Hi! I noticed this and just wanted to let you know that Bi-romantic Asexual is a thing (want a relationship with either m or f, but don’t feel any sexual attraction) and there’s also aromantic Bisexual (don’t feel that need to have a realtionship with m or f, but do have sexual attraction towards both). Idk if this was a strang reply to this post but yeah… Hope it helps
The thing is, I can feel sexual attraction for female and male and had crush on both gender for as long as I can imagined (Though with society I always downplay my girlcrush because patriarchy and bla bla bla. I come from a small town yay. )
But when it comes do sex, I have absolutely no desire in it. Like I enjoy reading about it and stuff but for myself or in a relationship I’m like…. eh? I like the idea of sex, the action is so terrible for me that I pressured myself in sleeping with boys just because I felt that’s how I’d be love and ended up being said I was a whore
So after two years of celibacy (and discovering tumblr which exploded my mind with sex and gender related question) I met my now husband and it even took me a year not to feel guilty and cry that I didn’t want to sleep with him but that I loved him? He’s super cool with that and I am blessed that he understand but like, we still send each other smutty fanfic and picture of cute boys or girls? Does that make sense?
I am sexuall attracted to men and woman but dont want sex. Which is why I took upon the label asexual because it is WAY easier than to explain thise whole situation. Whenever I read about things, I feel I know my sexuality less beause everything I see is based of either on what kind of person you want sex with or not feeling any attraction at all. And I am kind in a grey zone that give me panic attack when I think too much about it.,
And this is how you know way too much about my sex life but I felt I needed to explain because if you have a term for what I am, I would adore to know it. The LGBTQAI+ have a lot of strong opinion on things and Im always scared to tell people and offend someone
Why do a lot of very nice good folks say eddie was basically in romantic love with Bill when he says it was both either brotherly or fatherly?? If that sounds offensive Perdoname I didn't mean it that way but it makes me confused. I'm wondering if it's because it could be older eddie kinda lying to himself or something?
eh I’m lowkey one of those people. i could do this more eloquently at a time where I don’t have a glass of lambrusco in my hand. (Which should be NEVER) uhhh idk idk bill is never patronizing to eddie. it never seemed like a fatherly thing. There’s probably some underlying symbolism in eddie losing an arm like Georgie etc etc. bill to me. Is like. Spider-Man. In how I think eddie sees him. Does he wanna be him or fuck him? We just don’t know. Also… like. This sucks to say, but I just don’t think the loser’s club knew each other that well canonically. Eddies interactions with this man were until he was 11, and then again when he was 38. Bill left right after fighting penny. eddie probably puts a lot of idealism on to bill Bc he doesn’t fully recognize that that’s just a manifestation of his Gay peaking out. “Why was i so obsessed with bill?” “Because we had so much fun and bill bikes fast!” Like yeah but also you’re gay, eddie, that’s why. I don’t ship kaspbrough because bill is. A. Human man. And would inevitably let down eddies wild expectations. & in my only universe where they know each other really really well, he already has. (&tfat.) he still loves bill, just differently. in a more human, less superhero way.
do i still think eddie loved richie? Yeah. eddie kaspbrak loves him a whole-ass Two Men, everybody. Really though: a whole ass six people. He loved them All.
Lambrusco is so good y'all.
What would a fanon inspired dusttale sans be like would he have a eye for each trait? I believe he would look awesome and utterly insane but eh only two can teach inspiration so he wouldn’t have a chance to learn it. I just thought of a idea thank you for your time
True, it would be pretty cool. But idk who would teach or willingly give inspiration to Dust.
I mean Lucida pretty much gives Nightmare inspiration to keep him alive to complete her mission for Reaper and Haventale.
Nightweaver gives inspiration to Hell to also keep him alive and make him more useful in trying to retrieve Lucida and Nightmare.
Neither of them however are willing to teach inspiration since in Lucida’s case she believes it’s too dangerous for characters to use and with Nightweaver, he doesn’t want creations to become “a problem” for him. Given inspiration also disappears with time unless Luci or NW renew the power. So if Dust was even able to be inspired it would only last for a short time unless he managed to persuade either Luci or NW to teach him and develop his own inspiration.