Well I can't blame her. That article was the worst trash I've seen and it was so long. It was literally full of lies. At least with other trash, it's a lot shorter and has less than 5 lies in it.
If you look at Tree’s changes, you’ll notice that she wasn’t really interested in changing the narrative of the article. Because people are allowed to drag and critique Taylor. Tree was, IMO, sending a strong message that if you’re going to criticize her client and write a 40k word takedown, you better at least get your facts right. And that was my main issue with the piece too: that she included information that was blatantly untrue, didn’t look at things Taylor has done to counteract these narratives, and opted to not acknowledge or conveniently avoid anything that disproved her thesis.