fiscal results

Cable Revenues Help 21st Century Fox (FOXA) Top Q1 Estimates

Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. FOXA just released its first-quarter fiscal 2018 financial results, posting earnings of $0.49 per share and revenues of $7 billion. Currently, FOXA is a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) and is up marginally to $28.10 per share in after-hours trading shortly after its earnings report was released.

Twenty-First Century Fox:

Beat earnings estimates. The company posted earnings of $0.49 per share, just beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.48 per share.

Beat revenue estimates. The company saw revenue figures of  $7 billion, topping our consensus estimate of $6.87 billion.

Twenty-First Century Fox’s adjusted earnings per share fell from $0.51 in the year-ago period. However, the company’s quarterly revenues popped 8% year-over-year.

The company’s Cable Network Programming revenues jumped from $3.81 billion to $4.19 billion in its first quarter of fiscal 2018. FOXA revenues grew across all of its other operating segments as well, including its Filmed Entertainment unit.

“The Company’s double-digit gains in affiliate revenues demonstrate our strength in the dynamic global

market for distinctive video brands and content, across both established distributors and new entrants,” Executive Chairmen Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch said in a statement.

“We delivered top-line growth at all of our businesses, backed by stand-out storytelling, sports and news, as well as a product focus that will drive greater consumption and compelling opportunities for financial returns on our content investment. Our solid first quarter performance puts us on track to achieve our overall financial and operational objectives for this fiscal year.”

Here’s a graph that looks at FOXA’s Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise history:

Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise

Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise | Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. Quote

Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. is involved in creating and distributing media services. Its business portfolio consists of cable, broadcast, film, pay TV and satellite assets. Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc., formerly known as News Corporation, is based in New York, United States.

Check back later for our full analysis on FOXA’s earnings report!

Also, make sure you check out the most recent episode of the Full-Court Finance podcast, which dives into how the NFL’s rating might impact broadcast partners such as Fox.

Wall Street’s Next Amazon

Zacks EVP Kevin Matras believes this familiar stock has only just begun its climb to become one of the greatest investments of all time. It’s a once-in-a-generation opportunity to invest in pure genius. Click for details >>

Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. (FOXA) : Free Stock Analysis Report
To read this article on click here.
Zacks Investment Research

anonymous asked:

What are some talking points on why Greece is in the amount of debt it is in?

the structure of the eurozone is completely broken. it privileges germany over its neighbors. germany’s central bank, the bundesbank, has historically been one of the main incubators of neoliberalism (so-called ordoliberalism). this gives it a fundamental adherence to austerity, although not as much in the extreme sense it’s used in america. it values co-operation between workers and management as part of a general social order where everybody knows their place in social hiearchy, and will give concessions to placate unions and prevent upheaval in the form of strikes. however, when it has the power, its desire is also to bulldoze unions to prevent wage increases and thus inflation that might hurt the property holdings of the rich. it was generally agreed upon by the state planners who drew up the drafts for the european union that the main basis of the european central bank would be the bundesbank, as this way each government could both claim that its hands were tied when workers asked for higher wages and if a socialist government came to power, it would in turn find itself unable to set its own monetary policy and push through its objectives. with alan greenspan’s low interest rates in this past decade, there came a flood of american banks looking for easy investments, which in turn made it very easy to get loans. germany, however, also extended its easy credit to foreign banks as it knew most countries they were based in couldn’t afford to buy the exports it was inundating them with. so talking points are as follows:

  • germany created its own crisis by undertaking austerity during an expansion. the only way this can work is if other people buy your own goods, so germany took advantage of its trade surplus with eurozone periphery nations like greece to lend the profits right back to them (private banks and the bundesbank are closely tied, as in any nation) so they could buy more. it’s understandable that this ponzi scheme would some day come back to bite them. this also removes inflation from germany in the sense that it pushes its excess money supply out of the country, meaning workers don’t have to be given any portion of it.
  • most of the money lent went to purchases for the rich. the greek government, for instance, made exorbitant purchases on weaponry to keep the german arms industry afloat. 10% of german weapons sales are to greece, and some of those weapons, like submarines, turned out to be faulty. they also blew tons of money on the olympics, a spectacle for the rich, mostly updating infrastructure that would later be sold to private corporations like soccer teams for pennies on the dollar.
  • banks, both german and greek, were suckered into the same arcane financial instruments that defined the american crisis. credit default swaps on property weren’t as big, but they still played a prime role, as rich europeans looked for second vacation homes and as credit was transferred to greek workers to buy german goods. the biggest issue was the sovereign debt credit swaps on greek government bonds. all this took place instead of investment into fixed capital costs, which would have made greek workers more competitive with german ones, because the fraudulent property bubble was said to provide better returns. the speed of the collapse of the financial system meant that banks didn’t know who owed what, and in turn made them tighten their own fiscal policies, resulting in numerous foreclosures on the greek people’s only assets. as a result, workers were forced to suffer for bank mismanagement.
  • to some degree these fears are motivated by racism. there’s a general association of profligacy with brown skin, and in european terms greeks, spaniards, italians and portuguese are browner than germans, anglos and scandinavians.
  • there are a couple of ways this crisis could be overcome. the best way within capitalism would be the fdr-keynesian solution. use fiscal policy (government expenditures) to invest in make-work programs. workers have money and can buy basic necessities, pushing along the gears of the economy. fixed capital grows, making workers more productive and competitive. the economy grows, meaning debt is less of a burden because everybody can afford to pay it off. this is completely out in the modern era. property owners refuse to be taxed to pay for it and have numerous ways to prevent it (cayman islands bank accounts, etc). bond markets view it as imprudent, irresponsible, a waste of cash because state development leads nowhere in their ideological view (the reality is that they oppose it because of the inflationary cost and the benefits to workers). syriza hopes to short-circuit this by having the european union guarantee greek debt, meaning the bond markets will hopefully invest in such a program simply because the profits will be too good to pass up.
  • the second way would be the argentina route. in 2001 argentina defaulted on its debt, and the bond markets punished it by quarantining the country financially and cutting its exchange rates to minimal levels, horrible for an import-oriented economy. the government embarked on a keynesian import-substition system, well-planned and enacted with the adherence of the majority of local capital hoping to avoid any pain. they also used the weakness of their money to stimulate exports as a new route to gain hard currency. smelling profits, international capital began to flood in, and the bond markets relented. this is likely syriza’s route  if negotiations fail with the german government.
  • now we get to the ways considered normal in modern times. to ensure banks keep lending, countries with control over their currency can use their central bank to print money to give directly to banks through low-interest loans. this was mostly america’s strategy, although they did what they could in the fiscal sphere to give banks money too, within reason considering popular opposition. germany has the ability to do this, but they won’t, as they’re ideologically opposed to it. greece can’t do this, as it can’t print its own money, being part of the eurozone. instead, germany came up with a new solution that would bail out its own banks and greece’s without requiring its central bank to lift a finger.
  • an outside loan, in this case through the ECB and IMF adhering to the usual way of the latter’s activities, would be extended. greek banks would be paid off, in turn allowing german banks to be paid off. subsequently, the greek government would have to pay back the loan, with exorbitant interest, and adhere to a series of measures believed to make it more competitive, typically the reduction of workers to starvation wages, the sale of government assets to investors in order to gain one-time windfall profits, and making taxes more regressive in order to burden workers and not businesses that are the supposed engine of growth. even though there are three better solutions, this one, which will cripple the greek economy for years to come despite what a few cooked books say, was forced upon them by germany. if this is a bailout, it’s not the greek people who are being bailed out.
  • a fifth solution would be to restructure the eurozone in order to increase national sovereignty or decrease german power, but taht’s off the table. as yannis varoufakis stated, (replace french with any eu state)

Their thinking was simple: If the French state forfeited the right to print money (either by reverting to the Gold standard or by adopting the Deutsch mark [i.e. the euro today]), prices would stop rising and the trades unions would lose all bargaining power over employers: with the government unable to boost overall demand, especially during a slump, the trades unions would have a choice between accepting high unemployment (that would destroy their power base) and accepting low wages. In short, by forfeiting the printing presses the French state would ensure that organized labor becomes less militant, more “German”. And if this also meant a greater propensity to recession, it was considered a small price to pay. Today, with France in permanent stagnation under the euro, France’s elites are simultaneously unapologetic, regarding that choice of theirs, and concerned about the rising tide of discontent and anti-European, racist, ultra-nationalism.

people don’t know how to save themselves under the euro now that it’s bulldozed labour power, and they’re turning to the most horrific fascists because of their national chauvinism and their anti-eu credentials. state planners could save themselves from this, but they don’t want to because it might cede power back to the left.

  • germany has shown the most extreme hypocrisy on this. german banks actually own 80% of the debt created by the bailout, meaning that greece had to take out loans ultimately from german banks in order to pay back german banks. another ponzi scheme, this time supported by the now-scant assets of the greek people. in turn, germany eventually did decide there was a good time for the ecb to print money, in 2014, when its own economy was at risk from deflation that was in turn spurred by its own austerity policies. german banks can now take out loans from the ecb at virtually no interest and can buy greek bonds at whatever interest rate they are now (certainly higher than 6% with the impending election). germany’s naked opportunism shows the value of all its previous denunciations of greek spending and its claim to ethical superiority truly means. inflation is starkly needed in the short term, and it would even benefit german workers, but the ideological blinders at the ecb and bundesbank means it’s off the table.
2015: A Busy Year for OSHA

With 2014 dwindling to its last months, it’s time to think about what the future will hold. And for those working in manufacturing, the 2015 rules and regulations from the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) are something to follow.

For starters, 2015 will be the year of inspections. According to the OSHA budget justification, the organization plans to increase the number of health inspections occurring in the 2015 fiscal year as a result of increased identified health issues. That said, this is just the tip of the iceberg in regards to OSHA’s full 2015 agenda.

Final Rule Stage

On January 1, 2015 one of OSHA’s newest final rules will go into effect.  This new rule will require employers to notify OSHA when an employee is killed within eight hours of the incident, and to report any work-related hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye within 24 hours. In the past, OSHA only required an employer to report work-related deaths and hospitalizations of three or more employees. Single hospitalizations, amputations or loss of an eye did not need to be reported.

Even those who are exempt from maintaining injury and illness records will be required to fulfill OSHA’s new severe injury and illness reporting requirements. In order to simplify the reporting process, OSHA is also developing a web portal where employers may report incidents, in addition to the standard phone reporting.

Thomas E. Perez, U.S. Secretary of Labor endorsed these new requirements stating, “Workplace injuries and fatalities are absolutely preventable, and these new requirements will help OSHA focus its resources and hold employers accountable for preventing them.”

In addition to altering reporting requirements, this rule will also update the list of industries that will be exempt from injury and illness record keeping. The new list is derived from injury and illness data collected by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and will continue to exempt any employer with ten or fewer employees from having to keep records of worker injuries and illnesses.

Other important final rules to be decided this year include:

  • Confined spaces in construction. Currently the confined space regulations only apply to general industry; however, OSHA plans to issue a new final rule for confined space operations in the construction industry.
  • Cranes and derricks operator certification. OSHA has proposed to create uniform crane operator certification requirements. So far, OSHA has extended existing requirements to regulate crane operator competency by three years, to November 2017.
  • Walking, working surfaces and personal fall protection systems. OSHA plans to implement a new rule that will help to prevent slip, trip and fall hazards, as well as create clear requirements for personal fall protection systems.
  • Improve record keeping of workplace injuries and illnesses. OSHA plans to issue a final rule that will require employers to electronically submit certain information from the OSHA 300 Log, OSHA 301 Incident Report, and OSHA 300A summary. As of now, employers must only give information if it is requested, but such practices are on the way out. According to OSHA, this final rule will not come into effect until approximately March 2015. It is already creating resistance, however, as many business advocates worry that new electronic posting may create privacy problems for employers.