i feel like im legally required to make at least one post about this every day SO here are two things i noticed that seemed Off about the article i was talking about yesterday:
- part of it read “The SI report notes that Neville learned Aries would be making more in the next six weeks on the indies than Neville would in the same timeframe while with WWE.” the tweet that austin made regarding his pay was made about a week or so ago in response to this discourse, and this article also claims that neville’s frustration dates back to january, when aries wasn’t even a member of the 205 roster, so how could nev have been motivated to leave by a tweet that didn’t even exist in the time they claim it did??
- another part read “Neville reportedly felt that he was viewed as ‘nothing more than a very talented ‘get-over guy’ used to enhance’ other Superstars.” when meanwhile nev didn’t lose a singles match until august, so how could he possibly think he’s being viewed as an enhancement talent when he went almost a full year without being defeated??