Let me get one thing straight though… Even if Bucky didn’t have innervation in his arm (aka he couldn’t feel anything other than just pressure, ergo couldn’t feel the arm being blown off) he most definitely felt the searing hot metal that was attached to his fucking shoulder. The metal was glowing red hot where it got blown off. Like if you leave the end of a spoon over an open flame and then grab the other end you still burn the shit out of your hand. So imagine your entire shoulder/biceps is made out of metal and the end of it is so hot that it’s glowing red. You don’t think the skin and bone and muscle it’s attached to wont be burning? Like imagine hot metal touching your bones. Bone pain is literally some of the worst kind of pain you can feel and Bucky had searing hot metal attached to his bones. And beyond that it’s still burning his skin, his ligaments, and his muscles. It’s beyond just burning your hand on a hot object because the metal is integrated into his shoulder. And worst of all he can’t get the thing off. He can’t drop the hot spoon because it’s part of him.
So yeah tell me again that Bucky wasn’t in excruciating pain after that
Alright to add to my previous post about rowaelin vs tamlin’s abusive ass:
Do you know what Rowan does when he realizes the extent to which Aelin has suffered in her life? He flies off, to go demand answers from his queen, fucking Maeve, because he’s furious she hid those important details from him. He’s going to question Maeve, his master. Then he realizes that Maeve likely left those details out for a reason, so he flies back, worried that Aelin will think he left her alone intentionally. He moves her into his own room so he can tend to her and care for her himself. He pampers her. This is the exactly what Aelin needs and the perfect response given her character. She loves being pampered and she had expressed previously in HoF the desire for even one person to care for her. Rowan starts to care for her as soon as he realizes that she needs it- was he a dick before hand? yes. absolutely. but as soon as he realizes her pain and how much she needs someone, he quickly becomes utterly devoted to her.
Now Tamlin?? How many times does Tamlin ignore Feyre’s requests to have more independence? How often does she try to ask him for freedom? How much does it take out of her to ask and be denied each time? How long does it take Tamlin to realize that he’s hurting his partner and the woman he claims to love? What does Tamlin do to help Feyre when she is depressed and suffering from PTSD and an eating disorder? Does he care for her? Does he comfort her? Does he do everything in his power to help her? Does he listen to her needs and her wishes? Nope. Nah. He decides to lock her up in the house, doing the one thing, the one obvious fucking thing that someone who spent time locked in a cell under a mountain wouldn’t be able to handle. He does the opposite of caring for Feyre. He does not listen to her cries for help. He systematically perpetrates abuse and emotionally manipulates her.
Rowan listens as soon as he knows Aelin needs him to care for him. He is there for her, unwaveringly, from that moment onwards. And what’s more, Aelin doesn’t ask him to care for her or stay- he picks up on her need for him instinctually and does what is best for her. Feyre was fucking screaming at Tamlin for him to help her and he did the opposite.
Finally, Rhysand is completely different from Tamlin as well. Once he has the opportunity to help Feyre- and UtM he was incapable of truly helping her in a way other than indirectly and under the guise of being loyal to Amarantha- he does everything, everything in his power to help her. He answers her plea for help at her wedding. He takes her to Velaris, which essentially functions as a safe house for her as a victim of domestic abuse. He gives her power, and independence and freedom and most importantly: he listens to what she wants. When Feyre gets angry with him, he adjusts his behavior. When she needs space, he gives it to her.
So don’t try to argue that Rhysand and Rowan are abusive in the way that Tamlin is. Because while both Rhys and Rowan make mistakes and hurt their mates, as soon as they realize the hurt they have caused, and as soon as they are able to help, they do everything in their significant power to heal, care for, and love Feyre and Aelin.
And that, my friends, is the difference between an abusive relationship (Feylin) and a normal relationship that has its flaws and ups and downs. Listening and respecting your partner is the key.
I dunno if anyone’s done this before but whatever. Specifically, I want to talk about Bucky’s brain in relation to the cannibalized MRI thing they strapped on his noggin in CA:TWS. Like what the hell is that thing, how old is it, what are you trying to do HYDRA, is this one of those weird dryer things you stick your whole head in at the hairdresser’s? They have had 70 years to perfect this technology and it looks like a high schooler’s science fair project. There aren’t even any electrodes. Seriously there should be electrodes not only because they’re kind of necessary for this sort of thing but also because who would object to Bucky Barnes looking totally punk rock with a partially-shaved head? No one, that’s who.
But I guess let’s just assume the plate things themselves are in contact with his head and transmitting the charge themselves. Okay. That’s a big area they cover and approximately zero opportunity for finesse, so they can’t localize the damage at all. And there’s still all that hair in the way. But whatever, I’ll shut up about the hair.
So the plate things are basically concentrated on the prefrontal cortex, which is at the very front of the brain, behind the forehead where the plates are located. I mean there looks like there are plates going around around the back of the head but if it only goes as deep as the cerebrum they don’t want to damage anything back there because it’s all motor skills and balance and sensory perception and language centers, all of which were vital in the Winter Soldier’s functioning.
So yeah, the prefrontal cortex seems to be what they’re targeting, and the prefrontal cortex is for short term memory and decision making. However, it would be indescribably stupid to damage short term memory retention, so I don’t think they’d just fry the entire prefrontal cortex. Especially if it could compromise his ability to make quick, logical decisions in the field because the prefrontal cortex is important for logic and impulse control. So I would assume that they’re targeting the connections between the short term and long term memory storage systems rather than taking away his short term memory altogether.
Basically, recalling a memory that’s stored in long-term is just the brain returning it to the short-term memory center, or the working memory, concentrated in the prefrontal cortex. From there your brain literally refires all the neurons that fired during that experience, without compromising awareness of current circumstances. So severing those connections between long and short term memory would not only stop him retaining new memories, it would stop him recalling old ones.
They could be messing with his long term memory, except there are no intracranial bits and bobs that could actually penetrate deeper than the cerebrum without frying everything in between, and the hippocampus and amygdala where long term memory is stored are in there deep.
This picture doesn’t do justice to how deep in the brain the hippocampus and amygdala are, but it works well enough as a visual aid. You don’t want to damage the amygdala in a super soldier at any rate because that’s where the survival instincts are kicking around. Also, damaging the hippocampus on both sides of the brain would turn him into a potato, unable to retain any information at all, not even how to discharge his weapon, so you’d basically have to retrain him anew for every mission. And this contraption has clearly no finesse at all, as stated above, so I really don’t think they’d be able to destroy anything only partially or make any localized alterations.
And sure, maybe they actually opened up his head at some point in the past to get at long term memory storage, and the cryofreeze might stop that from healing, but I think the understanding of the brain was so ridiculously limited at that time that they didn’t really even know how to avoid excessive damage, and I don’t think they would have risked rendering one of their best assets brain dead. Honestly, I think the most likely thing they did was supplement the physical stuff with more traditional brainwashing and conditioning techniques.
So really, all Bucky needs to do is repair the connections between his long term and short term memory. Even with all this damage, the brain is adaptable even in normal humans. When certain parts are damaged, other parts can take over functioning in their stead. Although in this case, if the connections between long and short term memory were cut every time he went into the cryogenic chamber, he never would have stored any of the information gleaned as the Winter Soldier past the short term unless he managed to catch enough sleep to transfer those memories into long term storage before he got zapped or frozen again. So he would potentially remember everything about being Bucky Barnes fairly quickly, assuming his super soldier healing could repair those pathways or create new ones to compensate, and he would never remember most of his time as the Winter Soldier except what they wanted him to remember and let him encode before they took out those connections again. So basically, his combat training, his obedience training, and all that hydra indoctrination crap.
His old memories as Bucky would remain relatively pristine, because the more we view a memory the more current circumstances during the recollection alter it, and what you remember becomes less and less similar to what you actually experienced at the time. So instead of memories slowly changing and evolving as the person themself changes, which is what normally happens as we revisit memories and subtly alter them over time through new perception, Bucky would have this huge, disorienting, sickening divide between the well-preserved, untouched old memories of how he used to be and any new ones he managed to create as the Winter Soldier. The Winter Soldier memories will be less fleshed out, have more holes, be generally more ghost-like because of how they fucked with his brain and memories, so it would be easy for him to dissociate with them and to ignore them, but in order to ignore them Bucky would also have to ignore their consequences. He would be denying a part of himself. And he wouldn’t be able to deal well with their fallout, with the ways those experiences changed him, because he wouldn’t let himself examine them.
Honestly this is horrifying in its own way. All the fic I’ve read talks about how horrible it must be for the Winter Soldier to forget Bucky Barnes, but very little touches on how horrible it would be for Bucky to be all there and have a stranger in his head that he has few, dissociated memories of, but still retains a lot of that conditioning and finds himself acting like someone he doesn’t even remember being. He would feel betrayed by his own body and his own mind, doing things without knowing why he was doing them. I feel like not being the same Bucky as the one who went off to war would be so frustrating to him. Fics paint it as Steve being frustrated by the fact that Bucky’s no longer the same person, but I think Bucky himself would be far more frustrated by that fact than Steve. I think the fact that he’s not the same would bother him more than Steve’s longing for him to be the same, because he would understand that longing, share it even. I think he would dissociate from the foreign Winter Soldier part of himself, would try to bury it or force it out instead of facing it, would hate whatever memories he did retain from that time, because the Winter Soldier terrifies everyone but I think he would terrify Bucky most of all. And it would make sense, too. After all, the winter soldier was always supposed to be a ghost, the unseen threat, the silent killer, and I think, rather than inhabiting Bucky, the Soldier would haunt him, something he can’t prepare for or fight unless he’s willing to look through the dark to find it and confront it.
The problem I have with the argument that “Tamlin didn’t know the note Feyre sent was really written by her, especially since he didn’t know she could write and read now. He had every reason to think it was suspect” is that it so closely mirrors the type of rhetoric that people use to forgive abusers and reshape narratives of abuse in real life?
I mean it’s pretty simple:
Feyre = domestic abuse victim
Velaris = safe house
Inner Circle (and specifically rhys and mor)= people who help her escape abuse and get to the safe house
I mean, how many times, in real life, do we see domestic abusers angry and upset that their victims have escaped them? How often do those abusers go after their victims? I mean, that’s why the locations of safe houses are secret! That’s why there are entire networks of people devoted to keeping those houses safe and secret (the wards on velaris!!!!) Because abusers will try to prevent victims from leaving. And the reasons they give? “No one loves you like I love you” “I’m whats best for you” “I won’t do it again” “You can’t leave me because if you leave me I’ll do x, and x”
I mean, abusers, don’t exactly listen to what their victims say. They don’t listen to what the victim wants. They just…abuse and abuse and don’t really care about the victim’s opinion or wishes.
Fairly often, abusive husbands are angry when their wives and children escape and go to safe houses. They literally….will hunt women down.
So Tamlin’s reaction to Feyre leaving is…fairly in line with how abusers react in real life. He doesn’t listen to what she wants. It’s fairly clear that Feyre was unhappy…I mean her depression and eating disorder are obvious. She vomits from nightmares every night. It’s clear that she wasn’t being hurt by Rhysand all those times she went to the Night Court for a week and came back unharmed. She told Tamlin she was okay. She told him she was uninjured. So…Tamlin ignoring Feyre’s note is just another instance of him, an abuser, ignoring his partner’s wishes. It’s not a mistake on his part, nor is it an example of him trying to protect her.
It’s an example of an abusive man thinking that he knows better than the woman he is abusing.
Tamlin sends Lucien to HUNT FEYRE DOWN. He literally hunts her…to try and forcibly bring her back to the Spring Court. And yes, Feyre pretends to be all evil so that Lucien won’t know about Velaris but…Tamlin still doesn’t give up hunting her. He allies with Hybern in order to get her back. It’s sick and fucked up.
So I really…do not care that Tamlin might have had reason to think the note wasn’t from Feyre. Because at the end of the day, it’s just more of him being an abusive prick. And the logic of “but he didn’t know if she was okay!” mirrors how people in real life try to frame abuse. We constantly see this narrative in literature (fifty shades!) and real life that the abuser was just trying to do what was best for this victim and “didn’t mean” to hurt her. Okay well…ultimately it does not matter that Tamlin “didn’t know the note was actually from her.”
Would Tamlin have listened to it even if he had known, unequivocally, that it was from Feyre and represented her wishes?
Nope. Because…he doesn’t listen to her wants and needs even when she’s speaking directly to him. He didn’t allow her any freedom in the Spring Court even though it was killing her. Literally, she was wasting away. He didn’t care then, so why can we assume that he would have listened to the note had he known it was from her? We can’t. So you can’t really make the argument that “Tamlin didn’t know it was from her” because either way…his actions would have been the same.
He’s interesting in controlling and “protecting” Feyre, aka abusing her, he isn’t interested in listening to what she wants.
The argument that Tamlin didn’t know the note was from her implies that had he known, he would have acted differently. And that’s a false argument given what we know of his direct interactions with Feyre in acomaf (abusive! ignores her wants and needs). And…not only is it a false argument…it’s the type of argument that in real life…would be really detrimental to abusive victims.
I see a lot of people are disappointed that Lydia isn’t dressing wearing as many pretty dresses or doing up her hair as before. I agree, her costuming and makeup isn’t as good as it can be this season but consider:
She has packed everything but her bare essentials and doesn’t want to take them out because she is determined to go to college eventually
Holland said something at one of the fan cons about how as Lydia becomes more self-confident, she doesn’t feel the need to dress up as much, she lets herself wear pants and leave her hair down etc. By this stage, she no longer feels the need to doll herself up.
Sure, she probably still likes dressing up, pairing clothes together and all that, picking out nail colours etc, but refer to point 1
A large part of her time between 6a and 6b was spent with Stiles, and there were probably multiple occasions where they just woke up and lazed around at either one’s house doing nothing all day so they never changed out of their comfy pyjamas, and Lydia gets more and more used to spending an entire day in casual clothes and without makeup.
Teen Wolf ran out of budget to buy her fancy clothes
I need more Jisaac in which Jackson and Isaac bond over complaining about everything. I want banter where they team up against other people, with Jackson sarcastically above it all and Isaac bluntly fed up with everything, all while they both maintain that they’re the greatest. *claps hands* Make it so!
I really want to talk about the conclusion of the Lost Children arc, and Jill’s importance as a character.
One thing I see a lot of Berserk fans wish for is that the series could go back to the darker tones of arcs like Lost Children, the latter half of the Golden Age, and of course, the Black Swordsman arc. But the lighter mood is something that’s actually been developing since the manga’s beginning - it’s been gradual but it’s been consistent, and all the different characters Guts has encountered on his travels have been meeting better and kinder fates. Colette died horribly and had her corpse desecrated, then Vargas died cleanly and with hope of being avenged, then Theresia survived and carried physical and psychological scars as the price…and now Jill lives too; not undamaged, but she makes it out clean and strong and hopeful. And even though the Lost Children arc contains piles of dead children and shows Guts at one of his lowest points morally, this is the moment where the light breaks through at last.
And Jill is the character who brings this light into the story, and an incredible amount of hope too.
Imprisoning someone “to protect them” - a persistent theme in The 100
Since the beginning of the show, The 100 writers have explored the theme of imprisonment to protect someone, where the imprisoner argues that their actions are justified because it’s for the prisoner’s “own good” or to “save them.” We’ve seen this line of thinking from Bellamy, repeatedly towards Octavia in season 1 and once towards Clarke in season 3 (the handcuffing incident), and repeatedly from L.exa towards Clarke in season 3. Now, we’re looking at a similar situation between Bellamy and Clarke, except the roles are reversed. At this stage, this concept of imprisonment to save someone has become an important theme of the show, which also ties into the larger theme surrounding the justification of actions motivated by the need to survive.
First, let’s look at how Bellamy’s character has been used to explore this theme. Way back in season 1, Bellamy attempted to imprison Octavia in the dropship, firmly believing that he was justified in doing so because it was to “keep her safe.” From the outset, Octavia resisted that argument, and Bellamy’s attempts to control her “for her own good” were a constant source of tension between them. We also saw that thinking re-emerge in 3x05 (Hakeldama), when Bellamy handcuffed Clarke, literally telling her that it was “for her own good.”
So, the writers established this line of thinking for Bellamy early on, showed us that it was unacceptable (with regard to Octavia at least), and then went on to develop him away from that position. Since season 1, Bellamy and Octavia’s relationship has gradually moved toward the point where Bellamy now steps back and allows Octavia to make her own choices, as he should.
The last two episodes (4x09, DNR, and 4x10, Die All, Die Merrily) have made pointed, unmissable statements about Bellamy’s evolved perspective on this issue. In DNR, Bellamy faced off against Jaha to defend Jasper, Harper, et al.’s freedom to choose their own fate. This was literally a case of Jaha wanting to imprison people in the bunker to save them. There is no question here: staying in Arkadia = certain death. But, this time, Bellamy was firmly on the other side of the argument. To hammer this character development home, the writers had Monty explicitly ask Bellamy what he would do if Octavia were on the other side of the door. His response: “At least I’d get to say goodbye.” This is huge growth, but not sudden. Bellamy has been developing in this direction since season 1.
Then, in case anyone was wondering whether Bellamy’s statement to Monty was all talk, he got a chance to prove it in Die All, Die Merrily. Here, he stood back as Octavia chose a route that meant almost certain death. Not only that, but he was given a truly excellent line, where he advised Octavia to be “the girl under the floor.” Here, the writers showed us that Bellamy still instinctively believes the safest option is for Octavia to be hidden away, that that core belief hasn’t changed. BUT, Bellamy now accepts that Octavia has the freedom to choose. He knows that imprisoning or controlling anyone is unacceptable, that it creates a toxic relationship. The writers haven’t used the word “abuse” (as far as I know), but it applies once a pattern of controlling behaviour and imprisonment is established. So far, the message from Bellamy’s arc is clear. This kind of behaviour is NOT OK.
In contrast to Bellamy, Clarke has been on the other end of this behaviour. When L.exa imprisoned her, L.exa told her that “there was no other way,” before revealing that she actually “needed Clarke.” The argument in 3x03 (Ye Who Enter Here) that the imprisonment was “to save” Clarke was quickly undermined by L.exa’s admitted political motivations, since she needed Wanheda’s power and a supporting voice on the council. However, when L.exa forcibly reminded Clarke that she was a prisoner in 3x05 (Hakeldama), I do think her motivation was purely personal. So, these are more examples of imprisonment being used to protect someone, on face value at least. Although L.exa’s controlling behaviour was unacceptable and its duration and consistency established an abusive relationship, Clarke did not seem bothered by that aspect. She was angry with L.exa for imprisoning her, but I think she recognized L.exa’s political and then personal motivations and accepted her justifications. Similarly, Clarke was devastated when Bellamy handcuffed her, but she seemed to automatically forgive him. In that case, I think Clarke saw Bellamy’s attempt to imprison her for her own protection as some kind of misguided but harmless act of caring. Why do I think this? Because Clarke has just repeated this behavior herself, in 4x10 (Die All, Die Merrily). So, unlike Bellamy, she still believes that imprisoning someone for their own protection is OK.
To me, this looks a lot like behavioural re-enactment combined with normalization. Normalization occurs when an abuse victim comes to accept the abuser’s justification for their behavior and, thus, regards that behaviour as normal. Another outcome of normalization is that the abuse victim ultimately repeats that behavior, because they’ve been conditioned to think it’s acceptable and justified. What Clarke did to Bellamy at the end of 4x10 is very reminiscent of L.exa’s treatment of her. She had him taken into the bunker against his knowledge and against his will, to keep him safe from Praimfaya. In the promo for next week, Clarke seems to be threatening Bellamy with a gun to prevent him from leaving. If she is doing this under the rationale that it is “to keep him safe,” we have a clear parallel with the examples above.
So, what now? At this point, Bellamy’s development is conveying the message that imprisoning someone for their own good/safety is never justified. I actually think the scene with Jaha, Jasper, and Monty in Arkadia was included specifically to showcase this development and to make this point. At the same time, the writers have being showing Clarke mimic various leaders all season, with a lot of her choices being portrayed in a negative light. Now, she’s repeating L.exa’s treatment of her. I hate making predictions, but I hope that the writers will use the apparent confrontation between Bellamy and Clarke in 4x11 to firmly state that imprisoning someone for their own good is completely unjustifiable and unacceptable. They’ve already done it, but not with Clarke and not in such a clear parallel with Clarke’s experiences. Since the main character’s previous acceptance of this abusive treatment from L.exa seems to have generated a worrying acceptance among some of the audience as well, I hope this issue is addressed in a scenario directly involving Clarke.
To finish off, I just want to point out that this theme ties in really well with the major themes of the show. Essentially:
Do I have the right to imprison someone to protect them? => Is any action acceptable if I am saving someone else? => Is any action acceptable if I am doing it to survive?
The writers have posed these questions at various times and provided different perspectives, and I assume that they are gradually building towards certain conclusions. To me, the answer to the first question is clear, and I think Bellamy’s development reflects that. Since this kind of behavior is a serious problem in the real world, I hope 4x11 will be used to highlight the danger of controlling behaviour in a relationship, to acknowledge that an abusive pattern can develop from such behaviour, and to emphasize that this behaviour is unacceptable regardless of motivation or rationale.
This scene always felt like a Stackson moment to me even if it’s framed to be Jydia with Stiles upset over Lydia choosing Jackson. Because Stiles never wanted the annoying jerk to die, he needed the monster gone, and he’ll make a million excuses as to why he’d never cry over Jackson.
Inspired by the discussion on @halekingsourwolf ‘s blog about Teen Wolf timelines, I got kiiiinda into figuring out when exactly the Hale fire might have been set.
So yeah, Teen wolf wiki has Deuc being blinded in fall of ‘03, right after Derek turns 15, Jennifer happening in spring of ‘04, and then Kate and the death of the Hales happening in January of ‘05 (referencing the webisode that suggests it went down during the Wolf moon, which was Jan 25 in ‘05, claiming that born wolves have massive reunions/celebrations for that full moon every year, thus explaining why everyone was together), right after Derek turns sixteen… so it would have been just over six years since all that, when S1 starts.
But Peter’s comment is just that Derek was a Sophomore, and 15. While there are always exceptions, most folks I knew in California school systems, if they had a fall birthday, turned fifteen during their Freshman year. So I posit the timeline: Derek is 15 at the beginning of his Sophomore year, ‘03, when He and Paige start up. The shit with Deuc and the alphas and Paige’s death happens that fall, Derek has the shittiest sixteenth birthday, and Kate starts preying on him while he is exceptionally vulnerable that next semester (there’s probably some bullying/blowback/ostracization from his peers to deal with, if only because of his changed behavior, let alone any connections anyone has drawn to Paige’s disappearance and death, not to mention his mother’s distraction with pack politics and hunters, and him having gone from top-of-the-world to fuck-all self-esteem wise… plus, y’know, crushing grief and guilt). Kali attacks Jennifer that spring (2004), Talia is even more preoccupies there, and Kate makes her move sometime before the end of the semester, since Derek and Laura were presumably at a school function/practice/etc instead of home when the fire happened. This also Lets Derek and Laura be two years apart in school if she’s a senior, which I like better. Also lets her graduate (although, what a shit-show that probably was. Holy shit). And then it’s a full seven-years-and-a-summer before they come back and S1 starts (which would make him 23 when we meet him, instead of 22) (or, if you prefer, move all the years up one, duec attacked in 04, jennifer dies in 05, shorter time Derek and Laura were gone… or make Derek younger, make Paige happen his freshman year when he is 14/15, and Kate happen either that spring/summer he’s 15 or during his sophmore year, maybe, at 15/16).
This ignores the webisode/Wolf moon breadcrumb, which attempted to explain why all the Hales were gathered together, but unless it was, like, a lunar eclipse, which it was not, why would they have been inside the house, instead of out running with the moon? I would expect a moon celebration to involve, y’know, being under the moon.
I would argue that there doesn’t need to be a reason that they were gathered, at least, not beyond the fact that there were lots of dangerous things happening in the territory at that time. Maybe it was just a meeting to deal with that. Maybe it was a pretty regular occurrence, during times of strife like that, and so it was predictable. Hell, maybe they were in the house planning something for Laura’s graduation??? This is also suggesting that they didn’t all live there???
However, if you dig the Lunar Eclipse theory, do you know when there was a lunar eclipse? A total Lunar eclipse? That might explain the Hales gathered together someplace defensible? Like the Alpha’s house? 2004. 2003-2004 feature a tetralogy of full lunar eclipses, two a year, one in spring and one in the fall. On May 4, 2004, there was a total lunar eclipse, but it was not visible in California. And then there was another on October 28, 2004. The October lunar eclipse was visible from all of North America (if any of y’all were into baseball at the time, this is the lunar eclipse that took place during a a world series game, the first time this had happened, and was the world series where the Boston Red Sox won for the first time in 86 years, ending the curse of the bambino. ;) trivia!) . The penumbra started about 5pm in California (if I’ve done my math right), partial started at 6:15, Total at 7:23, and by the time of the greatest eclipse at 8:04, the Hales would already have been dead, since the canonical time-of-fire seems to be about 7PM.
But, if we assume the moon has some effect on you whether you see it or not, then I like the May 2004 moon. Even though it would be on the wrong side of the planet, the penumbral eclipse would start about 10:50am, with the greatest eclipse being at 1:30 PM… and the whole thing is done by 4:09 pm. But what if the goal is not so much having the wolves powerless as together? Because… I have a theory/headcanon/plot bunny about eclipses.
We know that the wolves lose all their wolfy powers during the short window of the full eclipse… but what about the rest of the time? What weird/new thing happened right after a full eclipse, probably still during the partial or penumbral part?
Scott breaking through an Ash Barrier. (which, I know, isn’t the only time he’s done it, but what if the eclipse stuff helped?)
So what if the hunters have figured out, and are desperate to never let the wolves know, that during the eclipse, yeah, they’re weaker but also sometimes they’re immune/resistant to weaknesses they normally have?
Were that the case, hunters would want to be very careful going after wolves on lunar eclipses because, if you screw up the timing like Jennifer did, you might wind up missing the “powerless” window and landing in the “pissed off, wolfed out, and mountain ash only works some of the time” window… which, hey, may be where the canonical “rumors” and speculation about wolves getting more powerful on lunar eclipses comes from.
So the October moon might not have been the best one, esp since they didn’t need to weaken the Hales, just get them together.
And on the evening/night of the May moon, the “danger” from their “weakness” would have passed, as far as they knew, they would be feeling safe (and from the hunter’s POV, they would be safely vulnerable to mountain ash once again), but they would likely still be together in the aftermath of a “dangerous” moon, and strategizing over the hunter issues and the alpha pack issues.
so in episode 5 when todd’s putting bright pink plasters on dirk’s scratched up face, dirk looks disappointed and wistful and asks ‘why did they have to be pink?’ kinda sadly. this just seemed a lil odd to me, considering dirk obvs has a thing for bright colours and is anything but hyper-masculine
likely reason: dirk just isn’t a fan of pink, it’s not his colour, whatever
my sad reason: dirk associates pink with bad things
Most of the demigods(with the exception of Annabeth, of course)use verbal or physical triggers when fighting, presumably to help their confidence in their powers, or their focus. It’s a pretty common device in fiction. Jason gestures where he wants the lightning to hit(such as his first use of the power in TLH, when he held up his spear as a makeshift lightning rod), Hazel tends to point to things(raising Jason’s sword out of the ocean in HOH, taking down Amazons with jewelry in SON), and Leo seems to have a penchant for yelling weird remarks. I don’t think we see anyone use this more often than Percy, though.
He yells at the top of his lungs when exploding water pipes to combat the Laistrygonians in SON, gesticulates using his fists earlier in the same book and, perhaps most dramatically, stabs a bridge in TLO to aid in its destruction while calling up the river.
The only time we don’t really see him do this while using his powers prominently is when he fights Akhlys in HOH, the scene commonly noted as his darkest moment. He stands to get a better view of the goddess, but that’s all. Just concentration and a bit of glaring. He does it all with his mind.
We basically already know that Percy at his darkest is also Percy at his most focused, powerful and deadly, but for some reason I can’t quite pin down, this feels too significant to ignore.