If you ever think that Fandoms now are fucking insane, remember that in the 80′s the Star Wars Fandom branched off into two factions called the ‘Cathedral of Hamill’ and ‘The Church of Ford’ as they flamed the fuck out of one another while throwing gay Skysolo fanfic on Mark’s lawn.
Sorry for all this, but since I’ve been blocked I can’t actually directly respond.
It’s great that you think that A became Asexual from Ally when AVEN forced the issue, but… AVEN formed in iike, what, 2000?
I can personally remember A being Asexual in the 90s, before that event.
My partner remembers it from the 80s, and points out that sometimes there were two As (Asexual and Ally) and sometimes two Qs (Queer and Questioning).
I know Marsha P. Johnson and Silvia Rivera were influential in the late 60s and early 70s, but they did not start the community. They were organizers IN the community that already existed. And they were in NYC. The communities in the midwest and California were not entirely identical back in the before times. Hell, the lesbians and the gays couldn’t always be in the same room with one another and stay polite.
The internet has homogenized this stuff some, but back in the 80s and 90s things weren’t quite as consistent as they have become.
The ‘X’ that Kinsey discussed were absolutely part of the existing queer community, even if they weren’t calling themselves ‘ace’. Same people.
I can’t remember citations, but I’m pretty sure if you go dig up some of good old Magnus Hirschfeld work that you’ll find that pre-WWII queer community in Berlin (ie, the San Francisco of Europe at the time) included discussions of people we would recognize as Asexual.
History is long and complicated. It’s a great story that Aces and Aros are cishet and straight and not part of the community, but it’s a story. It’s revisionist history. It disagrees with my lived experience (I’m old).
The thing that really cheeses me off about this whole conversation is that back in the 80s and 90s you had this exact conversation, except it was about the ‘B’ or the ‘T’. Not the ‘A’. Now, the people making these kinds of exclusionary statements are excluding the ‘A’ from the LGBT. And they use the same kinds of arguments. B people are either straight (and therefore not part of the community) or confused gay people (in which case they were fine). T people aren’t ‘really’ women, so they don’t belong in lesbian spaces. Really they’re just gay men who like dressing up or they’re straight men who don’t belong in the community because they’re some kind of fetishist.
It’s always about peeling off some of these queer identities and reducing them to the ‘actually gay’ part (who are okay, if strange, and part of the community) and the ‘actually straight’ part (who are our oppressors, and don’t belong and are evil and sneaky and trying to horn in on our community and make us unsafe and doing it for attention).
It’s a conversation that makes us poorer every time we have to go through it.