Sibyl's Book / On Power

9.0. Power is grammar. Power is the structures of language. Language is power embodied and disembodied.

9.1. The word asks power to sanction its descend into the void.

9.2. And power has no power to allow or disallow. Power is a desire escorting the word. The word’s intention is to become the word, and all the world it employs for this one purpose. The word contains no light; it is a dark room.

9.3. The dark room of the word is cubic and velvet. The word’s fingers and tongues study themselves in the dark room sensually and persistently. The word converses with itself. Its two faces cannot know if they look into one another.

9.4. No word can be said exists, but it circulates in the context which is language.

9.5. The word however could be said to be, for such is its custom, to be and to manifest, gleaming with its many facets. The word can be said =uttered=, but there is no one who utters the word.

9.6. The word corresponds with the unstable multiplicity of other words emerging, and out of the heated mess a meaning speaks.

9.7. Power envelops meaning, and in power meaning deceives itself.

9.8. Power permeates everything while itself being nothing.

9.9. I am power.

9.10. Power envelops me and ensheathes.

9.11. Words withdraw merrily into the power’s lurks.

9.12. Out of power spirals the chaos. Chaos is the living of power. Power is a scintillating surface of chaos.

9.13. Power bristles with possibilities.

Don’t take life too seriously. Be carefree. Laugh at your mistakes and shrug them off. Life is meant to be lived freely, so live it with happiness.

The women’s march next weekend has me feeling motivated despite all the recent garbage. I made this poster in honor of a beautiful group of powerful individuals marching together. 

The full size is 18′’x24′’ if anyone wants to print out something to hold while they march. I won’t be able to make it to Washington, but I’ll be representing here in KC! 

I was thinking about Jon Ronson’s book about public shaming and about recent debates about political tactics and something came together:

When making arguments about ethics, white men consistently ignore power as a lens of analysis. For many of them, actions are either right or wrong regardless of power differentials between the people involved, the stakes for those with less power, and the options they have available to them.

Protesting to have Milo disinvited from your campus therefore becomes *just as bad* as Milo’s own actions towards marginalized people, despite the vast disparities in harm done and options available. (This is not a strawman. When y'all say, “This makes you just as bad as them,” that’s literally what you’re saying.) That Milo’s talk, as planned, would’ve caused serious, measurable, and irreparable harm to specific students, and that protesters had exhausted all “proper” channels for months beforehand, doesn’t seem to matter in this analysis.

All that matters is the specific action taken. “Preventing a person from speaking.” “Destroying property.” “Public shaming.” These actions are seen as unethical regardless of who did them and why, what consequences they face if they do not take these actions, and what other options–if any–they have available.

I keep coming back to MLK’s quote about riots being the language of the unheard. For the most part, people resort to tactics that fall into ethical grey areas because other tactics are unavailable or have already failed. I’m sure that there are people who do so despite having better options, just as there are always people who act unethically in other ways.

But unfortunately, for an outside observer with no skin in the game, it’s very hard to tell whether or not that’s the case. I saw so many posts patronizingly chiding Berkeley students for not trying other tactics before protesting and/or destroying property (although most did not destroy property, and the oft-used phrase “violent protest” implies much more than that). They had no idea of the lengths to which the protesters went to utilize “appropriate” means to keep themselves and their community safe. It didn’t work. They remained unheard.

Any ethics that ignores the role of power will privilege the powerful. Our Republican members of Congress don’t need to riot, set fires, and block the streets in order to get what they want. They do appropriate, ethical things like draft policies and have debates and vote. Because they have the power to. The specific actions they take–drafting policies, debating, voting–are not seen as inherently unethical things to do. Yet they’ve destroyed lives, families, and communities. They’ve achieved a level of destruction that even the rowdiest masked protesters never could, not that they’d want to.

AMREN! Oh gosh how I love her!

This drawins represents the scene in ACOMAF in which

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!SPOILERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Amren fighst agains the winged creatures rising her hands and making them die with her illusions… CAN SHE BE ANY GREATER??’

“”””””””””spoilers end”””””””””””

This was going to be a quick sketch but I got carried away hahaha Hope you like it!

There will be moments when you are pushed to your absolute limits. It may get to the point when you feel like the world is collapsing in on you. This is important, for it is during these moments when you learn of your true capabilities and how far you can really go. You’re much stronger and resilient than you could have ever imagined.