more plot holes

You know what, the ‘suddenly, there’s 5 more Winter Soldiers’ subplot

has gotten a lot of flack, and I don’t disagree that it could and should have been handled a lot better, but even as it is, I really really like what it says, or rather, confirms about Bucky.

Keep reading

givenchy & gold, part i (m.)

;pairing — jungkook/reader

;warnings — sex | implied exhibitionism | mild dom/sub tones | if u’ve got a praise kink then ur gonna love this | mentions of daddy kinks | instances of spanking 

;summary — you’re the supervisor of the clothing department with a lot of useless lingerie knowledge, jungkook is the jewelry department’s defiant hot boy who flirts in wristwatch brands. basically an upscale retail au, but with lots of implied under-the-counter sex. and when an opportunity presents itself to fuck each other in the boss’s office after hours, you’re both too hot for each other to say no.

;word count — 20k im so sorry

part i | part ii | drabbles

Keep reading

5

 The Owl Prince || Art Masterpost || Chapters: 3/?

Summary:

Prince Dean and Prince Castiel have been betrothed for a very long time.
Close as they may have been in childhood, spending eight years apart from each other is enough to make anyone strangers yet again. When their gleeful reunion ends with a curse placed on Castiel by a vengeful witch, what lengths will Dean and Castiel go to find each other again?
Hopefully, to the stars and back.

tl;dr - The Swan Princess AU but gayer and with owls.

Story by: @thebloggerbloggerfun

Art by: @castihalo

A gift for: @whelvenwings

Read it on AO3!

i know i’m in the minority on this site, but i’m actually happy about the disney remakes

Localization CG Error

So while playing part of the Chapter 5 localization just now, I was pretty surprised to discover that one of NISA’s “CG fixes” actually made things… a lot worse. As in, completely made the biggest trick in the trial impossible and confused the facts of the case pretty badly.

Keep reading

Just a bunch of things that I’ve noticed and questions that I have

  1. In ch7, when grandpa de Sade is explaining history to Noé, he lists what has changed after Babel but there’s a pause before he says vampires, (which I found odd even back then) “Minerals that shone blue… and inhuman beings with red eyes” (ch7p4) So according to him, Babel created vampires. BUT. In ch15 an unspecified narrator says: “Inhuman beings, whose origins are thought to lie in Babel,…” (ch15p1) Are they, or aren’t they?
  2. Remember when Noé said that Vanitas’s “blood smelled very good” (ch12p16). Could that have anything to do with what Moreau did to him?
  3. The person we see at the end of ch15 seems to have gone to rescue the other child, for whatever reason, and (our) Vanitas made the decision to… tag along.
  4. Roland said about Vanitas “So the stories about the vampires using your power were true” (ch15p6) ??? What power.
  5. The stone in Roland’s weapon(s) looks like astermite (ch15p22)
  6. Is ‘Vanitas’ the VotBM’s true name? If what we’ve been told is the truth, I understand that vampires began using fake names only after the BoV was created (they wouldn’t have a reason to before). So, logically, ‘Vanitas’ would be the VotBM’s true name.
  7. Isn’t Luca technically the ideal candidate to take over the role of King if the Queen dies?
  8. The medicine that Jeanne takes could have been created by Ruthven (we know that he conducts experiments on vampires (curse-bearers).
  9. In ch7 when the vampires saw the mark of possession on Vanitas, how did they know that it’s from the VotBM? I understand that they possibly feel that it was made by a very powerful vampire. But it is possible to know exactly which vampire created that mark? Also considering that none of the vampires at the ball have ever seen the VotBM. They don’t even believe in the existence of the vampire! (In conclusion - Vanitas is bullshitting everyone again?) If the mark is blue as is shown on the cover of volume 3, then that would explain it.
  10. Johann said that Ruthven’s bourreau was in Paris. We know it’s not Jeanne (in ch3p42, Luca to Jeanne “You’re not a bourreau anymore! You’re my chevalier, remember…!?”)  so who is it? (could it be Domi? She was there around the same time)

Edited

Another timeline plot hole? Or a clue?

One answer that we did get out of 7x12 is that Melissa supposedly didn’t know that Spencer was adopted. However, Melissa is supposed to be 7 years older than Spencer. She would have noticed that Veronica wasn’t pregnant and then all the sudden she had a baby sister, right? Spencer even says to Veronica that only she and Peter “could appreciate the bitter irony” of her being checked into Radley, where she was born. But Melissa is smart. I find it hard to believe that she never put it together. 

I know they’ve mentioned the DiLaurentis family left Rosewood and then came back But when exactly was this? We’ve been told conflicting times.

  • In 2x20, Peter says he got Jessica pregnant with Jason. But then the DiLaurentis family moves to Georgia to raise Jason and Peter marries Veronica. According to him, they do not move back until Spencer is five. Consider Jason is 7ish years older than Spencer, this is supposed to be 12 years later.
  • But in 7x11, Veronica says to Spencer “Jessica knocked on the door, I hadn’t said five words to her since Jason was born. And there she was, like any neighbor, come to borrow a lawnmower or a husband.”
  • This implies that Jessica was their neighbor at the time. But she’s supposed to be living in Georgia!  
  • This is when Veronica learns Jessica has a twin sister in Radley. “Apparently, your father was in a restaurant when Jessica walked in or who he thought was Jessica.” So did Peter think Jessica was just ‘visiting’ Rosewood? And why keep Mary in Rosewood, where the Hastings live, if Jessica and family is living in Georgia? Was Peter still having an affair with Jessica regularly or was this time a “slip”?

How does Charlotte fit into this timeline? In 6x04, Jason asks why tf no one in Rosewood ever mentioned that they had another sibling. Kenneth says verbatim: “Nobody knew him. We moved here after Charles was admitted. Your mother wanted to be close to him.”

  • Charlotte was admitted to Radley at age 7, after burning baby Ali in the bathtub. That would put the DiLaurentis family moving to Rosewood when Ali and Spencer were just babies.
  • So according to Kenneth, they didn’t even move to Rosewood until Jason was nearly 6 and Spencer was just a baby–what? How?
  • We know for a fact that they had to have been in Rosewood when Jason and Spencer were conceived considering they both came from Peter having an affair with Jessica/Mary. In 2x20, Peter even said Jessica & Kenneth had an apartment nearby during his and Jessica’s affair and that’s how Jason came to be.

anonymous asked:

I'm a bit confused ;.; were Yata and Fushimi born in Shizume or another neighborhood?

The impression I’ve gotten is they were both born in Shizume, in LSW it’s mentioned that Yata’s just returned after moving away for a while when his mom got divorced, his stepfather’s job brought him back to the city. Fushimi we can assume was, at the very least he’s living in the same house in the First Contact manga as he is in LSW.

More plot holes have occurred to me, so buckle up.

1. If Mycroft was in charge of the asylum and didn’t have any clue that it was compromised, why the frick did they have to break in?

2. Sherlock woke up in that random room with all the pictures on the wall, right? Well, John woke up in the well. Just think about that. He was unconscious in two feet of water for how long? And he didn’t drown?

3. So, let me get this straight: Moriarty knew 5 years in advance that he would try to make Sherlock commit suicide, fail and end up killing himself instead, and then be gone for “Holmes killing Holmes” thing he was expecting to happen? Moriarty knew he would fail and die? THEN WHY DID HE DO IT IN THE FIRST PLACE?