I still believe in man in spite of man. I believe in language even though it has been wounded, deformed, and perverted by the enemies of mankind. And I continue to cling to words because it is up to us to transform them into instruments of comprehension rather than contempt. It is up to us to choose whether we wish to use them to curse or to heal, to wound or to console.
When the Greeks desired to construct a bridge across a stream, they begged the river deity to pardon this deed of man for which they atoned by offering up to him a sacrificial libation of wine. In ancient German lands, an offense against a living tree was expiated by the shedding of the offender’s blood. Today’s mankind sees only childish superstition in those who attend to the planetary currents. He forgets that the interpreting of apparitions was a way of scattering blooms around the tree of an inner life, which shelters a deeper knowledge than all of science: the knowledge of the world-weaving power of an all-embracing love. Only when this love has been renewed in mankind will the wounds inflicted by the matricidal spirit be healed.
Ludwig Klages, Man and Earth in The Biocentric Worldview
One of the things I get tired of from time to time is the perspective
that if something shows evil behavior then that means the story, song,
game, whatever, is inherently bad. But there is a difference between
illustrating evil behavior and promoting it.
Not all appearances of bad behavior invite bad behavior.
While one purpose of storytelling is to entertain, another purpose is to
teach or educate–a purpose that in today’s world, most people seem to
A long time ago, there used to be all sorts of horrific stories told.
Open Grimms’ fairy tales, and you’ll see that Cinderella really isn’t
that Disney-friendly. But often some of those older stories were meant
to teach a lesson or scare children into behaving (that latter point is
one I personally don’t condone). Horrific things happen in the Bible
(and the Book of Mormon). We can often learn from these accounts, but
some of them are simply a record of what happened (if you believe in
that), whether you like the content or not. It is what it is. Conspiring
incest, rape, slaughter, and even cannibalism can be found in scripture
stories. In today’s world, most people have been conditioned to believe
that stories are only meant to entertain. Or entertain and uplift.
Those two things are valid. But what I get tired of, though, is the
perspective that all stories should be full of puppies and rainbows
(yeah, that’s an exaggeration, but you know what I mean), and that’s
what we should be writing, and if a story is dark, it’s “bad” or lesser
or … something.
The World Needs Stories about Dark Things
It’s important we write about what I call “the big and heavies”–rape,
addiction, suicide, massacre, societal brainwashing, etc. And when I say
“we,” I don’t mean specifically that you or I HAVE to; I
mean “we” as in us, writers and creatives everywhere. The world needs
creatives who delve into the big and heavies, and here’s why:
1. Stories provide a safe means to explore and discuss dark things
The big and heavies are vital to discuss for a healthy society. We shouldn’t be turning a blind eye to dark deeds. We should be turning the right eye to them. Literature offers a safe way to explore and discuss these
issues. It offers some distance (because it’s usually a work of fiction)
while simultaneously having the ability to offer closeness–empathy.
Also, fiction provides a type of lens to view these behaviors through.
Speculative fiction might have a more exaggerated or symbolic lens, such
as the fashion industry of Panem in The Hunger Games, or the discussion of pure bloods in Harry Potter.
A lens lets us view the issues in a way that may emphasize certain
points or give us a new perspective on them, and again, the distance can
provide a bit of a “safe” buffer for readers. We aren’t talking about
racism; we’re talking about magical blood–and we can have a whole
discussion on it that correlates with issues seen in racism, and no one
needs to feel uncomfortable because this is about wizarding blood. Even
realistic fiction provides a perspective, though less exaggerated, to
see these issues through.
2. Powerful, emotional ramification drives home a point or idea or lesson.
Unlike reading text books or the news, fiction writing often works off making the audience feel something.
It appeals to emotional experience, even more than intellectual
experience. It is one of the only mediums where we can put on the skin
and thoughts of another person.
In parts of society, we try hard to divorce intellect and emotion, but
powerful emotional experiences are often what cement ideas and lessons
into our minds. Back in the day, fathers used to take their children out
to their property line and beat them so that the child would never
forget where the property line was. We’ve seen similar conditioning with
training wild animals. Both are crude examples, of course, but the
emotional experience drove home the lesson. While negative emotions are
powerful, this same thing can happen with strong positive emotions. We
remember powerful feelings of happiness and of love, and if there are
any lessons or insights associated with those, we recall those too.
In fiction, emotional experiences can drive home powerful lessons. And they stick with the audience.
Strong emotional experiences in fiction amplify the conceptual
ramifications of dark deeds, and cements into the reader the weight of
such behavior, in a way that pure intellect cannot. Once we “experience”
an issue, we care more about it. Fiction is a vehicle that allows us to
develop and fine-tune our empathetic skills, so we can better
understand and relate to those who’ve dealt with such issues.
3. Explore, cognitively, the causes, consequences, and facets of the big and heavies
In the real world, we live our own lives in our own perspectives, and
that’s it. In literature, you can include several perspectives of those
involved with an issue. You can often see the issue’s causes,
consequences, and facets to a degree you may not in your own life. You
can see far-reaching effects in a matter of hundreds of pages, rather
than decades or hundreds of years. This opens up new ideas, new
perspectives on the topic, which leads to more discussion.
4. To provide hope and uplift, in spite of darkness. To overcome.
I sometimes see this weird idea that an uplifting story needs to not
cross some invisible line too far into the dark. In some ways, that
couldn’t be further from the truth. As a Harry Potter fan, I’ve
had friends come up to me and talk about how they’re disappointed that
the stories got darker and darker. Maybe I’m weird (okay, there’s no
“maybe” about it), but I like that. I like stories getting dark. I like
when they get darker and darker. I like my evil, evil. I want the
Voldemort who tries to possess Harry to get Dumbledore to kill him. I
want the Voldemort who tortured animals as a small child and who
murdered others to split his soul into seven pieces. The world is often
an evil place. And how much more powerful is it to overcome the bowels
of the most wicked, than it is to overcome a guy who shoplifted? I like
my evil, evil. Not because I want to be part of the dark, but because I
like seeing people overcome it.
A story that includes dark materials can be just as uplifting, if not
more uplifting (because of the contrast) than a story that doesn’t. The
idea that a story can’t be dark and inspiring is just unfounded.
Every Christmas season, I become a fan of The Trans-Siberian Orchestra
all over again. If you’ve never heard of them, you may still recognize
some of their most iconic Christmas songs, some of which have gone viral
on synchronized Christmas light videos.
What many people might not realize is that each of their Christmas
albums actual tells, and comes with, a written story. If you see the
Trans-Siberian Orchestra live, they will read the story to you bits at a
time, interspersed with music. But not all their stories are about
happy sleigh rides, warm fires, Christmas hams, and decorated trees.
There are parents who abandoned their disabled children, babies born
addicted to crack, love that has been lost. But the stories and albums
are uplifting, not because the creators avoided dark subject matter, but
because they illustrated the power of overcoming–overcoming difficult
times and personal mistakes. It’s hard to make it through one of their
performances with a dry eye through the whole thing.
5. To render reality–others’ reality or your own
But some stories aren’t necessarily meant to be about overcoming the
dark or inspiring an audience. Some stories are just about reality.
Human nature. The natural man. Experiences that people actually go
through. Some stories are simply meant to render, often for reasons 1-3.
It’s a statement. It’s meant to create social awareness, empathy. Maybe
it’s meant to start a discussion. Those stories need to exist too.
Keep in mind that many audiences only see stories strictly as mediums
for entertainment and, on a subconscious level, a reinforcement of a
positive, maybe even sugary, feelings and ideas. Those audiences may (on
a subconscious level) refuse anything that is otherwise, and
consider any mention of the dark and heavies as something that shouldn’t
be there. That is their right.
And in some cases, they are correct. Some stories do not need and
should not have dark content. It doesn’t serve the purpose of the
story, it messes up the tone of the story, and it can ruin what was
already working. You wouldn’t, for example, put in a serious plot line
in The Office about Pam being legitimately raped. It doesn’t fit.
And with all that said, you shouldn’t feel forced to write content you
feel very uncomfortable writing. Your work should reflect the writerly
Next week, I’ll talk about how to write about dark things without promoting them.
Belief in God produces an optimistic spirit. It’s hard to stay negative and hopeless when you believe God has a plan for your life, that He loves you unconditionally, that heaven is a reality for you, man… the list goes on. You are given so much hope when you believe in God.
Albus Dumbledore’s Choices: or Why “The Greater Good” is Not a Get Out of Jail Free Card
One pet peeve of mine with
respect to the HP fandom and Albus Dumbledore is the apparent belief that Albus
acted in the only way that was possible at the time. He “did his
best”. He “acted as a leader” for “the greater good”.
I find this thinking so
very flawed. And why is that? Because realistically, Albus Dumbledore is a
horrible leader and his choices and plans are riddled with holes.
Warning for VERY LONG POST.
I have a lot of feelings about this.
Situation in 1981: child of
prophecy vanquishes madman
- parents are killed in the
process, child needs new caretakers
- mother has left
protection on child which is presumably tied to her bloodline
Possible people to raise
child of prophecy:
- muggle family known to
not like wizards very much
- Albus himself (unlikely,
too much of a public figure)
- someone of Albus’s
confidence (other members of the Orders of the Phoenix)
the Dursleys house, with the protection from Lily’s sacrifice
other properties unattached to the Potter name, possibly under the Fidelius,
this, I would have probably picked the latter option. If Albus had used a
combination of a Fidelius and an Unbreakable Vow with a paranoid guy like
Moody, for example, Harry would have been safe and sound. Remus would have
helped, if not acted as a main caretaker. The idea that Harry stayed with the
Dursleys could have been planted, as an additional layer of security. Thus, Harry
would’ve had a proper custodian who didn’t abuse him, and who raised him to
understand his position. It’s highly unlikely Death Eaters could have found him. They never appeared to even try. Hogwarts under a glamour
was also a good choice. Honestly, going abroad was probably the safest bet. The
shields on the Dursley house only protected the house itself – when he was
everywhere else, Harry was unprotected.
did not choose any of the alternate options. Presumably, Lily’s protection was
too important. The Fidelius had been broken before, after all. He might not
have known the Dursleys would be so problem. Maybe he thought Lily’s power
would be needed further along the line and was somehow tied to Petunia. Okay, fair enough. Moving on.
taken – muggle family picked for custodians. Options:
leave child on doorstep of muggles like bottle of milk
discuss situation with muggles and make sure the child is treated well
who thinks that what Dumbledore chose is a reasonable action to take is insane.
Anyone who thinks this is DOING HIS BEST or the RIGHT THING needs a reality
check. Not only was it dangerous for Harry, but it showed a distinctive lack of
care for Petunia herself.
least Dumbledore owed Petunia was telling her to her face that her sister was
dead. It’s common decency. But Dumbledore couldn’t even do that. He just forced
the Dursleys to take Harry, and that would have only made Petunia’s resentment
case of a fairytale element that doesn’t hold up to scrutiny in light of later
books. No need to go into it further, I think.