October 19, 1942 edition of the “Newsmap” publication, a weekly issuance of the U.S. Army which was distributed to members of the military and provided news about the progress of World War II. In addition to other fronts, this issue describes the ongoing Guadalcanal Campaign, which had started 2 months earlier.
Each issue generally had information on obverse and reverse sides and featured texts, photographs, illustrations, and maps. The reverse is usually a poster. The publications were designed for posting on bulletin boards or other display areas. The obverse side would have been displayed during the week the publication was issued and on the following week the back was displayed.
Newsmap - Volume 1, Number 26, 10/19/1942 (Reverse)
American propaganda works so well that we still have people out here thinking it was totally fine and justified that the United States dropped two atomic bombs on Japanese civilians, killing well over 100,000 innocent people. It works so well that, even though the United States is the only country to ever use a nuclear bomb in warfare, people think that the United States is still the only qualified entity to invade other countries in order to stop them from having nuclear weapons. It works so well that you can read all about every war crime committed by the United States all around the world, with little to no government censorship, and that STILL doesn’t make people rise up in anger. It works so well that you can read accounts of the CIA or FBI literally trying to brainwash Americans into total subservience and people STILL won’t resist.
Americans put the Soviets to shame in how effective their propaganda is. It’s not even close.
A toothpaste brand claims their product will destroy more plaque than any product ever made. A politician tells you their plan will create the most jobs. We’re so used to hearing these kinds of exaggerations in advertising and politics that we might not even bat an eye.
But what about when the claim is accompanied by a graph? After all, a graph isn’t an opinion. It represents cold, hard numbers, and who can argue with those? Yet, as it turns out, there are plenty of ways graphs can mislead and outright manipulate. Here are some more things to look out for.
First of all, the scale is inconsistent, compressing the 15-month span after March 2009 to look shorter than the preceding six months. Using more consistent data points gives a different picture with job losses tapering off by the end of 2009. And if you wonder why they were increasing in the first place, the timeline starts immediately after the U.S.’s biggest financial collapse since the Great Depression.
These techniques are known as cherry picking. A time range can be carefully chosen to exclude the impact of a major event right outside it. And picking specific data points can hide important changes in between. Even when there’s nothing wrong with the graph itself, leaving out relevant data can give a misleading impression.
This chart of how many people watch the Super Bowl each year makes it look like the event’s popularity is exploding. But it’s not accounting for population growth. The ratings have actually held steady because while the number of football fans has increased, their share of overall viewership has not.
Finally, a graph can’t tell you much if you don’t know the full significance of what’s being presented. Both of the following graphs use the same ocean temperature data from the National Centers for Environmental Information. So why do they seem to give opposite impressions? The first graph plots the average annual ocean temperature from 1880 to 2016, making the change look insignificant. But in fact, a rise of even half a degree Celsius can cause massive ecological disruption. This is why the second graph, which show the average temperature variation each year, is far more significant.
When they’re used well, graphs can help us intuitively grasp complex data. But as visual software has enabled more usage of graphs throughout all media, it’s also made them easier to use in a careless or dishonest way. So the next time you see a graph, don’t be swayed by the lines and curves. Look at the labels, the numbers, the scale, and the context, and ask what story the picture is trying to tell.
What do you think of Hulk the pit bull and the media portrayal of him and his breeders? Just curious
Oh boy. Alright, I think I may end up being attacked for this post,
because I’ve seen that “Hulk” has quite a few huge following of
supporters and I have seen that they that do not particularly like it
when anyone criticizes the the dog’s breeders, but I will try my best
here, I will try to tread lightly so please bare with me, thank you.
The fact is, “Hulk” is not a Pit Bull. And it would be best if we all stopped referring to him as such.
For anyone not familiar with “Hulk”, he is the record holding “World Largest Pit Bull” bred & owned by Dark Dynasty K9s. This is “Hulk”:
Let’s start with his breeders, Dark Dynasty K9s , who have probably never even seen a real APBT/Pit Bull, and wouldn’t know one if one bit them on the face.
I am not going to demonize DDK9 as dog owners, because I suppose from their photos and videos that they must love their dogs, but what DDK9 is doing as breeders is an entirely different story.
DDK9 is doing is very irresponsible, unethical, greedy, actually, and
even detrimental to the image of the real American Pit Bull Terrier and
it’s potentially damaging to the millions of non-APBTs bully breeds that
are falsely labeled as APBTs. And because of the size of “Hulk”, this
could very well put mastiff-type breeds in the same boat as bully
“Hulk” is giving public the false impression that Pit Bulls are capable
of reaching 100, 150, 175+lbs.
A lot of what DDK9 does as
breeders raises countless red flags. The most immediate red flag is that
they do not even know how to spell the breed of dog they are supposedly
breeding. “Pitbulls”, really?
They advertise their dogs as “XL Pitbulls”, which are essentially just oversized American Bullies (or American Bully x mastiff-type mixes?).
In the pedigree of “Hulk”, you will see a “Razors Edge” dog listed by the name of “Razors Edge Payback is a Bomb”
highlighted in yellow, which is the ever so highly popular original
American Bully line commonly (& falsely) referred to as Pit Bulls.
And, also “Eddington’s Wanna Be A Whopper”
(shown below) with a controversial, sketchy history as either an American Bulldog or
mixed breed falsely registered as an APBT in the UKC & ADBA,
which you can read about here because I really do not want to delve into that.
Below are images meant illustrate the different sizes in this American Bully size chart, including the “Pocket”, “Classic”, ”Extreme”, “Standard”, and lastly the “XL” American Bully.
DDK9′s website does not include any of the important details about
their breeding program, I decided maybe we should give them the benefit
of the doubt…
And so I contacted DDK9 through email, asking
them if their dogs undergo any health screenings and evaluations, what
their standards are in breeding in terms of health and whether they aim
to breed away from certain health issues using screening results to
better their breeding program.
This is why it took me a
while to get to your question, because I wanted to give DDK9 some time
to respond to my email, and well it has been about four weeks now and I
have not yet received a response. But if they ever do reply, I’ll be
sure to post it.
DDK9 advertise their dogs as being “huge”, having “great wide chests” and that their dogs produce “monsters”.
DDK9′s sole goal is to produce more of these massive, oversized
American Bullies like “Hulk”, and I have just read that by breeding
“Hulk” within their own kennel they are working towards breaking his
current “record” as the world’s largest (fake) “Pitbull” at 175lbs with his offspring.
found that one of their breeding bitches in particular was bred twice
within a year under the age of two. With how enormous these dogs are,
it’s incredibly irresponsible and potentially harmful to be breeding
them before they have had time to fully mature, not to mention it was at
that bitch’s every heat. While this is just one example of premature
breeding, surely this is a common practice at DDK9, especially
considering their hurried efforts to prodce another record breaking”
“Pitbull”. There is no way that DDK9 is breeding responsibly or with the
health and welfare of their dogs in mind.
“Hulk” allegedly weighs 175 lbs, and is clearly overweight. Just look at this dog:
actually wonder if his breeders have intentionally packed as much
excess weight onto “Hulk” as possible, in effort to truly make him the “World’s Largest”?
The poor dog is probably one wrong step or hop away from blowing a
knee, and not to mention all the other health risks involved in canine
obesity, especially a dog of such a massive size.
Below is an illustration highlighting the ADBA’s standard for the American Pit Bull Terrier:
The American Pit Bull Terrier’s UKC standard calls for dogs/bitches
to weigh between 30 lbs and 60 lbs, and the ADBA calls for 30 lbs to 75
lbs, with 60 to 75 lbs being on the larger side which are few and far
between compared to dogs/bitches of smaller sizes. “The American Pit Bull Terriers is a small to mid-sized dog, an athletic breed with great physical ability.”
To compare to the above photos of “Hulk”, here are some photos of real purebred APBTs:
huge red flag about Dark Dynasty K9 is that they “train” their
“XL Pitbulls” in “protection”, in their own backyard (I cannot seem to
find their credentials in this area, or any titles their dogs have
DDK9 allows all of their dogs to freely socialize / interact with one
another, even sometimes including clients’ dogs that are boarded at their kennel / farm.
According to americanbullydaily.com, “Additionally,
he [Marlon Grennan, breeder] does not believe in separating each dog
whether they are in training or not. By removing any fences, physical
restrictions and barriers the dogs train and live together as a pack
that teaches them how to socialize with other.”
Real American Pit Bull Terriers / Pit Bulls more
often than not are known for exhibiting at least some degree of dog
& animal aggression, and with real APBTs it would be next to
impossible for a dozen Pit Bulls to socialize, interact and roam freely
without a fight breaking out. These are not Pit Bulls. And I am
media hype surrounding “Hulk” has only helped in giving his breeders
more reason to charge tens of thousands to half a million by exploiting
“Hulk” for stud services and his “XL Pitbull” puppies.
media surrounds anything canine related, it makes me terribly nervous,
especially when it’s about Pit Bulls, because it tends to be more
harmful than anything. When a dog bites, it’s the family’s once harmless
“pibble” mix, or in the case of “Hulk”, it’s misrepresenting an entire
breed and giving the public a false impression of what a Pit Bull really
According to www.peoplemagazine.co.za: “The
gentle giant is a doting father to his puppies and is even allowed to
play with the couple’s three-year-old son. “Hulk has shown the world
that when this breed is gentle and balanced, they can be the greatest
dogs in the world,” said Grennan.”
what “Hulk” and his breeders have done for the APBT breed is that they
have given the public an altered and damaging perception of the American Pit Bull
Terrier as a breed.
A lot of rescue organizations that specializes in bully
breeds, have even spoken out against “Hulk” and what his breeders are
doing, and have called for the media to stop portraying “Hulk” and his
breeders in a positive light.
By continuing to misrepresent dogs
like “Hulk” as Pit Bulls, it is seriously damaging to the APBT breed,
bully breeds, and to non-APBTs dogs, and just dogs in general,
especially when these same non-APBT dogs are involved in dog attacks or
are impounded at city pounds / animal shelters. And because of the
appearance of “Hulk”, this could be potentially detrimental to Mastiff
breeds such as the Cane Corso, Presa Canario, and other similar looking
breeds that may find themselves in a dog attack or shelter and are
mislabeled as Pit Bulls.
So, end point: “Hulk” is NOT a Pit Bull, so please stop calling him one!
Actually, it would be best if we stopped calling ALL non-pedigree bully breeds/mutts Pit Bulls.