I love that apparently nasu had to argue that BB’s panties are a leotard in order to get her past the fgo censors because a) as if there aren’t girls literally walking around in nothing but panties in the game already and b) it brings up the image of nasu pulling up a powerpoint with pictures of BB’s ass in order to prove his point
EXCLUSIVE: Adrian Chase Gives Oliver an Ultimatum in Chilling 'Arrow' Sneak Peek: 'There's Nothing You Can Do'
Oliver Queen may have escaped Prometheus’ torture chamber, but the villain’s punishments are far from over.
In ET’s exclusive sneak peek at Wednesday’s Arrow, titled “Disbanded,” Prometheus’ plainclothes alter ego, Star City District Attorney Adrian Chase (Josh Segarra), pays Oliver (Stephen Amell) a visit at City Hall, placing a knife on his desk.
The point, it becomes clear to Oliver, is really more of a dare.
“You’re an animal who enjoys murder, there’s no telling what you’ll do,” Chase explains. “And it’s not like your alter ego can kill me, not since the SCPD put me in the protective custody since the Green Arrow slaughtered my wife.”
“So you kill me in broad daylight,” the villain challenges, “or you let me live, knowing that there’s nothing you can do.”
See how the chilling moment plays out in the video above!
Segarra spoke to reporters via conference call earlier this month, where he warned that Prometheus’ revenge mission against Oliver and the Green Arrow is only getting started.
“Now, you’re going to get to see it turn,” the actor said of the season five villain’s unmasking. “This whole time, I’ve been waiting to pop that top off… You’re gonna see Chase just kind of trying to burn the world around him.”
I think the funniest thing I’ve ever seen a SU Stan do is compare criticizing Steven Universe to criticizing Spongebob cause like
1. There’s nothing wrong with criticizing Spongebob either, no matter who it’s made for, nothing CAN’T be criticized.
2. They are two very different shows with two very different plot structures.
Like…. Was the point that criticizing SU is stupid? Cause you didn’t do well in proving that point
His entrance in V3 was to prove a point (that he was smegged off for Atlas stomping in on Oz's tuff), but it went waaaaaaay overboard and he abused his position and the value he has to the brotherhood to not only pitch the blame with Winter, but chuck her out of the meeting as well. Hell, even Oz was sick of his shit, but Qrow knows he's too valuable to lose. I'm a fan of Qrow, but no amount of Freudian excuse can cover up how much of an ass he is to anyone not named Oz, Ruby, Yang or Tai.
preeeeeetty much, and yet he’s still treated like a cool rebellious guy when Yang gets treated like she had the loss of her arm coming to her for being “too angry and reckless”, by her father and the fandom - when even a cursory attempt at paying attention shows that Yang is in control of her anger most of the time, the situation with Adam is an example of a time when losing control would be entirely reasonable, and she had no other options anyway (and any recklessness Yang portrays only ever comes out when she’s fighting alongside people she cares about. she’s more likely to dodge hits instead of tank them when she doesn’t have someone else to worry about - it all goes back to her talk with Blake, it’s clear what she learned in the woods wasn’t ‘you have to take care of yourself’ it was ‘don’t get yourself killed pursuing something on your own in case someone else needs you’. the only regard Yang has really had for her own life is that she has to keep herself alive so she might be of some good to someone else later - hell she even admits that she thinks she ought to have died in the woods that day)
Yang can’t have a totally reasonable response to a stressful and tense situation without being thrown under the bus and blamed for something she wouldn’t have been able to stop anyway and is dismissed as a temper tantrum throwing child (despite being probably the most mature person in her whole family), but Qrow can throw a hissy fit and wreck public property and he’s cool
au where @danisnotonfire and @amazingphil get into a heated debate over grammar which ultimately results in them sharpie-ing their foreheads to prove a point and phil pulling the ol’ “english language and linguistics degree” card
to both the moonlight fans eating up this “drag" and the la la land fans who are mad about him saying it: he didn’t and stop trying to make barry jenkins seem like a shitty person to validate your own weird pettiness.
Please reblog if you think that being gay is valid and not horrible
I’m trying to prove a point to my mom. She’s been telling me that my sexuality isn’t valid and that gay people are the same as child molesters. She said that gay people are monsters. I told her that I can’t help who I’m attracted to and she said that if she were to fall in love with a sixteen year old boy wouldn’t that also be valid if being attracted to the same sex is? She told me that I’m going to hell because I’m not following the bible. Please let me show her that people of the LGBTQ+ community are valid.