I’m not gonna do an intro sentence because I think the request summarizes this gloriously.
Request: “Did you see that post about Bear Grylls!Link and Total Aristocratic!Sidon? Like prim and proper Sidon gazing adoringly at his half naked BF wrestling with Wolf!Link as Muzu looks on in horror. I’d personally love to see a story about it.” Requested by @absolmon (sorry the normal linking system wouldn’t work for some reason.)
Word Count: 510 words. (It keeps getting lower, sorry.)
Warnings: Mildly Suggestive Content
Muzu would admit that in the beginning, his hatred for Link was bigoted and unreasonable. Despising him simply for being a hylian was an awful thing to do. As much as hated to admit it, he still held some resentment for Mipha’s death, even though he knew it was out of the hero’s control.
This, however, he was confident was a justifiable cause for his horror.
is far from the only character who gets a lot of
mentoring help throughout the BnHA series. So let’s talk about
Bakugou for a(nother) moment, shall we?
don’t know what it is about middle school in Japan, but it seems to
really suck? In every high school anime I watch, all the drama
always happens in middle school, and the teaching staff is highly
lax, if not completely irresponsible. They certainly didn’t do much
to quell a young Bakugou’s more violent
or help a young Midoriya with what is very obviously a bullying
safe to say that until he goes to UA, Bakugou basically lacks in
authority figures, which is one (not all) of the reasons he got to
act as bad as he did.
start of the series, he’s gotten a bit better. So let’s examine
his dads (and one mum).
contain an explosion
time we see an actual authority figure reign in Bakugou, is when he
hits UA. And in this case you can take that quite literally.
person is, of course, Aizawa. Now I frigginlove Aizawa
he is one of the most underrated characters in the series and I will shout that to the rooftops for all eternity but also,
Aizawa is, for his students and specifically for Bakugou, a
constant source of lowkey support. His
teaching method is very much hands-off, letting his students make mistakes and figure out solutions for themselves,
which seems to be the go-to for all anime mentors everywhere, but his
support is definitely there.
Because, and this is
important, he looks beyond posing. Beyond attitudes and images. He
has reason to, of course. Aizawa looks and acts like a drunken hobo
half the time, but he is actually one of the better teachers and
heroes as UA. He knows a thing or two about appearances.
honestly, it is very much needed. UA and the entirety of the
story are, remember, utterly brutal to Bakugou and his self-esteem.
It’s a pretty classic ‘break him down before you can build him up’
sort of theme. But Aizawa is not part of this. He restrains
the kid exactly twice. Once, when he was about to (possibly) murder
Midoriya, and a second time when he was blatantly breaking UA rules. Aizawa
does not belittle Bakugou, he does not fear him and most of all, he
does not underestimate him.
him, advises him. He defends
will scold him, but mostly he has a certain amount of respect for the
kid. He trusts him.
I think for
Bakugou that is incredibly important. Because Aizawa is
someone he respects. Here is a pro hero who has taken the time
to get to actually know him.
Aizawa is someone who
puts down clear boundaries and then gives him the freedom
to stay within them. Whether out of disinterest or fear, that middle school teacher way back in the
first episode wasn’t even trying to stop him from hurting
Midoriya. That sort of shit would not fly in Aizawa’s class. But he’s
also not going to lay it out for him. He trusts that Bakugou will, in fact, sort himself
out. Once your core is on the right track, the rest will follow.
shown, in a very real way, that this is how you get the best results
with Bakugou. Horikoshi does this by showing us how NOT to do it. For instance, while Best Jeanist certainly has the intentions and the authority as a Pro Hero to mentor him, he
goes about it all wrong.
Because what he does is exactly
that: micromanage, completely make over the outside, not the inside.
can’t just expect the kid to change his entire being like that.
Certainly not because it’s fairly clear that Best Jeanist,
well-meaning as he is, is not exactly trying to understand Bakugou.
It’s pretty fucking scary how many queer youth and young adults on this site are radicalized by “conservative protestantism in a gay hat” and/or radfems. I’d say 10-20% at a low estimate? The answer is “a terrifying amount,” but it’s hard to measure precisely. Fewer on Reddit and in IRL spaces, but there’s a perception in social justice circles that Reddit is evil, and then people with social support are less likely to be radicalized.
In any case, it needs to be addressed, and addressed at a deeper level than “Why [specific group] should be included” or even “Why rhetoric of invaders or being the real oppressors or sexual predators applied to identity groups is bad.” We need to address why these people are so vulnerable to radical exclusionist neo-conservatism, and honestly, I think part of that is recognizing that queer people under ~30 (particularly in the US and UK, and a few other places) are essentially second- and third-generation genocide survivors. No one talks about that. I’m not minimizing the first-generation survivors, and I understand that it is painful to talk about any of this, but more attention needs to be paid to the effects of growing up in the aftermath. In particular, the isolation and lack of mentor figures (particularly for trans people), and the tendency to latch onto any half-qualified queer adult as role models or political guides (and that the surviving queer middle aged adults skew cis and female, which means that you get a higher concentration of TERFs). Also, the difficulty in cross-generational knowledge transmission and the lack of official teaching of queer history—we are particularly vulnerable to this, because queer people are mostly born into cishet families. If we are not careful, every generation is a stolen generation. Not addressing all this has allowed the radicalization to happen. We need counter-radicalization online programs, because most of the radicalization happens on the internet to people who have no other way to access queer communities, and those will definitely need to take this into account.
your content quality has been lacking ever since new admins joined ): idk what do 😢
This is probably one of the rudest messages I have ever received on this blog…. I know that this probably wasn’t your intention, but…I am taking my time to answer this cause I am honestly really offended by this. I’m going to write a lot, so I’ll put it under a read more. This might give you more context and understanding about this blog, so if you are curious please read.
It bothers me when people use their past as a crutch. The lack of a father figure in your life is not the reason why you turned out the way you did. Your life turned out a certain way because you allowed it to. Yes, certain things that happen to us affect us for sure, but to hold that entire situation/person responsible for your life choices, is irresponsible. Take responsibility.
A/N: I don’t think that I’m good at angst. I feel like I don’t have a forte in writing yet and it’s really frustrating. But I’ll push forward until become more confident in my work. Thank you to those of you who have been here from the beginning, here from a few days ago and those who intend to be here for as long as we are posting.
Also, I’m using America as the place that Y/N is visiting. Not that that’s really important but it would explain the time difference.
(Uh… this wasn’t supposed to be smut but them Baekhyun wanted to go and be,,,beautiful. Also Sweet Lies is a thing so..ye)
There will be a part 2 that continues my original plan.
You sunk your hands into the warm laundry that sat inside of
the dryer. The comforting heat shot up your body and made you smile. Freshly
wash clothes always reminded you for your boyfriend; warm, soft and inviting.
You gathered the garments into your arms and made your way to your bed room. As
you walked down the hall you heard small whimpers and grunts, to which you
“Baek, what are you doing?” you chuckled out. You peered
into the room and saw him struggling to get into your suitcase.
there was noise all around him: the strident knocking of glasses, the loud chatter settled over the room like a heavy cloud, the steady sound of the pool table reminding him of first dates and awkward conversations over drinks.
a half finished flute of champagne sat in front of him on the bar table. he used to enjoy this drink, the bubbly feeling of it and the effect it had on him. but right now it simply made him think of the last time he’d had it and, thus, relive the biggest mistake he’d made in the past few months. he didn’t mean to sulk, he really didn’t. everyone around him was finally letting loose and coming together for the first time in what felt like forever; shadowhunters and downworlders all together at the hunter’s moon celebrating what had to be the most important victory and the end of a war that had seemed never ending until merely a day ago.
he could hear clary and izzy chatting animatedly a couple of tables over, his sister’s giggles travelling all the way to his ears and doing a better job of warming his insides than the champagne did. after a couple of shots, jace had been determined to ‘kick simon’s ass’ at darts, and now the two of them could be heard bickering and laughing at each other from the other end of the bar, getting along better than they’d had since they first met. even luke and raphael seemed to take their lead and challenge each other at a game of pool, throwing snarky remarks at each other once in a while, but the fondness in their voices and the laughter that followed could be heard even from alec’s spot.
‘too tired to party?’ a female voice asked, but it wasn’t until he saw a hand rubbing a towel over a spot right next to his glass that he looked up. he remembered maia from max’s rune celebration, but they’d never actually talked, short for the brief introduction on magnus’s part. magnus. right, he wasn’t sulking. he cleared his throat and tried to put on a smile, but he knew it fell flat.
‘yeah, i guess you could say so,’ he answered, and it wasn’t a complete lie. they’d spent almost 24 hours battling demons they’d never faced before in their lives, fighting circle members that seemed perhaps a bit too well trained and, eventually, killing a mass murdering psychopath. ‘tired’ was an understatement. yet the sheer happiness and relief that swept over the shadow world seemed to recharge everyone’s batteries better than any power nap could.
everyone’s but alec’s.
maia gave him a sympathetic smile, but her eyes seemed to hold more weight. he saw a flash of understanding in them, in a deeper sense than simply compassion for his lack of sleep. but he figured it was just his imagination. he turned his gaze back to his glass that looked as miserable as he felt. in one sweeping motion, he downed the rest of his drink, but didn’t ask for another one. at that point he didn’t think any amount of alcohol would have the desired effect on him.
he heard maia giggle, and squinted his eyes, raising an eyebrow at her in place of an inquiry. she shook her head, a smile still present on her face and took his empty glass. she didn’t entertain alec with an answer to his silent question. instead she kept looking intently over his shoulder, something akin to teasing in her gaze. her eyebrows wiggled almost imperceptibly for a second, before she walked away to serve a group of seelies at the other end of the table.
exhaustion took over his confusion, so he brushed off her behaviour. it wasn’t until she returned and slid a napkin on the bar, placing a newly filled flute of champagne on it, that the confusion settled back. he was about to tell her he didn’t ask for another drink when someone sat on the empty stool next to him. he was not in the mood for company, especially from a stranger, but he didn’t actually have time to appraise the intruder and decide they were indeed a stranger before he saw him.
magnus looked just as exhausted as alec felt, his usual poise replaced by tense shoulders and tired eyes. his previously styled hair was in disarray and his eyeliner smudged. yet he was still, without a doubt, the most beautiful man alec had ever seen.
he was still avoiding alec’s gaze as he motioned for maia to pour another glass. she complied and placed it in front of alec, sending him the same knowing smile she’d had a few minutes before. he saw magnus from the corner of his eye as he raised his own glass and turned around in his seat to face him. alec did the same, uncertainty clear in his slow movements, still not sure where the two of them stood, still weary of ruining everything.
‘alexander,’ spoken soft, like silk sheets gliding over his naked skin and slow fingers tracing patterns on his bare chest. and, by the grace of the angel, he’d never missed hearing his own name this much. ‘you know i hate to drink alone,’ magnus added with the hint of a smile, but every bit as genuine.
and alec could physically feel the heaviness in his heart be replaced by pure and honest relief, so much so that he could barely contain the soft chuckle it pulled out of him. as reluctant as he was to break eye contact with the man before him, he closed his eyes for a second and let himself properly bask in the noise surrounding him for the first time that night.
the gentle knocking of glasses, the joyful chatter settled over the room like a blanket, the inviting sound of the pool table, reminding him of when he fell in love.
he opened his eyes and found magnus still looking at him, the smile from before visibly bigger, enough to reach his eyes. he clinked his glass with magnus’s, sipping from it. and champagne never tasted sweeter.
one thing i’ve realized is, i have kind of a weakness for “neutral” relationships? by which i mean interactions that aren’t really all that positive or negative, they’re just. kinda there. neutral. sometimes awkward. one example being peridot and steven in “keeping it together” and the first half of “catch & release” (meaning before steven went all “aww cute!”), and recently, i think that’s part of why i’m now fascinated by jasper and pearl.
i realize they might seem closer to negative - they’re on opposing sides and jasper did insult pearl once, but… that was so little and non-consequential. she just brushed pearl off as unimportant, as she did with the others. their relationship isn’t directly “damaged” or uncomfortable the way jasper might be with, say, garnet and amethyst for a while.
that’s not to say they won’t ever butt heads, but it does remind me of early steven and peridot, in terms of just being so neutral - a couple positive interactions, a couple negative ones, but overall, they don’t seem to have a strong opinion of each other. they’re just kinda experiencing the same things, from opposite sides.
their first encounter? jasper fights garnet, doesn’t really engage amethyst or pearl. pearl’s words to jasper are also less harsh than garnet or amethysts, they’re all “you need to leave! back off!” while pearl just goes “this is not a gem-controlled planet”.
their second encounter? while one shouldn’t judge alexandrite as just the sum of her parts, she does catch and hold jasper, without hesitation. a part of her did not want to fight, or at least hoped they could solve this diplomatically. then pearl sits by jasper, not really bothered by her presence, and straight up tries to save her - not to the point of sacrificing herself, but still genuinely trying.
third encounter? just kinda. staring at each other. pearl was ready to fight, but not engaging, and then jasper walks off. this was important in the early interactions between peridot and steven - neither fought the other on sight, that was the hallmark of their neutrality.
pearl was worried about steven and connie, sure, and she definitely views jasper as a threat in that regard, but peridot and steven were also at odds. steven was trying to fight + catch peridot, and peridot did try to kill them. they still got to have neutral interactions, and steven was by far the crystal gem peridot felt most comfortable around at first. their friendship, eventually, became a close bond, and steven was naturally important in peridot’s reform arc.
i guess what i’m saying is, i have no doubts they’ll butt heads, but their relationship also feels carefullyneutral right now. pearl has been absent when jasper has been at her most stressed or aggressive. jasper has done nothing to really hurt her, despite having several opportunities to, and pearl hasn’t expressed any strong anger or dislike towards her.
this isn’t an attempt to give jasper Good Gem Points so much as something that makes me plain curious. it feels deliberately done - jasper being at her least aggressive / most occupied with other thoughts when pearl is there. pearl, too, has shown off her capacity as a fighter only in settings where jasper isn’t there. the question of who would even win in a fight hangs over us the way it doesn’t with garnet or amethyst (coincidentally, they both lose to garnet and beat amethyst, implying they might be rather evenly matched…).
if i’m right in my raid theory, it could also be that garnet and bismuth were the gems who forced jasper to fight “from the second” she was born, if that’s literal. in other words, another reason jasper would have the least bad blood with her than with, well, anyone. peridot and lapis included (lapis for obvious reasons, and with peridot there might be some lingering “et tu, brute?” after the literal stabbing, and the metaphorical one with joining the crystal gems).
basically pearl is the closest jasper has to a blank slate. someone she can interact with with some ease, eventually, if circumstances allow. someone she has not hurt, and who hasn’t hurt her. their histories are intertwined, they were the young knights of the war (“completely dedicated to a person and a cause”), they struggle to let go of the past and live, still holding on to their old feelings and causes. of course, pearl chose to fight in a way jasper didn’t, but differences do not negate parallels. this is something pearl is just now moving past, and it’s something jasper needs.
tl;dr: they’ve never fought or hurt each other. they haven’t exactly been nice to each other either, jasper had her rude moment and pearl expressed some worry over her just wandering around like that, but she still tried to save her… so they remain, overall, neutral. it’s hard to know whether they’re building up for them to finallyfight sometime, or if they’ll bond with less hurt standing in their way, with all their parallels, similar mindsets and struggles, or a mix of both… but i feel like that neutrality has been carefully preserved enough that it’s gotta mean something.
This is all really interesting input via @faelapis and tossing in my two cents, I do think it’s interesting that official Crewniverse art tends to pair Jasper with Pearl, Peridot with Amethyst, and Lapis with Garnet on the rare cases where the whole ‘crew’ is together.
And I think I have other reasons for being interested in Jasper and Pearl, beyond this- they’re both people who initially come across as haughty and caviling of others, and this is a defense mechanism for an abysmal lack of self worth. The figure of Pink Diamond is also very interesting because it suggests Jasper much like Pearl has a problem where she is not only grieving a loss, but heavily bound, almost defined in some regards- by who they are to that person who isn’t in their life any more. Both of them are even trying to chase closure, though in Jasper’s case, her closure is doomed from the start- she’s trying to pursue Rose, who is already gone.
What intrigues me about Jasper and Pearl is how similar they are. They’re also the only two Gems we’ve seen that are proficient in a weapon besides their summoned one (I don’t count Steven as “proficient” with Rose’s sword because iirc, outside of Bismuth, the only time he’s fought with it at all has been with Connie) but Jasper is able to use the destabilizer, and she uses it like a sword, while Peridot swings it clumsily and tries to use it like a club. This would actually suggest that Jasper might well have a background in swordsmanship.
There’s also the fact that despite being such a powerhouse herself, Jasper’s fighting style exploits a surprising amount of finesse and footwork- watch her fight against Garnet in Jailbreak, especially early on with the destabilizer. I’m not the only one intrigued by the idea of a potential duel between Jasper and Pearl, but, I think it might be interesting to consider a situation where Jasper might actually, specifically, try to compete with Pearl in a field where her strength and size are largely negated.
A couple of people have rolled their eyes at the idea of retreading Back To The Barn but I doubt that’s just what that would be about. Because I really don’t think Jasper would respond and relate to Pearl in the same way Peridot did at all- they’re too alike.
We also have a very interesting thing up in the air that hasn’t been addressed yet: Pearl during the war had a reputation. She was Rose’s right hand- the “terrifying renegade”. She was the one who swept her way through six Gems, including the personal bodyguards of a Diamond, in The Answer alone. At this point, we don’t know if Jasper has heard about that history, or if she’s cottoned that this is that Pearl.
At this point, I suspect Pearl is going to have a fairly major role in Jasper’s arc- much the way Amethyst did in Peridot’s. This means a mix of good and bad- some butting heads, certainly- but I’m with you, Felix, I think they have a lot of potential.
I could not stop wondering how this game works, how many pieces it has, how it is supposed to be played and if it is related to chess in any way.
So without further ado, a very long post about all its appearances and possible pieces.
Viggo uses it as a metaphor (despite him disliking metaphors) for his battle with Hiccup. Its first appearance was during Viggo’s introduction, in which he held a dramatic little speech about how he came to love the game.
He shows us the first piece, the Viking chief which he speaks of as “honorable” although he could have also been talking about the player being honorable in his or her strategy. I’ll just call the piece the Viking chief, as honorable is not used as an important part of the piece’s portrayal.
Next we get a close up of the board, left we see a dragon, in the middle stands the Viking chief and just behind it lies a longship. On the right there is a figure facing the camera, holding a sword in his hands, I’ll call it the swordsman for now. The figure seen from the back looks like he is holding a shield in his hand. And lastly Viggo holds a spare miniature mace.
In the next episode Viggo leaves Hiccup a maces and talons board with three pieces. Hiccup pointed at the left one and said it was supposed to represent him, the Viking chief. On the right stood the chief of the Marauders, the leading piece of the other party. The two chiefs start sound like the black and white kings on a chess board. Both pieces carry the same title, namely the title of chief, and are clearly of opposing teams.
In the middle stands the impostor, or the traitor as Hiccup calls it. Viggo later confirms that the piece is named the impostor, but also goes by the name of the traitor, possibly because of its role in the game. Hiccup stated that the traitor always dies in the end, which bears some resemblance to the role of the spy in Stratego. (The spy can take out the highest ranking piece of Stratego if he attacks first, but dies by the hand of any other piece). It also suggests that the traitor is a much anticipated piece. Players use it a lot and as a result it dies so often it ends up dead during most of the played games. Both the impostor and the spy die most of the time, but are still pretty important pieces to a player.
Fishlegs comments that “the game was designed to test the abilities and decision making expertise of future chiefs in the heat of battle”, telling us that it is a game stimulating a war where the player is the leader of their force, not unlike popular real-life games such as chess and Risk.
By now we can also identify the figure from Viggo’s board that was seen from the back. It is probably the chief of the Marauders. Both pieces carry a shield in their left hands and both have a helmet with a shorter horn on one side. The impostor (as seen on the right below) also carries a shield, but lacks the belt that both figures on the left have. Its shield appears to be more ornate amd the sides of its mouth point downwards. Another difference is the sword in the right hand of the impostor. The chief of the Marauders does not hold anything in his hand.
The impostor is also spoken of as singular. It’s other known name and role as the traitor could very well mean that there is only one of these in the game, flip-flopping from the Vikings’ side to the Marauders’ and back.
Next we get a scene where Viggo and Dagur play the game using real life people as pieces. They speak of “my longship” and “your kingship”, implying that both players own one of each of these ships. Any of these four could be the ship seen on Viggo’s board, but my money is on the longship. I would expect something a little more impressive from a piece called the kingship.
There are also eight hunters, addressed with possessives as well, making the total sixteen, just like pawns in a chess game. The word “hunters” used to address their pieces could both be the official name of the figures, or the name given to them because they are played by dragon hunters.
At the end of their game one of Viggo’shunters/pawns holds a mace to Dagur’s Viking king’s head. This mace could very well be the miniature mace he used to knock over a figure during his introduction, making that mace one of multiple. If there was only one mace in the game, it would have been THE mace to Dagur’s Viking king ’s head.
Dagur has the figure of the Viking king, which I believe is the same as the Viking chief. Taking out Dagur’s viking king made Viggo the winner, in resemblance of taking out the king on a chess board. As seen on the board Viggo left Hiccup, the Marauder chief and the Viking chief are the leaders of their respective parties and probably the most important pieces as well. Having another king on each side would not make a lot of sense, so I’m just going to assume the Marauder king/Marauder chief and the Viking king/Viking chief are the same piece.
It is also worth noting that if Dagur plays the Viking chief, Viggo is the Marauder chief, just like he was on the board he left Hiccup. Apparently Viggo prefers playing the Marauders’ side. Maybe because it gives some sort of advantage in the way the player playing the white chess pieces starts the game? Or maybe he identifies with the Marauders more, seeing as the said himself playing the “honorable Viking chief” was what got him to lose from his grandfather.
The last we see of the game in season 2 is Hiccup holding the viking chief.
now we know that the game is well known because every member of the
gang seems to remember this game. Hiccup feels the need to point out which
figure is which and what their roles are, so the gang’s knowledge of it
might be a bit shady. This does not seem illogical, after all not
everyone can recite the rules of a real-life strategy game at the drop of a hat.
Only those who play it often (in this case Hiccup) may.
It has the following pieces: The viking chief, the Marauder chief, one or more impostors, two kingships, two longships, eight viking pawns, and eight marauder pawns. Figures not identified yet area swordsman and a dragon, both of which could belong to any of the two parties.
All those pieces can never fit on the board together without making it impossible to move them. Every time we see a Maces and talons board there are only a few pieces on the board itself. Either they have been removed, or as Dagur said “have been taken out” or they are yet to be added as the game progresses. A third option would be that a player is able to trade pieces on the board for pieces not used at that moment in the way a pawn can become a rook or queen. I’d personally prefer the second theory, making the board pieces similar to the troops used in Risk that a player can add at the start of each turn.
Lastly we know it is played by strategists to test their intelligence.
So far so good, now it gets confusing~>
The game makes its reappearance in the season finale as Hiccup meets Viggo and hands him a piece that is most likely the impostor. the confusing part is that he was seen holding the Viking chief back in season 2.
We also get a view of the board, with the longship from Viggo’s board back in Maces and talons Part 1, the dragon and the figure that looks like the Marauder chief, but with a sword. I’ll call it a pawn. (My explanation will follow later, keep reading).
We get two more shots of the board, both from roughly the same angle. They show the longship on the left, the swordsman in the back, two impostors in the middle, the dragon and on the far right the Marauder chief.
I don’t know if this was a mistake, intentional or just Hiccup messing with Viggo by returning him another piece. Viggo does not comment on this, rendering the last theory unlikely, unless he chose to keep quiet to frustrate Hiccup.
Next we see Ruff, Tuff and Fishlegs playing the game. On the screencap above stand the Viking chief and the swordsman and on the screencap below Fishlegs looks at the dragon, a longship and the impostor.
On Tuffnut’s side we have a pawn, the Viking chief (so far the Viking chief is the only figure with bent horns) and the swordsman. The Viking chief and the swordsman are likely to be the same as the ones two screencaps up. Not much new information is given.
On the contrary, the game’s last appearance is VERY interesting. Fishlegs and Snotlout play against Heather and Astrid and their game is in full progress when the camera hovers over the board.
There are two ships on the board and two beside it: the longships and the kingships. It looks like the animators used the same model, so we can’t tell the difference between the two kind of ships, but I am sure the characters can.
The two pictures above show that there are multiple pieces of the figure with the sword in one hand and a shield in the other, pretty much confirming that these are the pawns.
Below I have marked every piece I could identify. Circled in green are the four ships, two kingships and two longships. There are eight pawns in red, one impostor in blue and three dragons in orange. Unidentified are three objects in the top left corner.
All figures marked with orange have a tail and wings, making the total of dragons three while the Marauder chief and the Viking chief are nowhere to be seen.
There are three pieces left unidentified. On the side lies a figure without bent horns, with a belt and without a sword in his right hand. If I have to guess I’d say it is the swordsman. The swordsman has so far only been seen once per game and was not on the board itself. The little piece on the right looks like a spare mace to me.
In the middle lies something I cannot identify AT ALL, but given that it was hinted at that there were multiple maces in the game, I’d pin this object as a second mace.
Except for two little errors, I’d say maces and talons is a very detailed and logical game with many elements from real life war-simulator board games.
The first error is that Hiccup gives Viggo a second impostor in Defenders of the wing Part 1, despite holding a Viking chief at the end of Maces and talons Part 2. For the conclusion, let’s assume this was a mistake and Hiccup actually handed Viggo the viking chief. This would turn the impostor into an unique piece, matching Heather and Fishlegs’ game where I marked only one figure in blue.
The second error are the three dragons on Heather and Fishlegs’ board and the lack of the two opposing chiefs. My guess is that there is only one dragon and that two of these dragons were supposed to be the chiefs instead. This is a guess, as the dragon has so far only been seen once per board. It has never been addressed, nor hinted at, so anything about it would remain a mere shot in the dark.
With those errors fixed… Let’s move on to the real conclusion
The game features two parties at war with each other, the Marauders and the vikings. The parties are led by their chiefs, and taking out the opposing chief will win you the game, like the king on a chess board. Each party consists of a longship, a kingship, a mace and eight pawns. Furthermore the game houses one dragon and one swordsman, both without known designated roles, and one impostor who does not belong to either side an usually pays for this with its life.
Furthermore, the Viking chief holds two axes while the Marauder chief holds up his hand without holding something in it. A spare piece of the game is the Marauders’ mace, which I think could fit into the empty hand of the Marauder chief. If the Marauder chief wins, the player can take out the mace and knock the Viking chief over in a chessmate kind of style.
Not all pieces are on the board at the same time, usually only a few are seen on the battlefield, tying into the strategy-part of the game. Picking the right pieces to play with at the right time could be a huge intelligence test for the player, reminiscent of how a player picks a card to play during various card games.
There seem to be rules on how the pieces are supposed to move across the board as well, yet I do know them, nor could I figure them out.
All in all Maces and talons seems inspired by turn-based strategy games like Risk and Stratego to some degree, while keeping Chess as its main influence.
So what do you guys think? Feel free to add your theories! ^^
Summary: Dad!Crowley & Daughter!Reader - Crowley comes home to find his daughter playing hide and seek.
Word Count: 1877
Triggers: None, just father/daughter fluff
Y/N = Your name ¦ Y/E/C = Your eye colour ¦ Y/H/C = Your hair colour
Note: So, as promised, a little fluff after yesterday’s angst in Phone Call. This was fun to write so might do more little one shots featuring this duo!
Crowley had been called a lot of
things through his well over 300 years alive, or well… Somewhat alive. Demon,
sure constantly. Bastard, pretty much his middle name. Vindictive, who wasn’t?
Son of a bitch, well, they’d clearly met his mother. King of Hell, soulless,
heartless, crazy… Hell the list went on and on… But father, that was not a
title he’d ever thought he’d hold again.
never suited Crowley. Therapists would likely say it was his own issues with
his wench of a mother, or possibly his lack of a father figure or some similar
obnoxious bullshit. He himself however just believed there wasn’t room for
children in his existence, more now than back then. Emotions were chains and
children were an extra weight on those chains made to slow you down on your
rise to greatness. And he wanted to be great. Roman emperor level great, except of course
without the backstabbing, iron poisoning and inevitable loss of power.
all the stupid souvenir t-shirts said… He’d been there, done that, and completely
screwed up his first child. His philosophy was simple, really. Child-rearing
wasn’t one of those get back up on that horse kind of moments. If you failed
the first time around you shouldn’t try again.
Juliet, his favourite trusted hellhound, brought a crying infant back with her
after reaping the ripe soul of a dealtaker, Crowley was clearly… Well, in a
bind was putting it mildly. The hellhound was somewhat smitten with the baby
girl. Taking a protective stance in front of the child if anyone but Crowley
tried to come near and curling up around her to calm her hiccuping sobs.