handleters

9

Follow me on Instagram @kim_artventures for more!

Hello fellow studyblrs!

I’m Kim and I have been a part of the studyblr and bullet journalling for more than a year already. However, despite messing around from month to month and week to week, I still find myself not knowing what my personal style is. I usually browse through a lot of other people’s work and absorb them into one single piece. I’m also someone who can’t stick to just one theme per month like how other people do it because whatever I do is always spontaneous and I think I might get bored with having a similar theme throughout. However, I really love the aesthetic of those who are able to do it. Here are some of my work.

What do you guys think?

So there's this thing

So where I’m from, we have this thing with ships. They have weird names and we always refer to them by those names as a classification.

•The Titanic
These are the ships that will never be canon. Mostly like those gay ships of straight guys that every fandom has.

•The Sailboat
These are the weak ships that are kinda like “I wouldn’t have a problem, per se, if this happened, but I don’t ship it hard.”

•The Fleet
These are the ordinary ship. Like, you ship it more than the casual “I ship it,” but less than the battleship.

•The Battleship
The strongest of the ships. It’s like the commander of everything shipping.

•The Pirate Ship
These are the ships that are already canon. They destroy other non-canon ships and plunder the remains, but we still love them.

•The Submarine
These are the obscure ships that we still love. Whether it’s a random pairing that nobody seems to ship or just an obscure source, maybe some book nobody seems to have ever read. But usually, these pairs are basically like two subs passing without their lights on.

•K-27
Named after a sunken Soviet sub, these are like the normal submarine, but will never be canon, and will probably sink with their nukes onboard.

These are the classifications of ships.


EDIT


•Santa Maria
@yuzuling pointed this out, but it’s a great addition. These are the old ships, the ones that practically everyone has forgotten, but for you, they’re basically classics, those ships you know you can always go back to.


•The Mayflower
@thereonce-was-a-girl named this one. It’s a “toxic ship”. For most of us, it’s the ship that we don’t like or support. We don’t openly spread hate for people who do ship it, but for us, these are the canonical ships that tend to cause the impossibility of a Titanic rather than allowing a ship to be a fleet ship or pirate ship.

anonymous asked:

(1/3) Omgggg finally!!! Dom!jimin I don't get why the fandom is so reluctant to see jimin this way?!! He's so obv dom I will cry about this for a ten years! The way he carries himself, so subtly confident yet always on the lookout for Tae.. you can see it in his eyes when he's with Tae, that strict yet gentle (and often fond!!) gaze.. and the way he treats Tae.. I see him as a strict but soft dom..

(2/3) the way he scolds Tae and makes sure he’s well (taking his ipad away from him in bv since he needs to sleep) and he’s so diff when he’s angry.. quick to scold (in a soft voice but it’s so effective!!!) and not afraid to punish when he sees it’s necessary (when he pushed Tae down and punished him in that one bangtan bomb where they were playing hide and seek and Tae cheated) and he’s always making sure Tae gets a chance to speak,

(3/3) and he always defends him when he needs to (the naver broadcast when the boys were dismissing Tae’s song as being popular simply cause it was after the title song, but jimin was comforting him and telling the boys that it was a great song) just omggg!! Fight me on this. Park Jimin: a whole dom. Cry with me please

this whole ask is so beautiful~ i completely agree, it’s a pet peeve of mine that a huge majority of this fandom refuse to see jimin as anything other than a bottom, like opinion is fine but so many people are so stubborn and refuse to even consider the possibility he can top. what’s really annoying about it is that a lot of them base this on completely on looks because he’s ‘smol’ and ‘mochi’ and ‘cute’ but ignore his personality and they way he interacts with the other members. 

he is such a soft dom i want to cry, he treats tae so gently but firmly like when he asked him if he was ready during the cruling thing on run and he loves him so much and always cares for him i am crying an ocean of tears jimin will never not be tae’s soft dom

just a few examples:

bon voyage way a whole blessing

look at jimin instructing tae and holding his hand

Originally posted by stayingmintyfresh

letting him sleep on his shoulder 

Originally posted by pjimin-bts

here’s the moment you were talking about- such a strict dom i love

Originally posted by jinmini

the caption says it all

Originally posted by minblush

he laughs at tae but also ushers him off stage

Originally posted by byeoltan

tae looks so squishy here help me

Originally posted by jimin-bts-trashs

jimin cuddling tae is the softest thing in the universe 

Originally posted by locotaehyung

jimin’s able to carry him so easily im weak-

Originally posted by shinevmin

they’re holding hands just-

Originally posted by aryurureiko

the arm around him TT

Originally posted by princessyerim95

wiping away his tears

Originally posted by shinevmin

DO YALL REMEMBER HOW WORRIED HE WAS WHEN THEY LOST TAE?? 

Originally posted by bwibelle

the way he pets his hair and looks at him my poor heart

Originally posted by busanplayboy

ahaha making sure to subtly cover tae’s exposed shoulder 

Originally posted by luvss-bantan

i see those hands on tae’s waist don’t think you’re so slick jimin

Originally posted by xnomoredreamx

this one just doesn’t need any explanation 

Originally posted by princessyerim95

|| Part 1 ||

-

english.  → infinitive. //  present tense. // past tense. // perfect tense. // imperative mood.

-

(to) bathe.  → (å) bade. // bader. // badet. // badet. // bad.

(to) find. → (å) finne. // finner. // fant. // funnet. // finn.

(to) give  → (å) gi. // gir. // ga(v). // gitt. // gi.

(to) go/leave/pull → (å) dra. // drar. // dro. // dratt. // dra.

(to) invite → (å) invitere. // inviterer. // inviterte. // invitert. // inviter. 

(to) jog → (å) jogge. // jogger. // jogget. // jogget. // jogg.

(to) know/feel  → (å) kjenne. // kjenner. // kjente. // kjent. // kjenn.

(to) make/create/prepare → (å) lage. // lager. // laget. // laget. // lag. 

(to) shop/act  → (å) handle. // handler. // handlet. // handlet. // handle.  

(to) work  → (å) arbeide. // arbeider. // arbeidet. // arbeidet. // arbeid. 

Jeg har virkelig virkelig svært ved at forstå hvorfor man skulle blive mindre feminist af at blive set i en eller anden grad af afklædthed, om det så er i Vanity Fair eller på sin Instagram-profil eller på byens torv. Hvor i alverden kommer den tossede idé fra. Nu er det senest Emma Watson, der har fået feminisme-politiet efter sig, og for ikke lang tid tid siden havde vi her indenfor landets grænser en sag med Nikita Klæstrup og hendes “girl squad”, som blev anklaget for at være dårlige og forkerte feminister, fordi de slog et slag for kvinders ret til at selv bestemme over deres krop og seksualitet - det skulle man jo da ellers tro er en temmeligt feministisk mærkesag.

Så sent som i går skrev gruppeformanden for De Konservative i Midtjylland en kommentar på Facebook om “smukke kvinder [der] mener, at det mest centrale i feminismen er, at de gerne vil have lov til at have en masse sex uden at nogen skal have en holdning til det.” - som om der skulle være et eller andet helt vildt krævende og ekstraordinært i at kvinder godt kunne tænke sig at have deres sexliv i fred for andres vurderinger, altså uha, det er da virkelig også bare totalt skørt. Hvad bilder de sig dog ind, disse opsætlige fruentimmere. Suk. Tænk at vi ikke er kommet videre i 2017.

Det er jo i virkeligheden et komplet middelalderligt syn på kvinder og deres krop og seksualitet, at de ikke længere skal/kan tages seriøst, hvis man har set deres babser eller har et aktivt sexliv eller hvad pokker det nu måtte være. Sådan en slags forlængelse af den gamle jomfru-tankegang, hvor kvinder kun havde værdi såfremt de var rene og uskyldige. Hvad i alverden er det dog for noget bræk. Hvorfor skulle man ikke kunne mene noget om ligestilling og ligeløn og kvinders rettigheder etc. og være en “god feminist” af den grund?

Feminisme handler ikke og har aldrig handlet om at låse nogen inde i et bur og sige at man ikke længere må være et seksuelt væsen. Det handler om at give kvinder retten til at vælge selv, at give dem magten og styrken og muligheden for selv at kunne vælge til og fra, både ift. deres krop og seksualitet, og i det hele taget, ift. uddannelse og karriere og politiske valg og hvad ved jeg. Det er sgu da en fuldstændig åbenlys og logisk følge af dette, at det så er aldeles ufeministisk at så gøre sig til dommer over hvad den enkelte kvinde så skal bruge den ret til - at gøre sig til dommer over hvad de skal vælge.

Man kan være feminist og være sky og aseksuel og gammeljomfru, man kan være feminist og sutte 100 dillere og gå nøgen rundt på Rådhuspladsen med en dildo oppe i røven. Man kan være feminist så længe man insisterer på at kvinder, ja folk i det hele taget selvfølgelig, har retten til at vælge selv, man er til gengæld en herredårlig feminist hvis man man shamer folk for de valg de så træffer, alene fordi man selv personligt ville have valgt noget andet. Det er totalt misforstået.

Feminisme handler om frigørelse, om empowerment, om at hive hinanden op og give plads og rum til diversitet, om at det ikke skal være religiøse autoriteter eller patriarkalske familieværdier eller whatever, der definerer hvordan det enkelte menneske skal leve sit liv og hvilke valg han eller hun skal træffe - det handler om at give magten til det enkelte menneske. Og det handler absolut ikke om at slå hinanden oven i hovedet og shame andre for de valg de træffer, for så har man godt nok forstået feminismens budskaber utroligt dårligt.

For nogle er det frigørende at vise sig frem, for nogle er det frigørende at dække sig til. For nogle er det frigørende at fyre den af og blive begæret, for nogle er det frigørende at slippe for sultne blikke og henvendelser. Hvorfor er vi så dårlige til at respektere og acceptere forskellighed, og at der er mange forskellige måder at være feminist, ja, menneske, på?

Hvis man virkelig mener, at en kvindes værd skal afgøres udfra hvilke valg hun træffer ift. sin krop og seksualitet, og at man har retten til at shame og nedgøre hende og ikke tage hende seriøst hvad angår intellektuelle og politiske spørgsmål osv., fordi man er personligt forarget eller uenig eller lignende, så er man ikke feminist. Punktum.