i'm considering the possibility


#well that plan definitely backfired

It always annoys me when white people kind of talk down to Japanese-Americans and diaspora bc they “know more” about Japan than whomever they’re talking to. Like congratulations on knowing more than me brad bc my grandma had to assimilate while u watched anime and decided to read 80 wiki articles and appropriate Japanese dress and traditions. Well done

anonymous asked:

do u think that if jonrya does happen, jon will be the first one to develop feelings of a romantic nature towards arya or the first one to acknowledge his feelings for her? i'm interested in seeing what you think of it

If GRRM stuck with his original pairing of Jon and Arya, I believe Jon would be the one to acknowledge his feelings first; not only because he’s older and more mature in the department of romantic feelings, but also because his thoughts have recently become muddied when it comes to her. 

Is she still my sister? he wondered. Was she ever?

By now she’d be eleven, Jon thought. Still a child. “I have no sister. Only brothers. Only you.” Lady Catelyn would have rejoiced to hear those words, he knew. That did not make them easier to say. His fingers closed around the parchment. Would that they could crush Ramsay Bolton’s throat as easily.

“I have no sister.” The words were knives. What do you know of my heart, priestess? What do you know of my sister?

In these quotes, Jon is having a hard time justifying Arya as his family in the titular sense anymore. I’m not saying these are romantic feelings, but they’re grey; odd even, in that they give you pause. Out of all his siblings, Arya should have the most firm position in his heart, and yet he struggles with her presence the most (metaphorically speaking). So if Jon and Arya were still on the table, I definitely think he’d be the first one to acknowledge the strange feelings/dynamic, if at least internally.

anonymous asked:

Hey! I'm trying to find this fic that I'm pretty sure was an auror fic and I think it might have also been a Veela/creature! fic but there's this part where harry apparates himself and Draco through the ministry wards because he wants him so bad. Lol sorry I can't give more description than that that's all I remember :/ thank you!!


I’m almost positive you’re looking for All Our Secrets Laid Bare by @firethesound (149.5K). No veela/creatures, but the scene you mentioned is definitely from this fic! Which I know thanks to the lovely @aibidil, who came to my rescue when I started whining about how I knew this scene was from one of my absolute favorite fics, but I couldn’t place which one.

Summary: Over the six years Draco Malfoy has been an Auror, four of his partners have turned up dead. Harry Potter is assigned as his newest partner to investigate just what is going on.

Enticements: Auror Partners, Sexual Content, Wandless Magic, Mystery, Investigations, Magical Tattoos, Getting Together, Trapped, Secrets, Secret Relationship, Shower Sex, First Time, Loss of Virginity, Blow Jobs, Office Sex, Duelling, Falling In Love, Hats, Glasses, Curry, Tea, Bars and Pubs, Hoodies

Thoughts: THE. QUINTESSENTIAL. AUROR. PARTNERS. FIC. I’ve said it before and I will say it again. It’s one of the very few fics I’ve been drawn to read more than once, and a fic I’m certain I will read again someday. This fic is required reading. R E Q U I R E D. I’m not even going to discuss specific amazing plot elements (of which there are loads), because you’re going to read it anyway, because it’s REQUIRED. If you love Drarry at all, you will 100% love this fic. It is perfection. 

please consider: rihanna as crowley and lupita as aziraphale 

this brought to you by the committee for the healthy perpetuation of good omens fancasts that don’t involve a) benedict cumberbatch and martin freeman, b) benedict cumberbatch and matt smith, c) martin freeman and matt smith, or d) all the above + arthur darvill 

Someone should write BTTF its own highly quotable Infamously Bad Fic, one of these days. Like apparently there’s BTTF ties in My Immortal and such, but like, this franchise deserves its own My Immortal, I know several other fandoms have one.

The protagonist is from modern day, somehow ends up in the 80s. Maybe the time machine got lost there and she returned it. How did Marty and Doc get home with no time machine? We just don’t know. Cell phones and internet connection still work out of their decade despite not existing yet. Anachronisms are everywhere, from references to slang to clothes to technology. Everybody uses their catchphrases too much. Protag and Marty are dating, obviously, and Jennifer is suddenly Super Evil. Doc is also apparently evil, but not like properly mad scientist evil or anything like you’d expect, he’s just an asshole and there’s no adequately explained reason for why he’s an antagonist all of a sudden. The third film is kind of retroactively erased from existence because it never gets brought up, except when it is, and then that’s contradicted later. Cartoon canon is brought into play. Young Emmett is There for some reason and he’s not evil for some other reason, he probably gets killed off with zero timeline repercussion and then shows up fine later which is never explained properly. Causality is-… More of a shrug and a suggestion than an actual rule. People just end up in different time periods without traveling ever being mentioned. The plot is pretty close to repeating the films, except it all takes place after the films and it’s confusing. The author doesn’t seem to realize Biff and Trump are actually different people. George dual-wields guns in one scene. It crosses over with some rather odd things at times, some of which even also take place in the 80s.

imthepunchlord  asked:

I'm wondering if Adrien will wind up considering the possibility of Marientte being LB at all or just wind up brushing aside the thought. I'm kinda worried he'll wind up doing the latter.

Marinette: *lying seductively on Adrien’s bed in a polka dot bikini with flashing neon signs reading LADYBUG pointing right at her*
Adrien: Well, I’m stumped. :/

thor? in my vagina? it’s more likely than you think

Guys sth scary just hit me! What if in this illustration by sensei Touka’s not actually holding Kaneki’s mask but instead holding her dead baby?? As many have theorized we know the possibility that Touka’s anticipated baby might die! Just a far-fetched guess and I might be wrong cause it seems more to be Kaneki’s mask. I’ve speculated this long time ago myself. But still let’s consider all possibilities.

anonymous asked:

Would u rec moving to Minneapolis for someone out of college?? Is it cheaper/is the job market good/are there a lot of lesbians?? I graduate this year and I'm trying to move as far away as possible so I'm considering all cities tbh but I've never heard anything abt Minneapolis. Thank u!!

well, apparently in april minneapolis was rated the best job market for new grads by ziprecruiter. it’s more expensive than other midwest cities but significantly less expensive than coastal cities and chicago. it’s one of the most progressive areas in the US with high taxes on the rich, we just passed a $15 minimum wage initiative and mandatory paid sick leave which is really cool. it consistently ranks in the top 10 most lgbt friendly cities in the US, passed marriage equality before the supreme court ruling and has a vibrant gay scene and history. another cool thing about minnesota is that we have a thing called the legacy fund amendment which means that 20% of sales tax revenue goes to our state arts board for creative grants, projects, jobs, etc which places minneapolis as the 5th most creatively vital metro area in the us and 5% of our jobs are in creative fields.

but the caveat is that you have to like snow lol. it’s really nice and i like it a lot. there’s a bunch of parks, lakes, and rivers everywhere. it feels like an unpretentious hidden gem. :)

anonymous asked:

I'm aroace but I have doubts if it's a real orientation or not. I just realized, that asexuality (plus sex repulsion in my case) is kind of evolutionary dead end. Why would evolution choose for individuals like me? It doesn't make sense. I'm considering the possibility that it's a sickness... I'm not trying to start discourse or offend anyone - I'm really sorry if I did... 😢 But it's a serious and deeply troubling question for me and I just can't stop thinking about it. Help please...

I was struggling with myself whether I should answer that or not, but I’m going to give you the benefit of a doubt and try my best here. [Aphobia Warning! for all my followers who don’t want to read this]

First of all, yes, aroace is a real orientation. It means a person does not feel romantic and sexual attraction. It is not a sickness or disease. And sex-repulsion is not a bad thing. It’s just the way you are and that’s ok.

Secondly, you can’t just apply evolutionary biology to people like that. You just can’t. People are so much more than their biological traits. The last people who literally applied evolutionary biology to human beings were supporters of eugenics and literal Nazis. (And I don’t want anything to do with either.) However, I don’t believe that your views are influenced by this (I sincerely hope not), but rather by learning raw biological theories at school without any context. I remember learning the “five signs of life” (or something like that) in biology class in high school, and one of those “signs” was “the need to produce offspring” and I was like “lol according to that theory I’m not alive”, but of course I am. Because some biological models you can’t just apply to human beings literally. We’re more than our genes and our ability to procreate.

Just think about what exactly you’re saying here. You’re basically saying that you think that life (including your life) only has value if you procreate and “pass on your genes”. So what about infertile people? People who simply don’t want any children? People in same-sex relationships, who will never have any biological children? Don’t their lives have value? (The last one is a super old homophobic argument by the way, which was used to portray homosexuality as “unnatural” and “wrong”. I hope you don’t support this. Or any of this for that matter.)

Your life does have meaning, even if you don’t have children. I found this list of important people who never had children on Google (http://brianhassett.com/2010/06/people-who-dont-have-kids/) and it includes people like Plato, Isaac Newton, Michelangelo, Jane Austen, Nikola Tesla, Dr. Seuss, Alan Rickman, Harriet Tubman (who had an adopted child), Queen Elizabeth I, Amelia Earhart and Rosa Parks. Their lives had meaning, they changed the world without ever having children. You can contribute so many other things than your genes and offspring in order to make the world a better place. Inventions, art, writing, music, teaching children, providing expertise - and even if you “just” help an old lady with her groceries you’ve made the world a better place for someone.  

So, don’t let other people tell you that your life is only significant if you have children. You can have a fulfilled, childless life. This attitude that having children is the only/most important way you can contribute to society is both homophobic and misogynistic, and it ends in “women are obligated to have children”, “women are birth machines” and “any relationship which differs from the heteronormative “norm” is unnatural”.  I really hope I’ve made you reconsider your point of view, because it’s very damaging and hurtful- not only to other people, but also to yourself.

(Also, I’m pretty sure that asexuality also appears in other species- just like homosexuality. There was this semi-serious post going around ace tumblr for a while, about a snail that rejected all partners that zookeepers wanted to pair them with. I’m sure there are better examples, though, if you go around digging through scientific sources.)

While playing Jumin’s route again I kind of thought about something. After Elizabeth runs away she’s found outside of the Mint Eye building, but the question then leads to why? What’s known upon finding her is that Zen had a psychic dream about it and that Yoosung actually found her there. Later on when V comes to pick up Elizabeth and brings her back Jumin then asks about how Elizabeth got there implying that V knows (and not just because Seven told him that she was there). V even admits that he knows the reason but he’ll tell Jumin later when the time is right. No I’m not saying V stole her, because that’s obviously not what happened considering we know that when Jumin was talking to the Chief of Security she was out of her cage and the penthouse door was open so she took off on her own and then V brought her back telling Jumin that Elizabeth is his. What I think did happen though was that she followed V.

If you remember that when Yoosung found her and Seven came up because Unknown was there Seven noted that Elizabeth was running after Yoosung, and it was probably because she recognized him. So if she recognized Yoosung after only meeting him a couple of times she’d obviously know V because he named her and probably used to go around to Jumin’s home a lot meaning she’s quite familiar with him. This leads me to believe that she followed him to Mint Eye while he was scouting them out. Not only that but she was clean too meaning that V might’ve been taking care of her too because he knew she was there. Yeah it could be like why didn’t V take Elizabeth back immediately, but I think if he did it would’ve made his story even more suspicious about what he was doing and what he was doing was already dangerous without raising more questions.

I mean I could be wrong in this but like I said I think Elizabeth followed V to Mint Eye somehow (because why would she travel that far away) and that he probably found her and made sure she was taken care of while he was taking care of his own business.

anonymous asked:

Im a Larrie and I'm considering the possibility they've broken up, mainly because of the shock of solo Harry affecting so much of what I'd believed about him. Oth I'm aware I dont know far too much of whats really going on, and that a relationship like Larry would be under vast external pressure which may create the kind of tension in the leaked lyrics. As I swither, I value varying opinions and I see this as a polite Anti-Larrie blog. I read here for some counterbalance to Larry belief.

The funny thing is, I am a Larrie.

I believe that Louis and Harry are not straight. I believe they are/were in a relationship. (And I still don’t think Freddie is actually Louis’ kid.)

However, I’m sick of how being a Larry has turned into this weird set of core beliefs that you have to have, and if you don’t, you’re “fake,” a “weak Larrie,” or you “don’t trust the men” and “they/he would hate you.”

And I think the fact that the fandom is clamping down so hard on these beliefs and declaring that anyone who even says “hey, wait a minute, what if they broke up?” or “hey, what if they don’t want to come out now or soon or ever?” or even “I’m not sure I like this solo music” is an evil traitor who needs to be stoned to death is a huge problem.

Such an attitude stifles creativity, it makes people scared to talk, and it destroys a fandom.

All of that because some of are willing to say, “I think Harry and Louis were or are in a couple, but I refuse to hold them up to some romanticized, impossible ideal.”

And as someone who is a Larrie, and who is in the Larrie fandom, I feel I have the right to stand up and say that attitude is fucked up. Even if–especially if–a loud, large portion of that fandom wants me to shut up.

You want to show two people support–actual support, as individuals and a couple? Quit pretending you know them when you’ve never met them. Quit holding them up to impossible ideals. Quit making every single thing one of them does about the other.

Damn, I need a drink.

(And thanks for calling me polite, anon.)

anonymous asked:

Mama floozy I need help. My boyfriend cheated on me and Idk what to do. I broke up with him but he still really wants to stay together, so I said I need some time to think about it before I even consider that a possibility. I'm not really angry at him or the other person, just sad, and I do still love him, but I don't think immediately getting back together would be a good thing to do, ya know? Anyways, love you, your blog always cheers me up :)

thank you angel! you’re being incredibly mature about the situation but the fact that he’s insisting you stay together instead of giving you space and making it clear that he wants to get back together whenever/IF you would ever want to is a clear indicator that he’s IMmature and doesn’t fully process the gravity of his actions! split up for now and if he ever shows growth maybe get back together with him in the future but for now you need space and if he loves you he should accept that! 💖💖💖

I’m also reminded of like. When I was a teenager and I Really Wanted to make a visual novel type game. Like that was the Goal for a good portion of my life and I’m kinda like…. maybe I should finally do that