, shingles…


Here’s the latest Ask the Fandom question from an awesome anon follower: 

  • What would you be the MOST worried/afraid of seeing in a future Veronica Mars mini-series? (Exs: can include artificial LoVe triangles, mishandled rape humors, and problematic portrayals of feminism). To put another way, is there anything Rob, et al. could do in a future mini-series that would ruin the show for you? (give your detailed examples below).

Please reblog and add your opinion. We’ll compile responses in a few days.

Have another Ask the Fandom question? Send us a note!


Here’s this week’s Ask the Fandom question:

  • What would you be the MOST worried/afraid of seeing in a future Veronica Mars mini-series? (Exs: can include artificial LoVe triangles, mishandled rape humors, and problematic portrayals of feminism). To put another way, is there anything Rob, et al. could do in a future mini-series that would ruin the show for you? (give your detailed examples below).

And here’s what a bunch of you had to say (seriously, this was a pretty popular ATF, although of course not in league with ‘What Hogwarts House does your fave belong to?’ and ‘Is Logan Echolls well-endowed?’)

Keep reading

Hope this wasn't done before
  • Psychic: *Reads my mind*
  • Psychic: Oh shit another one..
LEO D'AMATO - Another Veronica Mars "Nice Guy"

Reposting without need for decryption key, as promised…


I’m sure someone will want to take my head off for this, but here I go anyway…

Am I the only person who looks at Leo and sees a guy who stole key evidence from a murder trial - video footage of an underage girl’s statutory rape by her murderer - with every intent to distribute said evidence to the mass media in order to make a buck?

Yes, this transgression was over a decade ago, but on a base level, I have always felt that was such an inherently despicable thing to do.

I still consider Dick’s forwarding of Veronica’s sex tape to his entire mailing list to be one of the grossest things he ever did. In that case, although it’s of little consolation, Veronica was at least of age and the act was consensual, even if the video was not. I would be remiss if I did not hold Leo to a similar standard. In fact, I would be remiss to not consider Leo’s act significantly worse considering he was an officer of the law and it was completely premeditated, carefully executed felony, and in no way could be attributed to a momentary act of stupidity.

Secondarily, what Leo did was such a huge slight against Veronica personally. He was completely aware of how deeply important both Lilly and justice for murder were to Veronica and still went through with it. Veronica and Keith spent 2 years of their lives doggedly pursuing this case, obliterating their reputations in the process. They both nearly died obtaining that evidence and Leo’s actions broke the chain of custody, making the footage completely inadmissible (even if it had been recovered), and significantly weakening the case against Aaron.

Leo claimed that Veronica and Duncan could still testify to what they saw on the tape. Right out of the gate this is a weak argument, but even so, if they had been able to testify/hadn’t been discredited/were believed/gotten Aaron convicted, it doesn’t address the fact that Leo was willing to distribute unconsented video of a teenage girl’s sexual assault by her killer for public consumption - of Veronica’s best friend no less - all of which makes my stomach churn.

I understand that Leo’s sister was having a hard time at school and he was trying to get funds to put her in a different environment, but one teenage girl’s suffering does not warrant the sexual exploitation of another. Nor does it warrant aiding a rapist and a murderer to go free.

I was always sorta baffled by how easily Keith and Veronica let Leo off the hook for this. It stuck in my craw and I don’t think I’ve ever fully articulated it before. When the movie came out, it definitely rubbed me the wrong way that Veronica was so happy to be buddy-buddy with him. Now that Leo’s back in the picture in Mr. Kiss and Tell as another, and I quote, “nice guy,” I felt like I had to get this off my chest.

My idea of a “nice guy” and Rob’s idea are obviously very different. To be clear, venturing into extreme moral gray areas does not a bad person make in my book (duh - especially in fiction), but the nature of those actions - the reasoning and purpose behind them, does. Sure, both Veronica and Leo step over a very big moral line in Mr. Kiss and Tell with Sweet Pea, but in that case, they do so in the name of justice and they don’t exploit the victim in the process. When Leo stole the Lilly/Aaron tapes, there were numerous potential and actual victims from his actions, but there was no retribution, no balancing of scales, no justice to be found for the party’s at play as his motivation. It was essentially mass sabotage of potential justice for a get-rich-quick scheme to help a third party removed from the fallout.

Overall, all the characters of Veronica Mars have done morally questionable and sometimes outright wrong things, but I desperately wish Rob et al. would stop making the distinction between “nice guys” so poorly and therefore painfully drawn. For the life of me, I can’t see Veronica or Keith being so dismissive of Leo’s past transgression if they had been considering it in the same context as I have been. Basically, ensuring the key evidence was inadmissible in a deeply personal case that Keith and Veronica sacrificed 2 years, their personal reputations, and almost their lives to see come to fruition = serious betrayal. Sexually exploiting a dead minor being violated by her murder to make money = disgusting.

I’m sure someone will accuse me of ragging on Leo because I’m a Logan loyalist (while completely holding him responsible for his own shitty actions mind you) and there is a “love triangle”-type musing in MKAT, but this really goes beyond the concept of someone vying for Veronica’s affection…

I genuinely do like Leo as a character. I think he has potential within the universe - especially as someone who’s willing to cross certain lines - but it’s just that once again I’m frustrated by who gets held accountable for what within the Veronica Mars universe and why, regardless of romantic entanglements.

The supposed “nice guys” of VM have by and large done more things that I personally would never forgive than the supposed “bad boys”. Especially if I was Veronica Mars.

Am I the only one who is still massively squigged by Leo’s actions back in the day? As a fandom, we talk a lot about the merits of the term “nice guy” as it has been attributed to Duncan and Piz, but as far as I know, not so much when it comes to Leo.

(P.S. Don’t even get me started on the fact that during the search for the missing evidence Lamb and Keith both clearly state that there were two sets of the Lilly/Aaron tapes stolen from two separate safes at the sheriff’s department and the implications of that… I’ve never glossed over that in my viewing, but it appears the PTB always have. That is a rant for another day…)


The above argument speaks to whitewashing past misdeeds and ignoring established character behavior in order to keep a character Rob is fond of around and considered a “nice guy”. Today I’m also going to mention how subsequently, it also feels like there was blatant invention of present relationships in order to justify Leo’s purpose in the book…

In MKAT, the idea that Keith supposedly “adores” Leo despite all that I mentioned above (and even though they have never had any scenes together besides Keith determining Leo’s guilt and I guess that they worked together for all of 2 seconds when Keith was Acting Sheriff), the implied friendship between he and Mac and Wallace due to one wave (even though they have never had any scenes together prior to this, ever) and that Veronica (the queen of secrecy) would take him to the hotel room to be a party to her Sweet Pea misdeeds (when there was no actual reason he needed to be there until the next day and him being there just gave confirmation of her illegal actions to a detective) all seem like plot contrivances to make Leo seem "more convenient", which is infuriating.

If you want Leo to be credible threat to Veronica’s happiness with Logan (which for the love of God, I really don’t, FOR SO MANY REASONS, but that’s besides the point), why not at least do it validly and in character? If you love Max Greenfield and and you want him and his New Girl popularity around for the next movie, great. If you just love Leo as a character and you want to keep him integral, great. But why must his presence, plot purpose, and emotional impact be contrived to do it? 

Sorry to add fuel to the fire.

That’s it for today folks. Rant over. Thoughts?

Dear Melissa McBride/Carol Peletier's Fans,

Since the Emmy Nominations came out yesterday and we saw that once again TWD, particularly Melissa McBride, was once again snubbed by the Academy, I’ve been thinking about how we as FANS could join the “ANGRY INTERNET” grumbles directed at the EMMY people. 

Find a way to make it publicly known in some meaningful yet respectful way, that we support MMB regardless BUT that we are also tired of these oversights the mainstream award circuit seems to be making year after year. It’s commonly known that TWD is overlooked because of the existing genre bias and because of it, it’s routinely branded as just a “zombie show”, whose human elements are overshadowed by violence and gore. 

We know that’s not true and Carol’s story is the BEST example of why the emotional beats of the TWD are the driving force of the BIG PICTURE. 

We are not alone either - Twitter and Facebook are brimming with EMMY Outrage, and the media is flooded with TWD/MMB/AL were robbed articles and statements.! 

I am not even kidding about the ANGRY INTERNET series! 

But what can we do?! 

Politely complain, tweet out our disappointment… 

How about a support petition? 

I am not suggesting a EMMY or RIOT kind of campaign here but merely binding together to show Melissa McBride that we support and recognize her talent AND at the same time send a message to the committee that their viewers are not happy about whatever selection criteria they keep failing to use properly. 

Melissa McBride does some incredible work; 

TWD “Indifference” 404 

TWD “The Grove” 414 

 TWD “No Sanctuary” 501 

TWD “Consumed” 506 

TWD “Them” 510 

TWD “Forget” 514 

TWD “Conquer” 516 

Every EMMY Prediction list had Melissa McBride’s name on it! 

Every EMMY Poll had Melissa McBride name in it! 

Heck this year even every EMMY Snub Prediction had Melissa McBride listed!

Ridiculous and it’s not the first year this has happened either! 

I know we as CAROL/CARYL/MMB fans work best all together and I know so many of you are angry and disappointed members of the “ANGRY INTERNET” CLUB…. 

Let’s channel all of that into something good - something that says; 


“We Love You Melissa” 


“EMMY People - Why Didn’t You Look At The Flowers? Or Eat The Cookies”


Let’s brainstorm this thing and open a dialogue about this! 

Ideas?! Thoughts?! Grumbles?! 

Send it to my INBOX or leave it in the notes! 

Love XOXO