olber's paradox

mcknighty9  asked:

Why’s space black instead of pink?

●﹏● OK, let’s go. First, in relation to pink color, this depends on where the starlight would reflect, for example: “Why is the sky blue here on Earth?”. The daytime sky is blue because the sunlight nearby, beats Earth’s atmosphere molecules and disperses in all directions. The blue color of the sky is the result of this dispersal process. At night, when the part of the Earth is far from the Sun, the space looks black, because there is no source of bright light near, like the Sun, to be spread. If you were on the moon, which has no atmosphere, the sky would be black both at night and day.

So the black color usually signals the absence of light, and most of the universe is empty, the outer space looks black. However if the universe is full of stars, why does not the light from all of them add up to make the whole sky bright all the time? It turns out that if the universe was infinitely large and infinitely old, then we would expect the night sky to be bright from the light of all those stars. Every time you look in space you would be looking at a star. Yet we know from experience that space is black! This paradox is known as the Olbers’ Paradox. It is a paradox because of the apparent contradiction between our expectation that the night sky is bright and our experience that it is black.

Many different explanations have been put forward to resolve Olbers’ Paradox. The best solution at present is that the universe is not infinitely old; it is somewhere around 13,8 billion years old. That means we can only see objects as far as the light can travel in 13,8 billion years. The light from stars farther than that has not yet had time to reach us and can not contribute to making the sky bright.

This is an artist’s concept of the metric expansion of space, where space (including hypothetical non-observable portions of the universe) is represented at each time by the circular sections. Note on the left the dramatic expansion (not to scale) occurring in the inflationary epoch, and at the center the expansion acceleration. The scheme is decorated with WMAP images on the left and with the representation of stars at the appropriate level of development. Credit: NASA 

Another reason that the sky may not be bright with the visible light of all the stars is because the light source is moving away from you, the wavelength of that light is longer the light from stars that are moving away from us will become shifted towards red, and may shift so far that it is no longer visible at all. (Note: You hear the same effect when an ambulance passes you, and the pitch of the siren gets lower as the ambulance travels away from you; this effect is called the Doppler Effect).

Olber’s Paradox

In a Universe infinite in time and luminous stuff, like stars, we would expect to see light from stars in every direction we look. This would mean the night sky would not be dark and instead infinity would glow. This isn’t the Universe that we live in; but if we did perhaps this view towards the center of our galaxy simulates the feeling.

If every pixel detected the light of a star, this picture contains many millions of stars. To add to the hyperbole NGC 6522 (top right) and NGC 6528 (lower left) are two globular clusters with their own 100,000 suns. This is one of my favorite star fields. Few others pair globular clusters amid a sea of stars quite like this. It is a bit of a challenge to capture this area from the northern hemisphere since it is so low in the sky and requires steady, clear conditions.

Image Credit: ADAM BLOCK/MOUNT LEMMON SKYCENTER/UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

Hi there! As I understand it, Olber’s Paradox asks in its most basic form: “If the universe is static, infinitely old and filled with uniformly distributed stars, then why is the night sky dark?”

It was named after German astronomer Heinrich Olbers in 1823, but astronomers have been asking and posing solutions to this question for centuries. However, it’s not a paradox anymore because we understand more about the universe. Basically, the answer boils down to three facts:

  1. The universe is not infinitely old but instead has a finite age
  2. The universe is expanding and so stars are receding away from us
  3. Light has a speed limit, so light from distant stars hasn’t reached us yet

Bonus fact: Writer and poet Edgar Allan Poe gave the first scientifically viable answer in 1848 - he suggested that while the universe might be infinite in size, perhaps it’s not infinite in age, so there hasn’t been enough time for starlight to reach us from the distant reaches of space.

For a more in-depth answer, you should check out Minute Physics’ amazing and entertaining explanation

youtube

Olbers’ Paradox - Why Is The Night Sky Dark?

Let’s talk about the dark night. (NO! This post is not on Batman!).

Our common assumption is that the night sky is supposed to be dark with only few dots of light.

But then, aren't there supposed to billions upon billions of stars in the night sky emitting light. Yes, they are very far away, but, there is nothing stopping (like air or glass) the light from reaching us. So, shouldn't all those stars make the night sky (very) bright and not dark ?

This is actually called Olbers’ Paradox

Let’s look at the problem in another way. We can divide the universe into a series of concentric shells, being 5 light years thick. Thus, a certain number of stars will be in the shell 1,00,000 to 1,00,005 light years away. If the universe is homogeneous at a large scale (i.e., static), then there would be four times as many stars in a second shell between 2,00,000 to 2,00,005 light years away.

But, the second shell is twice as far away, so each star in it would appear four times dimmer than the first shell (intensity is inversely proportional to the square of distance). Thus the total light received from the second shell is the same as the total light received from the first shell.

Thus, the argument is that if the universe were static and filled infinitely with stars, the night sky should be much brighter than it is now.

I think you guessed the loop hole here. I said if the universe were static, which it clearly isn’t.

The Big Bang explains this paradox by saying that the universe started at a point, and expanded from that point. Thus, it is not static.

We know that the expansion is accelerating. So, two things happen. 

One is that, those stars in the night sky are moving away from us and the distance between them and us increases. This increase the time for to see them and eventually it takes millions of years for the light from those stars to reach us.

Second, which is the more important reason, is that these starts get redshifted away. Redshifting is when the wavelength of an object moving away from us goes towards the red side of the spectrum and eventually, it goes into the infra red, which we cannot see. It is like we listen to a honking truck passing by at great speed. As it moves away from us, the the sound becomes softer and softer and eventually it is inaudible.

So, because of these reasons, we never get to experience the real night sky light. But, it may be a good thing, as otherwise our eyes would be blinded by the light !

And then I thought about how for a long time scientists were puzzled by the fact that the sky is dark at night, even though there are billions of stars in the universe and there must be stars in every direction you look, so that the sky should be full of starlight because there is very little in the way to stop the light from reaching earth.

Then they worked out that the universe was expanding, that the stars were all rushing away from one another after the Big Bang, and the further the stars were away from us the faster they were moving, some of them nearly as fast as the speed of light, which was why their light never reached us.

I like this fact. It is something you can work out in your own mind just by looking at the sky above your head at night and thinking without having to ask anyone.

And when the universe has finished exploding, all the stars will slow down, like a ball that has been thrown into the air, and they will come to a halt and they will all begin to fall toward the center of the universe again. And then there will be nothing to stop us from seeing all the stars in the world because they will all be moving toward us, gradually faster and faster, and we will know that the world is going to end soon because when we look up into the sky at night there will be no darkness, just the blazing light of billions and billions of stars, all falling.

—  Mark Haddon, The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time
Observable universe contains two trillion galaxies, 10 times more than previously thought

In Arthur C. Clarke’s novel “2001: A Space Odyssey,” astronaut David Bowman exclaims, “My God, it’s full of stars!” before he gets pulled into an alien-built wormhole in space. When the Hubble Space Telescope made its deepest views of the universe, astronomers might have well exclaimed: “My God, it’s full of galaxies!” The Hubble Ultra Deep Field, for example, revealed 10,000 galaxies of various shapes, sizes, colors, and ages, all within an area roughly one-tenth the diameter of the full moon. 

Astronomers came to the surprising conclusion that there are at least 10 times more galaxies in the observable universe than previously thought. This places the universe’s estimated population at, minimally, 2 trillion galaxies.

The results have clear implications for galaxy formation, and also helps shed light on an ancient astronomical paradox – why is the sky dark at night?

Keep reading