futuristic structure

Marin County Civic Center,  Frank Lloyd Wright, 1960

GATTACA (1997)

Gattaca’s futuristic world, like that of Bladerunner, is assembled from iconic elements of California’s architectural past. The characters glide down minimalist roadways in electrified Citroens and inhabit monumental Brutalist, Futurist or International Style structures- utilised selectively to reflect the film’s thematic world of authoritarianism, social engineering, and antiseptic perfectionism. (Image: Ezra Stoller)

The Princess, the Hero, and the Tower

Fantasy Archetypes in The 100 Season 3

Okay so earlier in the hiatus I was part of a long thread discussion about season 3, specifically episodes 303 and 315, where we basically screamed for several pages about the parallels and the similarities of those episodes.  In that @raincityruckus pointed out that Bellamy was basically like a hero going to rescue the princess, and someone else talked about Clarke as a princess kept in a metaphorical tower maybe all through 3a, and that of course devolved into more squee over the screen-literal symbolism of episodes 3 and 15.  I don’t remember all of that episode discussion, but this week I decided to just take that idea and run with it into a huge scale break down of episodes 303 and 315 as a fractured fairy tale. So… here we are, 2000 words about symbolic storytelling, as well as a tribute to the mythic storytelling that has made this one of my favorite shows of the last three years.

If the tone is a little formal, it’s because I originally was going to submit this to a media site, but I decided it would be more fun on tumblr.  This is, as always, just one way among many of looking at the show.  Credit to @mego42, @verbam, @thelovelylights, @raincityruckus, @storyskein, @ship-picky, @nataliecrown, @velvet-tread, @alienor-woods, @bellsqueen, @easnadh1, @pythiaspeaks, @awesomenell65, @bellamyslady, and others.


In looking at executive producer Jason Rothenberg’s whirlwind story, it helps to love classic tropes as much as the show does. Archetypes from speculative fiction, religion, mythology, and fantasy are borrowed liberally. Alongside the well known science fiction stories of evil computers, outer space, and mad scientists, seasons 2 and 3 made liberal use of mythic characters and tropes. The second season told the overarching story of the villagers versus the dragon–or in terms of The 100, the Sky People &  the Grounders versus the Mountain Men. It’s a siege and infiltration story right out of The Hobbit, only this time the beast in the mountain is a society of science-vampires, the antihero burglar is a resourceful man instead of a nervous hobbit, and the armies outside are commanded by fierce warrior women. You could even parallel the Sky People to city-dwelling humans and the Grounders to forest-dwelling elves. From within the mountain, it’s a trip down mythology lane with in-world terms like “The Cerberus Project”. The show wants us to be clear that yes, entering Mount Weather equals a descent into the underworld.  Beyond plot specifics, major characters and groups have the most genre-specific names that a primetime television series can get away with: Griffin, Kane/Cain, The Commander, Octavia, Cage, Dante, The Outsiders. The 100 loves mythic stories and larger-than-life characters.

If season 2 was a story of alliances against old and terrible villains, season 3 lowers the stakes to a human level. Now our protagonists are facing personal political conflict and the creeping threat of a corrupt false religion. I’ll leave the religious allegory of ALIE’s cult to one side for this discussion, and focus on the story of the Clarke, Bellamy, Lexa, and the classic fairy tale storytelling at work in season 3.

Keep reading

A Guide to Being a Good Reader

Hello, it’s your friendly neighbourhood Tia here to bring joy and serve tea even though you in no way, shape or form asked for it! Your writing style is amazing. Just wanted to get that out of the way because I know I sound like a broken record with me constantly launching into crazy spiels about how much I love it so bear with me because boy do I have a lot to say.

Firstly, WRITING IS SUBJECTIVE THAT’S WHY IT’S CALLED AN ART AND NOT A SCIENCE. Writing isn’t defined by a structure or laws that are set in stone, it’s an art form based on content and intent mean to provoke and invoke. There’s a reason certain writing appeal to certain people, and that’s because they have preferences. If someone enjoys the episodic structure and futuristic aesthetic of Star Wars and another person prefers the thrilling chase and classic cheesiness of and Indiana Jones flick it doesn’t mean either one has to suck for one to prevail. It’s subjective and putting anything down because it doesn’t suit you is ridiculous. Not liking something =/= it’s bad

Second, SHOW SOME CLASS AND KEEP NASTY, UNCONSTRUCTIVE COMMENTS TO YOURSELF OR OFF THE RADAR. This is easy: nothing nice to say? Tell it to someone who cares- or better yet, don’t, because it might be a couple of letters on the keyboard bit to a writer who’s poured their heart and soul in to it it’s devastating. On the other hand, constructive criticism is always welcome. Authors, much like any content creator, loves to improve their craft, so a gentle nudge in the right direction would not only be helpful, but very much appreciated. Talking smack on the Internet? Not so much.

Third, if you no matter how hard you try, you take away nothing from this post and plan to proceed with your dumbassery, please note that I toss people for sport and I have no qualms catapulting the next person I see doing shit like this to a neighbouring galaxy.

tldr; talk shit get hit

This has been a PSA.