rachel borovik blog

The Elusive Big Idea-great NYTimes article

A great article on a subject I have been thinking a lot about lately.  This is just a clip from the article but if it interests you check out the link at the bottom!  I sat down and read the paper for the first time in awhile this morning.  It almost felt like riding a bike for the first time again.  Holding a newspaper in your hand and reading it verses reading short articles on the internet….Strange to think that our kids will probably be saying that about the internet one day!  Happy Sunday reading lovies!

 “We are drowning in information with no time or desire to process it”

We prefer knowing to thinking because knowing has more immediate value. It keeps us in the loop, keeps us connected to our friends and our cohort. Ideas are too airy, too impractical, too much work for too little reward. Few talk ideas. Everyone talks information, usually personal information. Where are you going? What are you doing? Whom are you seeing? These are today’s big questions.

It is certainly no accident that the post-idea world has sprung up alongside the social networking world. Even though there are sites and blogs dedicated to ideas, Twitter, Facebook, Myspace, Flickr, etc., the most popular sites on the Web, are basically information exchanges, designed to feed the insatiable information hunger, though this is hardly the kind of information that generates ideas. It is largely useless except insofar as it makes the possessor of the information feel, well, informed. Of course, one could argue that these sites are no different than conversation was for previous generations, and that conversation seldom generated big ideas either, and one would be right.

BUT the analogy isn’t perfect. For one thing, social networking sites are the primary form of communication among young people, and they are supplanting print, which is where ideas have typically gestated. For another, social networking sites engender habits of mind that are inimical to the kind of deliberate discourse that gives rise to ideas. Instead of theories, hypotheses and grand arguments, we get instant 140-character tweets about eating a sandwich or watching a TV show. While social networking may enlarge one’s circle and even introduce one to strangers, this is not the same thing as enlarging one’s intellectual universe. Indeed, the gab of social networking tends to shrink one’s universe to oneself and one’s friends, while thoughts organized in words, whether online or on the page, enlarge one’s focus.

To paraphrase the famous dictum, often attributed to Yogi Berra, that you can’t think and hit at the same time, you can’t think and tweet at the same time either, not because it is impossible to multitask but because tweeting, which is largely a burst of either brief, unsupported opinions or brief descriptions of your own prosaic activities, is a form of distraction or anti-thinking.

An artist friend of mine recently lamented that he felt the art world was adrift because there were no longer great critics like Harold Rosenberg and Clement Greenberg to provide theories of art that could fructify the art and energize it. Another friend made a similar argument about politics. While the parties debate how much to cut the budget, he wondered where were the John Rawlses and Robert Nozicks who could elevate our politics.


Watch on thisisrachelb-blog.tumblr.com

Had some fun writing and experimenting on this electronic track with Jeff Tubbs.  Let me know what you think!


So delicious and good

Bear Attack in Churchill, Manitoba, Canada

These  are pictures of an actual polar bear attacking a man. 

The  pictures were taken while people watched and could  do nothing to stop the attack! 

Reports  from the local newspaper say that
the  victim  will make a full recovery. 

The  photos are below.

External image
 May your troubles always be smaller than your imagination!