Do you think its odd....

To come home and see your neighbors digging in their side yard? Its the drug lords house, so if y'all don’t hear from me, just saying.

The Lord is my Light and my Salvation—whom shall I fear or dread? The Lord is the Refuge and Stronghold of my life—of whom shall I be afraid? When the wicked, even my enemies and my foes, came upon me to eat up my flesh, they stumbled and fell. Though a host encamp against me, my heart shall not fear; though war arise against me, even then in this will I be confident. One thing have I asked of the Lord, that will I seek, inquire for, and insistently require: that I may dwell in the house of the Lord in His presence all the days of my life, to behold and gaze upon the beauty the sweet attractiveness and the delightful loveliness of the Lord and to meditate, consider, and inquire in His temple. For in the day of trouble He will hide me in His shelter; in the secret place of His tent will He hide me; He will set me high upon a rock. And now shall my head be lifted up above my enemies round about me; in His tent I will offer sacrifices and shouting of joy; I will sing, yes, I will sing praises to the Lord. Hear, O Lord, when I cry aloud; have mercy and be gracious to me and answer me! You have said, Seek My face inquire for and require My presence as your vital need. My heart says to You, Your face Your presence, Lord, will I seek, inquire for, and require of necessity and on the authority of Your Word.
—  Psalm 27:1-8 amp
Today in Irish history: September 4th

1798 - Cornwallis moves forward from Tuam to attack Castlebar
 Humbert leaves Castlebar with 800 French troops and 1000 Irish rebels and moves into Co Sligo. His plan is to march to Ulster. Humbert marches all night. Rising takes place in Longford and Westmeath

1844 - Conspiracy judgment against Daniel O'Connell is reversed by House of Lords

1851 - John Dillon, Nationalist politician, is born in Blackrock, Co. Dublin

1922 - Dónal Foley, journalist, humorist and author of ‘Man Bites Dog’ column in the Irish Times, is born in Ring, Co. Waterford

1976 - Women protest against men-only bathing at the Forty Foot in Sandycove.
UK axes support for Mediterranean migrant rescue operation
Refugees and human rights organisations react with anger as minister says saving people encourages others to risk voyage
By Alan Travis

George Osborne was just on the news blaming the death of the young children who are washing up on the shores of Europe on ISIS and criminal gangs.

However, as this article from just under a year ago shows it was his government that championed the cessation of search and rescue operations in the Mediterranean which could have prevented these deaths.

British policy was quietly spelled out in a recent House of Lords written answer by the new Foreign Office minister, Lady Anelay: “We do not support planned search and rescue operations in the Mediterranean,” she said, adding that the government believed there was “an unintended ‘pull factor’, encouraging more migrants to attempt the dangerous sea crossing and thereby leading to more tragic and unnecessary deaths”.

Anelay said: “The government believes the most effective way to prevent refugees and migrants attempting this dangerous crossing is to focus our attention on countries of origin and transit, as well as taking steps to fight the people smugglers who wilfully put lives at risk by packing migrants into unseaworthy boats.”

This policy has been a complete and utter failure and has resulted in dead children on the beaches of Europe.

Osborne may want to shift the blame but there is blood on his hands and the hands of this government. Their policy regarding this refugee crisis has been “let them drown” and the direct results of that policy can be seen on the front pages of nearly every British newspaper today.

This is the menu in the restaurant in the House of Lords. The cost of the food served is subsidised by tax payers to the equivalent of £84 per week per Peer. That’s more, just for food, than unemployed people on Jobseeker’s Allowance get to live on each week, which is £71. That is, of course, on top of the £300 per day attendance allowance that peers receive just for turning up.

This menu is set by the House of Lords refreshment committee, on which sits Baroness Jenkin, who recently suggested that the reason so many poor people are using food banks is that they’ve forgotten how to cook porridge, which only costs 4p a bowl. Clearly she’s not always quite so frugal when it comes to her food budget. Indeed, the House of Lords refreshment committee recently rejected a proposal to combine catering services for the Commons and the Lords to save money due to concerns that it would result in Peers having to drink inferior champagne.

It’s essentially a case of, “Let them eat porridge,” says Baroness Jenkin, while feasting on Foie Gras, Calves Liver and Compote of Berry Fruits, washed down with the finest champagne, all at our expense.


Saw a man refusing to let his pregnant wife off the porch because he “saw a rat the size of a dog and I will NOT let it bite you, please go back inside darling”. Made me wonder how protective the Maheswaran’s were of their baby.


Part 2 here.

Lots of people tell me that politics is boring and irrelevant. This makes me sad. Voting turnout in the UK has gone down massively and lots of my friends (who will be old enough to vote before the next General Election) tell me that they don’t care about politics or that they’re basically clueless. They scarcely know who the Prime Minister is in some cases. I’ve decided to try tackling this with a quick whiz around the best bits of the British political system!

more in the series:

UK Politics: An overview || Part 1 | Part 2

The constitution (or lack thereof) || Part 1 | Part 2

Parliament || Part 1 | Part 2

Prime Minister and Cabinet || Part 1 | Part 2 | Bonus

The Judiciary || Part 1

Political Parties || Part 1

Pressure Groups || Part 1

Elections ||

Part 1

anonymous asked:

I have a question about the United Kingdom? They still have kings and queens and stuff but they also have prime ministers and politicians and stuff? What roles do they play?

The monarchy doesn’t have any political power here. They are, however, still very wealthy and lead very privileged lives on account of their ancestry. They are celebrities, almost, and there is still a lot of interest in the monarchy. Many people here still support it because it is traditional. 

The Prime Minister has to be invited to step up to that role by the monarch (so right now Queen Liz 2), but that’s a formality really. The Queen is required to do that. She can’t really say no.  The royal family sometimes do charity work and meet members of the public and tourists, and some can be vocal politically, but they don’t have any official power in politics. (Thank goodness). 

I still think it’s wrong that we have a monarchy but at the moment they’re still about. I wish them no ill-will at all and I think Elizabeth 2 has done an excellent job, but it seems outdated and unfair that people can still be born into such privilege. It goes against what I want to see in modern Britain. I also think it’s pretty awful for those born into the royal family because they have no choice in the matter and instantly their whole lives take place in the public eye. They are instant celebrities. The unwelcome/illegal press attention led to the death of poor Princess Diana, so that’s an example of how awful people can get over the monarchy over here. 

Okay so then we get to the politics. Our UK parliament is made up of two separate houses or chambers: The House of Lords and a House of Commons. Together they make up all law/hear appeals/debate various issues. 

The House of Commons is for elected representatives, so the MPs we’ve chosen in each constituency. Right now we have a Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition government. This means that the Conservative Party achieved the most elected seats in the House of Commons. (Our system is currently flawed so the Liberal Democrats, who were actually the third most popular party, had to decide whether to join with Labour (the second most popular party) in a coalition, making Labour the party in charge of the Commons, or join with the Conservatives (the most popular but without quite enough seats to be given an absolute victory). In choosing the Tories (that’s the Conservatives) the Liberal Democrats formed an alliance with the Conservative Party and therefore both parties currently run the country.) 

I think they run it very badly, but that is just my opinion, of course. I’m a raging lefty! 

But other parties still have some say depending on how many seats they won in the House of Commons. For example the Green Party is exceptionally well represented by Caroline Lucas, who was voted in as the MP for Brighton Pavilion. (Caroline is an absolute heroine and inspiration and you ought to look her up. She does brilliant work.)  There are also various Labour Party MPs that won seats (rather a few, second only to the number of Conservative elected MPs). Unfortunately UKIP (a party I find xenophobic) also have two seats in the House of Commons. That scares me, but it’s democracy I suppose and if the people voted for them then that result has to stand.

To show you what I mean here is a screenshot from

So there are a fair few parties mixed in there and all of the MPs that are elected may have their voices heard in the House of Commons. 

This is all vaguely democratic (although flawed and if I was in charge I would tweak the system for sure). 

But then you have the House of Lords, the second parliamentary chamber. They are not elected. For some reason I cannot fathom, whatever the House of Commons decides has to be okayed by this lot as well. If there’s real friction the Commons win the argument since they are elected, but I still find it all quite immoral. Now a lot of these members are good people and work hard. Many are ex-politicians. But there are still hereditary peers and Bishops that have their say here. That’s those born with a title, and obviously you know what Bishops are. 

I personally believe the House of Lords should be entirely elected, otherwise there is no point at all. And there certainly shouldn’t be hereditary peers making laws and being allowed into the very heart of government!

Anyway, I am sorry, I interrupted my explanation with my opinions. But I feel strongly about them so there we go. 

So what I am trying to say is that our parliament is made up of two Houses. One is the House of Commons. The other is the House of Lords. Together they make laws and govern Britain. 

The Queen has no political power. She is the Head of State. Technically she does have to approve every law before it is implemented, but she wouldn’t say no to a law. It’s more of a courtesy/tradition to ask her to approve it. No monarch has exercised their right to veto in 300 years, so there is little danger of that happening. 

I hope this helped in some way! British politics, eh! It’s a mess!

(But I hope we can sort it out soon.)